Failure Follow-Up Comment Count

Brian

16226948-mmmain[1]

a more pleasant item to lead the blog

When I write a thing of that length that I figure will stand as one of the things people think about when they think about MGoBlog, I like to talk about the aftermath.

WHY. A number of protests were lodged about why I wouldn't just leave the past in the past and move on. There are multiple reasons that post needed to happen.

  • I needed an elucidation of the argument I couldn't quite make when I was on with Dan Dakich in the aftermath of the email article. The way in which Brandon screwed up so hard with Morris was a natural result of the way he approached every petty problem he met previously, an indication that he was a terrible leader for reasons both private and public.
  • This is a space that tries to document what happens to Michigan. I got the same complaints about my Rich Rodriguez obit. We mostly look backwards here, talking about what has happened. Not having a summary of the Brandon era would have been a glaring omission. I do these for players annually, usually in the magazine. Hoke will get a (much less incendiary) recap as well.
  • Never forget. For this to not happen again we must identify the problem and remain vigilant against its recurrence. Those who forget history, etc.

Now that I've said my piece we can move on. Harbaugh excelsior.

WHY NOW. A variant on the previous bullet:

Brian's post has no new information or even new feelings or analysis of information he compiled.  It doesn't even have information or ideas new to his own previous posts on this blog.  Why did he do this?  I'm genuinely curious.  It's like a political post mortem in The New Republic or Investor's Business Daily against a vanquished foe, but an untimely one.  Has the piece been on his desktop for the last several months awaiting completion?  Was he waiting for additional DB shoes to drop that would need inclusion?  Was it an incredible stream-of-consciouness thing that just kinda poured out of him over a few very intense hours?  I don't know, but I'd like to.  Brian? 

I will say that it is very clearly grave dancing, but it's Baryshnikov or Shakira cutting the rug, or dirt or whatever (apologies to dance fans if these examples are crap, but you get the picture).

Brandon was canned during football season, when time for a 5k word piece was not available. Then we had the coaching search, which sucked up all available oxygen—I barely thought about this piece until Harbaugh was in the boat. After that was the recruiting sprint to Signing Day. All of these things took precedence; now that we're past all that it was time.

FWIW, the piece was assembled in bursts, with a slim majority of it coming together in the last couple days.

On calling someone a piece of shit human being. Some protests about that phrasing. This seems like different borders for a term. Complaints about it tended to invoke physical violence against innocents, ISIS, Boko Haram, assertions verging on Godwin and occasionally directly invoking it. I would file such things under "evil," "monstrous," etc. Being a shitty person doesn't rise to that level.

I did get a very long, well-argued email from a walk-on who had been around for a portion of the Brandon era asking me to separate out my critiques of the man from critiques of the athletic director. It cited a number of positive personal interactions with Brandon, and it's true that the one group of people universally in his corner are student-athletes. John U Bacon invited me to present a guest lecture to one of his classes this fall; as fate would have it that date landed about ten days after the Morris incident. Bacon's class was split about down the middle between athletes and regular students, and when I expressed my opinion about Brandon bluntly I got equally blunt pushback from a couple of the athletes.

I appreciate that point of view. I reject it all the same. Brandon was clearly not an asshole to all people. That does not excuse the careers he shattered for little or no reason or the condescension to people trying to talk to him politely. I still can't get over the guy taking shots at some emailer's marriage when he was being painfully polite whilst trying to explain why Brandon had caused him an issue by telling his wife to find a new team. It doesn't excuse the relentless strip-mining of Michigan's primary asset, fan goodwill, in order to make the spreadsheet numbers go in the right direction. It doesn't excuse the constant litany of untruths culminating in a five-day firestorm based on the fact that Brandon's first reaction to any crisis was to lie.

I believe his interactions with the student-athletes were genuine and positive. I don't judge people based on how they treat their most favored class of person. Nixon had a dog, after all.

On giving money to Mott. There's a parable about this.

On cancer kid. It's easy to be nice to kids with cancer, especially when you trumpet it from the mountain. It's standard practice to be open to Make-a-Wish; not doing so results in major backlash and Brandon's not a literal psychopath. When these arguments are made I always think of the Chris Rock bit about how you're not SUPPOSED to go to jail, you low-expectations-havin' mofo.

On the civility of the previous bullet point. Not very civil, I agree. I did weigh that, but I felt that pulling punches in any way here was 1) not going to be credible and 2) did a disservice to the lesson learned. I often write swears in first drafts that get edited out later, sometimes to my regret. There is something about the well-placed expletive that gets a point across in a way I cannot seem to replicate with less naughty language, and this was a full-auto post.

On the shittiness of those emails. From user Evenyoubrutus:

What convinced me of how clueless he really was was his email that said "I suggest you find a new team to support."  This was clear proof that he was still trying to sell pizzas instead of honoring the tradition of Michigan Football.  Yes, if you don't like Domino's, try Pizza Hut.  But I don't have over two decades of memories of sitting down at Domino's with my dad since I was a fucking CHILD eating the pizza, and memorobilia of Domino's items and memories in my house, and I don't dream of sharing the same experiences eating Domino's with my young boys, or memories of watching Domino's win championships and feeling some of the happiest moments of my life because Domino's! "Find a new team to support" Okay. Ass.

On things I missed. Inevitably there were going to be issues and problems with the Brandon era I missed, even in a post pushing 5k words. A selection:

  • BursleyHall82 reminds us that it was only a sustained campaign from MVictors that finally got Brandon to relent and allow Willis Ward to be honored and his story told.
  • I did not mention "The Process" via which Rodriguez was fired. That two-day dog and pony show was a quintessential example of doing something ostentatious to look impressive instead of just getting it over with quickly. Hackett fired Hoke and announced it in about 10 minutes, because he is not concerned with looking impressive. (Hackett occasionally dresses like Seinfeld's dad because he gets things done instead of picking out clothes.)
  • JeepinBen points out I didn't mention the press blitz after the Morris incident or the infamous "my personality is to the best of my ability and I have to fix that" statement. That was triply odious: Brandon hired a PR firm only after he'd burned the house down and then spent Michigan's money trying to prop himself up instead of repairing the damage he'd done. Add in the content of said blitz and you've got a triple. Oh, and he invoked his family as a shield. Home run.
  • I missed the giant Brandontron next to the stadium.
  • And of course whenever I bring it up more people add their stories to the list, including this gentleman who was dismayed because the athletic department tried to charge the hospital a licensing fee for sick babies in winged helmets.
  • There are many, many stories of people in the department being treated shabbily from Jon Falk on down. I didn't mention most of them because I hear most of them indirectly. Bacon's upcoming book on all this should shed a lot of light in this department; he reports that he has never seen people more eager to talk to him.

On revenues as a measuring stick. A common defense of Brandon is to point at the budget. I've repeatedly stated why I don't buy that argument but I've never stated it as eloquently as Blue Durham did in a comment on the post:

Increased revenues from sources like the Big Ten Channel can't be attributed to anything that he had done, and others, like Brian refers to, like the sale of water or the hoped-for rental of seat cushions(!), bring in little but have a great, negative impact in PR. So where is Brandon's biggest contribution in increasing revenues?

As far as I can tell, it was by increasing ticket prices. But all that did was to sell off an asset built up by preceding ADs, the waiting list and goodwill of fans, alumni, and students. When I was an undergraduate and graduate student at UM in the 1980's, everyone knew that the AD could have easily charged more for tickets.

But I think this was part of a policy to try to treat current students as future donors, and for the alumni, as a way to stay connected to the University in order to have more generous donors. Obviously this worked given all of the alumni events that occur every fall that revolve around a home football game.

All Brandon did was sell this asset off, to the University's detriment. This is akin to a kid selling is father's car and taking credit for all of the money he made doing it without taking into account the value of the car.

The damage he wrought in that department will be felt for years, or at least until HARBAUGH

On solutions. User Njia protests that the post was an unconstructive bombing. Guilty as charged. I'll put together something about the direction to go in an effort to rebuild ground zero.

The unedited post is available as an e-book for 50 bucks. To buy one, just go to this video of Rick Astley singing "Never Gonna Give You Up."

And now let's never talk about… that again.

Comments

Alumnus93

February 19th, 2015 at 5:26 PM ^

"Nixon had a dog, after all." Outstanding wit, Monsieur. That's just hilarious. All is forgiven for your past transgressions. Literally lol

Monkey House

February 19th, 2015 at 5:29 PM ^

I think this was needed. some times you forget everything that got so screwed up over the last few years. people still bash RR but to me there is no question that Brandon and Hoke were far worse for this program. nice job Brian.

The Reeve

February 19th, 2015 at 5:32 PM ^

The piece was brilliantly comprehensive in summarizing the man's sins, and pathetically amatuerish in making it personal and not letting Brandon's own record do the heavy lifting. He diminished his piece with infantile insults. Brian is right in that Dave Brandon was a disaster as an AD, but his diatribe, while pleasing the choir here, relegated the effort to the graveyard of hack journalism.

ChicagoGangViolins

February 19th, 2015 at 6:11 PM ^

 

Is that to some of us the phenomenon is intimately personal. We comprise the generations of goodwill powerlessly traded on by the Dave Brandon Administration and for what? Brian may not be a formally-trained journalist but he is speaking on our behalf as a popular historian capturing contemporary sentiments. You seem to confuse objective journalism, as if that exists, with insightful capture of a historical episode by an intelligent observer who possesses a gift for accurate expression. Respectfully, this is your error.

 

Yooper

February 19th, 2015 at 7:12 PM ^

call a person a POS, prove it.  Brian proved it.  The characterization, especially with the "human being" added, detracts from the argument being offered or the conclusion Brian was seeking to prove.  .

The Reeve

February 19th, 2015 at 7:24 PM ^

I think you are accurate in questioning the existence of objective journalism, but that only suggests that all purveoyors of information are located somewhere on a continuum of "reporting" that includes mgoblog. Where you are on that continuum depends, in large part, on "voracity."

Brian has some responsibility, which he acknowledges. Examine his reporting on the Harbaugh hire; he went to great pains to honor journalistic standards (to his credit). He does not want to be like that 14 year old kid (Teddy Blanks, or something) with no credibility, but he put himself in that class with:

  • "Dave Brandon's great failure is being a piece of shit human being. His overwhelming arrogance is not coupled with any intelligence."

 

This is absurd. And childish. And untrue. I guarantee Dave Brandon is more intelligent than 80% of the people posting comments by many conventional measures. Despite the caracticure of CEOs, few on the board could be a CEO. I also would wager he has performed more humanitarian service than 99 percent here. He's donated millions of his personal money, and if Brian wanted to investigate his charitable inclinations with the same fervor, he'd probably find much good. 

I am delighted Brandon is gone. I was often furious with him. But he is most likely not a POSHB. His was certainly not a good AD. His own actions confirmed that. Brian's final words only raised questions about Brian, not Brandon.

Stringer Bell

February 19th, 2015 at 7:41 PM ^

Brandon was smug, arrogant, and an asshole.  He exploited the paying customers that he was hired to take care of, and then fired back at them with equally childish insults any time a Michigan fan voiced their displeasure.  Depending on how you define a "piece of shit human being", that could very much fit the description.

Stringer Bell

February 19th, 2015 at 8:05 PM ^

Brian wrote an opinion piece.  Yes it summed up the Brandon era in all its glory but it also summed up his, and many fans', opinions on Dave Brandon as an athletic director and a person, with many references to people who personally worked or had some form of interaction with the guy.  Some people might think calling him a "piece of shit human being" is too far but I think he did plenty of despicable things to warrant such a characterization.  Is he as bad as murderers, rapists, etc.?  No, but he still did plenty of things that hurt or offended people.

Ike613

February 19th, 2015 at 8:15 PM ^

.. is that just in the last few days since this was written, POS became reserved for describing only the most evil murderers of our world.  

We can no longer think of someone as a POS, like a million people do every day, because someone does something dumb, is a bad driver, lies, is rude, is oblivious, etc?  Nobody says that about someone to imply they are as bad as IS.  When did this change?

And as far as charity... I guess we can't call Lance Armstrong a POS?.. because he lied, cheated, was a jerk, etc, but gave a lot of money to charity to fund cancer research so that somehow offsets how bad a person he was otherwise?  I'm sure he was nice to certain people as well.

The bits about how he treated current employees, basically letting people go and disrupting their families, just to bring in a bunch of yes men is enough for him to qualify as POS in my book.

Yostbound and Down

February 19th, 2015 at 8:20 PM ^

It's semantics. Insert various expletive instead of POS human being and you get the same thing. Brandon wasn't just a "bad" athletic director, he was bad AND defensive and pedantic and rude and childish and untruthful and etc., ad nauseum. Is it stronger language than you and some others prefer? OK, but to just claim he was incompetent or bad at his job understates how awful he really was. That's why Brian is so mad.

Hoke was a bad coach here, but he seems like a good person. Rodriguez was a bad coach (at least here) but seems like a good person. For most Michigan coaches and administrators, the same can be said about them. What Dave Brandon did was much worse than simply poorly executing his job, and he fully earned his vilification. 

I'm also not sure what sort of productivity you are looking for. Sometimes catharsis and venting is necessary.

ChicagoGangViolins

February 19th, 2015 at 8:00 PM ^

 

Else perhaps deliberate conflation on your part. Formal title, (g) intelligence, tax-deductible giving -- these aspects of a person cannot undo behaviors exhibited by that person. The behavioral record is an observable one, and opinions in respect of the record are just those. Brian's words accurately depict the phenomenon of Dave Brandon, UM Athletic Director, as perceived by many during a historical episode. It is appropriate to challenge whether Brian's depiction is "absurd" and "childish." But you have offered nothing - zero, zilch, nada - in support of your contention that Dave Brandon "is most likely N-O-T a POSHB" (emphasis added) when the overwhelming weight of the evidence at hand does in fact decisively establish that, over pertinent years, Dave Brandon DID ACTUALLY behave like, and thus Dave Brandon IS, a POSHB. Res ipsa.

 

The Reeve

February 19th, 2015 at 8:11 PM ^

Brian's presentation was entirely about Dave Brandon, the tone-deaf athletic director, which is, I might argue, not his whole life or the entirety of his accomplishments. To suggest that Brian convicting him of being a bad althetic director does not equate to him being a POSHB without any intelligence is not something I have to prove. It's common sense. Just as Brian's characterization is obviously unnecessary.

KBuck

February 19th, 2015 at 9:57 PM ^

So then we should completely ignore his unheard of and ridiculous responses to emails that he penned during his tenure?

To me that is a direct link to who he is as a person. He didn't HAVE to respond to thos emails, he could have ignored them.... I agree the POSHB was harsh but I think his track record warrants the title.

Reader71

February 20th, 2015 at 12:23 PM ^

Very obviously, no. The man's point is that all of Brian's factual claims were well and truly deserved. More to the point, they illustrate Brian's contention that Brandon is a POS, and they do it more effectively than the POS comment did. That comment can only distract from the good piece. If that one line had been edited out, there would be near unanimity of praise from all readers. I'd give it a Pulitzer. He's not saying Brian should take it easy on Brandon, but that Brian shouldn't undermine his own damn good column by slipping into that kind of attack. It absolutely hurt the piece in the eyes of some readers. It was petty, in my opinion. And a guy with this big of an audience might not want to be seen as petty.

Ike613

February 19th, 2015 at 11:07 PM ^

Because I'm sure the pattern of behavior where Brandon treats all current employees like shit and brings in a bunch of patsy's just started when he took the UM AD job.  He never before had thought, hey, I should fire these people who disagree with me and replace them with a bunch of people who will just agree with me and make my job easier never occurred to him until a few years ago.

The way he handled the UM job absolutely makes you question how he "achieved" the success he had in prior jobs... he's obviously a master politician, knows how to jump on the p-wagon and advance his career.  Does that mean he's dumb?  Obviously not.  But the intelligence he's displayed in advancing his best interests is absolutely not something I find admirable.  Basically just shows he's smart when it comes to looking out for himself... but he's obviously not that good at it since it finally brought him down.

Blue Bunny Friday

February 20th, 2015 at 12:31 AM ^

Did you read his emails?  They were worse than >50% of comments on this board.  He doesn't have some stellar educational record... It's a bachelor's from Michigan... In the early 70's... Earning a teaching certificate.  He's got a bunch honorary degrees from smaller Michigan schools.  He delivered a commencement address at Albion and did this:

Taped to the bottom of each of their seats was a coupon for a free pizza and a soda.

His philanthropy appears vastly overstated.  He gave a superficially impressive figure to put his name on stuff and did it in a public manner when people were thinking he was going to be on a path into politics. He didn't turn down that sweet buyout or agree to buy his own fucking tickets.

Hardware Sushi

February 19th, 2015 at 6:18 PM ^

I believe Brian has brought this up before, and I know I certainly view him this way - Brian is an Essayist and not a Reporter.

His game summaries are not pure fact or telling what happened. Ace typically does a fine job of that. Brian provides narration and emotion that connect the audience to Michigan - clearly something that is working well for him, especially for fans of something like the University of Michigan (rather than, say, the Pistons).

He has fact-based posts (UFR, Season Previews, etc.), sure, but he is generally not contacting sources and providing reports in the traditional newspaper sense.

BayWolves

February 19th, 2015 at 6:03 PM ^

Free speech is a beautiful thing, especially when you run a blog. Let it out and don't be afraid to voice your opinions. Everyone else will do so in turn. If all people, a former CEO ought to be able to take it as well as he dishes it out.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

dragonchild

February 19th, 2015 at 6:37 PM ^

My respect for Brian went up today.  I have a similar credo:  I measure someone's kindness based on how they treat those they care about the least.

For example, I really don't care if someone is super-polite and nice and generous to me.  If I see them treat someone (who doesn't deserve it) like shit, I judge them based on that.  Nothing makes me more uncomfortable than being someone's favorite, and I hope at least a few student-athletes aren't quite so self-centered that they realize that how DB treated non-athletes is every bit as important.

DB's an asshole.  That he had favorites means nothing to me.

WNY in Savannah

February 19th, 2015 at 6:11 PM ^

I am very glad that Brian wrote about The Failure and I think this was a fine time to do it.  Why look back at the past?  Partly because we may not actually be done with it yet.  We may be seeing indirect consequences for a long time.  What really worries me is that I don't think we have seen the full extent of The Failure yet.  Brian talked about the destruction of the waiting list and the alumni and fan good will.  This is no small thing.  That might never come back the way it was.  It is much easier to break things than to fix them.  The world has changed and that waiting list may never return.  Michigan football may never again be what it was for most of my life.  Or it may.  But I think Brandon's escapades have made it much, much tougher than it might have been otherwise.  Maybe (and hopefully) I'm wrong.

As for complaints about Brian's writing, I don't understand.  He writes the way he writes and most of us like it, which is a big reason we are here on this blog.  If you would rather not read such "amateur" writing, read a newspaper instead.  I don't want mgoblog writing to be "just the facts, ma'am."

charblue.

February 19th, 2015 at 6:14 PM ^

If you are a journalist and have some insight into a situation, then bringing light where darkness has hid the truth is comforting. Some of this is just unrepentant opportunity to vent without borders. I get it, but killing a dead corpse for the victims without remorse makes you what even if it's about historical record-keeping? It makes you subject to the criticism you most assuredly find worth challenging, but for what gain?

Does it take a rock star to reveal the blessings that Michigan is, period?

You are our rock star and we don't need a reason to challenge your choices. This is challenging without being overtly revealing in a way that sheds a bright light on what we already acknowledge is a bright future because of one man and the brilliance of our current leadership whose actual brilliance needs to be cherished -- forever.

Pinky

February 19th, 2015 at 6:17 PM ^

I didn't mind the Brandon piece at all, but does anyone else feel like Brian said almost nothing on the departure of Hoke?  It was oddly quiet.  I guess that's what happens when everyone expected it for three months.

SFBayAreaBlue

February 19th, 2015 at 7:01 PM ^

is that Hoke's failings are only twofold. 

1. He was just an above average MAC coach instead of a Bo, Lloyd, or Harbaugh.  

2. The Morris incident, which probably arose from detachment and incompetence rather than malice or a true disregard for player safety. And that was a pretty terrible incident that he has been and will be raked over the coals for. 

But under a different AD, If those were his only sins he would have been fired in due course in the usual way coaches are for not winning enough, and not much would have been said. It was Brandon's lies and general ass-hattery that exasberated the issue.  

Furthermore, Hoke is generally well liked by nearly everyone so long as they don't consider his winning percentage, and every player will testify that he does care about them as people and their health and safety.  

Hoke was charged with overseeing the football players.  His damage was limited to the field.  Brandon's interactions with the fans and all his money grubbing decisions were much more damaging with far reaching consequences. 

Also, Brian said that Hoke will get a separate obit. 

Ty Butterfield

February 19th, 2015 at 8:12 PM ^

I honestly don't get all the love for Hoke. He was obviously in over his head. I thought he was clueless before the Morris incident. He never came off as well spoken during interviews. His whole "This is Michigan" thing played great during 2011 but grew tiresome after that. The team regressed every year he was coach and always seemed weaker and slower compared to other teams. Except for a few players no one played with any urgency or fire. The team was all talk and no action. Maybe people are giving Hoke a pass because he loves Michigan and it was pretty clear DB was way too involved with the team.

SHub'68

February 19th, 2015 at 10:40 PM ^

come across as a smug, condescending ass.  You can still like someone even if they are a failure.  You can still criticize their failures, and then you fire them and move on.  But someone who fails, lies, fails some more and in the process damages something you care deeply about, and then condescends to those who would question them about it...those people you tend to not like very much.

WolverineHistorian

February 19th, 2015 at 6:21 PM ^

Oh, man.  That radio interview was the worst.  Dan Dakich cut Brian off mid-sentence through about more than half the interview, especially when he was listing Brandon's bumblings.  Then when Brian told him that he need not be so sensitive, he started rambling about his playing days at Indiana...which I had no idea what he was getting at or what it had to do with the topic at hand.  I think he should just stick with broadcasting basketball. 

Amen to the follow-up, Brian. 

maizenbluenc

February 19th, 2015 at 6:26 PM ^

with the extreme nature in which you say things or the opinions, conclusions and actions you formulate, but I really appreciate the this blog, and the effort you take to articulate clearly what you think is going on or has gone on.

I thought Failure was damning enough without the last three paragraphs, but hey, this is a fan-point-of-view-blog editorial, so why not.

Keep it up and Go Blue man!

SeekingSun

February 19th, 2015 at 6:29 PM ^

There hasn't been much conversation about the letter that came out in the fall from all of the head coaches unanimously supporting Dave Brandon. Stockholm Syndrome? Coordinated by DB himself? True feeling from the coaches (similar to the feelings reflected by the players) that Dave was great? There's a story there.....



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

dragonchild

February 19th, 2015 at 6:32 PM ^

IIRC someone here analyzed the revenue increase and showed that it tracked all other B1G programs over the same time period.  Granted these were based on rates not dollars, but essentially his mad scramble to increase revenue only followed the historical trendline.  An unwashed coffee mug would've done just as well for far less damage.

See, the thing about Michigan is that the fanbase -- on average, anyway -- is numerous, well-off and loyal, as fanbases go.  So revenue is in fact the easiest job of the AD; don't fuck up and the money just rolls in.  Against all odds and reason, Brandon managed to fuck up his most important and easiest possible job.