oblig [Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Deceleration Comment Count

Brian January 23rd, 2019 at 2:38 PM

1/22/2019 – Michigan 59, Minnesota 57 – 18-1, 7-1 Big Ten

Last night game was the season in microcosm, although the parts weren't quite the right length. First: Michigan starts 3/20 from the field and looks generally appalling, like they did in sub-1 PPP outings against Norfolk State and Holy Cross. Michigan then gets it together, turning a nine-point deficit into a 13 point lead over the course of about 20 minutes. This is the bit where they nuke a couple of top 25 teams—we'll call that the 23-3 run—and outpace various others by double digits.

Then they decide that's enough offense for one game and/or season. Michigan does not score after getting to 57 with just under five minutes left. A Charles Matthews midrange jumper exactly one tenth of a second before the shot clock expires is naturally the rescue. In the grand tradition of our people, Matthews looks like this afterwards:

A worthy addition to the Impassive Muhammad Ali Abdur-Rahkman wing of our weird internet meme hall of fame.

But Matthews is not MAAR. MAAR was the This Is Fine dog as a swooping late-clock layup machine, a guy who put out fires with the expression of someone binging C-SPAN. In contrast, Matthews has one of the most expressive mugs in the recent history of Michigan basketball. Our Flickr page is littered with Matthews face:

44607593450_636865c9e5_k

[Patrick Barron]

When Matthews looks like MAAR it is not a way of being but a specific feeling in the moment, and one that a lot of people share. Michigan is scuffling. Back-to-back performances of 0.82 and 0.92 points per possession don't mean the end is near, but they are a worrying blip back towards mortality after this basketball team hacked its way out of Jay Wright's head fully-formed and bearing axes in November.

It's different, but familiar. January doldrums are nothing new for John Beilein's program. Usually they've been preceded by, you know, losses. So the scuffles are part and parcel of the thing, along with the ignition stage in February. This moment feels off because for the first time since Trey Burke's crew the only direction they can go is down.

The good part is that the defense shows no sign of going anywhere. The regression in two-point defense halted after Michigan regressed from their unsustainable start. Just two teams have hit a point per possession all year. Michigan only has to fix the one thing, and only enough to outpace teams in rock fights.

Actually fixing it… well. Someone poke Poole with the same stick they used at halftime on Brazdeikis. Michigan can't have efficient offensive performances without their high-upside scorers, uh, scoring.

[After THE JUMP: Teske is out of his mind.]

BULLETS

HAIL TESKETRON 6000. 15 points on 8 shot equivalents, three offensive rebounds, three blocked shots, and a completely different game when he was on the floor. No exaggeration to say he's been not only Michigan's most important but best player since January started. Teske has the best hands of any Michigan center I can remember. He not only catches the ball, he makes tough catches. Down low, on the run, alley-oops that are a bit off: doesn't matter.

Default autobench complaint: Teske averages 3.2 fouls per 40. He got autobenched early in this one and ended up playing 27 minutes after with just more two fouls.  There is no reason to take him out if he gets an early one. Beilein seems to have heard the autobench complaints and doubled down by creating the one-foul autobench, which nobody else does.

Isaiah Livers is a situational 5 at best. Ace grabbed this from Hoop Lens:

Screen Shot 2019-01-23 at 12.31.40 PM

That opponent TO rate and 3P% rate are almost certainly unsustainable outliers; the offensive rebounding and 2PT D are not. Teske needs to be out there for as long as his endurance will permit. Sorry sorry I know this is never changing, it just drives me nuts.

Quit with the stepbacks. Michigan is utterly in love with stepback jumpers, especially when they get an awkward switch from the opposition. To me this is the main source of the offensive woes. The PNR game gets broken up and Michigan settles for way too many off the dribble stepbacks when Poole gets matched against a center or whoever. Even if you don't beat your guy clean off the dribble the chances are that you're going to draw help, and then put people in rotations.

Michigan has two guys who are not super quick but are very effective once they get downhill—Iggy and Matthews—and those guys are in gross slumps because too much of the offense is screwing around on the perimeter and not giving the slashers the edge a closeout provides.

Michigan did have a few off the dribble three attempts from screen action, which is not the same thing. A stepback off a switch engages no other players and is extremely static. The pull up off PNR action draws defenders, including the C, and should improve offensive rebounding opportunities; it also opens up other actions off the pick and roll. Brazdeikis got fouled twice on those because that action was way more difficult to defend.

Simpson continues to be binary from three. There's on and there's off and there's nothing else. 0/4 here. More worryingly, 0 assists. He could have had a couple on shots his teammates missed but not up to his usual standard.

39880231553_4fbb2f4843_k

[Campredon]

Thundering towards the rim. Michigan more or less won the battle to keep Minnesota off the line but even so I was frustrated by how frequently it seemed like Michigan would get run into by a Minnesota defender and a foul would be called for little or no reason. (On the other hand the charge-type substance Brazdeikis took was a very bad call.)

One item in particular stood out: Jordan Murphy would get the ball in the high post and attempt to blast his way to the rim by lowering his shoulder and crunching guys in the chest, particularly Livers. He got called for an offensive foul on his last attempt to do this. It probably was an offensive foul. So why did it not get called the first four times? Backing down a guy is one thing; Murphy was slamming into them. I can only imagine how many delicate pieces Brad Davison would have burst into if exposed to similar conduct.

Injuries ahead. A couple of personnel issues for teams coming up on the schedule:

  • Indiana suspended backup point guard Devonte Green "indefinitely," and since Michigan plays Indiana next it seems likely he'll miss the rematch in Assembly Hall. C De'Ron Davis missed their game against Northwestern and continues to struggle with an  ankle issue. While he's played in five of the last seven IU games he's topped out at seven minutes in his five appearances, and Miller stated publicly that he shouldn't have put Davis on the floor against Maryland.
  • Ohio State's Kyle Young is out with a stress fracture. Young is pretty low usage but does a lot of dunking on people's heads in about 20 MPG. He's shooting 77% on the season on 14% usage. OSU will either have to play smaller at the four or turn to FR Jaedon LeDee for Young's minutes.

Indiana is 0-5 in their last five; OSU is 0-4. Big Ten is biting those two schools harder than anyone else. IU's recent stretch has been particularly brutal: @ Michigan, @ Maryland, vs Nebraska, @ Purdue, @ Northwestern. Yikes.

Comments

Yo_Blue

January 23rd, 2019 at 4:48 PM ^

MAAR had a far better handle.  Matthews is a strip machine when driving to the hole.  MAAR was also a better finisher at the rim (minus dunks).  Matthews is a better athlete, but I don't seem him having any kind of NBA career.  The one thing that I was hoping Matthews would improve on was his mid-range jumpers.  He started the season looking like that was a legitimate tool, but lately can't buy a jumper.

Blue In NC

January 23rd, 2019 at 4:55 PM ^

Sorry, not sure I agree with that.  MAAR was a decent defender, although clearly a step down from Charles.  And Charles is a better rebounder.  But offensively, MAAR was a much better shooter and passer, had a better handle, and because of that could get to the rim just as frequently. He also was very efficient in late clock situations.  Honestly, I might take senior year MAAR over Matthews this season even though that would lessen the defense.  It would also mean a stronger guard rotation which could be important come tourney time.

jsquigg

January 23rd, 2019 at 7:28 PM ^

MAAR as a senior (and probably junior) was more efficient than Matthews in every way.  Matthews is a better defender, yet on both ends of the floor is plagued by habitual issues.

I think that offensively, Matthews is overthinking things as he gets caught in between when he drives. He has tunnel vision and isn't great at setting up teammates, both of which have led to turnovers when the defense doubles. His shooting tops out at average, which also allows the defense to cheat to his drive. I wish he could somehow learn how to better move without the basketball, and either shoot or finish without much, if any dribbling. I don't like the offense originating with Matthews. If he can't get to the rim the offense stalls.

Defensively I really only have one critique of Mathews: He leaves his feet way too often, either from the shot fake or when recovering. Other than that he is a great wing defender.

MAAR by contrast knew his role within the offense perfectly, and his top decision making made up for what he lacked physically. He was also an underrated defender. MAAR was tough as nails by any definition, but especially mentally. It's too bad the NBA swallows players like him up because of the sheer upgrade in athleticism. MAAR was one of my all time favorite players at M.

Yinka Double Dare

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:02 PM ^

Sitting Teske and sending Livers out as the 5 just seemed a particularly bad idea against a beefsketball outfit like Minnesota who has multiple guys whose offense is "barrel into you and fling it at the rim" and the related "hope for an offensive rebound." There's teams where Michigan can get away with the small lineup but that kind of squad isn't really one of them.

Reggie Dunlop

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:32 PM ^

Agree and I noticed that as well. Austin Davis draws lots of groans around here, but I think we'd all agree that he was better suited to bang in the paint with Minnesota's offense than Livers or Johns. Odd move there. The thought crossed my mind yesterday that perhaps Beilein was trying to spark their offense. Use their quickness to try and open up some shooters even if it meant trading baskets. That didn't happen. The small lineup sucked as much as any other offensively and got abused on the other end.

rice4114

January 23rd, 2019 at 6:01 PM ^

Davis might of been a better sub for Teske defensively but on the offense, without Livers, we wouldve been in trouble. At one time 7 minutes into the game-

5 starters - 3pts

Livers- 5 pts and a barely missed dunk

And that was after he sat almost all that entire stretch. I would start Livers. If you need more D you start him with Matthews. If you need more offense you start him with Iggy.

Also if Brooks keeps getting good minutes it will pay big dividends later in the year. Teske, Livers, and Brooks all seem to be making the most of their limited touches. Poole, Iggy, and especially Matthews seem to be having some terribly inefficient stretches. SImpson is just SImpson. Guy can dominate a game with 5 points or less.

TrueBlue2003

January 23rd, 2019 at 7:05 PM ^

And Davis was 2/2 with 4 points last game.  

Who are the most efficient offensive players on M?

1. Livers at 122.4 points per 100 possessions used.

2. Teske at 121.7

3. Davis at 117.7

Davis is fine on offense. I agree with Reggie that it was weird to play small ball lineups against Minnesota which plays two bruising bigs without much range.

It still wasn't the problem in this game.  The problem is Livers, Iggy and Poole combined to go 2-15 from three.  That's pretty much it.  If they go the expected 6-15, it's another comfortable double digit win with the kenpom and Vegas spreads covered.

CRISPed in the DIAG

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:04 PM ^

Good shit, Brian.

w/r/t Teske's apparent super-autobench - I wonder if this is merely a mid-season break for the big guy. There has been speculation here that Teske's minutes were unsustainable and the 1-foul autobench is an excuse to get him off the court for extended breaks. Of course, I have no science to back-up this warm take.

Michigan Arrogance

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:15 PM ^

I was going to say something simiar - Teske can't play 40 mins/game and the foul rate likely isn't linear due to fatigue - keep playing him another 9min/game to get to 36 and those last 9 mins will likely lead to more fouls per min played as he gets more winded.

taking him out with one foul gives him a breather mid way thru and protects the fouls on him. they need 10mins/game at the 5 from Livers and Davis one way or the other.

TrueBlue2003

January 23rd, 2019 at 7:19 PM ^

There's also the issue of altering how you contest shots when you're in foul trouble.  I'm pretty sure kenpom statistically proved, and it's entirely intuitive that guys are less aggressive than normal when they're in "foul trouble".  For a Michigan player, foul trouble includes playing early with one foul because one more and you're done for the half.

Sure, you can play a guy more minutes and he's probably not going to foul out, but it's going to affect the way he plays so then is it worth it?

Beilein has decided it's not.  Dunno what's the right thing to do there but I don't think it's quite as simple as extrapolating foul rates over remaining minutes because fouling out isn't the only problem, playing differently is also a problem.

stephenrjking

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:04 PM ^

The stepback jumpers are a symptom of Michigan's bad offense that seems to be pretty close to the source of the problem. Beilein after the game was talking about trying to get the guys to take good shots, still. 

There were at least two drives where Matthews slashed into the lane, had the half step you'd typically want for him to go to the glass... and did his stop-pivot-fadeaway shot instead. As if that were the plan all along. 

Iggy got poked a bit, but he didn't turn into an efficient player. He was still missing a bunch of stuff, but he got to the line a few times to rescue otherwise unimpressive offensive efforts.

And Poole made some nice plays on occasion, but the ball wouldn't fall for some of the fancy stuff.

And, look, there are three guys who don't pass much, who are settling for poor shots, who aren't getting good looks but are still the recipient of the possession's last pass almost whenever they get it. That might be our offensive issue right there. Honestly, Brian's prescription sounds exactly right, and I can see these guys getting it soon.

 

Michigan Arrogance

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:19 PM ^

IMO, Poole's success has gone to his head a bit. Too much heat check/hero ball early in the shot clock. He's good, but has to stay within the rythm of the offense to get a good look, not a "good enough cause I hit 42% from 3 and can take this guy" look.

Iggy's game is just getting to the basket and getting to the line. he's quick for his size and a beast. Can hit the 3 but has cooled off recently.

TrueBlue2003

January 23rd, 2019 at 7:43 PM ^

It sounds like you talked yourself right out of the initial premise!  First saying that those are symptoms (I presume of the offense not getting guys better shots), and then coming back full circle to realize, yeah, those are the three guys, along with Z, that need to actually run the offense and get themselves and others good shots but they're not doing that.  They're just playing one-on-one and taking bad shots.

It feels like Michigan doesn't run through their usual offense nearly as much this year as recent years.  They run a pick and roll and if it gets stopped, they just revert to an iso.  Doesn't help that Iggy and Poole (albeit, to a lesser extent) are mostly black holes themselves.  So not sure if they are just stopping the action or if that's what the game plan is, but it's not really working right now.

Reggie Dunlop

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:38 PM ^

I do. It's fine if you're out of options late in the shot clock, I guess. But we've seen variations of this offense run for years. It's best when guys are slashing and kicking and rotating to find wide open shooters and back-door layups. When that ball swings around and finds a guy wide open in rhythm, the likelihood of a make seems to jump up exponentially.

The one-on-one step-back seems to run contrary to what makes our team good. It stalls the offense, relieves any defensive stress and makes us easy to guard.

Michigan4Life

January 24th, 2019 at 9:34 AM ^

I hear ya but the fact is stepback jumper is a good arsenal to have because it creates separation for a clean shot. Poole is the only one who does that regularly and makes them. Taking it away removes the threat of it that defenders has to take account for which makes it easier to defend Poole.

DaftPunk

January 24th, 2019 at 1:09 PM ^

https://twitter.com/WolverineCorner/status/1068974975695167488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1068974975695167488&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.maizenbrew.com%2Fbasketball%2F2018%2F12%2F2%2F18121947%2Ftop-plays-purdue-at-michigan-2018-jordan-poole-near-perfect-game-oh-my-god-jon-teske

MaizenBrew begs to differ:

 https://www.maizenbrew.com/basketball/2018/12/2/18121947/top-plays-purdue-at-michigan-2018-jordan-poole-near-perfect-game-oh-my-god-jon-teske

Reggie Dunlop

January 23rd, 2019 at 3:41 PM ^

Regarding the Teske autobench, if you'll notice yesterday Beilein actually did NOT autobench Teske after his first foul. He left him in.

And the very next play he was reaching in defensively on a Minnesota big in the paint. He forced a jumpball, so yay. But he easily could've picked up a quick 2nd on that which would've been near disastrous given his value. That's when Beilein yanked him.  

Sure, that brief stay is inconsequential in the grand scheme, but I took it as a sign that Beilein's trying to let go and trust his guys a little.

RAH

January 23rd, 2019 at 5:13 PM ^

Great observation. I remember noticing it at the time but didn't think of it again until you brought it up. If people look at this objectively, they should retract all their complaints about his early time on the bench. Especially in light of the clear need to keep Teske fresh for the later stages of the game.

tnixon16

January 23rd, 2019 at 4:07 PM ^

“Michigan is utterly in love with stepback jumpers, especially when they get an awkward switch from the opposition. To me this is the main source of the offensive woes. The PNR game gets broken up and Michigan settles for way too many off the dribble stepbacks when Poole gets matched against a center or whoever. Even if you don't beat your guy clean off the dribble the chances are that you're going to draw help, and then put people in rotations.”

This is the type of thing I was referring to when I got negged (in another thread) for describing our offense as getting bogged down in “hero ball.” This, and Iggy and Matthews driving head-down through the lane without so much considering a kick-out or drop-off dime. Too often we are overconfident to the point that we force the least-best look because it has the highest upside of making a statement. When we were on fire earlier in the year, the ball was moving crisply, and so were the cutters. 

The sad thing is, we came out last night with an obvious urgency to not let the ball sit in anyone’s hands for more than a second...tons of player and ball movement early...and we generated good looks for a time....and none of them went in. Then it was back to forcing. Alas.

ak47

January 23rd, 2019 at 4:41 PM ^

I think the offensive problem is a lack of confidence in perimeter shots. When guys are driving and kicking the shooters have been hesitant to take the open 3 and instead drive or pass, this leads to bad late clock jumpers. Its also leads to forced shots at the rim as the only guys willing to create their own shot are the slashers and without the consistent perimeter threat its tough to drive. 

This offense needs Poole to be its creator and highest usage player, that is the only way its a top 20 offense which it needs to be for Michigan to get back into the elite, probably has to get closer to 10 than 20 if we want to win a championship. 

MGlobules

January 23rd, 2019 at 8:39 PM ^

This is a huge issue that I've come to realize is central to college ball--confident teams ring it up. Unconfident teams wait that nanosecond and pass it away or put up clunkers. I'll bet they get their mojo back, but the poster above is also right--the pecking order has continued to shift all season long, and that may be hindering everyone just a bit now. 

outsidethebox

January 23rd, 2019 at 5:57 PM ^

Interesting take. The problem is that teams are (correctly) assessing that Poole is the only shooter they need to be seriously concerned with...unless Livers is on the floor too. Teams are not afraid to allow Teske, Simpson, Iggy or Matthews to have good looks from the outside...and anyone defending those four off-ball are sagging inside to clog up the driving lanes. And this is going to continue. 

This happening is not surprising. My contention from the beginning has been that, while this team has many very nice pieces, the coaching staff is going to be very challenged to find the best combination of offense and defense when the grind of conference play begins. There are options-and I think they are good and viable ones...but they may not be very popular with the fans...at least initially. The "funk" this team is in is more related to the opposition figuring that starting five out then anything else-they are what they are...the good, bad and ugly of it. I believe this issue begins and ends with the fact that Poole cannot be stranded out there as the lone shooter. 

ST3

January 23rd, 2019 at 5:44 PM ^

I coached a team of 3rd/4th grade all-stars 6 years ago. One of the kids on the team was in love with the step-back jumper. That's the only shot he would take. It drove me crazy. I'd stop practice routinely and show him where the driving lane was, but he continued stepping back and shooting. He was a little undersized, so I understand that helped him get his shot off, but still, you've got to have variety in your game.

Since about November I've been thinking we should call Teske, "Big Pink," but I've resisted the urge to state that here lest I be called a racist against the race of gigantic, 7 foot tall, pink people. No one tanned in my neighborhood growing up. We all went from pasty white to pink, nothing in-between.

SysMark

January 23rd, 2019 at 6:06 PM ^

Murphy shoulder plowing is like a DB constantly holding in football.  You're counting on the refs seeing it so much they take it as normal, or at least don't want to call a bunch of quick fouls.  Obviously works at least some of the time.

MGlobules

January 23rd, 2019 at 7:04 PM ^

Brad wants you to know that you've broken his noogies with your meanness and a foul will be assessed against Michigan at the opening of their game on the ninth. 

jmblue

January 23rd, 2019 at 9:53 PM ^

Beilein seems to have heard the autobench complaints and doubled down by creating the one-foul autobench, which nobody else does.

I have seen other coaches do this.  It happens when the foul occurs in the opening minutes.