[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Basketbullets: Flickers Comment Count

Brian January 24th, 2022 at 2:54 PM

1/23/2022 – Michigan 80, Indiana 62 – 9-7, 3-3 Big Ten

Prepare for science: basketball is more fun when you are raining in all of your threes and the opposition is not. This is scientific take. In this particular game Michigan didn't actually need to be on fire from deep to win—you could have deleted five of their eleven makes and they still would have won—but for many reasons it was good to see it happen.

One is that we are all Beilein-adjusted basketball fans and it does not seem right to have a basketball team that is not burning up the nets from outside. Another is that makes imply more makes in the future. But the most important one is that the shooting in this game felt like rough justice, because:

Michigan's average quality of look was superb, and that came against a team that entered the game with a top 15 defense.

Taken with the Maryland game, and a game against Illinois that Michigan was in late despite not having Hunter Dickinson, and you've got the beginnings of a turnaround. You might have to squint to get there, but Michigan has the tools to dig out.

[After THE JUMP: marksmen of tall varieties]

BULLETS

51839024731_26bf2ff643_k

followed by celebration opposition fans found annoying [Campredon]

Dickinson: extended. We've seen enough long twos from Dickinson this year that I think his three-point shooting is likely to be sustainable even if we're looking at a very small sample size. He's just 9/23 on the season. Those number should start going up significantly, because lifting the opposition big out of the paint is likely to be a very profitable activity with Moussa Diabate camping out under the basket.

Diabate's shooting 60% on twos and is getting to the line quite a bit; his OREB rate is top 50 nationally. All of those things are going to be easier for him to accomplish if the lane is just him and some dudes who don't have his combination of size and athleticism. This pick and pop Dickinson 3 easily could have been a layup, and even if missed it's Diabate with seal-out position on Race Thompson and a high probability of a putback:

Dickinson's obviously going to make most of his living on the block but the addition of pick and pop threats will make Michigan's offense hard to get a handle on. They're currently 20th in Kenpom even with all their struggles. I think there's some upside there similar to what OSU experienced when EJ Liddell suddenly started canning threes partway through his sophomore year.

51839378354_259337e3f2_k

[Campredon]

The luxury of tall guys. After Dickinson picked up his third foul, Michigan could just swap Diabate onto Trayce Jackson-Davis and have Dickinson check Race Thompson. Since Thompson is almost exclusively a peripheral offensive player this worked out just fine. Thompson did make an Intelligent Cut™ to get a layup but that was a minimal cost to pay for the ability to keep an on-fire Dickinson on the court.

Bubble watch. Advanced metrics still believe in Michigan even at this late date, when preseason expectations are either entirely dropped out or a very faint signal. So that win over Indiana actually sees Michigan pop up to a 10 seed(!) on Bart Torvik's T-Ranketology page. That is an estimate based on future performance, to be clear. Torvik's if-the-season-ended-today projection has Michigan the fifth team out of the field.

Here's an informative twitter thread:

There's still a lot of work to do but Michigan is suddenly not dead in the water.

One good thing for Michigan is that there are a ton of Quad 1 opportunities left on the schedule, but none of them look insurmountable. Michigan's worst W% on Kenpom is a game at Purdue, which is still a 22% shot. The Big Ten is having a bit of a down year, which means they've got a lot of top 25 teams but only one in the top ten (Purdue).

You must be this tall to ride. Caleb Houstan is a roller coaster of a shooter. Last two games: 8/11 from three with a foot-on-the-line two. Previous five: 2/21. Previous four: 12/23. This seems highly correlated by the quality of shots he's getting up. In this game he was mostly wide open and nailing them; the one where he got a real closeout he airballed.

Hop over to Synergy and this appears to be a real thing:

  • Guarded jump shots: 0.9 PPP, 42nd percentile.
  • Unguarded jump shots: 1.3 PPP, 71st percentile.

You can see that in his high school numbers. When he was on the ultra-stacked Montverde team with Caleb Cunningham, et al, he shot over 50% for the season. As a senior (and in FIBA play) his numbers dropped off significantly. He is not a pull-up guy at all: he's only taken 10 shots off the dribble this year, hitting 3.

I'd say this is encouraging since the offense is functioning more smoothly as all the new parts begin to mesh together and Houstan should start getting more open looks, on which he is deadly.

51839755560_ddb8a3997b_k

astonishing [Campredon]

The softest tech. Houstan got a tech for arguing with the referee about a toe-on-the-line long two, which felt ridiculous because Indiana's Xavier Johnson had just spent several minutes barking at the refs for nonexistent fouls. On replay it looked like Houstan was peeved, not outright angry, and his incredulity at the tech was genuine. That was also his third personal early in the second half.

Of course, this became a satisfying ball don't lie moment when Johnson missed both FTs.

Oof. Boy did I hate the random bounces of the ball that turned what looked like an Indiana turnover and fast break opportunity for Michigan into a Trayce Jackson-Davis and-one that drew Dickinson's second foul. That felt like an eight-point swing what with the significant probability of Dickinson missing big chunks of minutes. Dickinson got his third foul early in the second half, but because of the aforementioned luxury of tall people and Dickinson playing smart Michigan was able to get away with it.

Actually now that I think about it that probably was a literal eight point swing since there were a couple of baskets for Indiana that Dickinson just gave up on because of his foul situation. /shakes fist at ball

This is probably just confirmation bias, but… Is it just me or is Assembly Hall the crankiest arena in America about supposedly missed travelling calls? I mean it makes sense, this is Bob Knight country and if there's any coach who would impart a maniacal anger about piddling technicalities it's that guy.

Gach watch! Around here we're still fascinated by Both Gach, the guy who transferred to Minnesota and put up an Isaiah Washington All Star season last year. He transferred back to Utah, because why not, upped his usage, and…. is shooting 53/36/79? With a high assist rate? He's got a 106 ORTG? Baffling stuff.

Comments

AlbanyBlue

January 24th, 2022 at 3:10 PM ^

If this upswing continues, we will look back on the season and think that perhaps COVID really hurt the campaign more than most people thought.

It could be that they played through it as much as they could until they had to finally cancel games....

Kilgore Trout

January 24th, 2022 at 8:47 PM ^

Couple things.

1. I wouldn't assume that there will be no more COVID cancellations. There's a chance both MSU and Purdue could find themselves with an unexpected opening.

2. I may have missed it, but I don't think the Big Ten has announced how they will handle unequal numbers of games. Let's say Wisconsin finished 15-5 and MSU is sitting at 14-5. I would assume MSU would want to play the UM game in that scenario. 

goblu330

January 25th, 2022 at 8:50 AM ^

Good points, but I think Wisconsin and MSU would just share the title in that case and I don’t think MSU would want roll the dice for an outright.  The BIG could just say the games are getting played and squeeze them in on a Thursday during a Tuesday-Saturday game week but I think they would catch hell from State and Purdue.

I think Michigan can make the tournament.  Short of winning the BTT, I think they need to win at Breslin and Mackey to do so.  Tall task, but the team that played Sunday could do it.

enlightenedbum

January 24th, 2022 at 3:18 PM ^

Houstan was also apparently saying he and/or a coach noticed a mechanical flaw in the last several games where he was leaning back (especially if there was a hint of a contest) as he rose to shoot.  So he was going straight up against Maryland and presumably yesterday.

mwolverine1

January 24th, 2022 at 4:32 PM ^

I think this is correlated to the numbers split Brian laid out. Many times it's instinctual to lean back as you describe when your shot is being contested instead of stroking it confidently. So I would still watch out for Houstan's form and numbers when the shot is being contested moving forward.

Either way, even if 8/11 isn't sustainable, we'll be helped by him being a threat. Currently teams aren't scouting him as a shooter (e.g. they don't stick with him in scramble situations). There will be more space for Eli in particular to work if Houstan is being closely guarded.

TrueBlue2003

January 24th, 2022 at 3:24 PM ^

Isn't KPI the terrible metric made up by the for MSU AD ee?  I can't believe that's still on the team sheets.

But yeah, this is a team that because of all its blowout wins still looks good to the margin of victory rankings and not great Bob to the resume ranks.

Weird year because they've also lost a lot of blowouts. 5 of the 7 were by double digits and a sixth (Rutgers) required a late rally to barely get within single digits.  Granted, the Illinois game (and arguably UCF) weren't blowouts but because we crawled into a hole and died in the last 5 min of both games, they ended with lopsided scores.

This season has been almost entirely devoid of late game drama.  Only Seton Hall has been close in the last couple minutes.  Tarleton State is the next "closest" win or loss as the only other game within single digits with two min to go.

njvictor

January 24th, 2022 at 3:26 PM ^

 Houstan got a tech for arguing with the referee about a toe-on-the-line long two, which felt ridiculous because Indiana's Xavier Johnson had just spent several minutes barking at the refs for nonexistent fouls

There was what seemed like a lot of tick tacky fouls that favored Indiana in the game especially towards the end of the first half. The officiating felt weird and inconsistent

TrueBlue2003

January 24th, 2022 at 6:01 PM ^

Yep, I remember that one (and just watched it again a few times).  It was a really savvy play by Jones because he did the thing where he slowed up just a little and put himself between the defender and the hoop so the trailing defender would plow him over.  I don't think it was a bad call.  Def gets called every time.

Defender needs to be able to hold up and not run him over.  He is in front and is entitled to his position.

KBLOW

January 24th, 2022 at 4:35 PM ^

Yes. A full-on ref show for the last 10min of the half. Michigan went from 5 fouls to 10 in just a few minutes while IU only had one more called on them. I get home court advantage, but that was the only thing that kept IU in the game. Anyway, the team showed backbone and didn't start to choke when that happened. 

M-Dog

January 24th, 2022 at 3:30 PM ^

Those Indiana National Championship banners in the picture are looking pretty faded.

It's hard to believe that the basketball monster that was Indiana has not won a National Championship since before Michigan did it.

TrueBlue2003

January 24th, 2022 at 3:37 PM ^

Seems even harder to believe that Michigan has won 9 straight dating back...6 years?  That's a sustained level of domination that seems crazy for a program like that.

I feel like IU basketball this century has a lot of parallels with Michigan football. Hopefully the Harbaugh era can peak for longer than the Tom Crean resurgence IU had.  It's still crazy to think they canned Crean just one season removed from a big ten title.  I know Crean had his struggles in the NCAA tournament but that tourney is a bit of a crapshoot.  He had two conference titles in his last 5 years.  You gotta be pretty pleased with that if you're IU.

Goes to show that they shiny upcoming object (Archie Miller) is often not worth it, which we've seen so many times in college sports.

MGlobules

January 24th, 2022 at 3:45 PM ^

The upside here is maybe less what they've accomplished these past few as that Juwan has now really identified the tools at his command, a set of effective actions with which to wield them, that the players see it, too. That's what's got me excited going forward. 

jdraman

January 24th, 2022 at 3:50 PM ^

One element of the offense that seems to be getting more run recently is DHO actions to initiate offense. Last year's team ran these types of actions consistently, mostly to get Franz Wagner or Eli Brooks coming off the DHO downhill and towards the basket. Two of Michigan's first three half-court offensive possessions were some form of DHO action to bring Eli either downhill to the basket or generate a look for him from three. It seems like the players are really starting to gel within Juwan's system. 

medals

January 24th, 2022 at 3:58 PM ^

I don't profess to be a good lip reader, but it looked like Houstan called the ref 'bald man' on the way back down the court.  If that's true can see why bald ref man t'ed him up! (Also is pretty funny).    

blueheron

January 24th, 2022 at 4:02 PM ^

Back in the day, when Knight roamed the sidelines and there were always a couple of annoying try-hards in the rotation, Indiana had easily the whiniest fans in the Big Ten. I'd still put them at the top, but the margin seems smaller.

bronxblue

January 24th, 2022 at 4:41 PM ^

Indiana fans feel a bit like St. Louis Cardinals fans in that they feel they inhabit a higher plane of fandom because Indiana has designated itself as the hub of "true" basketball.  I watched the Purdue game and they were doing the same thing.  It's not necessarily "bad" fandom (that's reserved for Duke in my book) as much as contrived and a bit unearned, like a self-appointed nickname that isn't catching on.  The "fetch" of college basketball, if you will.

I said this elsewhere but Michigan wasn't as bad as they looked in their games against UCF, Minnesota, and Rutgers, as those teams had unsustainable outside shooting (29/61 from 3, 48%) while UM couldn't hit anything (17/60, 28%), and they probably aren't as good as they've looked the last two games (19/37, 51%) while their opponents have cooled off (11/36, 31%).  But they've given themself a chance, and a big reason is they've discovered their shooting stroke and guys like Bufkin, Collins, and Howard are seeing more of the court and getting comfortable in their roles.  I still think Jones has issues as a conventional PG but he's been much better recently and when you can switch in Collins for a spell that gives you a different energy.

I agree they've still got some ways to go but if they can get to 11 wins in conference they'll be on the right side of the bubble if a couple provided they don't gack it up against a Nebraska-type team.

Blue Vet

January 24th, 2022 at 5:20 PM ^

AHT take (Assembly Hall Theory re crankiness):

Indiana sees itself as the bedrock of basketball, a conceit reinforced by Hoosiers, so its residents also see themselves as arbiters of the rules, and demonstrate their presumed superior knowledge by harping on the minutest violation that others overlook.

 

patrickdolan

January 24th, 2022 at 7:11 PM ^

Raised in Indianapolis, here.

I became an IU basketball fan because I watched Steve Downing and George McGiniss play on one of the greatest HS teams ever, and continued to pay attention to them at IU.

When I matriculated at Michigan, it began to shift. What pretty much makes it 90% UM now is realizing what an abusive asshole Knight was, especially compared to someone like Johnny Orr.

Still and all, there are times when I'm at a game in Iowa City, where I live now, and someone will say something, and I'll think, "People around here don't know shit about basketball." I didn't think that in Ann Arbor, but it's happened a lot of other places.

 

4th phase

January 24th, 2022 at 6:29 PM ^

I think if I did the math correct, that Michigan would finish the season with a WAB of 0.36 IF they win the games Torvik projects them to win, which assumes that MSU and Purdue are rescheduled and Michigan beats MSU at home and loses to Purdue. Without those games, its 0.22 (because beating MSU helps you more than losing to Purdue hurts you). Either way though, that's basically just on the right side of making the tournament. 

 

 

TrueBlue2003

January 24th, 2022 at 7:33 PM ^

It's looking to be really close.

And indeed Torvik gives them an amazingly tight coin flip chance (49.6%).  That's up from 16% before yesterday's game IIRC.  Talk about a pivotal, high leverage win.  They really needed that.

The interesting thing is, this team hasn't played like a bubble team.  They've oscillated between playing like a team that doesn't deserve the NIT and a team that could contend for a final four with the average being a bubble team.

What we get from here on out is anyone's guess but at least the trend is in the right direction and health could have had a lot do with with poor early performances.  Also, youth understandably probably did as well and it appears things are clicking better now.

Yo_Blue

January 24th, 2022 at 11:28 PM ^

Houstan's release point is so high there is virtually no chance of blocking it. I'd love to see him start taking (and making) shots off the dribble. Regardless, he needs to shoot anytime he is even semi-open.

michmaiku

January 24th, 2022 at 11:31 PM ^

I can confirm that Assembly Hall - to which I made my first visit for this game - is super cranky about alleged travels.  One woman behind me cried for travels every single time Michigan touched the ball, including when Brooks got knocked to the floor and passed the ball from his knees.  

outsidethebox

January 25th, 2022 at 6:50 AM ^

Most threes are pretty good looks-that's why the are taken. Indiana's defensive strategy was, clearly, to take away Michigan's inside game-the guards were collapsing all the way down to the blocks. There was nothing particularly better about the looks Michigan got in this game-relatively to previous games. This was not bad defense on Indiana's behalf-it was good Michigan offense...and sometimes, at the end of the game, you just have to shake your opponent's hand. Otherwise, Houstan drained several corner threes that were below average, quick-trigger looks. 

benzolamas

January 25th, 2022 at 9:33 AM ^

A lot of growing pains are starting to ease. Still many to surmount, but I have enjoyed the past 3 games immensely - even the Illinois loss. Michigan has been playing more confidently and has reinvested in their defense. I may be old school, as I love good defense in hoops, and am hopeful for the last part of the season to make the NCAA tourney! Thanks for a great post.