November 29th, 2016 at 10:00 AM ^
In China. SHAME...SHAMe...SHAme...SHame...Shame...shame... ... ...
November 29th, 2016 at 10:18 AM ^
November 29th, 2016 at 4:51 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 29th, 2016 at 11:01 AM ^
Perhaps one approach, for this topic and others, is to distinguish between thought threads and new development threads. I can see wanting to put a hault on all the new threads people create just because they think they have an 'original' thought about existing material.
But I think that when new developments emerge (i.e., facts, data), such as Sam Webb's article or Manuel's (non)response, new threads should be allowed. If a new thread lacks new outside material or developments, the mods should delete it.
Just a suggestion for common ground than quashing discussion. That never goes well.
November 29th, 2016 at 11:16 AM ^
saw this on the sidebar, and hoped against all hope that it was by one of you guys rather than yet another bitchy whiny poster.
my favorite part is that it got downvoted, 51 times at this moment. "wah, we want to keep making masturbatory bitch threads!"
November 29th, 2016 at 12:56 PM ^
Nice masturbatory reply.
November 29th, 2016 at 12:56 PM ^
Nice masturbatory reply.
November 29th, 2016 at 11:17 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 29th, 2016 at 12:39 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 29th, 2016 at 6:13 PM ^
November 29th, 2016 at 11:19 AM ^
...to take further action. Warde Manuel needs to step up to the plate, back his coach, and demand a formal investigation. UofM has a legitimate 'customer complaint' and the Big 10 needs to respond with a report on what corrective action is going to be taken to avoid a repeat of the staffing and performance of the crew that worked this game. I expect this 'complaint' has already been formally submitted through established channels. We jsut have to wait and see what happens. If the response is 'weak', then I think you'll see UofM take a more public stance.
November 29th, 2016 at 11:33 AM ^
The problem with saying "Use the existing threads" is that the very format of this message board discourages that - once threads are pushed off the sidebar they are forgotten.
I can understand wanting to rein things in a bit but to have a blanket ban on all officiating-related discussion seems excessive. It seems like we spend a lot of time discouraging others from creating new content, which is a bit odd for an internet message board.
November 29th, 2016 at 1:16 PM ^
November 29th, 2016 at 11:34 AM ^
Got to downvote Brain this morning. That was fun. Are we having fun yet?
November 29th, 2016 at 11:55 AM ^
Is the "ban" on posts at this point about anything at all related to that game and its aftermath, or just about the officiating?
November 29th, 2016 at 12:19 PM ^
November 29th, 2016 at 12:47 PM ^
November 29th, 2016 at 1:26 PM ^
November 29th, 2016 at 1:08 PM ^
And I get to do the last, LAST (no shit, really), LAST ONE...
November 29th, 2016 at 2:40 PM ^
Like Michigan, OSU hires officials for their Spring and Fall practices. Any bets that 1 or 2 of the crew in question worked those practices for the buckeyes?
November 30th, 2016 at 3:12 AM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad