Breaking In, Breaking Out
This was going to be a bit in UV but kept going. More Dorsey!
The Free Press got its FOIA muscles going again and found out that Dorsey confessed to a couple 2007 robberies as part of a group of five kids. He was placed in a diversionary program. The crime he was acquitted from was a 3 AM incident where he was in a car with four other kids and one of them hopped out to rob some guy; the kids all blamed each other and the cases were dismissed. So… 20% chance he actually did it if you don't believe the clean years after that mean anything. Considerably less if you do. 100% chance Dorsey needed to get far away from some folk.
You'll note that this makes one of Drew Sharp's statements from Signing Day accurate and leaves the rest in the realm of the reprehensible. Dorsey clearly had a rough past and hung with the proverbial wrong crowd, but amongst the many reasons this is the wrong crowd is it seems very bad at not getting arrested. His two years on the right side of the law and his very decision to GTFO are indications he's made a break.
I'm torn about the fairness of the article. On the one hand, it seems to think this is "acknowledgement" that Dorsey got breaks other kids wouldn't…
“All cases are individuals. We are dealing with kids,” [assistant state attorney Maria Schneider] said. “The vast majority of kids stop offending. I hope this is one of them. But if he’s not, we’ll find out soon enough.”
…when he was placed in a diversionary program while three others went to trial. Those three others were 17 and 18 and were already on probation. Dorsey was 16 and not. A second 16-year-old was also involved but what happened to him is unknown, which means he was—drumroll—almost certainly placed in a juvenile diversion program. (Except his records got sealed like they should.) The guy who Dorsey robbed was told that the kid might have a future so can we go easy, and Schneider didn't dispute it, so there's that. Still, the article spends a lot of time arguing—yes, arguing—that Dorsey's potential as a football player isn't a decent reason to keep him out of the criminal justice system.
On the other, it runs a quote from Dorsey front and center:
“My goal right now is to show everybody I’m not that person who I was a couple years back then, hanging with the wrong crowd and stuff like that, showing that I’m more focused,” Dorsey said Thursday in an exclusive interview with the Free Press. “I’m focused. I’m ready to move on with my life to bigger and better things.”
And Ann Arbor, he says, is the place to do it.
“I feel like that is a great place for me, where I can start all over and make something out of nothing, make nothing into something,” he said.
That's the point. Maybe Dorsey won't make it, but he's been clean for two years and deserves a shot. If he caught a break because he had a shot at going to college, that was a good bet by Broward County. He did, and now he's going to Michigan. It's up to Rodriguez and Dorsey to make it pay off.
The worst thing about all this pressure is that a Dorsey MIP is now a big deal in a way that Kevin Grady getting frighteningly drunk and falling asleep in his car is not. If Dorsey doesn't keep his nose clean at Michigan, the rest of the team can have a spotless record and the storyline will be Dorsey this and Dorsey that. That's a hell of a burden, one that few players with "checkered legal pasts" have to deal with. When Roderick Jenrette came to Michigan State, he was carrying two burglary arrests with him—about which more later—and no one knew. His troubles were explained away by Mark Dantonio and people either respected his privacy as a juvenile offender or were lazy or were just stunned by how magnificent Dantonio's jaw was, and he was left alone.
For whatever reason, Demar Dorsey wasn't afforded that luxury. I have my theories as to why.
Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe that will help him walk the line.
The larger context. So this article is basically fine, if too insistent on making a case against the local state's attorney for not treating a 16-year-old kid harshly. But compare this seven-page story that flags down everyone on all sides with the Free Press's pathetically credulous story on Michigan State's Posse Roundup & Engineer/Woman Beatdown— or "fight" or "altercation" or "pillow hugs" if you're the Free Press.
Remember this?
Dell Sr. said his son did not participate in violence at Rather Hall. He, however, did say his son initially lied to coach Mark Dantonio about his presence there.
"I said, 'Man, why didn't you just tell the truth and say you were there and didn't participate in any of the physical stuff?' " Dell Sr. said. "He said: 'I don't know. I should have just told the truth.' "
That was it as far as quoted sources went: parents of Michigan State players.
Cunningham and Dell each pleaded guilty to one count of misdemeanor assault and battery in East Lansing district court Wednesday.
How about the pathetically credulous article titled "Legal strategy at issue in Michigan State altercation" that asserted the criminal charges filed against nine Spartans were probably just crap to get "the truth"—about which see "bzzt" link above and the additional charges levied to Oren Wilson and Myles White? Or the pathetically credulous acceptance of Mark Dantonio's bald-faced lie about Roderick Jenrette, who had been arrested for robbery mere days before he arrived on Michigan State's campus?
It wasn't until Jenrette was booted for the team for hugging a unicorn at Rather Hall that anyone bothered to look into his double-robbery past, and this was a 2008 recruit who was arrested August 1st of… 2008! Dantonio took the bizarre step of sending Jenrette home to "work on family issues" and no one bothered to see if maybe there was something up with this kid. These are the same crimes, same state, hell even the same position, except one kid was two years past his trouble and was treated to a front page column questioning him and the other was two days past it and ignored. I'm sure I don't have to draw a picture.
I got a zinger in my inbox that's a good summary:
When did Demar Dorsey become Kwame Kilpatrick in the eyes of the Detroit Free Press?
Zing!
Anyway, just throw this on the ever-growing pile of evidence that the Free Press has a double standard. Soon we'll be able to put a ski lift on it.
February 5th, 2010 at 1:48 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:07 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:17 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:41 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:45 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:21 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:21 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:39 PM ^
But there are consequences for making bad decisions... even when you're 16 yrs old. One of those consequences SHOULD be (in my opinion) that you do not get a full scholarship to play football at the University of Michigan.This line of thinking can quickly lead to a terrible "one and done" policy. If you mess up, ever, then you're not worthy of playing for Michigan. Brian Griese would have been kicked off the team. Anyone who had been charged of anything would get kicked off the team. And so on. Its a flattly shortsighted and dim notion. As to the second point, all players are offered scholarships based on the head coaches' desire to accumulate wins for Michigan. I suppose Troy Woolfolk and Braylon Edwards had nothing to offer the team other than being legacies huh? This whole "story" is absolutely and ridiculously absurd.
February 5th, 2010 at 4:52 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 5:49 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 7:02 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 8:20 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 11:36 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:52 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:11 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:38 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:07 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 1:56 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:29 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:04 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:09 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:12 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:23 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:31 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:09 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:27 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:01 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:14 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:27 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 8:32 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:52 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:10 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:13 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:41 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:52 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:14 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:17 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:18 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:23 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:53 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:58 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:16 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:27 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 3:24 PM ^
It may be a stretch to say that he willfully and maliciously lied, but there's some history of untruths.With all due respect, I don't get the idea that it would be a stretch for you at all. Is it unfair of me to ask, Sparty troll or RR-hating troll?
February 5th, 2010 at 3:31 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:05 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 4:38 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:28 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:42 PM ^
February 5th, 2010 at 2:54 PM ^
Comments