OT: Soliciting College Savings Advice/Discussion

Submitted by Michigan Arrogance on

Asking for some advice from the crowd regarding a college savings strategy. I have some extra cash that is earmarked to college expenses for my kids and was hoping for some advice re: 529 plans VS Roth IRA. I am fairly knowledgeable re: 529 plans and Roth IRAs:

  • Roths have very limited contributions per year (5500/yr), but I doubt we'd really exceed that. 529s are effectively limitless re: contributions.
  • Roths have flexibility: Roths can be used toward retirement if we don't end up using it for college, but I seriously doubt we won't use it for college. 529s are penalized if not used for college.
  • Roth contributions are not tax deductible, 529 are in my state
  • Roth earnings are taxed if withdrawn before age 59.5 (we would be 50-52 when the kids finish college) even if used for college. 529s are not.
  • Roth doesn't count against you re: financial aid, but 529s are (how much? slightly AFAIK)
  • Roths withdrawn for education expenses are subsequently counted as income for the child one year later... so it's better to hold off on using a Roth until Sr year. 529s don't have this issue AFAIK.

I'm just wondering how to judge my situation specifically before I solicit advice from my advisior whom I anticipate will push their Roth product (of course). Short summary:

  • we have 2 kids about 10 years from college age. Total income less than 180k.
  • we have about 70k saved in various 401k-type thingss for retirement.
  • we are close to our maximum yearly 401k contributions (~10-12 out of 16k max or so per year) and have a modest pension in place at retirement.
  • we are appropriately insured, as are the kids re: life insurance.
  • No high interest (CC) debt.
  • the NYS 529 plan is universally considered among the top 5 529 plans available, given that it's a vanguard product and very low expense fees (0.16-0.17%)
  • I feel better diversifying our investments not only from our advisor's products, but also from the market. If a pre-paid option like the Mich. Ed. Trust were available, I'd prefer that. Just a bit gun shy about having so much retirement AND college funds linked to the market.

Thanks very much in advance.

 

Uncle Rico

April 10th, 2015 at 1:48 PM ^

1) I completely endorse OT threads like this - it's why I come to mgoblog frankly.  I'm not just a sport douche.

2) Considering the median household income of an american family, and that this blog is not THAT far above it, we can say 180K is deemed wealthy by most (maybe not in LA)

Score 1 for Team 529.  There's a reason this savings vehicle was created

WolvinLA2

April 10th, 2015 at 2:29 PM ^

It takes a lot more than being above the average American household income to be wealthy.  Take my wife and I - we make well over that combined, but have only done so for about 5 years and still have substantial student loans.  About the time we started making good money, we bought a house (FHA loan, 3.5% down because that's all we had) and had kids, two very expensive things.  We've been able to put money away, but no one would say that we've accumulated wealth.  

I would love to be wealthy one day.  But you need to have a net worth AT LEAST in the 7 figures to be considered wealthy, and I'm barely 6.  That's not wealthy.  

Bodogblog

April 9th, 2015 at 11:52 PM ^

Pinky's ink blots all look like spoiled rich guys and bitterness. The thread is clearly labelled OT, and it helps the community in here by helping them support their kids. Given Michigan is, you know, a college, this seems perfectly appropriate. I bet there'd be no objection from you if he said 30K instead.

joeyb

April 10th, 2015 at 12:11 AM ^

You want him to go elsewhere for advice and the first questions that get asked are the ones that gather the information he provided. It's not a dick-measuring contest, it's relevant info.

And, again, it was labelled OT with a good title. If you don't want to read it, then don't click. I happen to find all of this stuff about 50x more interesting than half of the stuff on the board in the off-season, so I'm kind of glad it got posted.

wildbackdunesman

April 10th, 2015 at 8:44 AM ^

Well it depends on what the money is for too.  If you want to avoid penalties and may need the money before age 59 and a half for the kids college or to buy a property, a brokerage is very nice.  That is why I do both.  

If you are buying and holding your annual taxes are very small, as you are only paying 15% on just the dividends and nothing else until you sell the stock.

Hypothetically, for every $10,000 you have invested in a 3% dividend paying stock, you only have $45 in annual taxes off the dividend.....which is actually probably lower than the fees you may pay for a fund in a typical 529 plan.

bgoblue02

April 10th, 2015 at 9:54 AM ^

based off of your expectations of tax rates now vs future.

If OP is in a high tax state and expects to move to a low tax state for retirement (NY to FL) its better to use pre tax money now, if the OP is in a low tax state and moves to a high tax (MI to CA) then it is better to pay taxes now.

Tax defference is never as easy as people make it out to be.

There is obviously the variable of tax raises / cuts (ha!) as well 

rob f

April 12th, 2015 at 9:16 PM ^

as someone who took advantage of the MET program for my two older kids waaay back in the first year or two of the program, MET is not nearly as attractive of a program now. From what I learned when my 20 yr old son and 6 yr old grandkid were born, there are better options out there. When MET first started, the terms ended up very costly to the State of Michigan (wasn't well thought out when written); as a result modifications were made by the state causing more of a financial burden to be placed on the purchaser of an MET account.

wildbackdunesman

April 10th, 2015 at 8:38 AM ^

You seem a bit insecure.

No one is "dick measuring."  He merely asked for advice and some advice was given.  I am a teacher and my wife also has a middle class income.  We are not rich or even upper income.  We do have a plan though where we are somewhat frugal and make investments so I offered some advice based on my own strategies.

If that bothers you that much you have your own personal issues.

HelloHeisman91

April 9th, 2015 at 11:18 PM ^

Some of my clients have invested some of the money earmarked for college expenses in a Universal Life Insurance policy.  You can invest the money to match your investor profile, it grows tax free, can be accessed via a policy loan and it doesn't create a tax liability. In addition, you're not tied to higher education expenses so if your children decide not to attend college or receive a scholarship all you've done is enhance your retirement.  To be honest, most people plan on using current income, some 529 money and some sort of third vehicle.  However, the 529 is a hot topic in Washington right now as Obama has proposed eliminating the tax benefits so there is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the vehicle.  It may not be a viable option very soon.  

dmac24

April 10th, 2015 at 10:58 AM ^

However, they both have their niches and of used correctly are great tools. Whole life shouldn't be considered an investment, but rather a savings tool for access to tax free, accessible, guaranteed-to-never-go-backwards money. Through the right company and structured correctly it can be an awesome financial tool. The money in the policy won't break records but it can be used to finance other opportunities that come up in life. Corporations and banks understand this and have billions of dollars in these policies (Chase has $20B and Bank of America has $18B). What do they know that the average person doesn't? Walt Disney, Ford and other companies wouldn't exist if their founders didn't have life insurance policies to use to keep them appear in tough times.
Sorry for the formatting, on my mobile.

HelloHeisman91

April 9th, 2015 at 11:47 PM ^

I think you're confusing UL with whole life.  UL is a market based product and the returns you experience will be based on how the money is invested in the market.  It essentially is buying term and investing the difference while creating a vehicle that allows money to grow tax free.  Some clients find this very appealing becasue when it's time to pull the money out of the policy it doens't have to be reported to the IRS.  It can be a great vehicle to create tax free retirement income for the right client.   My argument for for buying a traditonal whole life is simple.  They aren't for everyone.  However, they can be a great piece in a portfolio for the right client if positioned correctly. 

gopoohgo

April 10th, 2015 at 9:09 AM ^

There is a loophole for insurance policies with a cash value associated, where you can "borrow" off the cash value of the policy, and since it is a "loan", you don't have to pay income or capital gains taxes on it.  Some really wealthy people use this as an alternative retirement account once they max their 401Ks.

Or, if you are in a high-risk profession where you are worried about possible legal actions against you, if the insurance policy benificiaries are in the name of your spouse or kids, in some states this is exempt from garnishment.

That's about it from my own research.  

I have a variable life policy that was started by my folks when I was in middle school.  I keep it up because it is there, not that I am thrilled by it. 

Note: I have no financial disclosures/interest in peddling insurance.  

HelloHeisman91

April 10th, 2015 at 9:24 AM ^

It sure did and I stand by it. Like I said only some of my clients employ this strategy because it doesn't make sense for everybody and I wouldn't recommend it to everybody. Depending on my clients goals and income and insurance needs, adding a product like UL can make a ton of sense.

dmac24

April 10th, 2015 at 7:59 AM ^

Can be dangerous. If you take advantage of the flexibility it provides(Which many people do) it collapse on itself after so many years. I can't tell you how many clients I've had in my office frustrated over it because that wasn't explained very well and they basically wasted their money.

bringthewood

April 10th, 2015 at 10:42 AM ^

Universal life is the worst. I used a 529 because I was not eligible for an IRA based upon income. I guess that means I'm rich. Does that mean I can get rid of my 10 year old Chevy truck with 100k plus miles and get a new BMW? You can shift money between 529's if you have more than one child.

I have one child graduating from Michigan in May and another that is a sophmore. I leaned on the 529 when both were  in school at the same time and cash flowed some of the expenses when I could.

jabberwock

April 9th, 2015 at 11:29 PM ^

Have 529's for all 3 of my kids (the twins going to school at the same time is going to kill me!)
.
529s are great if you have relatives/friends that may donate as well.
.
As long as you don't crazy over-fund them (virtually impossible with Ed skyrocketing)
You'll be fine.
.
Also didn't see mentioned that they've evolved over the years, and you have many more choices in plan compared to the old days, & you can even switch states/plans regularly if your needs change.
.
On iPhone, apologies if formatting sucks.

Roc Blue in the Lou

April 9th, 2015 at 11:38 PM ^

If certain the youngins will attend college, its a no brainer, vis a vis the tax savings.  Broader expenditures allowed than many believed--used part of my daughter's for her National Boards.

MGoBender

April 9th, 2015 at 11:48 PM ^

I'll say this much regarding Roths:  I started one 2 years ago and just bought my first house.  I withdrew all my contributions to pay for the downpayment.  No penalty, the money earned me some modest money while out in the market, then I pulled it.  Like you said, you can't pull the earnings without penalty, though, but you are kind of hedging your bets.  You get back what you put in for your kids and you earn on that money for your own retirement, I guess.

I look at the Roth as an emergency fund that can earn you some actual interest. 

late night BTB

April 9th, 2015 at 11:52 PM ^

Living in France, it's amazing that the richest country in the history of the world can't provide reasonably priced education and healthcare for its citizens.  Us citizens should demand better. 

The next bubble will be higher education, and it'll make the housing one look like small fries.

gopoohgo

April 10th, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^

Would more worry about France's youth unemployment, anemic growth rate, skyrocketing deficit in violation of the EU treaties, and the racial unrest in the banlieues.

Besides, part of the reason Europe can afford generous social programs is that they haven't spent crap on defense spending because of the US presence in western Europe.  None of the major western European countries are meeting their NATO defense spending obligations, while the US continues to guarantee European security.

 

late night BTB

April 10th, 2015 at 9:42 AM ^

aww, look at you thinking you're up on things because you know a french word that you googled for spelling.  yes, tell me about France's racial unrest from the US.  That won't be hypocritical at all.  Sounds like Europe is getting a good deal, letting the US play the world's policeman, which it loves to do, while outspending the rest of the world combined.

Again, the US college system seems much better than the European one; where my French friends graduate debt free while their US counterparts or parents are shackled for decades by debt.  If things are slow in France/Euro zone, my French friend have found jobs in other parts of the world (which any early 20 something would love to do, and is nearly impossible for most young Americans).  Dubai, Australia, China, Canada, the US, Brazil, gaining life experiences and expanding their worldview.  And unlike the US, they don't get taxed on income earned outside France if they spend more than half the year there.  

But yes, keep defending the US system that you've gobbled up hook line and sinker. 

gopoohgo

April 10th, 2015 at 10:08 AM ^

Aww.  Looking at you bringing up strawman arguments.

Please find for me the racial breakdown at L'ecole Nationale or some of the other elite French colleges, compared to those of the US, and then tell me that France provides more opportunities for advancement for minorities.  Or tell me how great life is for African/Middle Eastern migrants near Calais or in Nice.  And don't tell me that the rise of Marie Le Pen is just nationalism/reaction to a poor economy and doesn't have racial overtones given her party's, father's history.

Europe is not getting a good deal; they are freeloading off the US taxpayer.  Fortunately for the US (or unfortunately for Europe) the good times will be ending.  The next few US presidents will be shifting attention and resources to the Pacific Rim.  So goodbye to both the US security blanket, as well as the economic opportunities that both the US bases provides, as well as the aerospace/defense collaboration the US brings.  Do you really think that Airbus or Rheinmetal will be getting more defense contracts with unwilling/unable partners.

Finally, Europe has a long tradition of sending expats around the world because of a crappy, cyclical economy.  This is a relative novelty for the US.

VectorVictor05

April 10th, 2015 at 1:26 PM ^

gopoohgo responded to most of your arguments, but on the tax side, US expats aren't taxed on foreign earned income so long as they're a legit resident somewhere else, are actually spending most of their time outside the US, and don't make over approx. $100k (amount gets adjusted every year).  Even for those making above $100k, you're going to get credits for each dollar in foreign tax you pay to offset the US tax on income earned over $100k.  It's a red herring typically thrown out by people who love to argue that Europe > US.  Nice try though.

joeyb

April 10th, 2015 at 12:05 AM ^

  1. I suggest you take a look at reddit.com/r/personalfinance. If you read the FAQ, it will probably answer you questions. You could also search and find common answers. Lastly, you could post what you just posted with a bit more info and get some better responses than what you'd expect here.
  2. "Roths withdrawn for education expenses are subsequently counted as income for the child one year later... so it's better to hold off on using a Roth until Sr year." I'm not sure what you're getting at here. If it's a Roth IRA in your name, then it's your money and I'm not sure why that would be counted toward their income. If you're talking about opening an IRA in your child's name, then the contributions cannot exceed their earned income each year. Considering that they are 10 years out, I doubt they have any, so I'm going to work under the assumption that you are talking about putting that money into your own Roth IRA.
  3. The max on a 401k for 2015 is 18k. That doesn't include matching from your employer. If your employer isn't matching every dime that you are putting in, then you should take the amount beyond what they match and instead put that in a Traditional or Roth IRA. You and your wife can both have one, so that's 11k between the two of you.
  4. If you go the above route and place whatever you're trying to save for college in a Roth IRA, everything that you put in is tax-free and penatly-free. Any growth is where you start getting hit with the 10% penalty. So, if you start contributing both retirement money and child funds into Roth IRAs, you have a lot of tax-free, penalty-free money to work with and a lot of growth remaining for your retirement.
  5. Keep in mind that the tax break for a 529 is only at the state level. Based on what you've said, that means that you are probably looking at a deduction of ~6.5%. If your kids don't go to college then you pay 10%, so you lose 3.5% overall.
  6. IRAs might not count against financial aid, but a high-income family will also disqualify your kids for a lot of financial aid. I don't know the formulas or what your plans are going forward, but the financial aid part might be a non-factor.
  7. If I were in your shoes, I'd probably be looking at the 529 because of the deductions that you get now. In a lower tax bracket, a state with lower taxes, or a state that doesn't offer the deduction, I'd be looking at the Roth IRA.
  8. I hope that your advisor's products are low-interest like Vanguard.

champswest

April 10th, 2015 at 12:17 AM ^

Use both a 529 plan and a non-qualified (no tax advantages) investment, like a brokerage account (in your name). Tax law is ever changing, what sounds good now may be moot in 10-15 years when you need the money. For the Roth, use an aged based mutual fund. This can start out as conservative or aggressive as you like and will automatically become more conservative as your children age and get closer to college age when they will need the money. This helps you manage risk very easily. For the NQ brokerage account, buy stocks and/or mutual funds. If your child never needs these funds, they are yours to keep with no penalty. If they do need them (after the 529 $ are depleted) you can gift the account holdings (as needed) to your child. He/she will likely be in a lower tax bracket at the time and therefore, pay a lower tax amount. Run this by your advisor (after he presents his advice). I have learned that flexibility in investments is a wonderful thing. Give yourself options.

PinballPete

April 10th, 2015 at 2:02 AM ^

Obviously there isn't one great solution otherwise you wouldn't have posted but there are multiple options so with planning you can build a good strategy that comes with options. 

With a Roth you can avoid distribution taxes/penalties by planning ahead to only use contribution money to fund college since it will be before age 59.5 (Roth contributions can be pulled out tax and penatly free after a five year holding period). The rest could wait for retirement. This idea does come with inflation risk for those dollars, not to mention the ever rising cost of tuition making those dollars that aren't growing look smaller and smaller every year. The bonus is that earnings buffer your retirement funds when you are ready to take a distribution, which hopefully will be qualified. 

There is the Coverdell ESA, which has major contribution limits but can be withdrawn tax free as long as the distribution does not exceed qualified education expenses. That makes this a good supplemental idea to cover what the other plans might not. 

The NY 529 makes the most sense, even if you are unsure about whether the kids will go to college, due to the deduction for NY residents. This is the only plan of these three where contributions are deductible. 

The Roth can provide a retirement buffer. The Coverdell would be the responsibility of the beneficiary at age 30 if they don't go to school and can be managed to be withdrawn tax free. The 529 provides a deduction and flexibility to choose beneficiaries. Combining a mix of all three alleviates some of the shortcomings of the others. A general idea would be 50-60% 529, 20-35% Roth, and 10-20% Coverdell or some sort of similar mix.

You may even want to keep some in savings until the kids get closer to college age, then max out contributions if you need to (with the exception of the Roth due to the 5 year holding period). Of course every situation is different and if you're managing this yourself then so many plans may seem a bit daunting, but smart planning can go a long way. 

Hope this helps. Cheers!

teldar

April 10th, 2015 at 8:17 AM ^

I didn't finish until I was 35 and I must be a cheap turd, but I paid well over 100k of college myself over the past 20 years, 50k at Michigan, 10k at a community college, another 15k at a private college, and another 40k in Cincinnati, and I kind of expect my daughter to foot a pretty good portion of her own bill. She can live at home and we'll provide a car as long as she's here, but... I did it and my wife did it. We're finally building up some equity and our daughter can probably either have inheritance or college money, but I think she can pay for her own.

WolvinLA2

April 10th, 2015 at 9:15 AM ^

That's admirable, but what if your daughter gets in to Michigan? That's upwards of 200k now, and living at home won't be an option. Same for if she wants to go to NW or Duke - or what if she gets into an Ivy League school? This is what I'm planning for - best case scenario. If my sons say "Dad I got into Brown and I really want to go there" I don't want to have to tell them no and I don't want to cripple them with debt forever. I'm fine with them taking out loans if they choose graduate school, but I don't want them to pass on med school or law school because they know they'll never get out of debt. I know I won't be to afford an expensive college just paying yearly, but by saving a modest amount from the time they were born, I'll be able to let them go to any school they get into. I didn't have that option and I want to give that to my kids. They will have enough bills teaching them responsibility - they don't need egregious student loans as well.

bringthewood

April 10th, 2015 at 10:58 AM ^

Slightly different perspective. My father covered my college in the 1980's and he said it would be an in state public school unless I wanted to study something not avaialble at those schools. I'm not sure an 18 year old is in the best position on how to spend $200k+. If you can afford it that is great but I would rather have that money in my account towards retirement. I ended up offering the same deal to my kids, I would fund an in state education and they would have to cover the difference if they wanted to go to a private school or out of state. btw some out of state schools and private schools cost less than Michigan in state does.

I like the idea of avoiding student loans and the idea of a frugal education, as long as it meets the needs of the student. My wife lived at home and communted to U of M Dearborn. I do however belive there is some value to going away and living in a dorm.

My brother dropped $200k+ on a daughter to go to Harvard to study anthropology, I certainly would not have done that but it depends upon your avaialble funds.

I think your retirement needs to be funded before your kids education. If you can do both great but it should not be one or the other.