Notre Dame Postgame Presser: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

Hoke presser 2

file

[Note: I wasn’t in South Bend, so this was all transcribed from the video provided by the Athletic Department’s site.]

Opening remarks:

“Obviously Notre Dame played a very good football game and we didn’t. You’ve got to give them a lot of credit. A lot of credit to what they did on third downs, either defending us or their third down opportunities that they converted on.

“We’ve got to go back to work, and we will as a team. You don’t want to have four turnovers in a game. That doesn’t help you. The red zone, we didn’t help ourselves in there. From the penalty side, we put ourselves behind the sticks offensively. And again, you’ve got to give them a lot of the credit too. But we will bounce back because this is a very resilient, hard-working group of young men who know what it takes to win.”

After [Devin] Gardner started fairly quickly, I think six-for-six, and then did they bring more pressure, did your offensive line struggle; what fell apart?

“I think a little bit it’s never one guy, it’s never one piece of the offensive line, or the quarterback, or the routes, or whatever. When those things happen I think they happen as a team. He started six-for-six. I think we’ve got to give them- we crossed the fifty and they were going to bring more pressure. That’s what they did.”

 

Can you talk about Ray Taylor and any update on his status?

“I’m not going to talk about any of those injuries. Number one, I don’t know enough about them.”

 

And then Jabrill [Peppers], he dressed. Could he have played?

“If he could have played we would have played him. We evaluated all those guys before the game.”

And then you dressed him?

“Well, he went out because we were evaluating him before the game.”

 

You said you’re pretty confident this team will bounce back. How do they bounce back from such a- I mean, this was a pretty humbling loss here.

“Yeah, it is but I think they’ve all been humbled sometime in their life. It’s part of the resiliency this group has.”

 

Your guys were pretty adamant about how bad they wanted this because of this possibly being the last game. Were you surprised at how lopsided this ended up being?

“This game? Yeah.”

 

[After THE JUMP: Gardner is still the starter, why Countess was pulled, and bouncing back from adversity]

 

You talked about Devin [Gardner]. Did you ever consider pulling him at any point?

“No. No. I mean, he’s our quarterback. You know, unless he doesn’t come to work every day, doesn’t come to learn, all those things, he’s our quarterback. We wanted to put points on the board.”

 

Do you feel like he’s slipping into some of his habits he had last year? Holding onto the ball too long, or…

“Well, obviously- I don’t think he slipped into all those habits. I think he’s a better quarterback- I know he is. He’s a better quarterback than he demonstrated today.”

 

You talked about how this team will bounce back, but does it need something different? Does it need some changes from you as the head coach, or personnel-wise, or anything like that? I know immediate aftermath it’s hard to know.

“I think that it is hard to know. I think when you evaluate it, and we’ll evaluate it on the bus on the way home; you know, how guys played, who didn’t play well, who played well. You know, because there were some guys who played pretty well. Jake Ryan- I thought he played a pretty good football game. You could feel him out there. You know, Jack Miller did some good things when you watch that.

“The bad part was we got behind the sticks too many times and got out of rhythm offensively, because we were running the ball halfway decent. That was encouraging to see but then obviously, I think at halftime it turned into a game where we needed to throw it a little more”

 

Evertt Golson is a guy who didn’t even make it out of the first half the last time you guys faced him. He was considerably better tonight. What are the biggest differences you’ve seen in him going against him?

“Well, I think they also use him well. I think Brian [Kelly] does a good job. There’s a lot of three-step game in it, a lot of slants. I think he’s matured. I think I said that this week coming in that he’s a much better quarterback than he was two years ago just from watching the Rice game, and I would say the same thing after our game.”

 

You shuffled the secondary a lot.

“Some of that was because of injuries.”

But even taking out Blake [Countess] at one point. What did you see there that you didn’t really like?

“Well, we’ve played a lot of guys back there in the past. Stribling, we wanted to get him some live reps in there. Sometimes you take a guy out and he gets a chance to watch from the sidelines a little bit, and maybe he picks up a few things. We didn’t play well in man coverage. You get called for two interference calls- and we’ve got to play smarter- early and the guys get a little bit worried about playing press.”

 

This is I believe 0-4 against the big three rivals on the road over the last four years. What is this team missing? What does this team need to get over the hump?

“Winning. You win the game. You play. You don’t turn over the ball. You don’t give up big plays.”

Is this a mental thing at this point or what do you guys view this as?

“You talk about it enough into being a mental thing. I don’t think it’s a mental thing.”

What do you think it is?

“Just what I said. You can’t give up big plays. Can’t turn the ball over.”

 

When the game was that far out of reach, Gardner often puts his body in a position where he takes hits. He takes hits in the fourth quarter. Why were you playing him at that point?

“Because he’s our quarterback. He’s our quarterback. You know, we’re going to play some really big games on the road this year, and for him to keep improving he needs to play quarterback.”

Is it a risk, when he takes a hit like that?

“Anything’s a risk. To me, the risk was starting him maybe. I don’t know. We’re trying to develop a team.”

 

You might have touched on this a little bit already, but what specifically was your message to the team?

“After the game? Number one, give Notre Dame credit for how they played. It was a total butt kicking all the way around that we all took. Going back to work tomorrow as a team, like they will. And we’ve got to get a lot better. I think we learned some things that we’ve got to get better at.”

 

It looked like your quarterback was under pressure a lot and their quarterback wasn’t under pressure a lot. Was there a disparity in the trenches or was that scheme?

“I don’t know about that. He had to run enough. He did a good job evading a lot of rush, Everett did. And so I think there was pressure there. And sometimes it’s hard to get pressure on a three-step game.”

You mentioned that you feel like this team will bounce back. Adversity-wise, with a young team do you worry that they may get off track?

“I really don’t. Not with this team.”

Why?

“Because of what we’ve seen every day from them. I mean, from their work ethic, from how they care about each other. All those things.”

Devin [Gardner] took a good shot at the end. Is he okay?

“Like I said, I’ll talk about those injuries when I know more.”

Comments

Tony Soprano

September 7th, 2014 at 2:34 PM ^

He said his team is resilient and yet they weren't even resilient within the game.  I think he just says some "buzz" words and hopes that people accept it and stop asking.

blueblueblue

September 7th, 2014 at 5:52 PM ^

Yeah, I thought this showed some real lack of intelligence. He clearly does not understand what the word means. How can he say the team is resilient now?  This team's resilience after this loss can only be judged several games down the road. To say it now is just to toss out some BS buzz words, as you said. 

CoverZero

September 7th, 2014 at 3:15 PM ^

Brady is a nice guy, but clueless on how to motivate the kids to play hard.  As a result, they play soft.  He is laid back, has no sense of urgency, repeatedly gives the group of kids credit for being "resilient" (really where is evidence of that???) when he should have gone ballastic.  It was a poor, soft, shoddy, undisiplined effort. 

EnoughAlready

September 7th, 2014 at 3:34 PM ^

of what's going wrong that I've read.  As a head coach, he inculcates an attitude of non-fire, non-urgency.  The team plays without attitude, and that's a reflection of a coach who claps his hands and says "let's go!" when his team is getting creamed.

blueball97

September 7th, 2014 at 3:31 PM ^

The entire offseason we hear about pressure and man press. Granted injuries can dictate, but did we blitz at all in the first quarter or half? And if you are playing press man, you can not, absolutely can not get beat inside, it happened all night. So either we can't execute a game plan that has been in place since the spring with 4 star talent, or they aren't being coached to execute it.

On offense, I didn't think our O-line was that bad. What is bad is snapping the ball with the same sequence every play and at the same time on the play clock. Go back and watch, the plays we were successful on we snapped the ball well ahead of 00 on the play clock. Otherwise you will see ND defense going full speed and timing every snap. No one can block defenders going full speed at the snap and you can't read a defense when they are flying at you full speed. I can't understand why we don't increase tempo or go straight no huddle. Gardner struggles to read defenses, pointing at the LB's isn't reading a defense, and letting defenses set up and disguise what they are doing isn't helping. 

Bmalhesiv23

September 7th, 2014 at 3:41 PM ^

This guy has no idea how to turn this around or make them play to there potential or they obviously would be doing it by now ! The secondary (back ups) or not were abused ... Gardner had no vision the backs missed big cutback runs ... This is a coaching problem not player problem

UMfanKT

September 8th, 2014 at 9:27 AM ^

Apparently he doesn't have to be.  He's already been given the vote of confidence by DB...although I'm not sure why.  He has shown nothing in 4 years to give me even the slightest warm fuzzy that he is the man for the job and can turn things around.  1st shutout in 30 years...that is something to be proud of.  Tell us Dave...do you still like the direction the football program is heading in after Saturday night?

UMichMSW07

September 7th, 2014 at 3:50 PM ^

I couldn't even get to the 3 min mark. Great guy, but great coach he is not. I'm not one to wish someone loose their job, but after this season it time. If you want to be elite, do not hire a HC with a mediocre career.

NYWolverine

September 8th, 2014 at 12:51 AM ^

I graduated in 2004. We had a head coach, this guy called Lloyd Carr. Took a lot of shit for not getting past 8-10 win seasons. He'd coach michigan to these bowl games in Florida year after year and win them. Every once in a while we'd go to Pasadena. Not good enough. I graduated in 2004, and 10 years later it feels like it's been overnight this discussion of what does michigan want to be? 10 years, and you just watch a program go over a cliff. There was a strong and steady thing we had. But it didn't always win championships. When I graduated I'm 2004, we hadn't won a championship on 7 years; the humanity. Ten years ago I graduated and I understand one thing really well. And it comes from a place as much from being a hard working sonovabitch getting by in this world as much as it does being a Michigan football fan. The lesson is this: shut the fuck up. Life gives you lemons. Young talent when you want maturity. Hardship when all you want is a full ride. This team right now is story of my fucking life. And I made it. I had to persevere and work and work and work, through difficulty and adversity and bad bosses and nonsense. But here I am, so thankful and grateful for every opportunity and adversity this world has put in my path because I got that chance to overcome and stay strong and persevere and feel the strength of fighting that fight. Life is hard, fans. The world works like a pendulum swings; you can be down and you can be up, but fortune favors the prepared always. At Michigan, we prepare our students, always; even when it doesn't always look great on the field. Be proud of these guys on the field; be proud of who they are. Talented, smart, hard working michigan students. Eventually our time will come. Right now, we get to be humble. We have to be. It's both the right thing to be; and there's no other choice. In any event, humility is a wonderful thing. You don't graduate to maturity without a strong dose of humility. So here it is: it's our time to just shut the fuck up, and stop analyzing; stop proselytizing; stop "punching cows for butter" or whatever the fuck; and just let it happen. Be Michigan. Be who we always are. Hard fucking working, always strong for each other, the ground that comes up to meet you, "the team the team the motherfucking TEAM". That's who we get to be right now; winners or losers and always. Be Michigan, people. And never complain. Our kids on the field don't want to lose. They don't want to let anyone down. Out coaches don't want to lose. They don't want to be on he hot seat. It is what it is. Youth at the wrong positions. Shifting through 3 OCs with one talent group. What do you expect. I'm proud of these guys, always will be. Be humble. Be Michigan. And for always go blue.

UMForLife

September 7th, 2014 at 4:33 PM ^

This guy's interviews are horrible. When you play like this, he looks serene. Watch Tom Coughlin after a game like this. Not a happy dude. Show some passion. Just saying "this is Michigan" doesn't happen. I understand leadership and all, but no emotion. I hate to say it. I would rather have the purple face of the ND coach than a clapping home after a disastrous 3 quarters.

Sopwith

September 7th, 2014 at 6:04 PM ^

After a loss of that magnitude, I want the guy to step up to the podium looking like someone shot his dog, burned his house down, and ran off with his wife.  He just seems so "meh, win some, lose some."  Is that a healthier way to live?  Probably.  But it's not what I'm looking for at a moment like this.

funkywolve

September 7th, 2014 at 7:21 PM ^

I want to see some fire.  Carr was noticeably pissed/upset after the Oregon loss.  I understand that Hoke isn't the fire and brimstone type coach, but there are times when I'd like to see him chew some ass instead of clapping his hands.

bj33smith

September 7th, 2014 at 5:47 PM ^

He actually said Miller did some good things!!! I remember Mayock saying it looked like Miller was on skates he was getting pushed back so much.
Also, he pulls Countess for Stribling because he wasn't playing good and said he wanted to get the other guys live reps. He also said that maybe Countess can learn something by watching the game from the sideline. So my question is why is Hoke so hell bent on Gardner never coming out of the game? I understand he's "your" QB but at the point when it's out of reach why wouldn't this same logic work for Gardner? Let him watch from the sideline and learn. Or do they really think Shane is that bad? God this is gonna be a loooong season.

1.21 Jigawatts

September 7th, 2014 at 6:14 PM ^

I no longer have faith in him as a coach. The coach speak that never changes from week to week is so frustrating.

Some people didn't think much of Lloyd Carr and his consistent 8 and 9 win teams. At least you saw some emotion from the man and you knew he would give it to you straight.

I miss those days, both consistency and transparency.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Todd92

September 7th, 2014 at 7:18 PM ^

Hoke sent Wile in to miss a FG on 4th and 2.  I hate not playing to win.  Also, Wile should never attempt another FG in a Michigan uniform.

Yes, we have gone from an potentially outstanding secondary to a suspect one with 2 key injuries.  Hopefully Peppers and Taylor are back soon.  Hopefully Funchess heals up quickly too.  But the O-line and D-line look sickeningly like last years failures.

This game was Hoke's swan song.  The annoying clapping after every big ND play.  The perpetually befuddled look.  The worst press conferences, it would be better to just not have them.

I'm tired of hearing that the Big 10 and especially Michigan have become irrelevant.  It's like we're the Britiish Empire.  A once mighty and respected power that now is just pomp and circumstance.  The Michigan 'brand' (makes me want to vomit).

UM_Columbus

September 7th, 2014 at 7:50 PM ^

Todd, this is very sad but also very real. I realized midway through the 2nd half, sitting in those stands, reading the game tweets as Irish fans around me were going crazy, that Michigan was no longer an elite program. It was one of those moments when everything becomes crystal clear and a feeling of understanding, acceptance and finally peace filled my mind. I've accepted the fact that UM football is now a 2nd tier program. I know I'm going to be in a much better place as we go through this season because I've accepted what this program is now and I can't expect the wins I once did. Can it get back to elite status? I think so but it's going to take some very drastic changes by the Administration, AD and coaching staff.

UMfanKT

September 8th, 2014 at 9:40 AM ^

Well said...although I seriously doubt that will happen with the current regime.  They need to call up Jim Harbaugh, give him a blank check and say fill in the blank.  He is the 1 coach that would make Michigan a legitmate program again immediately. 

Unfortunately the powers that be are going to put their egos in front of putting a competitive team back on the field.

matty blue

September 7th, 2014 at 7:44 PM ^

...to those of you are all pissed off that hoke doesn't offer specific injury information: why, exactly, is this such a big deal to you guys? seriously - what is the payoff here? why this desperate need to know?

Waves

September 7th, 2014 at 7:46 PM ^

I am just not buying the whole Hoke routine anymore. I think it's fairly obvious that he's a great guy, maybe even a father figure. But he has no business leading a team the size of Michigan. I'm sick of hearing platitudes and catch phrases when real football analysis is needed. Today's big program FB coaches are intelligent, articulate, and creative. I get no sense whatsoever that Hoke is any of the three.

maquih

September 8th, 2014 at 10:03 AM ^

hate to argue with you about your own feelings, but i suggest you're feelings have much less to do with what Hoke says and much more to do with the performance on the field.  Let's get real here, he could drop acid and sing janis joplin at the press conferences and i wouldnt really mind as long as we were winning.

He's not winning, and he's losing in a spectacularly awful fashion, that's the problem.

UMVAFAN

September 7th, 2014 at 8:25 PM ^

As much as a majority of us are done with Hoke, he is going to be the coach for at least 10 more games. I personally would've been happy with a coaching change at the end of last season, but it didn't happen and I accepted another year of Brady Hoke football. I also accepted that there is a roster of players that wouldn't contend for a Big Ten title or a National Title and didn't get my hopes up for this upcoming season. So as much as last night's game was an embarrasment, it wasn't totally unexpected. If anything, it makes the stakes higher for Hoke this season and puts the pressure on this coaching staff to win now or get shown the door. After getting blanked at ND, I personally think the powers that be will not accept anything less than a Big Ten title for Hoke to save his job. This means beating MSU and OSU on the road. I originally thought he'd have to win just one of those games and win 9-10 games overall to save his job, but he needs to do more to restore the faith of the UM faithful. Overall, I'm happy the stakes have risen for Hoke and his staff. If he's as good as Dave Brandon thinks he is, and if the players are really behind him, a Big Ten title shouldn't be out of reach in a down year for the conference. I still support this team and hope they run the table. I don't think it will happen, but let's all get behind them and quit worrying about Hoke & Company. If they don't win, he'll be gone at years end. Let's hope for the best in a year when championships of any sort shouldn't have been in any of our minds. 

M-Dog

September 7th, 2014 at 10:40 PM ^

I think we have learned our lesson about disruptive coaching changes. 
 
Hoke will be here next year, no matter what happens.  And I'm OK with that.  Let him run out his full contract.  See what he can do.  If we need to make a change, there's no buyout.  We can spend the money on the next guy and his staff.
 
We will not survive perpetual coaching instability.
 

ChicagoGangViolins

September 7th, 2014 at 9:11 PM ^

 
Nobody has flagged Bosch and his recently-announced indeterminate leave as possibly being indicative of problems with the prevailing culture of the offensive line. Personally, I suspect a Funky aroma and, further, something is up with that crew and the way they are being managed.  I believe this thang materially contributed to deficiencies on the field last night. Or so they would have me believe.

B-Nut-GoBlue

September 7th, 2014 at 10:01 PM ^

It is an interesting notion. The Oline and its "aroma" is not good. The players are allegedly supposed to be good according to many around here's favorite past time, recruiting stars, but they do not display it (Cole is very young, I admit). There were signs last night that a thing or two are better than last year, i.e. running game aspects, but not much. So when is enough, enough? Wisconsin fired their Oline coach right about now 2 years ago and succeeded the remainder of the season.

Desperate Alumnus

September 7th, 2014 at 9:34 PM ^

Good point about something being "Funky" about the OL.  Why did Kyle Bosch take a leave?  Not being talked about much.   

A whole bunch of our failures can be traced to the OL.  And a bad offensive performance can drive down the defensive squad.  Given the talent of the OL, why are we so mediocre.  Just doesn't seem to make sense.  Something's up here.

80% of FBS teams would take our talent over theirs.  Yet we will probably perform worse than 90% of them, again, this year.

erald01

September 7th, 2014 at 10:22 PM ^

I am starting to think these coaches are not evaluating the players properly, they are taking the scouting words and just looking at the players rankings and their stars and just offering them...there is now way some of these 5* and 4* cant perform, even if the coaching was bad, they should be decent enough to make some kind of play...

Michifornia

September 7th, 2014 at 11:00 PM ^

I agree with an earlier poster, Hoke reminds me a LOT of Wayne Fontes.  Nice guy, means well, cares about the players.  I also think he's a great recruiter.

Bottom line, he's not an effective coach and there's is ZERO chance we will regain prominence under his leadership.  This is painful.

Ty Butterfield

September 7th, 2014 at 11:14 PM ^

I think this is my last year with season tickets. You can examine film and write up long explanations about how this loss wasn't really that bad. Bullshit. It was bad and Hoke is the problem. If Hoke is not canned by the end of this season I am not renewing my tickets.

Kfojames

September 8th, 2014 at 7:49 AM ^

I was especially frustrated with the defensive effort. I hate to jump on the Fire Hoke bandwagon but gosh dang he is looking weaker and weaker as time goes on.
1. Very little development
2. NO emotion/passion on the sideline or on the field. It's like the players are just going through the motions and not playing like they're going into battle! Hoke is almost too nice. To win and be a fierce competition you have to be kind of a "dick" in a way. I don't see that competitive spirit from him and that's not a good sign because you need that in sports to do your best. There's no killer instinct. AT ALL!

west2

September 8th, 2014 at 9:31 AM ^

Michigan nationally is now totally irrelevant,  Nobody cares except M fans and even we are begining to not care.  The Wolverines are not a top 25 team and likely won't impact the bgtn championship which even if they did figure into it the bgtn is verging on becoming irrelevant with the this past weekends performances fresh in mind.  So how did M become a mediocre team in a mediocre conference?   I know the answer is complicated and therefore the solution is probably just as complicated.  Getting rid of Brady Hoke might not entirely right the ship.  Is there a culture problem at Michigan and the bgtn in general?  M and the bgtn seems to have missed the boat somehow in the last 10 years on what works in building winning programs and conferences.