Peters vs. Patterson... Army Bowl Version

Submitted by Andystubs on

Remembered watching this clip a few years ago and surprised I hadn't seen it pop up since the Patterson transfer.  Nothing in particular to pull from what amounts to 2016 recruiting clickbait from Bleacher Report, but interesting that forshadowed a battle for a starting job between teammates.

 

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2613177-no-1-2016-qb-takes-on-future…

FauxMo

December 28th, 2017 at 6:02 PM ^

They're adorable. They're like scientists and homicide detectives all wrapped in one, except without the education, experience, intelligence, or basic fucking common sense. 

Consider: President Trump's administration (and really, any presidential administration) cannot keep his comments in high-level security meetings secret for more than a day. And this comes after a year of trying to "root out and punish" leakers. But we are to believe the government orchestrated the largest planned building demolition in human history inolving hundreds or thousands of people, and has managed to keep this a secret for 16 years? Wow... 

FLwolvfan22

December 28th, 2017 at 6:27 PM ^

Has the education, experience, the intelligence, and certainly the common sense to point out that there is a bunch of data that does not match up with the official story.

But random blowhard on football message board knows for certain nobody possibly could ask those basic questions.

FauxMo

December 28th, 2017 at 6:40 PM ^

Is she the one that claims the buildings could not have collapsed from those planes and jet fuel (and gravity) alone, and then makes the leap to claim that giant invisible space lasers (again, another massive government cover-up hiding the existence of these, it seems) destroyed the steel in the twin towers without anyone seeing it and this caused the collapse of the Towers?

OK, sure, I stand corrected... 

FauxMo

December 28th, 2017 at 7:02 PM ^

Oh God, thank you FLWolvfan22, this is gold. I am reading reviews of her book now. These are gold, in the brutal assault people unleash on her idiocy. Some of her proof is that she looked at pictures of the 9/11 site 3 days after the collapse and said "there should have been more debris!" without actually finding out how much debris had been carried away already (answer: a lot). This is pure gold. Hahahahaha

thedayiscoming

December 28th, 2017 at 8:59 PM ^

fyi, if u want to argue the validity a conspiracy, never point to a proven quack for support. I've read her book and it's hot garbage. (I'm a licensed P.E./S.E. in several states) In this case, simply point people to a video of the building 7 collapse and it's clear something shady and unreported went down that day.

brad

December 29th, 2017 at 11:55 AM ^

I suppose everyone should think what they want. But you should know that, after the planes hit, everything that happened to that site on that day, including the day-long fire and ultimate collapse of Building 7, is easily explained by jet fuel burning inside the towers whose structure was severely damaged upon impact. This has been forensically studied by actual forensic experts to an extreme degree.

Blue Ballin'

December 28th, 2017 at 9:15 PM ^

This may have been posted before, but I missed it. Either way, evenyoubrutus, you made me spit part of my dinner out of my mouth with this. Priceless!!!!

And oh yeah, my wife works for a government environmental air quality group, and almost daily they get kooks calling to complain about fucking 'chemtrails.' (Attention all wackos: these are vapor trails. Please get a grip.)

Craptain Crunch

December 28th, 2017 at 5:55 PM ^

That video alone tells me he'll beat out Peters! Did you see how he attacked that last obstacle with enthusiasm unknown to mankind?