charblue.

November 29th, 2023 at 11:20 AM ^

The 2006 game was a 3:30 pm start. Whether it ended in the start of the prime time TV period is another question. I've always wondered given television's desire to maximize prime time audience numbers, why The Game has never been been played in the later afternoon time slot or evening. 

But Midwest tradition for The Game has always held sway over network starting time preferences for advertising purposes. 

WolverineHistorian

November 29th, 2023 at 2:13 PM ^

I’m going back many years here but when Harbaugh threw the 4th quarter touchdown bomb to Kolesar in 1985, it was pretty dark out.  The portable lights were on full blast when fans rushed the field.  I believe that was a 3:30 start because it was already a little dark at kickoff.

The Game went to noon starts for about 20 years after that.  

jwk899

November 29th, 2023 at 10:24 AM ^

And the largest TV audience for a regular season CFB game since 2011 (Bama vs LSU).  That 2011 SEC game, the 2006 UM-OSU game, and 1993 ND vs FSU are the three most watched regular season CFB games of all time....so Saturday's game was the 4th most watched all time.

Durham Blue

November 29th, 2023 at 9:56 AM ^

Harbaugh is right.  The networks, B1G and NCAA are making bank.  The Game was up there with NFL games, which is crazy.  How do we get the true stars of the show (the players) some of that revenue stream?

The Harbaughnger

November 29th, 2023 at 11:55 AM ^

2 things:

  1. Agreed re: NCAA- they are the pointless middleman as in every money-making industry/company/etc, whose only purpose is to create an exploitable buffer between those who provide the value and those who control the power structure
  2. Re: Durham Blue’s comment above:  At 19 million viewers, yes it’s similar to NFL viewership, which I agree even at face value is bonkers. But it’s actually even more bonkers when you consider that NFL vs. M/OSU viewership is, out of the gate, an apples to oranges comparison because: the viewers/consumers are WILDLY different, college football fan allegiance is infinitely more splintered than pro football fan allegiance (only 32 teams to choose from)………..AND, on top of that, by comparison, an exceedingly small fraction of NFL fans value the in-person game experience enough to actually go to games (the science of max stadium capacity alone in the NFL demonstrates this point), but the vast majority would also rather watch games at home with friends and family over watching next to a bunch of lukewarm fans and overly obsessed drunk fans while having to pay an arm and a leg just to get in the door. It’s a ludicrous viewership comparison when you make it apples to apples- 19 million viewers is truly insane when you consider all the different factors with NFL viewership.

wildbackdunesman

November 29th, 2023 at 9:56 AM ^

TV brings in the money for the conference.

UofM is the 3rd most watched team nationally and gets more views than any 2 Pac12 teams combined.

And yet the BigTen treats us as 🐕 💩 to Ohio State.

BallsoHarb

November 29th, 2023 at 10:15 AM ^

It would have to be SEC, independent or super conference. I did a ratings table for the ACC, similar to the forum on the B1G I posted a few weeks ago, and it is bad. Clemson and Notre Dame had 3.2 million viewers and Clemson/FSU had 3.38 in 2022. Most of Notre Dame's games couldn't assessed due to being on Peacock (information is not available for the streamer), but the exclusive televised game with Clemson which was broadcast when Clemson was still considered a possible playoff candidate had horrible ratings compared to my expectations. I don't see how only adding us changes that TV contract significantly. 

MGlobules

November 29th, 2023 at 10:20 AM ^

Found this interesting, though I don't know how some of these numbers could fluctuate:

https://www.foxsports.com/stories/college-football/ohio-state-michigan-ranked-most-popular-college-football-teams-per-study

What caught my eye was Duke at number four? Is that a powerhouse waiting to happen? Wonder about Elko's successor, and what he can bring to the table. The ACC can use another strong team, might not be as poorly positioned as thought. . .

BallsoHarb

November 29th, 2023 at 10:26 AM ^

Maybe but I'm very skeptical about this. Alabama lost 700,000 fans in one year, almost 20% of their total? And UCLA has more fans than USC or Oregon? It seems odd, but I suspect this is taking a large sample size beyond people who tune in every week (people who watch 2-3 games a year) and a lot of fair weathered types.

MGlobules

November 29th, 2023 at 10:04 AM ^

I live in Tallahassee, and my wife and daughter were walking the dogs at the end of the game. They heard cheers erupt from two nearby houses when it was over!