OT: Decision to have one more kid

Submitted by mp2 on August 3rd, 2019 at 1:12 PM

Wife and I are approaching the age where statistics start playing a role in having a kid. We currently have two boys (6 and 4).

 

Have others on the board had this debate thinking they were done after x children? Then later think if we don’t now we won’t be able to later. 

 

Prediction: Michigan wins the Big Ten without beating OSU. This allows UM to recruit at a slightly higher level closing the gap more. 

 

Go Blue!

MgoHillbilly

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:16 PM ^

We were going to keep trying until we got a girl. 4th time was what worked for us. No ragrets at all even though our girl much prefers mom over me and it may push back retirement plans by a few years.

Tools Of Ignorance

August 3rd, 2019 at 2:48 PM ^

Rarely does reading elicit audible laughter from me.  Couple that with the fact that bit is a little over-used and played out, even though I've tried my hand at it a time or two, and I have to tell you that was as well as I've seen it played.  Had to log in to give you the highest of up-votes!

taistreetsmyhero

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:19 PM ^

Wife and I haven’t decided if we’re gonna have kids yet. I’ve been told that the requirement is we need to have at least 1 girl and 1 boy. Don’t know if I would be willing to go past 2.

Optimism Attache

August 3rd, 2019 at 2:29 PM ^

That is a perfectly rational decision, and congrats. The best research I've seen says that kids decrease near-term happiness and slightly increase it over the long-term. Raising kids is hard (esp the first few years) and if you know what fulfills you, no reason to stray from it. 

Some of our fellow parent friends seem to resent the freedom and time to devote to professional pursuits that others our age without kids enjoy. It's like, we all chose this, they chose that. Get one of those Wine Mom t-shirts and make the best of life. 

Jon06

August 3rd, 2019 at 4:10 PM ^

You've got me by 1 state and apparently some continents, but I've got you by dozens of countries and 3 kids (2 of whom have been to something like 14 countries). Traveling versus having kids doesn't have to be an either-or choice. Now, regularly going to dinner alone with your spouse or going out with your friends whenever you want is another question.

Carter the Darter

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:21 PM ^

if you’re big on your career then stick with two and don’t spread yourself too thin.  Be the best you can be. 

bluebyyou

August 3rd, 2019 at 2:23 PM ^

Spreading yourself thin financially can be very problematic.  Assuming college is in your kids' wheelhouse, your expenses to raise each child will be very substantial.  Childcare is not inexpensive if both parents work.

From my experience with my kids and now grandkids, the number of kids is not a linear function in terms of the work involved.

Then there are those "poopoo-didi's," as one of my sons used to call them, that one has to change.

brad

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:23 PM ^

Yes, had that discussion many times.  It's so extremely personal and life is so uncertain that there is no correct answer, even for you who is ostensibly making the choices.  Whatever you decide, or don't decide but happens anyway, my only advice is to make it correct through your approach to life by the day, and even by the hour.

BlueMan80

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:33 PM ^

We had a boy and a girl.  Took much longer than expected to have the girl.  By the time things had settled in with 2 kids and we had the energy to try for number 3, we thought the better of it.  Wife would have been 36 or later with number 3.  Doctor wasn’t giving us a warm and fuzzy about risks.

Arb lover

August 3rd, 2019 at 9:23 PM ^

Essentially don't save up for retirement because why bother? Maybe have a smart kid who saves the planet by the time he's 25 or 30?

Science is crucial, but don't throw out predictions that obviously won't come to pass, because that just gives the crazies more ammunition as to why science is wrong to begin with. I realize this statement was probably in jest or an equivocation or just overly dramatic, but it's also all over the news and it really needs to stop.

mgoblu88

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:35 PM ^

One and done. 

Wife (now ex-) and I started late; she was 37 and I was 35 when our son was born. 

I would have liked a brother or sister for my son, but it wasn’t in the cards due to late start. 

Best wishes to those having kids later in life.  Any number of kids is a labor of love for sure.

And brainwash them for the Maize & Blue right out of the shoot!

MGolem

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:38 PM ^

Currently sitting on the couch holding baby #2 (a girl - 1 day old). Watching son (3) play with toys. Let’s just say I was paying close attention to the vasectomy topic from yesterday...

daddylox

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:39 PM ^

We planned on a large family, and had 5(!) children.  Wife said she was done.  Good enough for me.  I would've gone along with that after being in the room for the first.  Adopted 3 more since.  No regrets.

Heads up: going from 2 children to 3 was hardest transition for us (outside of adoption).

East Quad

August 3rd, 2019 at 2:39 PM ^

You may need a go fund me account!  EEK!

I remember 4 driving and 4 in college at the same time. Blended family 2 boys and 2 girls all within 3 years of age.  All are out of the house.

Probably could have retired a few years ago if we had only 2, but glad we had all of them.

(I'm an old guy)

Durham Blue

August 3rd, 2019 at 11:57 PM ^

Eight kids?!?!  I have one and she is a chore.  A lovely, wonderful, beautiful chore.  But a chore nonetheless.  Then again, I am 46 and I guess if I was 10 years younger it would feel less so.  She is 25 months old and is quite literally a miracle.  Wife and I had nearly given up after 7 years of heartbreak.

If you have kids in your 40's you get 20 solid years of good, free livin'.  But then you pay for it because babies/toddlers are difficult and you're old.  IDK, if I had to do it over I again I'd probably do it the same way.  Just choose the decade you want to give up.

RedHotAndBlue

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:39 PM ^

Certainly had the conversation, at about exactly the same time (we have 2 that are slightly older than yours).  Ultimately we decided we were good with two (and don't regret that choice), but agree with others that this is highly personal.

Within my friend group, some have chosen to have no kids, some one, some two, some more. All of them seem happy with their decisions.  

Also, no way we lose to tOSU this year. 

reshp1

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:50 PM ^

We decided 2 was enough . 3 seemed like someone was always the odd one out while the other two were super close. Plus we're both tree huggers and making another human is about the most environmentally destructive thing you can do. 

bluebloggin

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:50 PM ^

Came from a large family (oldest of eight) and decided that was not our desired route. Couple that with two rough pregnancies (second one especially that culminated in an induced delivery due to cholestasis) and I was very much okay with getting snipped after the second one was born.

no regrets. Wanted a boy but love my girls with every bit of me that I got. 

Ibow

August 3rd, 2019 at 1:56 PM ^

We had two, a girl & a boy. Life is good, yet, with both my wife and I coming from large families, I often look back and wonder and sometimes wish we had more. Kids are great and grandkids are even more. 

Khaleke The Freak

August 3rd, 2019 at 2:04 PM ^

I’ve heard 1 is plenty, 2 not much of a difference if closer together in age but 3 really throws a wrench into things.  I’m 1 and done personally.