Full Details of Clark Domestic Violence Arrest Released
A Sandusky area news source released the full details of Clark's case, complete with interviews and a graphic description of what allegedly ocurred. It does not look good at all.
Link:http://www.sanduskyregister.com/news/law-enforcement/6618011
November 16th, 2014 at 10:20 PM ^
He is a previously convicted felon who was welcomed back to the team. Just saying.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:51 PM ^
It's really a "guilty by association" deal. In no way am I saying anyone other than Clark is guilty, but I just couldn't think of a better term to describe it.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 16th, 2014 at 11:27 PM ^
Clark is a Michigan football player. His actions, whether good or bad, reflect the programYeah, fuck that. This is utter nonsense.
November 16th, 2014 at 9:50 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 9:52 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 9:54 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 10:03 PM ^
What would the reaction be like if Clark isn't suspended and he is introduced with the other Seniors on Saturday?
November 16th, 2014 at 10:06 PM ^
Clark has lost the privilege of being honored on Senior Day.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:14 PM ^
I just mean if they don't suspend him that could be an ugly situation.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:05 PM ^
Clark needs to be dismissed tomorrow.
However, he should be allowed to finish the semester academically, and have access to the university counseling services. We don't want to send this guy out to the real world at his current state, especially if his gf is pregnant.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:05 PM ^
I guess that comments section is where the racists go to fraternize.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:10 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 16th, 2014 at 10:14 PM ^
So what is the "full story," then, and why would anything else nullify the fact that Frank Clark threw his possibly pregnant girlfriend off a wall while there were kids in the room, who then ran down the hallway of a hotel yelling "Frank is killing our sister!"?
Pray tell, what could possibly add to this story that would make any of that better? And why a police report isn't acceptable to establish those facts?
November 16th, 2014 at 10:21 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 11:04 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 16th, 2014 at 10:14 PM ^
EDIT: Double
November 16th, 2014 at 10:16 PM ^
This is not enough detail for you?
November 16th, 2014 at 10:41 PM ^
As for the kids. We don't know what their back ground is. They could come from a violent home where arguing is the norm and someone has been badly beat in front of them.
These things are why you allow the process to play out.
Then again this is the fan base who is so concerned with being high and mighty that they ignore due process just so they can say they are above Notre Dame or OSU
November 16th, 2014 at 11:07 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 16th, 2014 at 11:20 PM ^
of playing football for the university of Michigan doesn't require guilt beyong a reasonable doubt---that's only the standard for our criminal justice system. Next thing I know, my son will be insisting on that standard when I find him standing next to a newly broken window.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:32 PM ^
Go away Pete. Just like you went away on 247.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:16 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 16th, 2014 at 10:45 PM ^
I commented pretty early in this thread. My comments in the other thread were saying that we needed to wait for some facts to come out before burning Frank Clark at the stake. Just because he now certainly appears to be guilty, doesn't make what I said wrong. The fact that you say that and get upvotes for it is even more disturbing to me than people's initial reaction before any information was released. Tell me I'm wrong about any of that.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:58 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 11:25 PM ^
I admit I exaggerated your view, just like your buddy who replied below is exaggerating when he says others were making knee-jerk reactions. However, you weren't just saying we needed to wait for the facts. You were having a self-righteous fit over people who you thought were too quick to judge. You wouldn't have needed 10+ posts if you were just saying we needed to wait for some facts. You were insulting people who made a judgment (that appears to be correct) too quickly (in your opinion). But those people weren't making a judgment based on no information. They were making a judgment based on the information that Frank Clark got arrested for domestic assualt. Innocent until proven guilty is a good standard for criminal law courts, but there is no reason I can see (or least that anyone has mentioned) to extend that to individuals' judgments. Why shouldn't I believe the police who arrested him when they claim that he was involved in an incident of domestic violence? Because OMG GUYZ CHICKS LIE AND I HAD A BUDDY WHO BANGED A CHICK AND SHE WAS A KNOWN LYING COMMODITY AT A FLAG FOOTBALL GAME AND...? *I know you weren't making this last argument, but others were while you weren't making any argument on this point at all.
You can always claim we need more information. It's always possible that some exclupatory fact is just waiting to be discovered. Alas, we often have to, and ought to, made judgments based on imperfect information. Now, I actually agree with you that kicking Frank Clark off the team without waiting to talk to him and see the police report would be foolish. But I think it's perfectly reasonable to suspend him until then, using the fact of his arrest as good but rebuttable evidence that he did something bad. Still, even the people who advocate the first (foolish) course of action are not the moral reprobates that you make them out to be.
November 16th, 2014 at 11:31 PM ^
Innocent until proven guilty is a good standard for criminal law courts, but there is no reason I can see (or least that anyone has mentioned) to extend that to individuals' judgmentsAre you serious? The standard is like that because it's reasonable. I concede that most people are incredibly unreasonable, but that doesn't mean irrationality should be tolerated. People who jump to conclusions instead of waiting for the facts are fucking dumbasses and should be treated as such.
November 16th, 2014 at 11:31 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 10:20 PM ^
"I don't care what he did" ...pretty chilling.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:28 PM ^
It's sad. Two games left in his career. After reading the stories about his childhood you hoped it would turn out better. This is a shame. More important than football Frank needs to get his life together.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:30 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 10:31 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 10:37 PM ^
...but let's not throw the baby out with the bath water. Let him finish his degree online/correspondence and get him some professional help (assuming what's being reported are the facts of the case). I don't believe regular prison will be good for Frank, and certainly won't "rehabilitate" him.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:44 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 11:13 PM ^
there are plenty of online universities where he can complete his degree after the dust settles
November 16th, 2014 at 11:44 PM ^
victim here? You don't make things better by ostracism. Have you ever read The Color Purple. It's a pretty good read.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:44 PM ^
Yes, because Frank is special, unlike everyone else in jail.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:51 PM ^
The baby is the problem here bro, not the bathwater.
November 16th, 2014 at 11:05 PM ^
do anyone good, other than protecting victims
November 16th, 2014 at 11:14 PM ^
if guilty, there alot of people serving time who are more deserving of a prison pass--like all those serving time for non-violent drug possession. Its the violent guys we do want incarcerated.
November 16th, 2014 at 11:26 PM ^
Heaven forbid he goes to regular prison like regular violent criminals.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:41 PM ^
For his live in girlfriend, I hope the best for her. If she is pregnant I hope nothing is wrong with the baby and I hope this hasn't been going on for a long time.
Ugh. Terrible every way you look at it.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:42 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 10:45 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 10:55 PM ^
the way he just rolled over to Dantonio during the stake incident, i question if Hoke has any balls.
November 16th, 2014 at 11:40 PM ^
And Will Campbell.
November 16th, 2014 at 11:44 PM ^
November 16th, 2014 at 11:47 PM ^
I was going to mention him, but there was never any legal trouble, just team trouble, unless I'm remembering wrong.
November 16th, 2014 at 10:53 PM ^
It's one of his SONS after all. No head in the sand stuff.
The new Prez must be shaking his head in disbelief at this football program.
November 16th, 2014 at 11:06 PM ^