The Brandon Peters Decision
October 8th, 2017 at 11:17 AM ^
This a million times over. Is Pep the problem???
October 8th, 2017 at 12:08 PM ^
Pep, who went 1-15 with the Cleveland Browns last year. Hmmm-- just maybe!
October 8th, 2017 at 5:23 PM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:40 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 12:09 PM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:43 AM ^
When are we going to stop chasing the QB bench?
There is a reason that O'Korn was behind Speight. We saw it last night.
Why do we not believe that there is a reason that Peters is behind both of them?
Chasing after yet another bench QB is not the answer.
The issue is our OL. None of these QBs is going to thrive behind an OL that can't run block or pass protect.
Unfortunately, that's not as easy to fix as just swapping in another QB off the bench.
This season is going to be an uphill slog even with our historically good defense. We shouldn't be surprised by this any more. There is no quick fix coming.
October 8th, 2017 at 11:22 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:33 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 12:18 PM ^
Coaches will play the qb that gives Michigan best chance to win the game barring any discipline issues.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:45 AM ^
Theres obviously no magic fix to our offense. Peters isn't playing for a reason. Watching O'Korn vs Purdue it was tempting to think the coaches had chosen the wrong guy. Obviously they aren't complete idiots.
Young WR, mediocre RB, bad offensive line. I'd like to throw Peters out there too but its probably not going to make the team any better.
Going to have to face that this is a rebuilding year and 8-4 seems pretty likely. Ughh.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:46 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:03 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 3:45 PM ^
The rain storm was definately the time to play field position football. It seemed the playcallers panicked as if the rain would never stop.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:46 AM ^
I think playing Peters now could really hurt things moving forward.
Let's say he plays decent to well. Then great, you have your QB for the next few years...but then it might be reasonable to assume Speight transfers so he can play his final year, and maybe McCaffrey transfers seeing that he will be behind Peters for all but one year. So then who is the backup is Peters gets dinged or worse?
On the flip side, say Peters comes in a is bad, like worse than O'Korn. Then, other positions have no chance to progress either. Teams stack the box and the RBs have no where to go. And as other teams keep loading up and blitzing, the line continues to struggle and loses more and more confidence. Receivers do not even get to run some of the most basic of routes as there is no time.
With O'Korn in there, at least you have a senior who has played. He was bad, bad, bad last night, especially the decision-making at times. But, you would have to think there is still more playbook to run with him than with a younger guy.
October 8th, 2017 at 2:53 PM ^
This assumes a lot. Too much. McCaffrey wouldn't transfer just because he had one guy in front of him that many of you are saying isn't playing for a reason. Not buying it. I think it's more likely he isn't playing because Harbaugh has an old-school view of the QB position as it pertains to college.
October 8th, 2017 at 5:28 PM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:46 AM ^
Harbaugh wins in 2016 and MSU loses with dignity / Michigan didn't dominate like it should.
Dantonio wins on a "Hail Mary" in 2015 and in a slop fest in 2017 and it's a reminder that he "owns" Harbaugh.
October 8th, 2017 at 11:25 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 12:10 PM ^
Not Meyer either, quite frankly. We're one terrible spot away from him being 1-1. I'm a bit alarmed how many are writing off OSU as a loss already. OSU got shutdown by a defense that let up 38 points to a 3rd string QB who was switch to linebacker this season. I'm quite sure Don Brown can make OSU look like that again. And any game the D keeps close is a game we can win.
Everyone just looks at 1-4 and oh no Harbaugh sux!!! But hes been incredibly unlucky in those games, literally two plays highly improbable plays away from 3-1. All I'm saying is let's stop focusing on the record so damn much. Harbaugh has closed the gap. Yesterday is a setback - let's hope he gets the team back on track.
October 8th, 2017 at 12:15 PM ^
checks out
October 8th, 2017 at 2:55 PM ^
Blaming the media is stupid. They don't play the game and have no power over the outcome.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:46 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:49 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:27 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:39 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 12:28 PM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 2:58 PM ^
Dumb is also just saying In Harbaugh We Trust like he is some kind of fucking god or something. He screws up too.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:47 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 3:00 PM ^
Happy feet doesn't show up in data. Panic doesn't show up directly in stats. JOK is not good. Period. Put Peters in or I don't want to hear any bitching next year when we're coming off a horrendous year and it goes there again.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:48 AM ^
Hamilton was a horrible hire. This offense has regressed 5 years overnight. Having said that, I would put in Peters at QB for the rest of the season and see what he has. He should have been the starter all along because Speight and O'Korn have no future here.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:49 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:53 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 3:03 PM ^
Agree 100%. People on here are making an argument that would logically have Peters and McCaffrey sitting possibly this and next year at a minimum because it's too dangerous to be behind such a bad OL. It's craziness and only an argument I have ever seen here.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:53 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:56 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:56 AM ^
Sorry, but you say that your "calm, rational perspecitve" is for the "Peters era" to begin? The ERA? How is that rational? What then was your irrational response? Wait, better not type it on the interwebs, you might find yourself with agents knocking at your door.
(Un)believably irrataional.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:58 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:03 AM ^
Hahaha, that does toss a little more rationality into the idea. But even if its just a week commitment, what if it doesnt work? It's back to O'Korn. Then you have had two weeks of disruption, added to the previous week after switching to O'Korn. It seems like a much more rational approach to stick with the original 2nd string guy and just keep trying to get better.
October 8th, 2017 at 3:06 PM ^
O'Korn is not good so keeping him in there is not helping anyone. It's just prolonging the inevitable but hey, you go with that. You all wanted him. You got him.
October 8th, 2017 at 10:56 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:07 AM ^
...plus several other drops, not deciding to go for 2 on the TD, and generally inferior playcalling, and Michigan probably wins this game. But, this is Michigan, get used to things never ever going our way, even when we're more talented and out-gain the other team. It's our job to win the game for ourselves, especially with six straight 3 and outs by the defense. No excuse.
October 8th, 2017 at 12:56 PM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 10:57 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:01 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 3:07 PM ^
Sure, let's wait until those highly touted recruits are seniors before we put them in because we have to fix the line in order for them to take a snap. SMFH
October 8th, 2017 at 11:02 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:03 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 11:28 AM ^
October 8th, 2017 at 5:13 PM ^