Peter's concussion vs Evans/Hill

Submitted by chad on
Sounds like Peters is still in concussion protocol as of today and not looking good. Ayone have a timeline of when Evans and Hill got out of concussion protocol? I know Evans suffered one vs Illinois and was able to play the next game. Also when was Hill cleared from his. Just curious there timelines compared to Peters for The Game.

*Edited. It must've not posted my entire question comparing Peters concussion timeline to where Evans and Hill were at this point. Anyways I updated the post with my entire question above.

SpilledMilk

November 23rd, 2017 at 10:39 PM ^

As to why people stress the last letter in a typed word they're trying to "scream". I would stress the vowel towards the middle of the word, this just makes sense to me. For instance, "chaddddddd" would be pronounced with emphasis on the d. If you were to spell it, "chaaaaad" would make way more sense. Thanx ** Yes, I've been drinking beer (quality beer). Sorry if this doesn't make sense

big john lives on 67

November 23rd, 2017 at 4:37 PM ^

Peters is in concussion protocol which means he either has or had at some point a concussion. Both Evans and Hill do not now have a concussion and therefore are not in the protocol. If you compare them, one is in the protocol and the other is not. There is a critical non-congruence here that must be pointed out in its own individual thread. This also means that the three of them may be doing interpretive ice dance as a “my life’s journey” through concussion protocol. But this is risky because you could fall on the ice and end up even deeper in the protocol. But the real risk is the packs of stray dogs that control most of our major cities. That is really what we should be talking about.

FranklinHatchett

November 23rd, 2017 at 5:18 PM ^

Anyone see the crap Cardale Jones is talkin on twitter? Smdh God i hope we pummel these rats saturday.

cazzie

November 23rd, 2017 at 5:57 PM ^

Agree. Was first thinking Montana. Then I thought, wtf, not even Tom MF Brady could beat Osu with this line. Doom.
And all these concussions that we casually discuss as if routine, are cumulative and likely result in permanent brain damage (cognitive and motor deficits , behavioral changes, etc. ), to these young Michigan Men. What the fuck are we doing? Remember: a brain is a terrible thing to concuss.
Happy Thanksgiving.
Beat Ohio state!

FranklinHatchett

November 23rd, 2017 at 6:07 PM ^

Some yall actin like your in concussion protocol... stop trippin. Sayin we got 0% chance to win is ludicrous.

Baffin

November 23rd, 2017 at 6:32 PM ^

I'm just looking forward to the QB controversy that emerges after JOK puts up a Heisman-worthy performance on Saturday. 

Who will lead us to victory in our December bowl game against an off-vintage LSU team?

Lawyer12

November 23rd, 2017 at 7:04 PM ^

Why would this be a controversy? Peters earned the starring role and is the one coming back next year. He starts because he is better and needs the experience. They already said they are looking forward to going into the off-season with a clear starter.

Baffin

November 23rd, 2017 at 7:49 PM ^

In the absurdly unlikely event that JOK delivers a "Heisman-worthy" performance leading to a big victory against OSU's evil empire, I think it's fair to assume that there would be a QB controversy going into the bowl game. However, based on recent results, the likelihood of that actually happening is maybe 0.000000001% so no need to worry, my good sir.  

golfer

November 23rd, 2017 at 11:22 PM ^

peters is the guy why?. he is the starting qb for next year. john okorn is gone. i know jh would not play with his health. it is what it is. okorn is in. we lose. bowl game next. rest time for the qb's