This Week’s Obsession: Giggity Comment Count

Seth

image

[Christopher Cook]

This is our weekly staff roundtable. Readers are always welcome to submit questions.

The Question:

Most encouraging thing you saw this weekend?

The ResponsesNyah-Nyah

BiSB: Two related things struck me on the offensive side of the ball. The first was that the running backs looked really good. In particular, Evans, Higdon, and Isaac all showed good vision, which was a continuation of something we saw in the spring game. Other than the sprint draw to Higdon in the 2nd quarter, it didn't seem like they missed any obvious reads. All three did a good job of pressing the hole and looking for a crease. This was the kind of game that would have seen a number of Michigan backs of recent years get regularly buried in the line. On Saturday, the only TFLs were the ones where the line just gave them nothing to work with, which will happen against a defense like Florida's.

image
Ain’t stoppin. [Cook]

The second thing was how consistently Michigan moved the ball. They only had two three-and-outs in the entire game: the first O'Korn series, and the drive with two minutes left in the game where first downs weren't really the point. Other than those two, every Michigan drive in the game (that didn't end with a pick or a the end of the half) either scored points or gained at least 30 yards. After Michigan took a 9-point lead in the middle of the 3rd quarter, they moved the ball 30 yards and pinned Florida at its own 8. Then they moved the ball 51 yards before a false start and a missed field goal. Then they moved the ball 58 yards into the red zone before they missed another field goal. People talk about the offense's ability to "close out" games, and to me, THAT is what that looks like. With that kind of help from the offense, this defense can turn a nine point lead into a stone cold lock. (edited)

[After THE JUMP things make us happy with Florida caveats]

---------------------------

David: I feel like this is so obvious, but I have to go with Don Brown playing mostly with a new formation (3-3-5) that he only really tinkered with last year.

There were plenty of great points made about this: using an alignment that hadn't really been put on film, potentially looking at something different for stopping what OSU does well, finding something specific about athletic matchups against Florida, or just using the athletes that he wanted to get on the field...all of these are awesome things to think about.

Sometimes I wonder if he's in his laboratory trying to conceive a way to get a 2-2-7 or 2-4-5 to work.

This is what gives me as much confidence about Michigan's defense in the future as anything. I'm sure no one is going to out-think him, he probably has about four aces up his sleeve that no one has contemplated, yet, and he's going to prepare and develop his guys -DUDES- as well as anyone would be able to do so. This team has gotten more fun and interesting for yet another reason.

---------------------------

Seth: A 2-4-5 is actually pretty common—it’s how 3-4 teams go to a nickel nowadays. Functionally it’s no different than when a 4-3 under team like 2011 Michigan would technically be a 3-3-5 when they lifted Will Heininger for Blake Countess and put Jake Ryan’s hand in the dirt.

Anyway I loved the linebackers. Everything about the linebackers. I loved that McCray came back in and was fine after terrifying me by his absence at the start. I loved how Devin Gil was totally adequate in his stead despite getting so little mention this summer our argument over him was whether he was fodder or just too small yet to be of use. I loved that Khaleke Hudson looked like everything our hypest hopes could come up with. Furbush and Uche were born to play the 3-3-5 SAM role they were given, and I loved that.

Oh, and after seeing Devin Bush and David Reese on the same field I agree with the Michigan coaches' decision to pursue the former like a 5-star.

---------------------------

image

I SAID you’re a tough sonovabitch! [Cook]

Adam: Remember when Jim Harbaugh tripped at his introductory presser and cribbed that Bo line about how a lesser man would have gone down? Wilton Speight's game Saturday reminded me of that. As Brian extensively detailed in the season preview, Speight had a tendency last year to go from Speight-baugh to Speight-ges whenever a no good, very bad thing happened to him.

That reared its head again after the first unfortunate pick-six; Speight then winged one that was actually on him and found himself on the bench, while O'Korn found himself with meaningful playing time.

Even more encouraging than having a backup QB who seems to have earned the staff's trust is Speight's in-game re-calibration. Harbaugh mentioned on Monday that you can't really tell how a guy is going to respond to that type of adversity until he goes through it; Speight had a track record of responding a certain way and, to his credit, has accelerated his timetable for bouncing back six-fold. His completion percentage could use some work (it was a hair under 50% after he re-entered the game), but he threw for 7.2 yards per attempt after the second pick-six and seemed more mechanically sound in the second half; his passes no longer had that bounced-off-a-trampoline feel seen on some of the deep balls thrown in the first half. Harbaugh again reinforced why we have a "Jim Harbaugh QB whisperer" tag, and Speight no longer needs a bye week to right the ship.

---------------------------

Ace: While Florida may not have the most dangerous passing game, they have talented, athletic receivers, especially Tyrie Cleveland. Michigan entered this game with an entirely new secondary led in experience by last year’s dimeback; every other starter was a second-year player. And yet, thanks in large part to being in year two of Don Brown’s system, *there wasn’t a single noticeable coverage bust*. Tyree Kinnel got the defensive backs aligned and on the same page to the point we didn’t see much, if any, pre-snap scrambling, and nothing got behind the entire defense. There will be more tests, but so far the supposed weak point of the defense (relatively speaking) doesn’t look very weak at all.

image
THIS is how you use a 3-3-5 SAM. [Cook]

---------------------------

Brian: HOLY PANTS YOU GUYS I KNOW WHAT A 3-3-5 IS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE NOW. Michigan took a look at a couple of super burly linebackers and some dodgy DL depth and found a spread-oriented solution. I have no doubt we're going to see Bryan Mone more extensively against manball outfits, but for Brown to pull at 3-3-5 out and have it work more or less perfectly speaks to Michigan's offseason preparation, Brown's willingness to adapt, and vision to see he's got the horses for it. Noah Furbush has always seemed like a fish out of water in Brown's defense and he just started and played the vast majority of a P5 opener. And he did well.

Also: the cornerbacks were mostly fine. Hill got hit on one inadvertent back shoulder throw that was worrying. Other than that it was a lot of excellent positioning leading to PBUs, or sometimes misses when UF QBs tried to thread the needle and missed. Seeing Brandon Watson go step for step with a Florida receiver and bat the ball away was encouraging. That UF receiver might not be any good but I have to assume he's a highly touted dude who can run, and "Can Watson run with guys?" is his biggest question.

The CBs are still going to be a step down from last year; after one game it looks like it'll be a tolerable one.

Comments

garde

September 7th, 2017 at 10:49 AM ^

I wouldn't say the RBs looked "really good," but just "looked good." I think "some" of their best runs were attributed to great play calling. That's not to say they didn't perform well as we certainly racked up the yardage. (Maybe I still remember the days when Michigan running walked through holes any of us could gain yards on).

Higdon in my eyes is our best pure back in between the tackles (who can also run to the outside). Love how he hits the holes and runs hard. I'm a little skeptical that Evans can be the featured back as the season wears on in Big Ten play. Although I clearly trust the coaches on who is best. (although I still can't for the life of me understand last year's consistent play calls for Smith to run to the outside)

1VaBlue1

September 7th, 2017 at 10:54 AM ^

"They only had two three-and-outs in the entire game: the first O'Korn series, and the drive with two minutes left in the game where first downs weren't really the point."

Isn't the point of 'closing out games' actually getting first downs when you have the ball with two minutes left?  I get the rest of BisB's post, and agree with it.  But that part of one sentence confounds me...

Malum In Se

September 7th, 2017 at 11:37 AM ^

beside the QB play and the refs.  

The defense was literally fun to watch.  The freshman WRs showed why we'll have the best passing attack in the nation within the next season or so.  The RBs made guys miss and broke tackles against a legit defense.  There weren't many OL gafs like we saw from UF.  It was pretty much all good.

1VaBlue1

September 7th, 2017 at 11:51 AM ^

I thought the game was called pretty well, save for the unallowed TD on a stoopid penalty that wasn't explained very well.  The two targeting reviews took too long, but - I thought - ended with the correct decisions in both cases.  (I'll agree that targeting is horribly inconsistent across the football world, but in this game it was applied fairly and consistently to both teams.)  We can all point to bad calls within any game, on both sides.  But this one was pretty good, overall.

Last years OSU game, OTOH...

XiX

September 7th, 2017 at 12:32 PM ^

but it is what it is. Some refs/crews have their own points of emphasis early on and guys have be more conscientious about that going forward. I thought the refs did a good job on both targeting calls and, aside from the illegal man downfield penalty, were decent overall.

mgoblue78

September 7th, 2017 at 12:37 PM ^

I recall Bill McCartney, in his last year as DC before leaving for Colorado, trotting out a 3-1-7 against Mark Hermann and Purdue  - #4 offense in the country - to pitch a shutout in 1980. 

Lawyer12

September 7th, 2017 at 1:06 PM ^

It's not that the concept is new. It's the manner in which it was deployed. Brown's defense was ultra aggressive and he used it to get a lot of Michigan's faster players on the field - and it showed. Played poorly, a 3-3-5 can get taken advantage of quite often. It tends to be bend, bend then break. This defense looked great.

bluepalooza

September 7th, 2017 at 7:18 PM ^

I am most concerned about the Right Tackle.  Speight will settle down and will be very good by week 4.  The rhythm with recievers takes time with a whole new set of recievers. Also surprised that Ulizio struggled so much.  Thought he would be better based on beating out Runyan and Beatty for starting job.  Of course there is growing pains.  But Saturday left me feeling that may be an issue all season.

Solidify RT and this season could be really something special.  What I saw in pass protection was a huge concern. Michigan will have to leave a tight end in for pass protection.  Leaves few options for receivers in space.