Unverified Voracity Finds Weird Picture Of Smokin' Jabba Comment Count

Brian

jabba-no

Well, damn. BREAKING NEWS(!!!): Brian Kelly is indeed the guy at Notre Dame. Notre Dame fans of the insane variety are hilariously opposed to the move on the grounds that Kelly isn't Bob Stoops, Bill Belichick, or one of the ND Nation moderators; everyone else is terrified that Notre Dame has now acquired a coach with a track record of doing anything at all.

This is probably going to go poorly. Kelly is the most competent coach Notre Dame has hired since Holtz and at the very least should turn Weis's excellent recruiting classes into a genuinely good team in short order. Smart Football says so.

Next year might be meh since his one option at quarterback is going to miss spring practice and large chunks of summer conditioning with an ACL tear, but expecting an implosion similar to the Michigan one is foolhardy: for one he'll have a five-star quarterback throwing to Michael Floyd and plenty of talent on defense if he can get a defensive coordinator to manage it. Something thematically similar to Michigan's 2004 Rose Bowl season might go down. Michigan had to get clutch drives from a freshman quarterback and an onside kick to get to 9-4 that year. A Gator Bowl or something with incredible expectations in 2011 seems the most likely outcome.

This makes the next two years against Notre Dame pivotal for Rich Rodriguez. If Michigan loses to Notre Dame next year against Kelly when he's finally got a quarterback experience edge over someone, anyone, it'll look like a rough year and possibly the end of everything.

There are some minor plusses in the hire: I assume Kelly won't keep Corwin Brown around, which should help Michigan recruit against ND. Also for whatever reason Weis just killed Michigan head-to-head and Kelly can't possibly do better. I've heard conflicting things about what high school coaches in the state think about him, FWIW. I imagine that's something you could say about any coach.

We are so terrible. The basketball… it is not good anymore. I don't really know why, but holy crap:

  • Michigan’s defensive rebounding percentage of 60.7% ranks last among all Division 1 major conference teams.
  • Michigan’s three point percentage of 28.3% is better than only two major conference teams (Oregon St. and UCLA) yet only two major conference teams (Iowa and Northwestern) shoot more threes than Michigan (3FGA/FGA).
  • Michigan is allowing opponents to shoot 52.2% on 2 point field goal attempts, the worst percentage allowed by any major conference program.

Dylan has a few more numbers that look more like Indiana last year than a team with any tourney aspirations. They add up to "ugh."

This season is even worse than what went down in football. Everyone knew this wasn't the #15 team in the country but it shouldn't be a team that will be lucky to make the NIT. (No, seriously. You have to get to .500 and Michigan is going to come out of the nonconference 6-6 unless they beat UConn or Kansas, so then they have to go 9-9 in the Big Ten despite showing no ability to hang with mediocre teams from mid-major-ish conferences.) This is stunning underachievement. And what happens next year when Manny is gone and the only big guys on the roster are Ben Cronin, who may or may not still be broken, Blake McLimans, and Jordan Morgan? Morgan and McLimans are redshirting; Cronin almost literally can't jump.

I know I shouldn't be surprised about anything nasty happening to Michigan sports these days, but seriously… what the hell. There can be no place underachieving expectations across the board like Michigan is these days.

PREWB! Also BREAKING(!!!) is that nine MSU players got tagged with multiple misdemeanor charges based on the video evidence of the frat beat-down. Three more kids ended up suspended, including the other Chris Rucker on the team. Don't recruit guys named Chris Rucker no matter what their middle initial is.

I only mention was seems like a formality because the crack MSU reporters at the Free Press immediately came out with an article arguing that most of the charges would get dropped as various members of the team agree to testify against the ex-members of the team.

Meanwhile, the News gets clarification from Winston's initial victim on what, exactly, happened…

Montgomery, a student at Schoolcraft College, was hanging with friends near the Michigan State campus on Oct. 19, 2008, when Winston approached him and MSU hockey player A.J. Sturges and dropped them both, each with one punch, police said. Montgomery's fractured jaw was wired for six weeks, and Sturges' skull was fractured. …

"I was attacked for no reason. I was not in a fight. I was with a friend, and Glenn Winston came and hit me for no reason at all."

…in a story that has the fantastic lead "Ian Montgomery has an intimate familiarity with Glenn Winston's fist." They also reveal that Jenrette's mysterious redshirt was because of a robbery that happened August 1st of 2008, literally days before Jenrette arrived on Michigan State's campus. Jenrette was already sporting a 2005 offense. Michael Rosenberg's column awaits him.

Again, this is not really about Dantonio, whose public image has taken a hit but will recover in time as long as these things don't keep happening, but the rampant bias at the Free Press that would be funnier every day if it wasn't having a material impact on the local/national perception of Michigan.

Etc.: WVU fans, prompted by bubble pipe professor Matt Zemek's assertion that he'd rather have "integrity and humanity" in the form of Bill Stewart instead of whatever Rodriguez is, debate whether they'd rather have their current coach or our current coach. Opinion is split. CATS 4 GOLD. Sun-Times asserts that Harbaugh actually met with ND officials; tomorrow they announce that Bob Stoops is back in the picture!

Comments

buddha

December 11th, 2009 at 5:09 PM ^

Ditto...and, I was floored. I can't believe it - and likely won't until I see the press conference! But, the KC newspapers are going nuts over the offer. According to reports, though, no formal announcement will be made until after this weekend's Heisman presentation.

SteffiS

December 11th, 2009 at 5:18 PM ^

Kelly is going to start winning right away at ND. The biggest hope we and other ND's opponents have is that their defense will suck. But, WOTS is that Kelly will get Chuck Martin to be the DC. That guy will probably be the best DC in the country. This is not going to go good for Michigan, and RR in particular. We MUST have gotten Kelly instead of RR. Damn!

thevictors85

December 11th, 2009 at 5:29 PM ^

over at umhoops, one commenter posted "If you look at recent NIT bids since the NIT started handing out automatic bids to lower conference champions, there hasn’t been a team that received a bid that was not at least 2 games above .500." that means we may need a 10-8 in conference play just to get to the nit if they follow suit.

champswest

December 11th, 2009 at 11:11 PM ^

What is up with these guys? Were Merrit and Lee that good? Is it the absence of desire (presence of contentment)? Was last year a fluke and what we are seeing now is what they really are (and were last year)? Is it just a temporary slump? Who would have thought after the football 4-0 start that our bright spot for the year as of mid-December would be the women's basketball team.

James Howlett

December 11th, 2009 at 5:42 PM ^

Could Suh lay a block that even Suh could not break? Theologians and philosophers will debate that until the end times(which will probably be brought on by a Suh tackle.). Yes, if indeed the award, as it's credo states, goes to the most outstanding player in college football. Then Suh most certianly deserves it. Damn the pretty boy QB's and the high-profile backs.

m83econ

December 11th, 2009 at 10:32 PM ^

That St. Mark up in East Lansing! What a joker! In a Detroit News article detailing the criminal background of a now former Sparty football player, this line at the end is priceless: "Dantonio says he enforces a "zero tolerance" policy for any such problems with players, after they have been in trouble a first time." Obviously counting has never been Sparty's strong suit; this provides further proof. http://www.detnews.com/article/20091211/SPORTS0202/912110420/MSU-s-Rode…

M-Wolverine

December 12th, 2009 at 12:30 AM ^

The Freep link goes to Raback's thread, but the News link doesn't go to mine. I'm hurt. I think I will be upset for, oh, 5 seconds.

jmacdon

December 12th, 2009 at 8:50 AM ^

Yet more odd gobbledygook from the mouth of St. Dantonio: "I feel like it's something that I have to deal with as a head football coach, and I feel strength, and I feel like a leader," If by leader, he means something akin to Tom Osbourne when he kept Lawrence Philips on the team after he dragged his girlfriend down the stairs by the hair, then yep, yer a leader sport!

peg dash fab

December 12th, 2009 at 12:53 PM ^

From DetNews: Dantonio dismissed Jenrette from the team Nov. 24. Dantonio says he enforces a "zero tolerance" policy for any such problems with players, after they have been in trouble a first time. I.e., a one tolerance policy.

wiscwood

December 12th, 2009 at 9:08 PM ^

For all of you who knock 3 star players Mark Ingram a Michigan native just won the Heisman Trophy. The star system is flawed. Michigan has a good recruiting class.

SpartanDan

December 13th, 2009 at 12:46 PM ^

There are going to be hits and misses on recruiting rankings - the occasional 5-star bust, or 1-star who turns into a beast. This isn't exactly a revelation to anyone who's paid the least bit of attention. But those are exceptions, not the rule. Based on last year's All-American class (HT: Dr. Saturday, here from about 11 months ago), 1 out of 14 5-stars in the previous five classes was an All-American, while that dropped to 1 in 160 for 3-stars and 1 in almost 950 for anything lower. Are there going to be misses? Obviously. But if you pick a random 5-star, a random 4-star, and a random 3-star, the odds are quite high that the 5-star will be the best player out of the three. (Also, winning the Heisman means relatively little about an individual player these days. You have to be good, yes, but more importantly, you have to play for someone who's going to be in the title game, and you have to play either QB or RB. I would argue that Ingram's not even in the top two RBs this year, but because the other two play for Stanford and Clemson, Ingram had a huge advantage before you look at anything on the field.)

wiscwood

December 13th, 2009 at 2:42 PM ^

Think your system is the most important thing. Stars catch the average guy''s attention. It legitimizes someone's opinions. True, players have been evaluated, but this is about averages. 5 stars on average are good players, 4 star less so. If some does not measure the intangibles you miss a Steve Breaston, Mike Hart, Mark Ingram, Steve Slaton, or a Pat White. Yes, one can get a 5 star like Henne, Tebow, Bush, or Leinhart. My point is that a 17 to 18 year high school kid can grow into a great player in 3 to 4 years. It is impossible to judge accurately someone's college outcome. Gabe Watson was a college bust. He made it to the pros. I think the star system is based on the NFL's model for players. They want big, strong, fast players. Michigan is looking for smaller, strong, agile, athletes. The players RR looks for are the sleepers and the overlooked.