SEARCHBITS XII: GIL THORP IS A NUTTER Comment Count

Brian

598561[1]cutcliffe_david025[1]

who are you going to believe, a black and white 1950s comic strip or common sense?

YOU HAVE BEEN OFFERED THE JOB. Michigan is talking to people now. One of those people was David Cutcliffe or his agent, which led wildly inaccurate NFL.com insider Gil "Thorp" Brandt to assert that he had been offered the job and turned it down. What actually happened: Michigan gauged his interest and he said no thanks*. Or nothing at all, but taking public statements from the people involved at face value is never advisable in a coaching search.

If Michigan did contact him, why would Cutcliffe say "no thanks"?  He's 60 and underwent triple-bypass surgery in 2005 that he thought might end his coaching career; Duke was described to me as a "surprise retirement job" for him. Anyone could call him and he would not leave Durham, where he has infinite job security and a level of commitment he can be comfortable with.

What does this say about Michigan's end? They're casting a wide net and poking anyone who looks like a quality college head coach so they have a list of interested people in the event they don't get Harbaugh. Asking after Cutcliffe is a good idea—he's a terrific coach. Or it means nothing at all in the event it didn't happen.

NEXT UP ON LET'S GO NUTS ABOUT A PHONE CALL. Michigan talked to Les Miles's agent yesterday, according to everyone except LSU. (See what I am saying about public statements?) This spawned a WHAT DOES IT MEAN thread on the board that was a little overheated—not that I expected anything else. It's clear that Miles is a guy Michigan should ask about if their policy is "let's talk to good head coaches," even if there remain conflicts between Miles and big chunks of the program alumni.

A call is a call. It means that Miles is not entirely off the list; it doesn't mean much more than that. It has spawned a lot of insiders chattering about how he might be #2 on the list, which would be a shock to me. If so, Hackett is an OG for real. There are a lot of "over my dead body" hurdles to clear there.

An alternate possibility: Hackett made a very public overture to Miles—every newspaper and site had it yesterday, and prominently—in an effort to spur Harbaugh to a decision. That doesn't necessarily mean Miles isn't a legit candidate. The nature of the contact when everything else is murky and disputed is a clear signal to Harbaugh, though.

*HERE IS HOW THIS WORKS. Search firms create a pool of candidates; when they do that they make sure that pool consists of people actually inclined to take the job. A reader who's been involved in these sorts of things details the process:

Anybody who’s been involved in either side of a job search conducted by a search firm knows that the search firm’s job is to create a pool of candidates.  As a potential candidate, you get a call (or, I guess if you are important enough, your agent gets it) from a staffer at the search firm. The person asks you whether you’d be interested in being a candidate. (Sometimes the first question is whether you know anybody who’d be interested and would be a good candidate.) 

You ask about the process - how many people are they contacting?  What’s the timeline?  In my world, to commit to the process, you actually have to do something like write a letter of interest and submit your C.V, and I don’t know if that’s true for coaches.  But you DO have to commit to expending time, energy, and the possibility of disappointment if you say “yes.” 

So from time to time I will get a call about an opening because I’m a plausible candidate, even if it is only to make sure that the firm has fulfilled its duty to create the pool. And in most cases, I’ll make an immediate decision that throwing my hat in the ring isn’t worth it, because the likelihood of getting the job just isn’t worth the physical and psychic costs.

The news story on Cutcliffe in particular struck home that way. He’s a plausible candidate to have in the pool. He’s got a good job. He’s not likely to make the final cut.  He says, “no, thanks, I’m not interested,” not because he wouldn’t like the idea of being the coach at Michigan (just as I wouldn’t mind being the dean at the XYZ Law School), but because he says or thinks, as I do, if Jim Hackett (or the equivalent provost in my case) really wants me, have him give me a call and we can cut to the chase, but I’m not willing just to fill out your NCAA 64 team bracket.”

There, I feel better.

Jeffrey

Michigan is obviously creating this pool in earnest now.

BUT WHAT ABOUT HARBAUGH? I don't think this means much about Harbaugh. It rules out wildly optimistic scenarios in which Harbaugh has already agreed to the job and is going to punch Jed York on the field Sunday before escaping in a block M emblazoned helicopter, giving the stadium an epic double bird while laughing maniacally on his way out.

Michigan is uncertain enough that they're giving themselves a fallback option, or fallback options. This fits with the general belief that Michigan has come after Harbaugh with a very strong offer and hopes he accepts it, but doesn't know.

I've heard conflicting things, but one thing that seems clear is that Harbaugh is 100% honest when he tells the media he is not focused on anything other than his current job. If the 49ers get eliminated from the playoffs things might start moving faster then. Right now Harbaugh is still maniacally focused on something other than where he'll be next year. Frustrating; also why he's a very good coach.

NFL OPENINGS NOT SO OPEN. Despite currently being 5-8 in his second year with the Bears, local opinion holds that Marc Trestman will be back next year. Harbaugh was of course a Bears QB for a long time and an open Chicago job was described as a "problem" a few weeks ago.

large[1]large[1]

how not to conduct a coaching search
an epic poem in iambic pentameter
by Jeremy Foley

"DISORGANIZED." Bruce Feldman called Michigan's search that while discussing Cutcliffe, and we've heard other media people echo that assertion. For one, I don't think that's knowable. For two, M has been laser-focused on Harbaugh; agree with that approach or not it is a clear goal Michigan is pursuing before exploring other options.

For three, I fail to see why Michigan's search is being held up for ridicule when Nebraska just hired a 62-year-old who's under .500 in the last five years and Florida—Florida!—botched their search so badly that half of the media in a five-state radius descended on their negotiations. Those negotiations fetched a guy with three years of head coaching experience for a seven million dollar buyout. Michigan doesn't have a coach yet, sure. I'd rather have this search than either of those.

PLAN B. Still nothing resembling clarity. Scout's Jamie Newberg reports($) that Jim Mora, Dan Mullen, Bob Stoops, and Butch Jones have all said no thanks; 247's Clint Brewster reports that Mullen and… erk… Bret Bielema could be next options after Harbaugh. He also says Seahawks OC Darrell Bevell is not so much, after Sam named him a person of interest. Nobody knows!

Similarly, opinions on how realistic a Miles candidacy is are all over the place. Brewster says "some people directly tied to NFL and college agents" say it's his to lose(!); Rivals and Scout are far more circumspect—or at least were. Today the chatter is that he's moving up, potentially way up. In this case I place far more trust in the local guys than some agent chatter. But, man.

At least there's this: on GBW's new, insane rumor board Sam noted that Schiano's support comes from his agent and this guy who runs the search firm and his detractors include($) "anyone with coaching experience" still affiliated with M. So we can rule that out, I imagine.

Comments

McConkey

December 10th, 2014 at 3:07 PM ^

Is it possible Ross said he would prefer Harbaugh at Michigan to drive the price down for a potential trade?  He would be seriously dicking Michigan over, but he does have a little bit of money invested in the Dolphins...

SalvatoreQuattro

December 10th, 2014 at 4:38 PM ^

The beginning of Rice's "Four Horseman" article is a masterpiece of writing. Yeah, it's not a style we much appreciate today(thank you, Hemingway) but it's still a masterpiece nonetheless. It's poetic and memorable in ways the writer of that article never will be.

 

StellaBlue

December 10th, 2014 at 3:29 PM ^

Reader Jeffrey's analysis is very smart.  Academics and lawyers generally get a bad rap, but his insights are far more informative and calm-inducing than most of what has been written about this coaching search.  More such content, please.

 

 

Pancakes House

December 10th, 2014 at 3:43 PM ^

Feldman is a straight up jagoff from seeing his comments live over the weekend.  Disagree with the "disorganized" bit, seems more like there is an actual strategy this time round, but our real-time craving for any bit of info doesn't jive with the human emotions involved.

michigandune

December 10th, 2014 at 3:53 PM ^

Lots of bluster, smoke, mirrors and just plain bullshit.

Sounds like NFL media guys are just making stuff up.  Anyone can say "my sources". 

My guess is Jimmy will be introduced on December 29, unless the 49ers pull off a miracle and get into the playoffs.  And if and when that happens, Hackett should be given a gold medal.

Yinka Double Dare

December 10th, 2014 at 3:57 PM ^

I don't think you have to worry about the Bears regardless. Everyone assumes that Trestman will be back because the Bears are cheap and never fire coaches so quickly. Even if they do fire Trestman, they (read: ownership) do not show any inclination to spend the 8 million or whatever it would cost for Harbaugh. 

Bluebyyou23

December 10th, 2014 at 4:57 PM ^

 

 

However, I do disagree with the notion that Gil Brandt is not accurate in this case. He is a TRUE football insider and a guy so well thought of that he is often 'the' guy that headhunters turn to in gathering info of candidates for their coaching searches. If he said Cutcliffe was offered the job and turned it down, I would bet money on the fact it is true.

Most of the speculation for both Harbaugh coming and not coming to UM has been played out by the media whether they have been local or national  and the media is in the speculating business. Those who say a candidate has not been offered have no 100% knowledge that they are correct--they are speculating. The reason I say that is UM seems to be sensitive to the fact they are trying to 'land the first guy they offer to' for some reason.

I don't see why that is a issue. Bielema was offered the Nebraska job before Riley, and Nebraska could care less who knows that.  Is Coach Mac the first offer from Florida or did they look at Mullen or Stoops first? I will gurantee you they could care less either way.

The issue is not being turned down, but the issue is whether you asked people good enough to turn you down.  There is no shame in being turned down by Cutcliffe, or Butch Jones, or Les Miles, or even Harbaugh. The shame is in not asking.

champswest

December 10th, 2014 at 5:32 PM ^

I had lunch with some gentlemen today, and one of them said that his barber (with inside info) told him that UM and Harbaugh already have a deal. They just can't announce it yet. True story. I wonder if this guy is also Brian's barber. Naw, I don't think Brian has a barber.

SZHough

December 10th, 2014 at 7:11 PM ^

How concerned do you think we are with making a big name hire? It's very easy to become a moribund program (howdy, Nebraska and Miami) and the Rodriguez-Hoke years were not good for that.

SZHough

December 10th, 2014 at 7:14 PM ^

Biggest plus for Harbaugh? There's a 22% chance he punches Urban Meyer in his smug, sanctimonious face in the next five years. Also, while I think Harbaugh's intensity and personality can grate in the NFL I think that plays to his advantage in college.

NJWolverine

December 10th, 2014 at 9:41 PM ^

I don't have a good feeling about this search.  I hope I'm 100% wrong and get negged when Harbaugh gets hired, but if what we have to hang our hat on right now is waiting until the NFL season is over before getting word from Harbaugh, I don't see that as a good sign because Harbaugh will most likely have multiple NFL offers after the regular season.  Look, there's no perfect scenario where the only opening ends up being Oakland.  NFL teams fires coaches frequently, and there will be firings that you don't expect.  There will likely be at least 1 (Jets), maybe 2 (Jets and Giants) openings in NY, for example.  For me to have some hope, there would have to be some indication that Harbaugh wants to come back to college.  The longer this holding pattern continues, the worse off we are IMO.

Again, if you were Harbaugh, and there are multiple NFL offers on the table, what would you do?  He hasn't proven himself yet in the NFL, but he has in college.  The pinnacle of football is the Super Bowl, and if there are desirable openings on teams that are willing to spend money on players, what would you do?  The logical move would be to stay in the NFL. 

We need to try to see this search from a non-Michigan perspective.  Harbuagh isn't a better fit for college because he's a control freak.  I mean, that's like saying Bill Belichick is a better fit for college becuase he's a control freak.  Harbaugh doesn't have this irrational desire to "come home" because if he did, he would have accepted already.  Look, it's widely stated here (and elsewhere) that Miles would have accepted in 2010 and 2007 if offered.  So that means Miles was willing to work with Brandon.  It's widely believed that Miles would accept again if offered now (even though he was spurned twice already, and even though he's a good coach with longevity in the SEC West and a national title).  To me, that's an irrational desire to come home (because the rational reaction would be to give the finger to a school that's alraedy rejected you twice, even though it's a clear downgrade in terms of wins and losses in recent history).  I see absolutely no such desire in Harbaugh.  I see someone that is rational, and if true that means we're in big trouble.

Hackett needs to be as objective as possible here.  Right now, there needs to be a clear back-up plan.  Putting out feelers for Cutcliffe is a step in the right direction, but there needs to be an overture to at least 1-2 solid backups, and maybe even extended negotiations with them.  Look, guys like Mullen and Stoops are not idiots.  They know who our #1 is now.  If they can't handle that, then maybe they shouldn't be candidates.  My greatest fear is that Harbaugh rejects us, and then there's a mad scramble to find someone.  It will look like we are disorganized, there may not be enough time to vet Mullen / Stoops (or other credible candidates), those guys get impatient, and we end up with a Hoke again (Schiano / Addazio).

I'm not seeing a clear backup plan right now.  The most logical (IMO) and obvious one is Miles, but apparently Hoke was better than him, so he's out.  If not Miles, it has to be someone.  It can't just be more hope for Harbaugh.  If you don't pinpoint the backups right now, and start serious (and honest) discussions with them, you will most likely not be able to pull off a last minute save if Harbaugh says no. 

I'm afraid this is starting to look a lot like the last 2 searches.

Simps

December 11th, 2014 at 7:49 AM ^

I agree with some of what you said (re: Schiano and no backup plan) but to say that the Super Bowl is the end all, be all in football isn't 100% true. I am sure it means a great deal to these coaches but you look at a guy like Saban who never won a Super Bowl and I feel like he's pretty happy at Bama winning Nattys quite frequently. Also, I don't think Harbaugh being a control freak is the main issue he has in the NFL, if that were the case they can simply give him GM/Coach job and he'd probably stay. I think the thing that makes the NFL difficult for Harbaugh is that while he is a good X/O's coach, he derives much of his success from motivation and getting more from players who previously have not filled their potential. I think he has an intensity that NFL players feel like they don't need because they're like professionals man, and they think they are above busting their ass everyday in practice. Some of them feel like they've already made it, and anything beyond that is gravy. He seems to have done well at Standford by taking guys like Gerhardt and Fleener and keeping them hungry, maximizing their skills, and continuously motivating them to do XY and Z. Just my take.

Johnny10er

December 12th, 2014 at 1:32 AM ^

Some coaches set up plays, others teach skills.
JH is a guy who prepares, who teaches, who encourages, who leads.
He eats last.

"Some day you'll play for a contract, you'll play for this, you'll play for that ..."

That's not Jim.

He plays for NOW.

That's why I think he is "struggling" in the NFL.

He's giving the X&O's as good as anyone, but expecting his level of concentration, intensity, preparation, competitiveness, and drive from guys who have what they want.
He's meant to teach those qualities to his players, along with the X's and O's.
Not to men who feel like they inherently possess those skills due to their pay check.