Michigan lost to Ohio State, 62-39, on Saturday
[Fuller]

View from the Sidelines: The aftermath of a tipping point Comment Count

Ethan Sears November 25th, 2018 at 12:45 AM

COLUMBUS — “Wish I could have got a couple wins in it,” Tyree Kinnel said, four minutes into the most excruciating press conference of his life. “That’s the toughest part, I guess. I’m gonna have to sleep on it for the rest of my life, that I did not get a win in this game.”

 

Then his voice cracked.

 

“Other than that,” he continued, ultimately keeping composure, “I’m blessed to be here.”

 

It’s not easy to lose this game under any circumstance. In this specific circumstance, it couldn’t have been any harder.

 

[After THE JUMP: column]

 

Michigan came into Columbus favored on Saturday — and with good reason. It had the better roster. It had the better team.

 

Ohio State gave up 51 points to Maryland last week, looking out of focus. The Buckeyes’ linebackers — and really, their entire defense, has struggled at various points all year. Their offense has been one-dimensional.

 

This was the Wolverines’ best roster since Jim Harbaugh has been in Ann Arbor — really, since a whole lot longer than that. They came out of a gauntlet of a schedule relatively unscathed, winners of 10 straight headed into Saturday. Ohio State is still Ohio State, but winning this game felt a whole lot more realistic than it did in recent years.

 

And if they had won, a trip to Indianapolis that doubled as a formality awaited. So did the College Football Playoff. So did the allure of becoming a national contender year-in and year-out — dominating the Big Ten under Jim Harbaugh, with Ohio State fading into the background.

 

This game, make no mistake, was a tipping point.

 

Sixty-two points later, Michigan was right back where it started, and Kinnel was on the podium, trying to put into words a stunning loss, and the wave of disappointment that came with it.

 

Dwayne Haskins and Ryan Day shredded the Wolverines’ defense with crossing route after crossing route. Michigan’s defensive line failed to get pressure in a sense more complete than you would have thought possible. The offense left points on the field in the first half and failed to do much of anything in the third quarter. By the time it started moving again in the fourth, the blowout was on.

 

What started as a day of promise ended with Ohio State students storming the field, the Wolverines walking into the tunnel single-file, heads down, having lost, 62-39.

 

And then there was the aftermath. A parade of players with an interlude from Harbaugh, volleying away questions about why and how things could have gone so awry.

 

“What went wrong for you guys today?” one reporter asked Chris Evans.

 

“The score,” he replied.

 

“The progress you guys made this year — do you feel like today was a step backwards for you and your team?” another asked Jim Harbaugh.

 

“Like I said, it didn't go good,” Harbaugh said. “Didn’t end up good. And I would say — and we take responsibility for us.”

 

In the end, it was Kinnel who provided blunt, unyielding clarity.

 

“They completely beat us everywhere,” he said. “Run game, pass game. Everyone to blame.”

 

That’s the truth of it. This game came down to more than three ill-timed drops from Zach Gentry, or a handful of coverage mishaps from Brandon Watson.

 

It came down to poor red zone offense. Killing a drive with a false start on fourth-and-2. A failure to defend crossing routes. And, according to Kinnel, a confidence that got Michigan ahead of itself.

 

Those small things compounded, and when the Buckeyes pounced, the Wolverines simply had no answer.

 

Kinnel will leave Ann Arbor with three close calls against Ohio State, but no wins. That’s becoming a commonality for departing seniors. This year was Michigan’s best chance to reverse the trend — a program defining moment — and Michigan failed to capitalize on it.

 

Just as in the past, that failure will define the program.

 

 

Comments

patrickdolan

November 25th, 2018 at 3:12 PM ^

I was around for the twelve years John Cooper coached at OSU. This too shall pass. I hope UM doesn't mortgage its soul to make that happen.

Meanwhile, even including Saturday, this year was the most fun I've had watching UM play football since 2006, largely because of the defense that failed so spectacularly yesterday. If they pick themselves up and play well in the bowl game, I'm willing to call it progress and wait to see what happens next.

True Blue Grit

November 25th, 2018 at 3:21 PM ^

I'm actually getting resigned to losses against OSU.  What I can't accept though is the way we lost yesterday - getting dominated and looking like we didn't belong in the game for the last 3 quarters.  That's on the coaches completely.  If we had a better game plan and preparation going in, the game would have been a lot closer IMO.   In a rivalry game of this magnitude with so much on the line I don't get it.  It was bad when it happened in the bowl game last year against SC and inexcusable.  

Michigan fans will probably need to dial down their expectations with Harbaugh unless something changes, like he overhauls his staff or tactics in these big games.  Trying to run the ball down OSU's throat and win time of possession hasn't worked and won't work in the future.  But 10 wins is likely the ceiling for now.  

Catchafire

November 25th, 2018 at 3:32 PM ^

Trust me, we as fans will not hurt as much as these players and coaches. We question their drive, focus, and determination as if they were not. They knew what was on the line and they were determined because this was part of the revenge tour.

Let's support our team and not let outsiders or poisonous "fans" tear them down.

ILL_Legel

November 25th, 2018 at 3:34 PM ^

“In the ulcerating silence, perspective comes the way it always does for its ransom.”

Gord Downie

That lyric makes me feel better today for some reason.  The song is Beautiful Thing by the Tragically Hip.  It made me feel better too.

Ramblin

November 25th, 2018 at 4:33 PM ^

Can someone please explain to me why the coaches and some of our fanbase is dead set on this manball "Bo style" offense?  It's not 1976.  It's completely mind-boggling to me.  Do we get style points or something for being predictable?

We run, run, pass.  Run, run, pass.  Get down by 20 points, start throwing downfield and low and behold we move the ball...  Actually, we were STILL running up the middle while getting blown out, but we started throwing it downfield eventually.

Also, how can it be that everyone in the world, almost literally, knew that crossing routes with fast athletes would kill us, yet we had zero game plan for it?  What the hell were we doing running press man coverage and not having the ability to apply a simple zone defense?  If a guy is getting burned over and over again, you have to AT LEAST replace him with someone faster if your team is incapable of running a zone.  Saquon last year vs our slow linebacker.  Same thing.  Just leave him in to get burned over and over.  It makes no sense.

The players didn't play well, but this was just a god awful display of coaching.  A monkey picking plays randomly would have been significantly better than this.  

Why do we continue to do the same shit year, after year, after year, then act surprised when a good team has a game plan to stop it? 

Listening to OSU after the game, they were actually shocked that Michigan came out with the same exact look they were exposed on the week earlier.  They couldn't believe they would be that dumb and stubborn.

I'm just in awe of how stupid that gameplan was.  Run a zone defense and use a spread offense like everyone else for the love a god...  A real spread with passing downfield.  We are not Alabama.  I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

 

  

Don

November 26th, 2018 at 9:54 AM ^

"Listening to OSU after the game, they were actually shocked that Michigan came out with the same exact look they were exposed on the week earlier.  They couldn't believe they would be that dumb and stubborn."

This is a long Michigan tradition dating back to Bo that Lloyd continued and expanded upon.

"USC's center, Ryan Kalil, and its defensive end, Lawrence Jackson, both talked about the predictable nature of Michigan's strategy—on both sides of the ball. Jackson called U-M's defense traditional and stale. Meanwhile, USC—after mustering only three points in the first half Monday —scrapped its plan and came out throwing.

Cushing.... praised the Wolverines afterward because that is what players are taught to do and there is no percentage in not doing so. But he also admitted that he had been well-enough prepared to know what was coming with just about every Michigan trip to the line of scrimmage.

"Yup, pretty much so," he said. "I understand what they were trying to do," Cushing said. "It is the Big Ten mentality to try and overpower you." —Jan. 1, 2007


"Defensively, we did not have the answers to the spread offense. I haven't seen anyone who has. We're in a new era of college football, and I think defensive coaches are in the same position that people were in 25 years ago when the wishbone offense came into fashion. Until somebody does come up with the answers, you're going to see more of that offense. You're going to see a lot of points scored." —Lloyd Carr, November 6, 2000

 

Every goddamn year Michigan fans confidently predict that "(insert head coach here) is just saving things for Ohio State/bowl game/random team X and we'll shock them with new stuff they've never seen before."

Since 1969, that's happened two times that I can think of, and the most recent was LC's last game against Florida.



 

Parkinen

November 25th, 2018 at 5:08 PM ^

Michigan football is like my kids.  Sometimes they make me proud.  Sometimes they embarrass me.  Sometimes they frustrate me. Sometimes they really piss me off.  I worry about them.  I desperately want them to succeed and live a good life.  And, I always care for them deeply and wish them nothing  but the best.  I’ll always be there and have been for the past 45 years of my fandom.  

GoArmy

November 25th, 2018 at 6:10 PM ^

Bama fans were in a mild meltdown after OSU beat them in 2015. Saban had been rethinking his offensive approach by hiring that ass hat Lame Kitten. He went through several OC's until he got close - and then he pulled the program defining trigger at halftime vs UGA and won that game.

Meyer is no longer an OC guru - that is what the up and coming talent brings - and with it, on-field player talent that wants to play in that system.

 

Look at Syracuse under Dino Babers - he brought in a model that works. Look at army - like UM, they invested in cutting-edge strength and conditioning, and they transformed their programs.

UM was leading edge for a while - they invested in the Bill Walsh West Coast Offense and it produced. Coach needs to make an investment that matches his philosophy: FB TE Power Run game with dynamic QB and WR play. Oklahoma has all of the above. OSU is similar - without the FB.

Parts of the staff with experience are here now - Ed Warriner can develop the line for this. Proved it at OSU. McElwain is not a fit - he should leave.

Go find the next Lincoln Riley. Go to Texas. The QBs are there and so are the WRs and RBs. Coach can get his TEs and other WRs and RBs nationally and in OH and PA.

The Defense can be tweaked - and it needs elite secondary coaching. OSU was sending great CBs and FS' to the NFL and it all started to fade once they lost Kerry Combs to coaching in the NFL and a great LB Coach in Fickell. They still have talent on their roster; however, that will fade in a cycle or two once OSU continues to fail in the passing game defense. Their secondary and LB coaching is very weak. If Clemson was running crossing patterns on OSU, you would see the same thing UM saw yesterday. OSU has garbage LB and secondary coaches. Schiano is stubborn and his scheme is a disaster vs. Power Spread offenses. 

Bo would tell Coach to keep his FB. Keep his TE. And he would tell him to evolve on to the next chapter in UM football.

Saban made such changes - while they were on top and winning. Coach simply needs to evolve each year. The NFL game is no different. Coach ran the Pistol in the NFL. He could do that or a Power Spread game now. That is Warriner's strength. And he despises Meyer.

Bring in some new OC and position coaching that still builds around the power run game - adapt and the elite talent will commit. The WRs are good at UM now - need about three to four more a year. Adapt and the wins will follow. NFL teams change every year. The Eagles win an epic Super Bowl and collapse the next season. Saban changes. Meyer changes. Screaming Brian Kelley changes. Dabo Swinney changes - no more Clemsoning. This can be a tipping point or a coaching point.

mrjblock24

November 25th, 2018 at 6:33 PM ^

I would agree with all of that, except for the part where Ohio State has a better roster than us. They have a ton of talent on both sides of the ball that is either under-coached, or just young and still figuring things out. If you decide to go head up (as Michigan did running the ball right up the middle) you're going to lose. Not a coincidence the two most matchup oriented offenses were able to hang - Purdue & Maryland. 

Jonesy

November 25th, 2018 at 6:55 PM ^

When they torched us with their base mesh play on the first drive it was clear it was over. It's like we didn't prepare for them one bit, how do we get wrecked by the pass play they run 30 times a game all year? We played zone and stopped it once in the second half, the next play they run a zone beater and have a wide open guy in the middle of the field. We run zone on another play and they have a guy in the endzone with nobody within 30 yards of him. WTF was don brown doing? Where were our massive schematic advantages of the past two years when we finally had players to compete? Why does OSUs LBs suddenly know how to play and their OL suddenly know how to block? Those guys got torched by Minn and PSU and MSU and Purdue.  The world makes no goddamn sense.

cp4three2

November 25th, 2018 at 7:17 PM ^

I’m not sure we can say we had the better roster. Outside of tight end, it’s hard to argue they weren’t better at every offensive position. 

 

If we want to start beating OSU, we need to recruit like they do. Luckily, it’s looking like we finally are. 

Oldadguy

November 25th, 2018 at 8:48 PM ^

There is something to be said about momentum: if those passes are caught, if one of those crossing routes are defended once early if the second FG is a TD, everything could have been different. Don’t underestimate the snowball effect. Could have gone the other way too. Let’s not over react to one loss. OSU could easily have lost to Nebraska.

lhglrkwg

November 25th, 2018 at 8:53 PM ^

That was easily the most deflating loss I've seen in my fandom of Michigan which goes back to 2006 now. We've had a lot of bad losses, a lot of humiliating losses, and a few all time embarassments, but I think this was a new way to get knifed in the heart. We had the better team, the better roster and OSU completely gutted Don Brown's D and Michigan inexplicably looked like it had never reviewed a second of game tape for this one.

Right when it felt like we were about to take a big step forward, it feels like we took one back. There are reasons for optimism and there are reasons for pessimism, but I personally have given up on believing the hype on Michigan until this team finally beats a good Ohio State team. Still waiting to see that happen for once

Don

November 26th, 2018 at 9:26 AM ^

"believing the hype on Michigan"

Next season will be full of confident 14-0 predictions, Urban Meyer is retiring next week with fake headaches hahaha, the 2019 version of Revenge Tour sales & marketing bluster, whole milk/khakis/steak/Don Brown moustache/etc etc, and whatever MGoBlog meme that replaces Murderwolv.

MGoStrength

November 25th, 2018 at 8:57 PM ^

This game, make no mistake, was a tipping point.

This is the problem with making statements about what is and what is not before it happens.  It just sounds like sour grapes.  What happened happened and no ifs or could have beens will make any difference.  It happened and we have to accept it.  Although Meyer had a rough year in many respects he still kicked our ass.  We must live with that, the coaches must continue to find ways to succeed recruiting, and they must make adjustments and get the players to believe we can beat them next year.  It was not a tipping point.  It was the status quo.

brad

November 25th, 2018 at 11:18 PM ^

Michigan should spend it's entire bowl practice playing Ohio State.

Learn to pass on zone coverage; learn to play zone coverage on defense; devise a way to eliminate the effectiveness of the shallow cross by zone blitz, alignment, jams, whatever.  Realize what the rest of us already know: you have multiple elite wide receivers who can't be covered and you have a QB who can hit them.  Impregnate the team with the knowledge that the Ohio State game is the only game that matters.  

The program lost its way a long time ago and still hasn't found it.  Learning how to beat Ohio State,at the expense of everything else, is the way.

BlueHills

November 26th, 2018 at 12:09 AM ^

Don’t be fooled.

This whole thing about Urban Meyer having a brain cyst is a coverup; what he has is a device implanted in his brain by highly intelligent, though evil, alien beings. These aliens are called the “Grays”.

The device literally calls the shots during games. That’s why he wins. Occasionally the device malfunctions, and the result is the Purdue Anomaly. The device also allows the aliens to cause physical pain to Meyer if he doesn’t listen to their instructions. This is why we see him bent over in pain from time to time.

The solution to Michigan’s lack of invincibility is for Harbaugh to get his ass over to Area 51 as soon as possible, and get an implant from the highly intelligent, good aliens, called the “Blues”, who are giving our government alien technology for national defense. They’ll give him alien technology for football defense. They’ve already given Brown some insight, but his software needs updating.

 

Brugoblue

November 26th, 2018 at 5:33 AM ^

Yes. Got boat raced by an OSU team with all the pieces playing up to potential for the first time all year. Did it suck? Damn right it did, but that shit happens in rivalry games. Give me the program where it is today - the future looks better than good. 

TheBursleyBus

November 26th, 2018 at 8:25 AM ^

Against reason (D line no-show, pass coverage fail, O line collapse), I am haunted by the idea that this game may actually have had an entirely different outcome if it weren't for 3 plays

1) Gentry not hanging on at 7-3

2) Punt debacle

3) Pick deep in our own territory

Game would still be a shootout, OSU still gonna get theirs, but....Momentum, confidence, stadium energy play immeasurable roles.

SD Larry

November 26th, 2018 at 8:44 AM ^

Kinnel said it and summarized it well.  We all hurt from this loss, but not as much as the players.

Personally still stunned, though I now understand OSU was ready to play their best football of the season and Michigan was not. 

10 wins, and probably slightly outplaying Notre Dame on the road the last 3 quarters, and earning top 10 status will always be something I respect and appreciate about this team.  Pulling hard for a good bowl win.  These guys worked hard and are a really good team.  Just ask Nebraska, Wisky, MSU in a rational moment, and PSU.  Not the best team in the country.  Would still love to see them go out the right way.

chrisu

November 26th, 2018 at 11:53 AM ^

I am not sure if I am  completely past the shock, so temper my opinion with that notion. I look at the progression since coach arrived, and I see similarities to the Bad Boys era of Detroit Piston basketball. That team as it was developed, had to lose in a conference final before learning how to dethrone the reigning champ. Then they lost in the finals to the reigning champs, and had to learn how to beat them - and more importantly - as well as what it took in order to BE the champs. As a program, there was so much to be done in order to restore it to the 10+ wins each season many of us were accustomed to. To the level where The Game was the season. Well, clearly the team is not quite there, but as a program, the revenge tour and season seems a reasonable facsimile to the Pistons learning to win. The revenge tour wins were like beating the reigning conference champs, while beating osu is more akin to dethroning the reigning champs. Yes, there are playoffs to be had beyond beating osu, but my humble opinion is that if and when the program rises to the level of beating osu, the playoffs will take care of themselves. The Game sucked...but I woke up, I was breathing, and I am still a fan of this team. I also hope I am right about this because the alternative would be disappointing, and I have plenty of that watching the Lions play.

jrems

November 26th, 2018 at 1:35 PM ^

Kinnel will leave Ann Arbor with two close calls against Ohio State, but no wins.

 

No disrespect to Kinnel or anybody on this team. But I'd say "two close calls against OSU" is a bit more accurate. Those two being 2016 and 2017 -- albeit with a 3rd string QB.

Regardless of what happened on Saturday, this season ended up exceeding my expectations, despite the wealth of talent we had on his squad, because of how skewed the schedule was with all the away games against our rivals.