Acceptable and Unacceptable Block M's

Submitted by Lionsfan on

Per Kyle Meinke, the Athletic Department has sent out a flier detailing which Block M's are and aren't right. A lot of people here knew about the Split M, but here's the official guide.

Not every block M was created equal. What is and isn't approved, per the U twitter.com/kmeinke/status…

— Kyle Meinke (@kmeinke) February 28, 2013

What's funny is that Yost and Crisler have "incorrect" Block M's

 

Soulfire21

February 28th, 2013 at 7:48 PM ^

I like the embroidered block M, very Bo.  I'm surprised they don't have a plain blue block 'M'.  Shocking that Crisler and Yost have the "unacceptable" M.

I was never really a fan of the split M, it just looks a bit tacky to me, reminds me of Notre Dame for some reason and I hate that.  The plain block M is very crisp, simple, and says everything it needs to say.  You don't need to see "MICHIGAN" splattered across the 'M', everyone should know what the block M means.

the Glove

February 28th, 2013 at 8:03 PM ^

I am completely fine with the acceptable logos. The skinny block M reminds me of the 70's, a split block M reminds me of 90's, and the Navy block M with maize outline reminds me of the early 2000's. My favorite version of the block M is now the flagship logo.

Marshmallow

February 28th, 2013 at 8:06 PM ^

Obviously, this was not thought out carefully.  Even if you put aside what's at Yost or Crisler or on the various away jerseys, only a fool would overlook the fact that the student shirts (and many other popular clothing items) have been maize for almost the entirety of their existence (about 10 years).  A maize M is going to look fantastic on a maize shirt.  Well done, Dave Brandon.

Paps

February 28th, 2013 at 8:49 PM ^

That M on the bottom left looks the best to me. I'm too young to have seen the old ones, but that seems pretty close to the original M and original maize I've seen in pictures and on my dad's shirts from the 80s

M_Jason_M

February 28th, 2013 at 9:36 PM ^

Technically, the ones at Crisler and Yost aren't listed. They'd be single border blue block m and that isn't on the page anywhere, only double border blue is on there. Maybe any single border or no border block m is considered acceptable?

Jon06

February 28th, 2013 at 10:12 PM ^

on some of the video monitor animations. Maybe we should get stupid shit like this worked out internally before we release instructions to the media.

A Lot of Milk

February 28th, 2013 at 10:04 PM ^

Damn. I love me some split M. I don't understand why we have to revert to the simplest M we have...looks boring. I also have no problem with the thin Bo M...I like the kind of throwback-y look. The split blue M with maize letter box is the best, though.

snoopblue

March 1st, 2013 at 12:32 AM ^

Isn't it unbelievable that there is an office that makes rules like this and people who get paid to implement these rules? Go figure out how to lower tuition instead of worrying about the fucking M. If you approve products with the correct M's and put the correct M's in places where they belong, then the rules wouldn't even be needed - but they can't even follow their own rule in Crisler and Yost!

snoopblue

March 1st, 2013 at 12:36 AM ^

I also think it's silly to just throw all these other M's (and logos/'mascots')to the wayside. As seen by so many posts above, they carry a lot of history and tradition with them. Would be really cool to see that M with the wolverine on the court at Crisler.

backtoblu

March 1st, 2013 at 1:00 AM ^

wtf?  A lot of famous, coveted people/players/coaches here that have apparently been disgracing the university.  This list can go screw itself, imo.  Most of those are FINE.

gbdub

March 1st, 2013 at 2:09 AM ^

The letter makes it pretty clear that it applies to publications - I doubt they're coming for your skinny M New Era caps (unless you wear them sideways with a flat brim and the sticker still on). And I'm assuming the floor and ice Ms stay blue.

This has been university wide policy for several years now, an the AD is either just bringing things in line or felt the need to reiterate.

I'm surprised we aren't arguing about Official Maize - they give print colors right there in the bottom left!

saveferris

March 1st, 2013 at 8:00 AM ^

Wait, you mean this memo is not an all-out assault by Dave Brandon on Michigan tradition in the pursuit of the almighty dollar and we've been blowing this way out of proportion?

Color me shocked.

Blue Mike

March 1st, 2013 at 6:47 AM ^

Those regulations have been in place for a long time; the website (http://logos.umich.edu) has been around for a while also.  I think they are just reminding everyone that they exist.  What surprised me the first time I looked through the site was that different "units" of the university have different "official" shades of maize and blue.  What? 

Craig

March 1st, 2013 at 1:08 PM ^

Yeah, the "official" colors of the university are much lighter than we think they are. More of a baby blue and faded yellow. Those have been around for about 100 years. The dark navy and deep maize colors that we are used to are from the athletic department.

There was a really interesting article on this wayyy back in '96:

http://michigantoday.umich.edu/96/Fall96/mta13f96.html

MJ14

March 1st, 2013 at 11:36 PM ^

Very good read. So according to that the official University colors are here:

 

The official athletic colors are here:

So that pretty much settles that. I must say if everything was made in the official athletic colors, they would be very good looking. I think those two colors go extremely well together. It's too bad you hardly ever find them just like this.