Snowflakes
I see that there is already a "Devin for QB" thread and a vent thread. Figured I would create one for general thoughts (although I expect many will be of the Devin for QB or Vent variety). My thoughts:
1. The defense was solid tonight. Dominant (save for one series) through three quarters. As for the 4th, when a defense is on the field for the entire half, at some point, they will start to give up plays. Happens to even the best defense. Also, after making stop after stop and having you offense turn it back over on the next play, any defense will start to wear down.
2. Craig Roh deserves special mention - kid has gotten better and better every game this season. We will miss him next year.
3. Norfleet - I know he is a bit of a cult hero around here, and I see the potential, but dude, can you please run somewhere other than into the pile on kick returns. That said, he has jets. If he could only figure out which way to point those jets, he would be a threat to take every kick to the house.
4. Offense with Denard - yeah, losing him ans watching bellamy do his best Nick SHeridan impression made me appreciate Denard, but its not like we were scoring with him in the game - With Denard, we hadn't scored in 5.5 quarters. That is pathetic. I don't put all of this on Denard - the WRs are the worst Wr group I have ever seen at Michigan, from a talent standpoint, and we lack even a credible running back threat. What worries me is that while Hoke has recruited well, he isn't exactly stockpiling top level Wrs and RBs. Fitz has been terrible, V. Smith blocks like s TE, but is just not a running threat. And Rawls is obviously doing something in practice that the coches don't like.
5. Bellamy - cut him a break - he is a redshirt freshman. That said, holy hell he was terrible. AT some point, in a close game, you just have to give Gardner a try. Its not like he is doing anything productive at WR lately. To me,when your QB goe 0-12, he gets pulled for any other option. At least Devin is a run threat.
I have more, but I am too numb to keep going. This loss hurt.
October 27th, 2012 at 11:55 PM ^
MAAAAANNNNNBAAALL
October 27th, 2012 at 11:56 PM ^
It hasn't snowed yet in Ann Arbor. (good chance we wake up to a few inches after tonight).
October 27th, 2012 at 11:56 PM ^
Each time we didn't score a TD from within the ten, Denard was out of the game. The offense was rolling.
October 27th, 2012 at 11:57 PM ^
The defense and Gibbons were both great tonight. Defense would have given up less points but the offense pretty much gave Nebraska great field position every time. Denard's injury is the main concern right now. If Denard is healthy, we could probably win the next 3 before Ohio State.
October 27th, 2012 at 11:57 PM ^
We win this game with Denard. Hopefully Denard is fine. Nebraska still has to play MSU and PSU. They need to lose one of them if we win out or both if we lose to Ohio.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:07 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:02 AM ^
This offense is still a square peg in a round hole.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:07 AM ^
And in 2008 and 2009 it was a fucking round peg in a square hole. FML get it straight michigan.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:03 AM ^
What I want to know is why Borges can't get any WRs really open? Are the WRs just that bad that even with the treat of DR the DBs can easily cover Michigans receivers?
October 28th, 2012 at 12:09 AM ^
Because our QBs can't read the field...
October 28th, 2012 at 12:24 AM ^
Denard is good enough at reading the field. He has a tendency to throw behind his WR's, though, and that's been his biggest issue. Other than square peg, etc.
Bellomy... RS freshman gonna RS freshman.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:50 PM ^
I don't know if you're a ticketholder, but if you are, watch our routes develop downfield. Denard will to go to the pre-determined first read on the vast majority of his deep throws. The safety will read his eyes and come over, often leaving another wideout completely uncovered. This is the main reason why we almost never get deep separation. If he could learn to look off his receivers and then go to them, he'd be much, much more effective. (This may of course raise questions about Borges as our QB coach. I'm actually more concerned about him there than I am about him as our OC.)
October 28th, 2012 at 12:12 AM ^
We don't have a great deal of speed at WR IMO. Gallon is fast but not tall. If Stonum hadn't been a moron he'd be our deep threat WR this season, but we really don't have a burner at WR.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:42 AM ^
and if stonum were here, dg would be the backkup qb and we wouldn't have seen bellomy tonight
October 28th, 2012 at 12:04 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:04 AM ^
I really think other than Bellomy, this game was totally on the coaches, mainly Borges. I've just about had it with Borges' conservative play calling, and he did nothing to mold around the style of play that Bellomy could work with. Running Fitz out of the shotgun worked maybe once the entire game and the rest of the carries, he ended up running parallel to the o-line and lost four yards. It truly looked like the offense in Rich Rod's first seaon with Sheridan and Threet running the offense. All I can say now is, I'm scared for the offense next season without Denard.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:16 AM ^
You want the OC to be aggressive and tailor the whole offense to a freshmen QB in three quarters after working on an entirely different gameplan all week?
Doesn't work like that in real life.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:32 AM ^
On the first INT, Gallon had a few steps on the defender with the safety trying to come over to cover. Throw it deep and to the outside and only Gallon can catch it. Underthrow it, and a play with an open receiver turns into an INT.
He also missed a couple of gimmes to the flat. Compound this with a couple of drops and you get DEATH.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:04 PM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 2:26 PM ^
does he?
October 28th, 2012 at 1:25 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 10:19 AM ^
I'm all for criticizing Borges for his play calling and some of his decisions, but if moving Gardner to WR was soley on Borges, then Hoke should be fired for incompetence. No way does the OC make a decision like that on his own, and the ultimate decision had to reside with Hoke. I'm sure they realized it was a gamble, but let's not pretend this was a decision made by just the OC.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:05 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:07 AM ^
Why is Oregon State - Washington not on TV?
October 28th, 2012 at 12:18 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:11 AM ^
I think even with denard in this would have been a tough game, but winnable especially with the defense playing like they have.
This is a combination of issues, but the lack of audibles is getting to the point the of unbelievability.
Not sure if it's borges playcalling, a lack of comprehension or ability on the part of Denard, or just a side effect of the super-super slow offensive style that leaves almost no time on the clock to audible if they wanted to.
But when I know it will be a run play, and when Nebraska's defense knows it is a run play and tells you so, and you still don't even consider changing the play even though they are stuffing you every time - there is something wrong.
After watching Bellomy today, I think even if we win out this year (will depend on Denard coming back and playing well), I have no real hope for a stong season next year. We lose Lewan and our only passing/and or running threat, to be replaced with a talented but untested true freshman.
October 28th, 2012 at 9:28 AM ^
I agree....I'm starting to get really worried with Borges at the helm. He might be saddled with a less than talented O-line and WR's but you'd think he could get Denard comfortable with calling an audible. If not, I'm just shocked that a SR QB can't look at a stacked box and call for a quick pass to the flat or any other audible.
Give us something, please!
October 28th, 2012 at 12:14 AM ^
The D tackled and pursued very well, right up to the point the inept offense allowed Nebraska to wear them down. Seriously thought they were good and hung in there, hoding Nebraska to 23 should win you some games if your offense is in tact.
I can now say I've seen a 1 in 1,000,000 interception
Refs realized their horrible mistake in calling a late hit on Michigan early in the 2nd half, by making the worst pass interference call of the year on the only Bellamy drive with a pulse. Thanks guys that was nice to get our hopes up like that.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:26 AM ^
In the first half, Nebraska had one good drive, never got much further than midfield on three others, and then on their final drive the D forced a fumble to give Bellomy the ball in Nebraska territory right before halftime.
In the 2nd half they picked off a pass on the opening possession. One drive started at our 4 yard line and the D held them to a field goal attempt. Another started at our 39 and NU gained 5 yards and kicked another field goal. NU had one decent drive for a field goal, and another where Roh pushed them out of field goal range only to see an interception on the first snap end all hope.
Three huge stops to keep the team in the game and only 2 scoring drives. You can't play D much better under the circumstances.
October 28th, 2012 at 11:01 AM ^
I don't like using 'ifs' when it comes to sports but jaysus, I feel I could call a better game than Borges ATM. Clearly, running Denard/Fitz out of the shotgun with the same read play over and over isn't working, so call something else.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. Open up the playbook and let Denard go to work. I'm tired of this conservative approach. Our D is good enough to keep the O in the game but it's not good enough to win the game for us. We need something from the other side of the ball.
SORT IT THE FUCK OUT.
October 28th, 2012 at 1:35 AM ^
His drive that ended up with the INT on the attempt to Gardner actually had more production.
Whoever stopped bribing the refs should be fired. They were unstoppable.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:16 AM ^
I am disappointed in not taking time outs on the last defensive series. I realize Bellomy had been a disaster, but I really hate the message of simply giving up with more than five minutes to go and a 14 point deficit. A fluke TD, get the onside kick... Obviously coming back was really unlikely, but a head coach at Michigan should never give up in a game.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:18 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:20 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:23 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:31 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:37 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:44 AM ^
I can agree with the "Sending a message" but that's about it.
October 28th, 2012 at 10:08 AM ^
A better chance than not calling the timeouts.
Giving up doesn't seem very "Michigan".
October 28th, 2012 at 12:19 AM ^
I think people should realize Denards injury has probably been an issue all year and part of the conservative play calling this year has been to protect him from injury.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:26 AM ^
Maybe mgoblog should just takeover play calling. Use the live blog or something, then text the play to Borges..
October 28th, 2012 at 11:34 AM ^
Here is the problem with Borges:
Denard went down with about 5 minutes left in the first half. Michigan had scored 3 points. At that point, Michigan had not scored a touchdown in over 5 quarters. Now, this is what other teams did in their first 25 minutes against Nebraska:
Southern Miss: 14 points
UCLA: 17 points
Wisconsin: 20 points
Ohio State: 21 points
Northwestern: 7 points
So comparing our game against Nebraska with their past performances against teams with a pulse, Al Borges managed to coordinate a gameplan that would rank us dead last.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:22 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 12:23 AM ^
making it to the Big Ten Championship game.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:31 AM ^
October 28th, 2012 at 10:20 AM ^
Why not?
Nebraska can easily lose to MSU and PSU. We just need to beat the bad teams on our schedule and hope Denard stays healthy against Ohio.
This did not put the title game out of reach, it just made it more difficult.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:24 AM ^
This is sounding familiar, minus the defense bit.
October 28th, 2012 at 12:34 AM ^
I'm getting a bit tired of the " against good defenses, our offense has trouble " line.
Maybe ... maybe it's because the defenses are good?
October 28th, 2012 at 12:55 AM ^