shocked gambling establishment etc
- Member for
- 3 years 3 days
- View recent blog entries
|2 days 4 hours ago||Great story, you had me||
Great story, you had me laughing out loud at work, alone in my office. The second read through also got me.
|2 days 8 hours ago||I know nothing.||
I know nothing. =(
|3 days 8 hours ago||Saw the header of the||
Saw the headline pic of the article, thought Resph1 was now writing the previews.
|4 weeks 12 hours ago||I'm not condoning the choice||
I'm not condoning the choice to mock anyone, and I actually completely agree with your philosophy.
But even so, it seems ridiculous to me that making a joke about someone would result in the joke maker having to pay the subject of his joke...even if it was a bad joke, made in bad taste. And again, only if the joke maker happens to be rich.
|4 weeks 12 hours ago||Because every time you mock||
Because every time you mock someone, you should definitely have to pay them. But only if you're rich.
|5 weeks 2 days ago||This is an awesome||
This is an awesome big-picture summary. Thanks for taking the time!
|7 weeks 2 days ago||So fatigue sets in for||
So fatigue sets in for players as the game goes on, but only when they happen to be on defense? They are also taught to crash the boards on offense, after all. They don't relax from that?
|9 weeks 2 days ago||(No subject)||
|12 weeks 22 hours ago||Did you read the entire||
Did you read the entire article? I'm on my phone so I can't copy paste, but it said that in their first version to police they said they weren't sure who hit them, maybe the guy in the red polo. But then in their second version, after they found out who the man I'm the red polo was, they changed their story to be that it was definitely the man in the red polo. That doesn't seem odd to you?
|12 weeks 22 hours ago||Previously we were led to||
Previously we were led to believe that he instigated the fight and punched a guy in the face. Now it seems more likely that he joined an existing fight to help his brother, and then probably punched a guy in the face. Surely you can see how this is "better"?
|13 weeks 8 hours ago||I don't understand why people||
I don't understand why people seem to get upset about this every single time there are rumors a commit may visit elsewhere. It seems pretty simple to me - Michigan is saying, "If you look around for contingency plans, so will we." It makes perfect sense - what is there to get upset about?
|16 weeks 3 days ago||"Remind us at every||
"Remind us at every turn."
Are we really reminded that often? They showed us last week, after we had been away from the mutineers for a while, to remind us of their nature. Was there that much "reminding" before? I don't think so. I feel like this is all an over reaction to the Jamie-Cersei scene from a few weeks back. To my recollection, the rape criticism has all occured this season, and all the rapey scenes this year were the Jamie-Cersei scene, and last week at Craster's. Unless I'm forgetting some?
Interesting note: Drogo essentially raped Dany after their wedding in S1 and there was no huge internet outcry or criticisms.
|19 weeks 1 day ago||And so you went to Hope?! Or||
And so you went to Hope?! Or is the username a random coincidence?
|19 weeks 1 day ago||Hah! Never expected to see a||
Hah! Never expected to see a Calvin pos-bang here. Class of 2004!
|21 weeks 5 days ago||Can't get enough of dropping||
Can't get enough of dropping the casual moran, excellent work.
|25 weeks 5 days ago||The excuses never stop...||
In the post game press conference, Izzo says they had some outside distractions this week (presumably the inquiries into MSU's response to sexual assault complaints) and goes on to say about the media that he was "disappointed in some of you". It sure seems like he is blaming his team's effort on the media asking pesky questions?! #LOL
|26 weeks 6 hours ago||Another thing to think about:||
Another thing to think about: the team was in the double bonus! You don't want to be settling for 30 footers when you're in the double bonus.
However, I'm sure that's not the play Belein drew up, it seems like Purdue disrupted the action pretty nicely and M was out of timeouts.
|26 weeks 6 hours ago||As Space Coyote said,||
As Space Coyote said, sometimes they switch, sometimes they don't. But maybe Brian is making this statement based off actual game observations, not just a stat sheet?
Try watching individual players (not the ball) on defense, especially GR3 and Stauskas, and I think you will not be happy with what you find. Mutliple times a game, they lose their men on defense. Some of the times may not be entirely their fault (due to a miscommunication with a teammate, for instance), but often they just fall asleep watching the ball and lose their guy.
It is very frustrating, and I think a large part of the reason why this team has so many problems defensively.
|26 weeks 1 day ago||I wasn't looking at his feet,||
I wasn't looking at his feet, I was watching the ball. I'm pretty sure the Purdue defender tipped the shot before it hit the backboard...but hey, I'll still gladly take it!
|26 weeks 1 day ago||A measly upvote wasn't||
A measly upvote wasn't sufficient...this was a great read & very well done. Thanks for posting!
|29 weeks 2 days ago||*Seth||
|31 weeks 9 hours ago||I feel like I should respond||
I feel like I should respond to this comment, but unfortunately I know nothing.
|32 weeks 1 day ago||Perimeter Defense||
IMO many of the defensive problems are happening because of a lack of perimeter defense. Opposing guards are able to get in the lane far too often and far too easily. Whether it's bad closeouts or lack of quickness or just being flat footed, the on-ball defense on the perimeter is just not good. Tough to play defense when the opponent is living in the lane.
I don't know if it would help, but I'd like to see them bust out the zone a bit more just to try it.
|33 weeks 9 hours ago||I like it. Bang away!||
I like it. Bang away!
|33 weeks 22 hours ago||Pos bang!!!!! I'm so||
Pos bang!!!!! I'm so excite!!!!!
|36 weeks 6 days ago||Amen to that.||
Amen to that.
|36 weeks 6 days ago||After many years or lurking,||
After many years or lurking, I didn't start posting until points were capped at 5. Very excited for this, my first ever pos-bang. Please don't be gentle!
|37 weeks 1 day ago||Completely agree. They||
Completely agree. They recently built one a block from my work; everyone hyped it up so much and I was really excited to go try it...only to get there and find that it is an entire restaurant built around subtle variations of the McChicken. I honestly don't get it. Glad I'm not the only "crazy" one.
|40 weeks 9 hours ago||Big Bob's||
Try Big Bob's in East Grand Rapids, and get the Briazzo! Such a great pie, plus they usually have some great beers on tap.
|41 weeks 6 days ago||Pretty sure his mom is||
Pretty sure his mom is reading this so you should try being a little more positive!