Peppers at 10, which seems low.
- Member for
- 6 years 18 weeks
|1 week 3 days ago||Seriously?||
Almost no one has defended Goodell or the NFL on this. Talk about echo chambers, just look at this thread. Everyone here is on Brady's side on this one. It takes a lot of gall to say what everyone else is saying and then act like you're hopelessly outnumbered.
|24 weeks 3 days ago||Iowa||
I got hit by a full beer can thrown at me and my girlfriend had a lit cigarette flicked in her face. Other than a few jeers and taunts I was treated well in Columbus. One guy bought me a beer for having the courage to come to Columbus by myself rocking Michigan gear. You never know what kind of experience you're going to have in most of these places. All you can do is go into it with a good nature and thick skin. I would never bring children though.
|24 weeks 3 days ago||OSU||
The Game is always a no-brainer for me. Plus my experience in Iowa City was far worse than my experience at the shoe. Mostly classy is not a description I would use to describe the Iowa fans I interacted with. Every fanbase has a few lunatics, you might run into them and you might not. It's out of my control so I don't even factor in opposing fans when I consider making a trip. I'll be in Columbus this year.
|1 year 34 weeks ago||Here's one||
You must not be trying very hard because a simple argument could be made from the performance of their two teams. In the three years that Harbaugh has been in the league his teams have performed equal to Belichick's teams in terms of how far they have advanced in the playoffs. Considering that Harbaugh did this with Alex Smith and Colin Kaepernick and Belichick has Tom Brady I feel like a decent argument can be made there. Also, Jim Harbaugh has a remarkable coaching tenure at Stanford to add to the resume hence the phrase "football coach" was used rather than NFL coach. I'm not going to argue with anyone about Harbaugh/Belichick because I care less than zero about the NFL but I think there is an argument to be made.
|2 years 18 weeks ago||If this helps||
I have a close relative who works in the athletic department at VCU. They're high up enough that they are part of the traveling contingent during the A-10 and NCAA tournaments and were on the team charter to and from San Diego last week. They told me that there has been zero chatter about this prior to the news coming out and in the past they had heard about the Illinois and UCLA possibilities before they were reported publicly. VCU is a much smaller athletic department than a school like Michigan and pretty tight knit with basketball at the core. My relative said that it's definitely possible that Shaka could take another job without them knowing until it was announced but they would be surprised.
|3 years 8 weeks ago||Doug Ditmar story||
I went to HS with his kids. One of his tons was totally obnoxious, so one night we TP'ed their house. Mr. Ditmar went ape and called our school and made up a bunch of stuff about vandalism that wasn't true in an attempt to get the school involved. So the school pulls some kids in to grill them and find out who did it but they never suspected us for a second and we laugh about it to this day.
|5 years 13 weeks ago||Good Decision||
I absolutely love going to games at Ryan field. I went in '03, '05 and '07 and will probably go again this year. Every seat is good and tailgating is easy because their lots are free, it's awesome. I would say definitely do not buy your tickets through either school. Ebay, stubhub or scalping at the venue are all way better. I sat in the front row for below face in '05. In '07 I had friends get tickets for free from fans outside the stadium. If you do it one of those three ways you won't pay more than $30.
|5 years 19 weeks ago||Wow||
+1 for mentioning Hayes Grooms. Hurley and Hill had a lot of fun this week mentioning their record against Duke. Let's hope Douglass and Novak (and the rest of the team for that matter0 can have some fun this coming week mentioning their record against Duke. go Blue.
|5 years 29 weeks ago||Remember T Woolf?||
Having Woolfolk back will be huge for us. Molk is huge fore the offense. Obviously we have to retain one of our three capable QB's. It's difficult to speculate on offense because we won't know what our offensive philosophy will be. Basically our whole defense is (besides Martin) is a lot more potential than results so it's hard to say but my guess is Demens, Roh and Avery. The talk is that Josh Furman and Richard Ash are really improving and Courtney Avery is improving every day so we'll see.
|5 years 30 weeks ago||I now must disagree with you||
I also think that Jack Morris is the most deserving. He had the most wins of any pitcher in the 80's and he was "truly dominant" in the Playoffs. Morris is under appreciated because his ERA is relatively high but Morris did what it took to win. If the team scored 8 runs then he'd relax and allow 5 if they scored 2 runs then he'd bear down and allow 1. I hope Larkin gets in but I don't think I'd call it a no-brainer. I didn't follow his career closely but it never occured to me that he'd get into the hall when he was playing. Best of luck to all three though, seeing any of those three get in would make me very happy.
|5 years 30 weeks ago||Similar Scenario||
The only precedent I can think of for this scenario would be Tubby Smith taking the Minnesota job. A coach will downgrade if he has a strong suspicion that he's going to get fired.
|5 years 30 weeks ago||Reminds me of someone||
This guy rivals Pearlie Graves for most terrifying recruiting profile photo. Based solely on this photo I'm predicting that he'll be an All'American.
|5 years 30 weeks ago||Who cares?||
It would be interesting if a day went by that the FreeP didn't bash RR. Since when is people not liking RR news, very creative and nuanced journalism by the DFP.
|5 years 30 weeks ago||I hope not||
Conelius did a favor and not qualifying so we could avaoid wasting the scholarship that we had promised him.
|5 years 37 weeks ago||Thanks||
I'm glad you're so worried about these poor college football players who are mistreated so badly. After all can you imagine the atrocity of having to go to college to be considered qualified for a lucrative job? It gets worse though, they get full scholarships, elite coaching and tons of national exposure. They might as well be migrant workers. I know the kids in my schools chapter of the Social Justice League were working tirelessly to free college football players.
|5 years 41 weeks ago||So many holes in the argument||
A. The players are paid in the form of room and board
B. Players can refuse to go to college if they would like
C. Players aren't ready for the NFL so they aren't ready to get paid, just like I wasn't ready for my job until I had my college education.
D. The people you are talking about are the exception (There are a less Mike Martins and Denard Robinsons than there are Greg Banks and Rhocko Khourys out there) You're proposing that we pay all players because a couple dozen kids each year have to wait one extra year to get paid.
E. Where do you draw the line on who gets paid and can you draw a line?
F. People who compare college th the minor leagues or the D-league have a seriously flawed comparison. 95% of these players will never set foot in a NFL training camp. It's not the minor leagues, it's college just like college baseball, basketball and every other sport.
G. If you want to make a minor leagues comparison, here's one. The value of an athletic scholarshipis equal or more valuable than a minor leaguers salary and when a minor leaguers career fizzles out they are left without an education. Athletic scholarships set up athletes better for the rest of their life can the minor leagues do.
H. Just because people don't take advantage of their compensation doesn't mean they aren't fairly compensated. People propose paying players because of the large number of players who don't take advantage of their educational opportunity. If I blow my paycheck at the casino it doesn't mean my boss didn't pay me enough it means I was foolish. And don't tell me that football players can't get good educations because they're too busy or whatever because I can give you a long list of football players that were good scholars.
I. These examples of home foreclosures and 5* WR's who might be 5th round picks (the NFL would never take a kid who hasn't demonstrated his talents at least one year in college) are the 1 in 10,000 scenarios. Why further corrupt a system for two kids in the whole country.
|5 years 42 weeks ago||He really is II||
His dad (Wonderful Terrific Monds Sr.) played minor league baseball. As soon as I heard the name I knew it was familiar so I looked it up. His dad played 7 years of minor league ball('93-99), mostly in the Braves farm system. I saw this guy at a minor league game about 15 years back and the name stuck in my head.
|5 years 44 weeks ago||Rad!!!||
I thought me and my friends were the only people who have seen Rad. What a comically terrible movie starring a very hot Lori Loughlin aka Aunt Becky from Full House. Breaking Away is a sweet movie, you need to watch it.
|5 years 44 weeks ago||More like 90%||
Tate may not be able to start at 80% of the schools right now but Locker won't be at Washington next year and Pryor and Mallett won't be at their schools in two years. Tate could start almost anywhere eventually. Penn State might be somepace that he couldn't because Bolden is a freshman but then again he might be able to beat out Bolden.
|5 years 45 weeks ago||Spring game||
I was at the spring game and I'm surprised at how well Robinson is playing. Our defense is horrible and he went against the second team most of the time. Last year Tate Forcier looked like Payton Manning in the spring game. I'll take Denard's early production though.
|5 years 45 weeks ago||LSU||
I guess I have no reason to argue that they should be higher. They probably should have beat UNC by more. However, I think they wil be a top 10 team by the end of the year.
|5 years 45 weeks ago||wait a second||
So are you saying you'd rather pin your hopes to a high school junior than Cox, Touissant and Hopkins?
|5 years 46 weeks ago||Who cares!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!||
Who cares what the rule says. We all saw it. It was a catch by any definition. If it doesn't piss you off that the nfl can find a way to call a perfectly good catch, not a catch then you need to grow a pair.
|5 years 46 weeks ago||Cink?!?||
When was the last time he contended? the Brittish Open last year is the last time he played well. Brandt Snedeker has had top 5's the last 3 weeks and he's #1 on tour in putting which is huge in Match play. I probably would have picked 10 guys before I picked Cink.
|5 years 48 weeks ago||Good Post||
Forget everybody who mentioned Bo's "The Team" speech because they would be crying in the corner if Brandon Graham had gotten hurt last year. We all love Bo and his speech but losing good players can cost us games. i think if anything your article demonstrates that Woolfolk's was less damaging and not more.
|5 years 49 weeks ago||Best Solution Yet||
I have alwas been fearful of how any playoff would affect the excitement of the regular season (as I've clearly stated) and small playoffs and plus one scenarios have more holes than swiss cheese. One of the reasons I've opposed a playoff is because I'm afraid they will do it small and they will do it poorly. However, I've always felt that a big playoff (16 teams most preferably) is by far the best scenario. My ideal scenario is similar to what you laid out. In mine I would give auto-bids to every conference which is something I think NCAA would want and would make it like all other sports. It also would have less dispute about who is in than and allow for home games which I think are important. Also, I would have two home games and put the four winners in two BCS games and the four quarterfinal losers in two other bowl games. While I am not on the playoff bandwagon yet. You at least have identified the best and most logical playoff scenario. I can't fault anything that you've said. I just love college football so much I'm afraid that a playoff would diminish the excitement.
|5 years 49 weeks ago||Did you watch?||
The BCS would have settled it by having an undefeated Nebraska play West Virginia and we would have had an undefeated national champion. With the bowl alliances West Virginia and Nebraska ended up in different bowls. If you're going to try to suggest a 4 team playoff in the '93 scenario then that FSU/ND regular season game would have been drastically downplayed and that's my original point.
Utah vs. 3-9 Michigan was a close game in '08. Oklahoma or Florida would have hung 50 on Utah.
My whole idea is that good teams should be putting teams like Boise State, Utah and TCU on their schedule so that A. We get an even better regular season and B. We can feel better about the two teams that make it to the championship game.
|5 years 49 weeks ago||Missed the Point||
It doesn't matter if football is different than basketball or a 64 team tournament is different than a 4 team one. The point is that it's a FACT that the masses prefer a great 15 week regular season to a great 2 or 3 week post-season. Also, I defy you to illustrate how a playoff would make the regular season mean more. Tell me how the'06 UM/OSU game would have been MORE meaningful if both teams were already in the playoffs. For you to think that you have presented a valid argument is what is astounding.
|5 years 49 weeks ago||Missed the Point||
I'm not arguing that the current system (which wasn't in place in '93 by the way, so your point is moot) is a more fair way to pick a champion. As a Michigan fan I didn't really care who won the championship in '93 anyway. My point is that the current system is more exciting and a better product. No one has put up an argument to dispute that yet.
|5 years 49 weeks ago||Disagree||
The plus one sounds good until you think about it. You're just as likely to have a three way dispute after the bowls as before. Also it punishes a team that plays a great opponent verses a team that plays an easy one (there's always a weak BCS team ie. Hawaii). Also it's a punishment if there is clearly a best team after the Bowls. Should Alabama have had to play another game after beating Texas last year? Who would they have played? Should they have had to beat Florida again? The plus one doesn't accomplish what people claim it would accomplish.