- Member for
- 5 years 32 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|5 years 28 weeks ago||It was just a simple||
It was just a simple question, but thanks for the hostility. It is basically worthless to post anything on here anymore when you have some individuals on full-out attack mode.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Blue in South Bend: I think||
Blue in South Bend: I think you need to go back and reread my post. I said "some", not all. There are many on here that are legite, but when you responded to my post without me mentioning names trying to defend yourself tells me that you are admitting to it. As I stated, thank you for that. It was a simple question that some, as you would call them "know it alls" viciously responded to. What is the point of that? What is the point of you posting that since I have been on here I have been trying to convince some that others are doing wrong? Where is your valid premise for that argument? If this blog is full of know it alls and people with major egos (as you and waggles have stated), then wouldn't it be proper to respond to others in a civil way who are not "know it alls"? This will be my last post on this issue. It is pointless to talk about something like this to someone who admits to being a "know it all".
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Wow, wow, wow; where did I||
Wow, wow, wow; where did I try to convince ANYONE that they were doing things wrong on here? Are you just pulling things out of your ass now? Post any comment and prove to me where I tried to convince others that people are doing wrong on here. Again, sorry I haven't been on this blog posting for several years, but Blue in South Bend, you are proving my point exact. Thank you.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I will stop the argument||
I will stop the argument there and respect your statement. I do not believe in your belief, but will respect it. I will be serious, though, it sounds like crazy talk.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Man, I hope you are kidding.||
Man, I hope you are kidding. Please, please tell me you are kidding? It's ok to be on the greatest blog supporting the best program of all time, but, come on with that "we should have ego" talk.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Man you are dead on.||
Man you are dead on.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||What you are missing is my||
What you are missing is my meaning to the question. People have answered that they are or maybe back for the Kalis visit, but I have not read any post answering as to when their vacation ended or ends? So, let's say that Kalis was not visiting this weekend, would the Michigan coaches have been back from their vacations? When did the vacation start, and when was it scheduled to end? That was the basis of my question, but to get attacked on for a simple question just proves some people's egoes on here.
I am fairly new to this blog, but I have quickly realized just how egotistic some people are on here. It's like if you don't know everything about Michigan football and the coaches, then you are not to shun out any posts on here or you will be massively attacked. Sorry I do not spend 24 hours of the day getting up-to-date on the latest on Michigan issues, so that is why I come on here and ask certain questions, but just to get attacked on.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||The third one does not answer||
The third one does not answer my question as it is a question as well. The second and first posts do not answer my questions either. Each refers to the coaches being back for Kalis' visit, but where does it answer my question of whether or not their vacations ended this weekend or not? They could have just come back for the visit and that's all.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||"Go read the entire thread||
"Go read the entire thread before ever post again"? So, what type of anger management issues do you have? Or, is it because it's Saturday and you got a head start on your drunken period of the week? WHERE in the thread does it answer my question? I said "I thought", not that it was actually the case, so, please, before you post your worthless comment make sure you understand what it is you are typing.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I thought the coaches were on||
I thought the coaches were on vacation for a week and that their vacation began last weekend? If this is true, then wouldn't that mean that they are back by now, or close to it?
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Thanks for the information||
Thanks for the information OMG Shirtless. Scout made it seem like (when they referenced to a "surprise" team) that it was not Michigan, or any of the other teams that had been on his top 5 for a while.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Scout's Michigan front page||
Scout's Michigan front page has an article on Washington possibly having a new #1. It talks about a "surprise" team maybe being his #1. Out of his recent top 5, the only team I can think of at this point is MSU. IF this is true, it would be an excellent grab for MSU. I would not mind grabbing Shittu and having a 3 man DT class consisting of O'Brien, Pipkins and Shittu (even though the coaches have stated they are only taking one more DT). It is a longshot, and I know they play different DL positions, but if Washington does not commit to Michigan, would this persuade Shittu to take a stronger look at us? I think there was talk about moving Godin to the tackle position, but if Washington does not come here, could they keep Godin at end if Shittu commits? I am not to technical on going deeper into each DL position, so I apologize for not referring to each DT position, and each DE position (WDE and SDE).
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Sorry, I made a mistake on my||
Sorry, I made a mistake on my last post. It is O'Brien and not O'Neil. My apologizes.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||It does not seem like this||
It does not seem like this Mega Class is over yet (hopefully). How many of those talented players would be back-ups if Michigan gets some more elite players? Can you imagine Godin as a back-up if Michigan gets Pipkins and O'Neil? How about Ojemudia backing up Washington or Wormley, or one of them backing up Ojemudia? Beyer would also be a back-up to one of those two guys unless he out-plays them. What about Kalis, Bryant, Braden and Stacey battling it out for two starting positions while the other two are back-ups? Countess would be a big contender at CB as well. This is all off course if they get commits from the players I mentioned that they currently do not have committed to them.
Would Rawls really redshirt this year to be placed as a "Sr." by the time the 2012 class is at senior status? Dam, it's good to have the traditional style of play and recruiting back to this program.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||She lived a long life and||
She lived a long life and that is what we all want before passing. As M-Dog said it, peace to her and former President Mr. Ford.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||If the university declared||
If the university declared this 6th man ineligible, then why are they asking the NCAA to reinstate him?
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I saw that on 247sports.||
I saw that on 247sports. Could Wilson's committment to Michigan have influenced Smith to decommit from Tennessee and heavily look at MSU? Maybe Smith wants to still have some kind of connection with his teammate, and since Michigan has not offered him a scholarship then why not go to an arch-rival and play your buddy every year? I thought that may have been the path O'neil was heading to before his latest comments of focusing on two schools which does not consist of MSU.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Not only that, but they are||
Not only that, but they are still paying his salary, atleast up to this month. I had a tremendous amout of respect for the OSU program, and even after all these violations that had been coming out I still held a little respect for them, but I am down to nearly no respect left for this program. They are just a disgusting cheating bunch of idiots that are working on these scandal issues.
This is off-topic, but was there a report that came out recently saying that Adolphus Washington was leaning towards MSU? I just went to the Michigan scout page and read a small portion of it. Couldn't read all of it because I am not a subscriber to scout. Can anyone shed a little bit of light on this?
|5 years 28 weeks ago||You live in a state I would||
You live in a state I would love to live in. I just finished up college, so I hope to get into my profession in your state, or states that surround your state (Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, or South Dakota).
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I am not saying that I want||
I am not saying that I want him to run faster, because it is what it is and you can't teach anyone to run faster. What I am saying is that he may have a lot of problems playing the position against faster WRs.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I apologize, the 4.7 was in||
I apologize, the 4.7 was in Stanford's time and I got the two times mixed up. Nonetheless, a 4.61 for a CB is not that impressive. I am not saying that this is Standifer's normal time (4.61), because he could have just had an off day in acceleration and rhythm of the run. The criticism on Hollowell was his height and 40 time (between 4.55-4.7), so why wouldn't there be criticism on Standifer's? I am excited that he committed to Michigan, but in my opinion, to be excited on ALL aspects of the player just because he committed to your school whether it is deserved or not is just not plausible.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Hopefully the couple of||
Hopefully the couple of hostages will get through this with no physical harm done to them. It is sad to try and ponder what goes through the minds of certain people.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||So, because I expect a CB to||
So, because I expect a CB to run faster then a 4.7 I am being unrealistic? Recievers who are taller then 6" that run 4.5 or better are not realistic? As I said, I hope this is just a one time record of their run and not what they place as an average.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I think it would be a good||
I think it would be a good signing in drawing in recruits. Wheatley is doing pretty well getting the attention of some good recruits for Syracuse.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Mistake. Stanford had a||
Mistake. Stanford had a 4.73, not a 4.77.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||Dunn had a 4.77? Stanford||
Dunn had a 4.77? Stanford had a time of 4.77? Dang
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I did not find any of the||
I did not find any of the Michigan's 40 times or verticals that impressive. To be satisfied by a 4.61 time is basically settling. Other top programs will have recievers that run faster, so how are they going to be caught? I like Standifer and Richardson committing to Michigan, but hopefully this is not their average times and just a one run record.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||I wasn't comparing them||
I wasn't comparing them recruiting talented players to Michigan, I was comparing them to other programs at their level. This is the second good DT they have lost to Iowa in the last two recruiting classes. Darian Cooper was (I believe) pretty high on MSU based on his buddy Darien Harris committing to MSU. Eventually Cooper put Michigan into the mix as well, but lost out to Iowa. A runningback from the 2011 recruiting class decommitted from MSU and chose Iowa. I would never compare MSU's recruiting with Michigan's, because they are not on the same level, but to lose out on talent to other teams at your level historically after the 10-2 season is pretty pathetic, especially when Iowa had a pretty dissappointing season compared to what some thought they would be. I guess that one game dominating MSU did it for some recruits.
|5 years 28 weeks ago||This is a very weird||
This is a very weird recruiting year for MSU so far. You would think that the 10-2 2010 season would help them recruit talent to the program, but it has done the exact opposite so far. It does not seem like Dantonion can reel in those talented players to MSU.
|5 years 29 weeks ago||Is it still possible that||
Is it still possible that Tennessee will be hit by the NCAA for their violations in football?