spoiler alert: i linked this
- Member for
- 7 years 43 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|2 days 20 hours ago||You're right.||
For some reason the MGoBlue archives omitted that game. Overall point still stands, though.
|1 week 21 hours ago||Have no fear.||
It'll be in the tourney. A few of these fit multiple categories.
|1 week 1 day ago||Yeah, it's unfair.||
Peoples-Jones hasn't sought out much attention at all given his high profile, and the only time he bucked that trend was to speak out against the satellite camp ban—not because it served his best interests, but because it could help out lesser-known prospects.
Taking the time to evaluate all available options doesn't make one a diva. Blanket characterizations of high school kids really, really bother me.
|1 week 3 days ago||For non-mobile users...||
...this was a response to a post that can no longer be seen.
|3 weeks 2 days ago||Yes, he has.||
Evan Smotrycz played quite a bit as a 6'8" stretch four before he transferred; he also played the five but he would've been a four long-term had he stuck around.
At West Virginia, Beilein played 6'8" Joe Alexander at the four, and I believe he had taller fours in general at WVU, but KenPom doesn't list heights/weights for his pre-2007 teams.
Just because Beilein has played shorter players at the four here doesn't mean he doesn't want bigger guys there. Note that, as mentioned in this post, he wants to play DJ Wilson on the wing. There are good reasons to believe Peters won't end up here, but it won't be because he isn't a fit.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||Because...||
Robinson, MAAR, Dawkins, and Donnal all had impressively low turnover rates. Also, Michigan may have been sixth nationally, but they were fifth in Big Ten play—they didn't do as good a job taking care of the ball against quality opponents. I'm not trying to lampoon Irvin for no reason here; it's a part of his game that needs work.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||I'm not inventing...||
...the 18.3 turnover rate in Big Ten play. That is too high. This isn't that hard.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||This totally isn't moving the||
This totally isn't moving the goalposts:
I'm done using my time on this. In the final five games you cited below, Irvin went 7/33 on three-pointers. The point of that section in my post was that Irvin and Walton couldn't put it all together this year; for Irvin, a major part of that was the turnovers—which I think I've shown were an issue as teams adjusted to his new style of play—and another major part was him losing his jumper.
Out of the seven games in conference+tourney play in which Irvin dished out four or more assists, he had three or more turnovers in four of them—the exceptions were Rutgers, Nebraska, and the Notre Dame game in which he shot 4/16. When he got more assertive, he struggled to take care of the ball. I'm not sure why this is so hard to accept since it was quite obvious when watching him play.
Yes, Irvin got thrown into a tough situation when LeVert went down and he was tasked with generating more offense. Yes, there were encouraging signs from his play. But take off the maize-colored glasses; he posted an O-Rating below 100 and context only covers for so much of that. Michigan needed him to be a viable #1 option and he wasn't that most of the time.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||It's difficult to argue...||
...when you keep moving the goalposts. I'm using KenPom, the standard-bearer for college hoops stats. Irvin's turnovers were an issue, increasingly so as opponents adjusted to way he expanded his game, and while he deserves a lot of credit for said expansion, an objective analysis of the team still requires looking at the flaws—turnovers were a flaw, and in conjunction with his shooting numbers an especially troublesome one.
To then turn around and say Robinson's very reasonable turnover rate is "unacceptable" doesn't make any sense to me. Plus, context is important here: Irvin is heading into his final season at Michigan and he's played a major role for three years; Robinson just played his first year of game action against D-I competition. The expectations for them in 15-16 were different for good reason.
|4 weeks 1 day ago||Sure, let's compare.||
First of all, Irvin's season-long turnover rate was 15%, not 13%, a difference that's far from unsubstantial. I like to look at conference-only numbers since they eliminate a lot of the variation you get from quality of non-conference schedule. Looking at the players you brought up:
Irvin 15-16: 18.8 assist rate, 18.3 turnover rate
I agree that Irvin improved quite a bit as a shot-creator this year, but his turnovers are an issue, and that became apparent down the stretch as opponents looked to pickpocket his too-high dribble or cut off his baseline kickouts. He had 20 turnovers in the last five conference games; four of those were losses. Plus, his shooting numbers this year were way worse than those of the other players mentioned.
I'm encouraged by many aspects of Irvin's play, but to say his turnovers are acceptable is to overlook both the numbers and what was quite apparent simply from watching the team play down the stretch.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||That's his 247 listing.||
Usually they're up to date, but even if that figure isn't exactly correct—and especially if he's grown a couple inches—the point still stands. He's going to need to add a lot of muscle once he gets on campus to the point that it's probably best if he redshirts.
|4 weeks 2 days ago||Hence the...||
|4 weeks 3 days ago||Re: cover||
I've seen this year's cover design and it's the best one we've had, IMO. Don't want to give it away before we announce the Kickstarter and all that, but I think you'll all like it quite a bit.
|4 weeks 3 days ago||The Izzo comparison...||
...confuses me. Forbes is a pure two-guard. Nairn and Trice are PGs. Forbes is a gunner instead of a lockdown defender, but otherwise that's the exact same thing I'm advocating for Beilein to do if a spot opens up.
Watson is there for depth if injury strikes, plus Michigan could play Irvin at the two and use Chatman/Wilson at the four if the backcourt needs to be further bolstered. With limited scholarships to work with, there's only so much you can construct an injury-proof roster; Michigan's actually not in bad shape in that regard.
|4 weeks 3 days ago||The trouble with bringing Spike back...||
...is you're then impeding the development of a highly regarded player at the same position. Xavier Simpson is the future at point guard for this team and they want him to get plenty of time next year. If he's stuck behind Walton and Albrecht, it's hurting the team down the road just so the team can have a marginal one-year upgrade at backup point guard (and that's not a slight against Spike, I just think Simpson is very good).
If there's further attrition, I'd rather see Michigan go after a grad transfer shooting guard, preferably one who's a positive on the defensive end. That's far from the sentimental choice, but I think it's the best one for the team.
|4 weeks 3 days ago||Aigh||
Complete brain fart on Poole—I've been working through withdrawal from a medication I had to stop taking and it's turned me into a temporary zombie, so I'll go ahead and blame that. The overall point still stands; barring injury, Michigan won't need to play a walk-on in the guard rotation, and with Simpson's ability to make an instant impact I'm still more worried about the center position.
|5 weeks 1 day ago||In addition to that...||
...when a defender is beat off the dribble at the top of the key, especially on a high screen, the help defense usually comes from the corner. Those shots aren't only shorter; attempts from the corner tend to be more open because of the way they're created.
|5 weeks 1 day ago||I'll get to Donnal...||
...in another post, but here's the short version: while he improved, his defense is still quite bad, he continues to have trouble finishing contested shots, and as Wagner bulks up and cuts down on fouls there will be less and less reason to play Donnal over him. I'd love to be more bullish on him but sometimes you have to look past the numbers; it was very apparent who Michigan's best big man was at the end of the season and it wasn't Donnal.
|6 weeks 2 days ago||No.||
|7 weeks 3 days ago||Those are two different||
Those are two different things, chief.
|9 weeks 1 day ago||Yes.||
That's not going anywhere. Can't record at our normal time this weekend because of Sunday evening's hoops game but we're trying to do a new episode next week.
|9 weeks 2 days ago||I got back from vacation...||
...this afternoon, but Alex wrote a preview.
|11 weeks 1 day ago||Oh, c'mon.||
There are also the statistics in the entire rest of the post, which used that as a jumping-off point. Here's another one: in the first matchup against Saturday's very good opponent, Purdue, he went 8/11 on two-pointers. This was far from a one-game fluke against a bad team.
I understand the pessimism surrounding the basketball team right now, but lazy, knee-jerk comments like this aren't helping anything.
|11 weeks 1 day ago||Those (rightfully, IMO) don't count...||
...as "at-the-rim" attempts. Those only include dunk and layup attempts, essentially.
|11 weeks 2 days ago||Yeah, the OP's comment...||
...confuses me a bit, too. Robinson is more inclined to take someone off the dribble, especially in recent games. Dawkins finishes at a higher percentage but that's in large part because his two-point opportunities are usually created by someone else. According to hoop-math, 83% of Dawkins' makes at the rim are assisted. For Robinson, that figure is only 57%.
|11 weeks 4 days ago||To my knowledge...||
...they have not moved to Istanbul. So that's a positive, I think.
|12 weeks 1 day ago||It's...||
|12 weeks 1 day ago||A few potential factors here:||
1. Rockford is a really good program that tends to dominate their division opponents.
2. Aggressive fourth-down strategy tends to be the norm in high school and coaches tend to stick with their ways.
3. It's not just about having a good kicker. You need a reliable long-snapper and holder, too. The former can be especially tough to find at the high school level, and unless you have a dedicated long-snapper, you're taking practice time away from working at positions that are going to be on the field a whole lot more.
|12 weeks 6 days ago||How you drew all that...||
...from one line is rather remarkable.
At no point did I say this team shouldn't shoot a high number of threes—I've maintained quite the opposite all season (and all of Beilein's tenure), in fact. It's hard to dispute, however, that when Michigan doesn't make many threes, they tend to find themselves in trouble—they got crushed in similar performances against UConn and SMU. The whole theme of the post is that they've now reached the point where they're able to generate consistent offense even when the outside shots aren't falling—which is, I believe, your second point above.
If you're going to criticize for lazy writing, you might want to be more careful in your reading.
|12 weeks 6 days ago||34 points in the paint...||
...this afternoon. Michigan doesn't list game-by-game totals so I'll leave the research to someone else for now, but that's definitely one of their higher outputs this season.