Why are people So Convinced Mccaffrey Will Be a Good QB

Submitted by MGoBlue96 on November 24th, 2020 at 12:33 AM

So one of the narratives forming is that UM's season might be going better if Mccaffrey was the starter, but I honestly have to ask why are people so bullish on a guy who hadn't proved anything yet at the college level? Rooting for him to turn out to be a great QB wherever he decides to go obviously, but it sure seems like a leap in logic for people to assume what he is going to turn out to be at the college level.

RobM_24

November 24th, 2020 at 12:40 AM ^

He was the best athlete of the QB options, so the QB run game would be on the table. He looked better than Milton in the limited snaps they had. And probably most of all, everyone in his family is an accomplished athlete.

Magnus

November 24th, 2020 at 9:06 AM ^

Yup. McCaffrey struggled throwing the ball, except for a deep ball to Ronnie Bell in 2018.

I do think he is/was better than Milton, but McCaffrey wasn't better than Shea at anything except running. And even then, McCaffrey got hurt while running, whereas Shea stayed healthy.

Magnus

November 24th, 2020 at 10:03 AM ^

I think he strained his oblique, and that caused some issues, but not season-ending issues. Every player gets dinged up throughout a season, whether it's a strained muscle, a rolled ankle, or whatever. McCaffrey broke his collarbone and got concussed, both of which basically ended his seasons.

Mgoblue0205

November 25th, 2020 at 4:07 PM ^

I beg to differ, with all the experience Shea had he still panicked when pressured, was careless with the football in the pocket leading to numerous fumbles....Despite Dylan's lack of experience he was poised in the pocket against Notre Dame. We didn't see enough of him in live action to say he couldn't pass as some have said like it's a fact. He was pretty sharp in the spring scrimmages. Most importantly, overall he had much more polish than Joe Milton. So yea I think Michigan beats MSU and plays Wisconsin and Indiana tougher with Dmac.

Buy Bushwood

November 24th, 2020 at 7:06 AM ^

Look, the back-up QB is always the best QB on the football team, if only these idiot coaches would realize it.  It's the same from the NFL level, right down to Uncle Rico.  So it stands to reason that a QB who isn't even on the team any longer would be even better than the back-up QB.  It's just basic distributive math.   

CMHCFB

November 24th, 2020 at 8:46 AM ^

As an OSU fan, I remember seeing him play against WI and thinking that UM finally found a QB.  Shea was never a threat, IMO, McCaffrey was great running the ball and was ok in the pass game.  This is a pretty good analysis of the limited number of plays that he had in 2019. 
 

https://www.michigandaily.com/section/football/film-breakdown-three-takeaways-dylan-mccaffreys-2019-season

chunkums

November 24th, 2020 at 12:44 AM ^

A lot of people are absolutely certain of things that they couldn't possibly know. It's a really weird phenomenon. We saw McCaffrey come in at times last year and he seemed fine. He didn't look bad, but he didn't light the world on fire. Rutgers caveats apply, but what we saw from Cade on Saturday was more than we ever saw out of McCaffrey.  

manhattan wolverine

November 24th, 2020 at 12:52 AM ^

1) Father played in the NFL and his brother was a Heisman finalist. His younger brother is starting for Nebraska. Football is basically encoded in this kid's DNA.

2) Highly rated by all recruitment services, was a 5-star at one point, ended up as a 4-star top 150 recruit. 

3) Beat out Milton and McNamara, was on track to start up until the incident

What else do you need? 

MGoBlue96

November 24th, 2020 at 1:00 AM ^

1. For every story like that there are plenty other examples of genetics not always working out. Barry Sanders son played RB in a college a couple of years ago but he was just another guy to throw out an example.

2. High recruit is somewhat meaningless in terms of guaranteed success as many do not pan out.

3. Where are you even getting that? That is pure speculation. There is not a single source that has said he won the job.

Do you notice how all three of those points you made have nothing to do with what he has actually shown on the college field to this point?

manhattan wolverine

November 24th, 2020 at 1:11 AM ^

1. I'll bet on the kid whose father is an NFL player and has brothers in the NFL and starting at the college level, to be better than a true freshman.

2. Two thirds of selections in the 2020 draft were 4 stars or above. Not sure how you could think that's "meaningless".

3. Yes, multiple sources said he won the job and transferred after a disagreement with the coaches. Was not about the depth chart. Posted a few weeks back. 

Will let you figure out the rest. 

1VaBlue1

November 24th, 2020 at 8:49 AM ^

MGoPoster 'Ghost of Jermain' has inside sources and occasionally drops gold nuggets here.  I've actually never read one of his insidery posts that didn't prove true.  In any case, he dropped this four days ago.  I believe it, in part because both Jermaine is usually (always) right, and because it makes sense out of an otherwise non-sensical thing.

I've remained convinced that DMac replaced Shea at Wisconsin for good, not just for that game.  He sparked life into the team, and had them actually moving the ball pretty well, against UW.  Until he was targeted, twice, into a multi-week concussion protocol.  By the time he got back on the field, Shea was more comfortable in the offense and DMac was too far behind to catch up.  I have no reason to believe that Milton had passed him in camp, so Jermaine's reasoning seems plausible to me.

As for him being a great prospect?  He remains just that - a great prospect.  Predicting certain greatness for him is as much a reach as predicting he'll suck - which largely seems like what you're doing.

manhattan wolverine

November 24th, 2020 at 12:56 PM ^

You're being dense on purpose. Really made a whole thread just to argue. Lmao.

You asked for reasons why people thought he was going to be great, and got a ton of answers. None of it is a "leap in logic".

The rumor that he beat both QBs out and transferred after a disagreement is linked above. Ghost of jermain posted it

Ezeh-E

November 24th, 2020 at 1:19 PM ^

1. I'd've bet $ on McCaffrey being a great QB, too, given the same reasons. Turns out we'd have both lost our money. He may yet turn into a good QB, but it hasn't happened yet.

2. It would be a lot more useful to look at the % of 4-star QBs who are starting in year 4 at the school they enrolled. My guess is under 50%.

3. Hey maybe. But coaches usually do their best not to run off their starting QB

sbeck04

November 24th, 2020 at 1:15 AM ^

He’d shown the ability to correctly make some reads which are vital to this offense and that he was a real threat running at least.  
 

He was almost assuredly going to replace Patterson as the starter last year if he hadn’t gotten decapitated.  It’s just outrageous how much talent these coaches run off.