November 9th, 2013 at 9:50 PM ^
which is why Brandon should fire Hoke.
If Hoke can see that a change must be made then give him a 4th year.
If not, what's the point?
November 9th, 2013 at 9:25 PM ^
It appears that the coaching staff has gotten so far into Devin's head trying to turn him into the anti-denard that the poor kid doesn't know what to do. His hesitation & timing is not all the o-lines fault. Don't get me wrong, the o-line is bad at best, but when he does have time he freezes. Still trying to make players be something they are not into what they want.
November 9th, 2013 at 8:56 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:05 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:56 PM ^
He used the short passes, screen play, etc. on the scoring drive then never went back! Reminded me of the OSU game last year, where he had a totally different approach in the second half vs. what was successful in the first half.
November 9th, 2013 at 8:28 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 8:35 PM ^
hiring Narduzzi for HC if Hoke is let go?
November 9th, 2013 at 8:43 PM ^
Would Narduzzi come here?
November 9th, 2013 at 8:46 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:20 PM ^
Neither Narduzzi nor Dantonio should be considered even if they were interested. If we hired a coach who preaches 60 minutes of unnecessary roughness, I would stop rooting for my alma mater. Hoke is the right kind of human being; neither Narduzzi nor Dantonio satisfy that primary criterion.
November 9th, 2013 at 9:47 PM ^
I am seriously starting to hate that phrase.
November 9th, 2013 at 10:17 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:59 PM ^
The criteria for coaching is winning football games. There is nothing, absolutely NOTHING wrong with preaching toughness when playing your opponent. The game is ultimately about intimidation and enforcing your will! If you can get in the head of your opponent you have already won.
If you want a sport based on etiquette watch golf or tennis.
November 9th, 2013 at 9:49 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:46 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 8:54 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:13 PM ^
Borges is the problem. He decides how plays will be designed and what plays will be run. He has no clue as to how to best use the players he has, even when there is clear evidence as to what can be done. The first drive of the second half worked great. We never saw that set of plays again. When Bo was the coach, if something worked, we did it until the other team found a way to stop it. When Borges finds something that works, he goes right back to an under center play action pass or power running play, neither of which have a snowball's chance in h@#l of working. It's painful to watch. And it is interesting that the Nebraska defender says Nebraska knew what was coming based on the formation. For the most part, so did I. Funk should get a chance to put a more experienced line on the field. Borges should not get another chance, because he cannot work with whatever he has and refuses to take what a defense is giving. In addition, Denard got worse each year under Borges, and Gardner is not improving or being put in a position where he can be successful. Did we ever try that swing pass to Toussaint that went for 40 yards at any point later in the game?
November 9th, 2013 at 10:31 PM ^
@TremendousUM: "@swmckewonOWH: Gregory: "They had tendencies. Whatever formation they came out in, we knew what they were going to throw at us." #Huskers"
November 9th, 2013 at 9:13 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:38 PM ^
I only saw the first quarter of the game (took my little girl to a rollerskating party). When I got home I was surprised to learn Nebraska didn't score more points. Looking at the offensive stats of the game only and the first two possesions of the game, it's so frustating watching this team play offense.
November 9th, 2013 at 9:39 PM ^
I just watched the press conference and it's difficult to figure out what Hoke really thinks. Sometimes I look at his mannerisms and voice and think he's on the verge of losing it and breaking down. Other times I think he just doesn't want to call anyone out so he makes the blanket statement "I need to coach them better". But, at the same time he says he has to look at play calling, running on first down, etc. He seems unsure of what to do going forward. He seems to realize there is a problem, but he's not quite sure of how to handle it. Maybe I'm way off, but I've never seen him this unsure of himself. If in fact he is frustrated I wish he would just admit it and say he's not sure, but he is going to figure it out instead of half pretending he knows what the problem is, but yet being vague about it.
November 9th, 2013 at 9:40 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:40 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:43 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:41 PM ^
Borges just had his lunch money stolen again, this time by one of the worst defenses in all of the major conferences. He had to know exactly what every team for the remainder of the season will doing to his offense following the MSU debacle. His response? The worst fear of every Michigan fan watching that game was Al's response. Failure across the board. How many other big-time programs in the nation would tolerate such utter failure?
November 9th, 2013 at 9:45 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:45 PM ^
I am not sure if Hoke is right for the job or not. It seems like the coaches that do well at schools like Michigan are the big personalities like Harbaugh, Saban, Meyer, and Miles. I don't see Hoke in that mold. He seems like a nice person and from all accounts is a good coach, but I am not sure he is the type of transformation figure that can get it done when expecations are championships. The bar is quite a bit higher than his previous stops.
It also bothers me that after todays game, he supposedly commented that he was happy with the play calling. Will he make the tough calls with his coaches and scheme after the season? Maybe?
At Michigan the expectation is Championships, not just competing.
Time will tell! He's not going anywhere anytime soon!
November 9th, 2013 at 9:47 PM ^
That's okay: even if we finish poorly, we'll be able to pick high in the draft.
:)
November 9th, 2013 at 9:48 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 9:58 PM ^
Funk should have been fired already. This is a disgrace. All of this teams offensive ills stem from a lack of execution and toughness on the Offensive line. Missed assignments, slow and weak play. It is amazing to watch. Btw how is it Vincent Smith could block defensive linemen better than our guards and tackles? Also, what is up with the lack of explosion and strength?
We need to get an ace O-line coach in here yesterday. A prime time well regarding coach with a proven track record - not someone who happens to be buds with the HC. If Funk is arond next year you'll get another 4 or 5 loss season and more games with negative rushing yards.
November 9th, 2013 at 11:17 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 10:03 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 10:05 PM ^
Hoke is too loyal to his coaches to fire anyone of them. He'll take all the blame for himself and already has, in his own words.
November 9th, 2013 at 10:12 PM ^
Whoever said they question our toughness can shove it. The guys seem to say the right things. All sources seem to indicate the guys practice and play hard. Yet, we don't execute in games. That has to mean the playcalling is bad, the coaches are not putting them in positions to be successful, and/or we are simply young an inexperienced. I just wish that even if all those things are true we could show improvement.
November 9th, 2013 at 10:19 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 10:26 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 10:39 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 10:33 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:33 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 10:42 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 10:52 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:13 PM ^
The coaches have loved to emphasize accountability. If accountability is truly a virtue of this football program, Al Borges will be gone after this year (if not others along with him).
There are many reasons why our offense may be struggling this season. But very few of those reasons, if any, relieve Al Borges of accountability.
To me, Borges has now become GERG.
November 10th, 2013 at 12:21 AM ^
November 10th, 2013 at 12:45 AM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:17 PM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:19 PM ^
They talked about how well wison has been playing but they decide to change him up and Furman sounded like he was gonna play to even if Gordon's ankle wasn't hurt. Now tell me why the hell would u do that when the offense is the problem maybe sit Fitz's loesy blocking ass which seems to be no one on the team can do is block. We were suppose to have all these good rbs but they don't play anyone but Fitz? Finally green played some and at least when he had some room he gained yards unlike Fitz who loses them always he has gotten worse since his sophomore year. I say change up all the offensive coaches Fred it is time to go we need some young blood. Wheatley my choice. Borges we can have a monkey do better than him n funk well I say hire someone who has been a pro before Backus runyan, Backus is helping the lions line and they look good. Maybe I am biased but I think he would be good or hutchinson. Just want someone different. N it would make recruiting better
November 9th, 2013 at 11:42 PM ^
November 10th, 2013 at 12:40 AM ^
November 9th, 2013 at 11:37 PM ^
What completely befuddles me is why Borges thought it was good play calling when he called the two runs after the muffed punt recovery. It makes no sense whatsoever. There is NO rational justification that he, Hoke, nor anyone could offer that would justify this. First, it has not worked all season. Second, it has not worked all game. Most importantly, although I understand the idea of "maintaining the run" to keep the defense honest, but that wasn't the right circumstance in the game to be doing this. This was a time in the game to take shots at the End Zone and make Nebraksa pay dearly for fumbling.
Freakin' pathetic. I just cannot understand why a guy would do that.
November 9th, 2013 at 11:40 PM ^