Shout-out To The Refs On Overturning That Scoop And Score

Submitted by MaizenBlue93 on December 29th, 2019 at 12:09 AM

andrewG

December 29th, 2019 at 2:50 PM ^

Yup. Takes 3 steps with the ball secured in his hands, tries to turn upfield and finally gets the ball knocked out. Catch, fumble. If it had been called incomplete on the field, I would have been surprised for the call to stand, but for it to get called a fumble and then reversed is insane.

My eyes went wide and I cackled when the overturned call was announced.

maize-blue

December 29th, 2019 at 12:11 AM ^

Herbie did his damndest to convince us it was a catch and fumble.

Dude sounds he wants to cry giving his final thoughts on this game.

Detroit Dan

December 29th, 2019 at 12:12 AM ^

That was a horrible call which probably decided the game.  The targeting call was legit, but mostly a fluke.

JamieH

December 29th, 2019 at 12:12 AM ^

The fact that Herbstreit thought it was a fumble means nothing.  In real time he had the ball for a fraction of a second.  If that play happens in the end zone, it probably wouldn't be ruled a touchdown.  Therefore it isn't a fumble either--it's incomplete.

It COULD have been ruled a fumble, but I don't think calling it incomplete was ridiculous.

the fume

December 29th, 2019 at 12:23 AM ^

If they rule it a catch and he doesn't fumble, they rule forward progress 4 yards up-field.

I'm not sure if that's actually reviewable, but I think the correct call was made in the end. You can't fumble after forward progress is stopped.

snarling wolverine

December 29th, 2019 at 12:17 AM ^

Live, it clearly looked incomplete.  On replay it was closer, but I think the right call, because it looked like "the process" was ongoing when it came out. 

Of course Herbie thought otherwise because he's a pathetic homer.

CFraser

December 29th, 2019 at 12:18 AM ^

The problem is that they play it in slo-mo and literally any contact with the hands around the ball will look like a catch. 
 

Play that full speed and it’s beyond obvious that it wasn’t a catch. 

the fume

December 29th, 2019 at 12:19 AM ^

It's interesting, it looked like 3 steps, but happened real fast, and no football move.

In the end tho, forward progress was essentially stopped on the catch, so I don't think it can be a fumble.

Detroit Dan

December 29th, 2019 at 12:21 AM ^

Targeting call prevented the game from being a Buckeye blowout.  It was probably a good call, given the rules as they are.  But quite an impact for a player making a good defensive play that ends up helmet to helmet mostly by chance.  Athletes competing at full speed cannot be expected to know where the exact point of contact will be.   

Ohio State was the better team, but the Gods allow fluke outcomes.

Leaders And Best

December 29th, 2019 at 12:27 AM ^

You do realize that Herbstreit's twin sons are freshmen at Clemson right? His wife, a former OSU cheerleader, wore a Clemson jersey to the game to support their kids. I'm sure he bleeds Scarlet and Gray as a former OSU captain, but I think his kids being on the Clemson team take priority.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2019/12/28/kirk-herbstreit-family-feud-between-clemson-and-ohio-state-fiesta-bowl/2756870001/

https://clemsontigers.com/sports/football/roster/jake-herbstreit/

https://clemsontigers.com/sports/football/roster/tye-herbstreit/

Detroit Dan

December 29th, 2019 at 12:30 AM ^

Yup.

The last Clemson drive was amazing however.  

Still, Ohio State was the better team, but Clemson got break after break from the officiating.  

Day made the call of the day on that 4th and 1, but Dabo Sweeney is a great coach in his own right.

Detroit Dan

December 29th, 2019 at 12:41 AM ^

Hard to say that Clemson outplayed OSU on the targeting call.  OSU won the play, but luck turned the play, and the game, around.

Still, it was close enough that a couple of officiating decisions could change the outcome.  Great coaching on both sides.

Erik_in_Dayton

December 29th, 2019 at 12:45 AM ^

I don't like the rule, but that was a correct call. He never completed the third step of a catch by making some sort of move (not the exact wording of the rule but close enough). And he couldn't do that because he never fully controlled the ball. And, per the rule, there isn't a catch if any of this is in doubt.

Again, I don't like the rule. But that was a correct overturn.

Um1994

December 29th, 2019 at 1:35 AM ^

It was a close call if you were pulling for OSU. As it happened, it looked like no catch. The rules expert went against Kirk and Fowler and said no catch. He seemed to be right on with his analysis when they called on him.