Semi OT: Montana to Washington

Submitted by jokenjin on
So Nick Montana has verbally committed to Washington. I guess this semi-affects us positively because it means that he is not coming to Ohio State or Notre Dame. Since Washington missed out on Heaps, who went to BYU, they now have their QB of the future after Locker leaves. Probably one of the biggest pick ups for Sarkisian and Washington in a long while. Hopefully, we'll see Montana in a couple of years when we're playing Washington in the Rose Bowl.

Six Zero

June 10th, 2009 at 9:55 AM ^

As long as he stays as far away from the vest as possible, I got no problem with this kid. On the flip side, who becomes new primary target for free Escalades in Columbus for the next five years?

mrider

June 10th, 2009 at 9:58 AM ^

Yeh, I was thinking that. They also kinda waited on Gardner because Montana was their #1 guy. So this makes me happy, who is next on their list?

Magnus

June 10th, 2009 at 9:58 AM ^

Considering this is Sarkisian and Washington's first year together, I'd say it's their biggest pickup ever. But as for UW, they got Locker back in 2006 or 2007 and they got Kavario Middleton in 2008. I think Locker was in the top three QBs for his class.

Ziff72

June 10th, 2009 at 10:00 AM ^

As long as he didn't go to the Buckeyes. I loved Montana as a kid, the last place I wanted to see his kid go him go was OSU. Wash is a little bizarre.

lbpeley

June 10th, 2009 at 10:03 AM ^

Washington is extremely surprising. On the OSU / Gardner thing: will this make Gardner's verbal a little softer now? Wasn't he sort of an OSU fan growing up? Maybe I'm not remembering right but I thought OSU was going to be a big obstacle but they hadn't offered.

Zonereadstretch

June 10th, 2009 at 10:05 AM ^

jokenjin beat me to the punch, but all in all it’s great to see OSU lose out on their #1 QB target from what I’ve read over the past few months and have some egg on their face. I tend to think their offering of the QB from Moeller turned Montana off a bit despite noting he had no problem with the offer (article linked below), It’s been mentioned Tressel was going to wait on Montana's decision before offering other QB’s, but that appears to have just been lip service. I know over the past few months there’s been quite a few questions about RR’s recruiting tactics, but let’s just tip our hats as we’ve landed our #1 QB target. http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/barrier_noentry.asp?ReturnTo=&sid=… http://bucknuts.com/news/articles/2009/5/30/buckeye-recruiting-the-week…

Erik_in_Dayton

June 10th, 2009 at 10:26 AM ^

I'm pretty sure they only did that after they got wind that Montana wasn't coming to OSU. Joe Montana and Tressel are close b/c of their mutual ties to Eddie DeBartolo. The Montanas probably gave them a heads up. RE: Gardner, I don't think we have to worry too much about him going to OSU. He did, as mentioned above, burn a bunch of OSU stuff on video after committing to U of M.

littlebrownjug

June 10th, 2009 at 10:14 AM ^

I have nothing against the kid, but this would have been great cannon fodder had he decided to matriculate at Notre Dame. I would imagine that we would have roughed him up like we did Jimmy C. I would love to see him do well at UW, and I would imagine that Fat Charlie is not going to take this too well.

WolvinLA

June 10th, 2009 at 2:07 PM ^

I would hardly say Jimmy's performance against us last year as "kicking our ass." We lost the game. He had like 2 big plays. He didn't throw for 300 yards or anything. EDIT: I just looked up the stats. He was 10/21 for 147 yards (7.0 ypa) with 2 TD's and 2 INT's. What, 80 of those yards came on one play that we royally fucked up. Steven Threets stat line from that game makes him look All Big Ten compared to Jimmy's.

jokenjin

June 10th, 2009 at 11:12 AM ^

That's a great point - why try to live up to the hype that your dad put up at ND when you can build your own legacy at Washington? I would love to be "the quarterback who led Washington back to prominence" (or the qb who led Random University to prominence). Seriously, who does he have to beat out for that honor? Brunell? Tuiasosopo? Locker?

I Luv TDs

June 10th, 2009 at 11:51 AM ^

Wow! Great Pick Montana. The NCAA should be coming down on Sarkisian and UW in the near future. I wouldnt plan on bowling. But hey good pick.

WestWolverine

June 10th, 2009 at 11:57 AM ^

Pretty good decision for him. Sark has groomed Carson Palmer, Matt Leinart and Mark Sanchez so he definitely has credibility as a QB coach. I'm going to enjoy not seeing him in scarlet.

Blazefire

June 10th, 2009 at 12:17 PM ^

That probably had as much to do with it as anything, really. "Sure... go play for Tressel. How many QB's has he sent to the pro's now? Or, you know, you could play for me and be a 1st round pick making millions in three or four years at most."