Seattle Times Way-Too-Early Top 25 Has Michigan No. 1

Submitted by BursleyHall82 on April 6th, 2021 at 12:27 AM

One of the fun and truly pointless things about the last day of the college basketball season is that a bunch of publications release their Way-Too-Early rankings for the following season. A bunch of them came out today, and some of them are stupid, in that they have Michigan ranked down in the teens.

I choose to believe the Way-Too-Early rankings of the Seattle Times, which is predicting that Michigan will be celebrating on a Monday night in April 2022. You'll find the glorious list HERE.

WichitanWolverine

April 6th, 2021 at 12:32 AM ^

You mean football? 

In all seriousness, I'm a very pessimistic fan (as many of you will attest to) but I don't think this is unreasonable at all. Howard won the toughest conference (pre-tournament, anyway) well before he brought his stud recruits in. The future is very bright right now in Ann Arbor, and even I can't deny that. 

LabattsBleu

April 6th, 2021 at 12:42 AM ^

well one of the caveats is the assumption Franz is coming back... Which I would love, but I'd be a little surprised unless he really wants one more run at the tournament.

he'll only be 20 by the draft next year i think...

too early to know. Similar to this year, we don't know how good these kids are, even if there are 3 MAAs...

Last year, no one knew how good HD, Smith and Chaundee were going to be...

HailHail47

April 6th, 2021 at 12:49 AM ^

It will all hinge on who comes back. If any of Franz, Livers, Brooks, or Smith come back, then I think we will be a contender.If two of them return, then we will possibly be the top team in the country. We need guard play. 

not TOM BRADY

April 6th, 2021 at 12:52 AM ^

I’ve seen some lists with Michigan out of the top 10. With Maryland and Purdue ahead of us. Love that we are criminally under ranked in basketball every year. 

bronxblue

April 6th, 2021 at 9:25 AM ^

Let it never be said that ESPN won't fire off a completely bugnuts article in a couple of hours to collect on those sweet clicks.

I swear people talking about UCLA only watched the last 5 games of their season.  They are legitimately one missed FT from not even making the tournament, and yet they are projected to be #2 in the country next year because apparently FT defense and hitting 70% of contested 2s is absolutely a repeatable skill and not, you know, a quirk of small sample size.

mackbru

April 6th, 2021 at 10:51 AM ^

Still sticking with the lame narrative that UCLA was lucky, huh? God people are annoying. UCLA ran a gauntlet against good competition. And they have a lot of talent and a good coach. The only reason they were seeded so low was because they lost a few straight games at the end of the season - to teams that ended up having deep tourney runs. You don’t get to the Final Four, beating Michigan and taking Gonzaga to OT, by being lucky.

Beilein 4 Life

April 6th, 2021 at 11:03 AM ^

You don’t almost miss the tourney because you lost a couple straight games at the end of the year. You almost miss the tourney because you were mediocre throughout the year.

As for the final four run, it was impressive and they hit their stride at the right time, but that doesn’t mean they weren’t lucky to get there. Making it to the sweet sixteen by beating MSU, BYU, and Abilene Christian was not a gauntlet.

bronxblue

April 6th, 2021 at 11:14 AM ^

What "gauntlet" did they run?  They went 4-7 against the KenPom top-50 (and that's with teams like Oregon St. getting a boost into the top-50 during the tournament) during the regular season.  Before their late "swoon" their biggest two accomplishments were a 3-point home win against Colorado and a sweep of #29 Arizona.  Maybe had they swept the final 3 games of the season they would have been a 9 seed, but they had some bad losses during the season and weren't remotely as good as the 6-game sample they had in the tournament.  

MSU beat three top-10 teams to end the year and then flamed out in the play-in tournament.  That's as impressive as anything UCLA did to end the year, but I doubt we'd call them a good team.  Sometimes you do get lucky, and if you're reasonably talented that can get you somewhere during a single-elimination tournament played during a pandemic.  Doesn't mean they are objectively good.

dickdastardly

April 6th, 2021 at 1:51 AM ^

Team chemistry is what truly matters and we have no idea what next season's team will be like. For all of the heartache of the UCLA lost, we might have witnessed something we may never see again. 

FB Dive

April 6th, 2021 at 2:59 PM ^

Seriously? We won the Big Ten championship and made the Elite Eight. So, just recently, we've won the Big Ten in 2012, 2014, and 2021 and made at least the Elite Eight in 2013, 2014, 2018, and 2021. We have the COTY and the #1 incoming recruiting class in the country.

How does any of that translate into "we may never see that success again" ?

Dodgersftw

April 6th, 2021 at 2:59 AM ^

Re: ESPN

Folks, if I was a writer, this is an excellent top 25. UCLA at #2? Ok, I will click and see why. Michigan at #17? Ok, I will click and see why. 

 

lhglrkwg

April 6th, 2021 at 6:28 AM ^

I honestly don't know how you leave Michigan outside the top 10. Yeah we lose Franz and Livers, but we bring back a lot, a lot of talent is coming in, and I think Juwan has shown he knows what he's doing but whatever. We'll just surprise people again