Scott Frost is the saltiest man on the planet

Submitted by Maizen on

Frost doubles down: "We out-hit them in the first half and I thought we out-hit them in the second half. ... I thought we won that battle."

— Nick Baumgardner (@nickbaumgardner) September 10, 2016

Scott Frost: "It's rare when you come into Michigan and rush for 300 yards on them. They had to run a fly sweep in the 4th to get to 100"

— Nick Baumgardner (@nickbaumgardner) September 10, 2016

UCF coach Scott Frost: "We came in here and outhit those guys today. There's no doubt which team was hitting harder"

— Steve Lorenz (@TremendousUM) September 10, 2016
MGoBoard

Whine and Cheese

September 10th, 2016 at 9:58 PM ^

"Crusty" is someone who holds a 20 year grudge because, well, Nebraska probably was better than Michigan in 1997.

I think the difference in that game would be coaching. LLoyd almost blew the game to Warshington State--NO WAY should that game have been close. Yet, somehow, they were a disputed clock thingy from tossing a hail mary at the end to possibly steal the game.

Yet, Nebraska went out and pounded Tennessee by about a hundrit points.

I think Osborne would have gone for the KILL in the first half, and Lloyd would have played the old, "feel 'em out" Big Ten style, and Michigan would have been clobbered.

Nevertheless, Michigan fans need to let that shit go--the old system was tailored for arguments like this, ones that never get resolved, and left open the crying and hining for votes.

Hell, Michigan fans lobbied for UM to get into the title game in 2006--only to be boppywhomped by USC when they might have had a chance to steal a Natty had they won that game (at least half anyway).

 

Joined: 09/10/2016

MGoPoints: -15

BroadneckBlue21

September 10th, 2016 at 10:30 PM ^

You are not a Michigan fan, but you feel so passionate about Nebraksa and Frost being picked on that you come to a UM blog 20 years later to preach moving on. I'd love UM and Nebraska to play each other still, and Woodson and Griese would still whip the smut right off the husk. Trying to bring up teams ten years apart to win a bull argument: go shuck yourself.

Joined: 01/12/2015

MGoPoints: 6310

Whine and Cheese

September 10th, 2016 at 10:03 PM ^

He's not really worried about arguing semantics with a bunch of basement dwelling message board posers. He's talking football--and trying to get his team to realize they were toe to toe with Michigan in a lot of aspects--as in Michigan's Ofeensive line couldn't block his defense and run the ball.

And if he is, he knows he can rile Michigan fans and their sensitive egos, get them to rush to defend michigan--and actually win the war, as Michigan fans will now probably devote two to three threads per week on this board to him.

Joined: 09/10/2016

MGoPoints: -15

TrueBlue2003

September 11th, 2016 at 12:46 AM ^

41 minutes of the game by 6 points even though our starters were in most of that time.  And the early 31 point lead was largely aided by special teams.  We didn't play that well. Yes, limited playbook and all, but even with a fraction of the playbook, you'd like to see a playoff contender look better against a 0-12 team.

Joined: 01/05/2010

MGoPoints: 38075

1WhoStayed

September 10th, 2016 at 6:14 PM ^

Thought UCF played very tough. Was at the game and speed-watched the replay. But what do I know!?

I know Harbaugh said his oines both played well. But that doesn't mean they didn't lose some battles. Running the ball was one of them.

Not everyone with a differing view of events is a dumb f#ck.

Bradstetter, Jansen and Dierdorf all made comments about the o-line which indicated how much they struggled against the movement of the defense. But what do THEY know, right!?

After all, none of them have almost 7000 mgoblog point (as far as you know)!

Edit: Based on the votes for HIS post vs YOURS, I guess this blog has a lot of stupid people!

Joined: 09/07/2015

MGoPoints: 12148

Roland Deschain

September 10th, 2016 at 5:55 PM ^

Easy...not the whole team, but parts were outplayed. Our O-Line looked shockingly incompetent for much of the game, significantly impacting our run offense.

Honestly, it was a game that I watch being very happy it was UCF. I feel like if we had played a team with a pulse, our mistakes would have been magnified much more.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Joined: 07/17/2015

MGoPoints: 564

Bo Glue

September 10th, 2016 at 7:08 PM ^

I didn't notice it live a tthe stadium,  but when I saw after the game that they were stacking the box most plays, it made a lot more sense. We'll see what the UFR says, and I doubt it will be as kind to us as last week, but I don't think our stagnant running attack was on the OL.

Now allowing that many rushing yards...I am more at a loss. We definitely lost contain a few times. It had nothing to do with how hard anyone was hitting...

Joined: 04/02/2012

MGoPoints: 13007

gustave ferbert

September 10th, 2016 at 8:20 PM ^

we capitalized on what they gave us.  WS was great at throwing the long ball.  And our receivers responded as well. 

I will say though, jake butt was a little off today. He never drops passes.  And there were a couple where he was wide open and he didn't catch them.  

Joined: 06/21/2011

MGoPoints: 46408

TrueBlue2003

September 11th, 2016 at 1:01 AM ^

for them though.  They had an undersized front, so needed the help on run defense.  They have a NFLish CB and we have a very untested QB.  It was the only gameplan that could have given them a chance, and Wilton stepped up big time in response.  If he doesn't play as well, and we don't get all the fluky stuff on special teams, that's a much closer game.

Joined: 01/05/2010

MGoPoints: 38075

Swazi

September 10th, 2016 at 5:53 PM ^

Special teams werent outplayed.

Pass defense wasnt outplayed.

Pass offense wasnt outplayed.

They stacked the box and Michigan still got 100 yards rushing.

Take away that 87 yard run, which McCray was blatantly held on, and suddenly those numbers dont look so impressive.

So I guess all those RichRod teams were better cause they grossed all those yards but no points right?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Joined: 08/13/2010

MGoPoints: 11892