Rules question regarding a play Colorado ran against us
Colorado failed to convert on this 4th and 1 pass with 9:45 left in the 4th Quarter. The targeted receiver on the play was lined up as the right tackle though, which I thought made him an ineligible receiver. But it's apparent from the video our defense realized they needed to account for him (and did), and no flag was thrown for an ineligible receiver downfield, so apparently it was a legal play. I just don't understand why. Can any MGoFootballRulesExperts explain what's going on here? The play occurs at 2:06:05 in the Youtube link below. Thanks.
https://youtu.be/k-KpNblOcqc?t=2h6m5s
September 20th, 2016 at 1:24 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2016 at 1:45 PM ^
September 20th, 2016 at 1:53 PM ^
I was shocked the refs didn't call "intent to deceive" on Ty Isaac's juke on that critical screen pass on 1st and 19 near our own endzone (where Ty ended up getting a first down).
September 20th, 2016 at 2:45 PM ^
September 20th, 2016 at 2:07 PM ^
2014. Here's a good explanation:
September 20th, 2016 at 1:25 PM ^
Doesn't he just have to report to the referee as an eligible receiver?
September 20th, 2016 at 1:29 PM ^
Not even sure he had to do that. It looks like his # is 81. So as long as they don't send too many guys lined up on the line out for the pass, I think they're ok. I'm no expert, but you could possibly line up 4 guys left of the center and the RG could go out for a pass if he's reported or wears an appropriate #.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:20 PM ^
To be eligible, you have to have an eligible number (check), and you have to be either in the backfield (nope) or uncovered on the line of scrimmage (check). The two WRs to his right were both in the backfield leaving him uncovered and therefore eligible.
September 20th, 2016 at 3:32 PM ^
even the center can be an eligible receiver in college football so long as he is wearing the right number, assuming that everyone else on the line is to one side or the other.
September 20th, 2016 at 4:41 PM ^
Even with a lineman's number he only has to check in with the Umpire as eligible. The ref will then announce that the player is eligible. That negates the "trickiness" that the Colorado play provides.
The way Colorado ran the play, the TE (hiding as the RT) pushes off big time and then slides into the flat. A better throw would have resulted in a first down.
September 21st, 2016 at 11:26 AM ^
"Even with a lineman's number he only has to check in with the Umpire as eligible."
This is true in the NFL, not in college. There is no declaring yourself eligible in college - you must physically change your jersey to an eligible receiver number.
September 20th, 2016 at 4:51 PM ^
Khalid Hill would be ideal for this play.
September 21st, 2016 at 12:14 PM ^
Automatic +1 for name and avatar.
September 20th, 2016 at 3:32 PM ^
Put everyone to the left of the center, and have the center go out for a pass. Just crazy enough that it would have to work!
September 21st, 2016 at 12:39 PM ^
September 20th, 2016 at 1:30 PM ^
I don't think that's a thing in college football, but happens in the NFL.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:04 PM ^
He's 81 and the 2 players to his right are off the line which makes him eligible.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:27 PM ^
It was an unbalanced line and he wasn't covered plus he was wearing an eligible number...all of that made him eligible.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:47 PM ^
The only reason an illegal formation penalty is ever called is to protect the defense from intentional deception either by substitution or alignment. And if you notice in the presnap look, there are two Colorado players on the right side of the formation who are a step back from the others at the LOS, and neither are coveing up anyone else.
What is really curious about this play is the way defense is aligned to counter the call because it is really unclear the way it is lned up who has what responsibility in the secondary.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:13 PM ^
September 20th, 2016 at 1:28 PM ^
As far as I can tell, he is an eligible receiver because there aren't any other receivers outside of him. The other two "receivers" lined up to the right of him are technically in the backfield. Contrast this to the left side of the line where you have one guy on the edge who splits out as a receiver. The lineman on the inside cannot be an eligible receiver.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:28 PM ^
IIRC, you can faintly hear with sound the referee announce over the speakers that person reported as an eligible reciever. The TV announcers talked over him but you can hear it in the background.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:05 PM ^
He didn't need to report. He's wearing an eligible receiver number, and was lined up on the end of the line.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:28 PM ^
B. Because the other two guy to his right are off the line of scrimmage he is eligible.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2016 at 1:45 PM ^
He is on the end of the line, he's wearing #81. He doesn't need to report to the refs any more than any other tight end needs to report. The fact that there is 1 offensive lineman between him and the center rather than the more usual 2 is immaterial.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:28 PM ^
The end man lined up along the line of scrimmage is eligible. So with 7 on the LOS, the 5 inside are ineligible, usually the offensive line. Colorado ran a tackle-over here, so the lineman lined up as a TE on the left side in ineligible with the WR lined up outside of him on the LOS.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:29 PM ^
He is wearing a wide receiver number. The notification rule only applies when you are wearing a typically non-eligible number (maybe?) Something in the 50's-60's-70's would require notification. In this case, he is lined up as the last player on the line of scrimmage on that side and is sporting an eligible number so shame on the defense if they don't pick that up.
September 20th, 2016 at 3:33 PM ^
the two end men on the LOS are eligible if wearing the right number and ineligible if wearing 50-79.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:29 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2016 at 1:29 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2016 at 1:31 PM ^
He isn't covered up by a tight end or receiver.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:32 PM ^
the guy playing tight end in that formation who also reported which you can hear in the video?
September 20th, 2016 at 1:35 PM ^
And they would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for that meddling Rashan Gary damn near eating the quarterback.
September 20th, 2016 at 5:43 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2016 at 1:36 PM ^
He is also "uncovered" meaning there is not a person on the line of scrimmage to his right.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:49 PM ^
He is an eligible receiver based on both his number as well as being on the end of the line (He's not covered up by either wide receiver to the top of the screen).
There is also a TE to the bottom of the screen but he is covered by the WR, therefore, THAT TE is not an eligible receiver.
EDIT: This is what is commonly called an "unbalanced" formation. Meaning there are only 2 people on the line of scrimmage on one side of the center and there are 4 on other side. It's often done to give one side of the center a numbers advantage if the D doesn't recognize and slide a man over (Making the LG in this situation the hypothetical "center." Hoke's teams would do this often to run to that side.
September 20th, 2016 at 1:55 PM ^
You can see Thomas pointing to him. Probably he's noting that he's eligible, then he covers him (until getting bumped back). Niiiiice blitz (McCray). OT, but that guy is having himself a season.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:01 PM ^
On a similar question I had some years ago, this was explained to me (here) in a way that has helped me understand ever since:
On the line of scrimmage:
- There must be 7 and exactly 7
- The two ends are eligible receivers
- Anyone inside an end is "covered" and therefore ineligible
Behind the line of scrimmage:
- There must be 4 and exactly 4
- All 4 are eligible receivers
Once you understand those principles, it becomes much easier. Note that a lineman is considered "on" if he is slightly behind the player closer to the center (I think of it as head not behind the shoulders of the guy next to him).
September 20th, 2016 at 2:04 PM ^
One nitpick: I believe you can have more than seven men on the line of scrimmage if you want to. But the eligible receiver rules are the same, so if you put more than seven on the line you're sacrificing eligible receivers - only the guys on the end, and the backs, are eligible.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:08 PM ^
There can be anywhere from 1 to 11 (!) players on the line of scrimmage at the snap. There is no minimum or maximum.
There can be anywhere from 0 to 4 players in the backfield at the snap. There is no minimum, but there is a maximum of 4.
6 on the line & 4 in the backfield? Legal.
10 on the line & 1 in the backfield? Legal.
They changed this rule about 5 years ago (it used to be minimum 7 on the line) because refs actually only counted backfield players & were caught making mistakes when the offense only had 10 players on the field.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:22 PM ^
11 players on the LOS at the snap would be a very interesting play, not good, but interesting.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:46 PM ^
With 11 on the line who receives the snap? The center can't hike it to himself can he?
September 20th, 2016 at 3:10 PM ^
I guess I'm only talking about what is permitted and what is forbidden in the rule book. Obviously no sane coach would have their team line up without anybody to receive the snap. No, the center has to snap it to somebody other than himself (or, I guess, to nobody at all).
I'm going to have to amend my post, though. A team has to have 5 players on the line minimum, because the rules require that they have 5 players numbered 50-79 on the line of scrimmage.
So...minimum 5 players on the line, and maximum 4 players in the backfield.
September 20th, 2016 at 3:29 PM ^
After thinking about this, the "fumbleroosky' (have no idea how that is spelled) is the center hiking it to no one.
September 20th, 2016 at 5:05 PM ^
Actually, if I correctly recall the way that play is designed, the center hikes it to the quarterback, who touches the ball; the ball is then "fumbled" by the center replacing the ball on the ground, where it is then picked up by an OL. I believe the quarterback does briefly make contact with the ball to receive the "snap."
September 20th, 2016 at 2:22 PM ^
To be clear, the only way to have less than 7 on the line is to have less than 11 on the field. The rule, as you point out, is no more than 4 in the backfield.
September 20th, 2016 at 2:21 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2016 at 2:31 PM ^
You're right! I thought it was McCray but blew it up to compensate for poor eyesight. That guy might amount to something.
September 20th, 2016 at 5:06 PM ^
Easy mistake to make, since he's moving so fast our minds automatically assume he must be a linebacker.