retraction!

Submitted by alabluema on
I take back what I said before. Sorry about that. How about that Wermers thing?

wile_e8

July 20th, 2009 at 3:36 PM ^

It's a picture of boobies!

Ever open a fifteen-post thread at work and get two different 800x600 pictures of impossibly fake boobs alternating for pages and pages? And then have your boss walk up behind you? Thanks, internet hero, for turning my idle surfing of a sports site into a firing offense! No one needs to see the same set of fake gazongas eighty times accompanied by your three words of deep insight into the team of your choice. EXAMPLE Go to Rivals and click on a thread. DIAGNOSIS Person is fourteen and has a constant boner. Likely to turn into a guy who says "stud" constantly after being rejected by women for the next ten to eighty years. CURE An introduction to life's harsh realities, hopefully beginning with a slap upside the head. SUSCEPTIBLE FANBASES Anybody with a site on Rivals. EXCEPTIONS Arguments about hot chicks are always welcome as long as denoted in the subject title and the specific purpose of a thread. Also exempt are pictures of Scarlett Johansson.
I'd also like to add avatars featuring very large profanity to this category. Thanks for making me have to check over my shoulder any time I scroll down the thread and come to one of your posts.

Seth

July 20th, 2009 at 5:32 PM ^

I came late to the X chick(s) Y cup(s) phenomena. My sister's friend said I should "look it up," and when I googled it, I got the Wikipedia page, read up, and totally lost the whole effect. Same thing happened with that whole rickrolling thing. And I consider myself a pretty Internet community kind of guy. Either Wikipedia is getting really really adept at this, or I need a new source for my Internet memes.

GRBluefan

July 20th, 2009 at 4:02 PM ^

thoughts about having an obese, unattractive chick as your avatar? I like to think that my avatar indicates that I enjoy humorous pictures.