Quote About Previous Coaching Staff From Jake Rudock Interview - 08/28/2015

Submitted by Schmozerine on

As the season grows closer and closer my obsessive need for content has increased exponentially.  I came across this interview from Jake Rudock and found it very interesting and very sad.  It is just another example at the ineptitude of the previous coaching staff.  

At the 0:55 second mark, he was asked about how he's been in 3 or 4 different offense's in 4 years and he interjects with this gem,

"That's Shane.  He's learned like 5, or 6, or 10, or 20."

 All of the interviewers laugh and I even let out a chuckle but as I thought about it further, my heart just started to ache.

My heart aches because 1) I think I may have either stable angina or psychogenic chest pain secondary to the panic attacks and hyperventilating from watching the past several years.  Either one sucks.  2) I feel so terrible for these young men.  They commit to a program and sacrifice so much day in and day out for the team, all while trying to earn a degree on top of it.  I played college football in AZ so I know what it is like to go through that.  

I know these players are now getting the teaching and coaching that they truly need and deserve.  I feel terrible for those that never got the chance to be coached by actual competent coaches in the past 7 years and even more props to those that stayed through all of the garbage. 

Here’s to a bright season and even brighter future of Michigan Football.  Cheers!

 

https://youtu.be/A_BrIpSSWVA

Edited: to make the title less alarming

 

Stringer Bell

August 29th, 2015 at 11:16 PM ^

It sucks for Shane especially, because he's always been with the program and worked so hard to recruit others.  And then of course the whole Minnesota debacle.  Regardless of what happens with his football career (not looking good IMO), I'm rooting for Shane in life.

Cali Wolverine

August 30th, 2015 at 12:29 AM ^

Might be the alchohol...but I don't remember any Michigan Football post-Carr and pre-Harbaugh. Who was his coach again? EDIT: I remember UTL and UTL II. I remember Gardner not being able to put away a Notre Dame team the way he should have, and throwing one of the wort interceptions I have ever seen on any level of organized football.

trustBlue

August 30th, 2015 at 2:43 AM ^

In UTL II, Devin Gardner scored 5 TDs (4 passing, 1 running), passed for nearly 300, and was also the game's leading rusher.

If all you remember about Devin's performance that day was the one interception he threw, then I'm not sure that you have any business trying to critique Devin's ability as a quaterback.

Prince Lover

August 30th, 2015 at 2:46 AM ^

I know, I know. "It's Indiana". But he didn't play defense. His job was to score more points than the other team, not stop them from scoring. And he did, he had himself a day. A day I thoroughly enjoyed watching. I will never say anything disparaging about Gardner. Was he great? No. Was he a warrior who loved Michigan? From what I can ascertain, yes.

Tater

August 30th, 2015 at 9:49 AM ^

Devin Gardner basically had to run an offense dictated by David Brandon.  It was the most predictable offense in college football because it had Brandon's hubris stamped on every play.  From how other defenses reacted, often before the ball was snapped, it looked like whoever was going to get the ball was wearing a sign saying how he was getting the ball and where he was going.

 

Cali Wolverine

August 30th, 2015 at 11:41 AM ^

I think I am going to hire 1974 for some therapy. I don't hate Gardner...so the downvotes are funny (and probably support the don't drink and post theory)...he is a great person and an incredibly talented athlete. I just think it takes a certain kind of person to play QB successfully...and he did not have the head for it...or coach or offensive line or receivers. But there were plenty of terrible plays that were on him as well.

getsome

August 30th, 2015 at 9:10 AM ^

gardner never had a chance under hoke.  any rational coach wouldve spread the field with gardner (and spread all game / every game, not just during pitiful 2-4 minute O's), given him the simplest possible reads, checks, sight adjustments, route combos, etc, utilized some dangerous RPO sets, and just let him run the rock or make comfortable throws.

hokes stubborn O philosophy, refusal to adapt, weak skill player recruiting, terrible management, etc resulted in schizo schemes and injured QBs who lacked confidence.  hoke envisioned winning with pro style O and pro style passers, reality and logic aside.  and gardner still put up some crazy #s.  he wouldve been a real threat under competent, flexible coaches like briles, meyer, patterson, etc

charblue.

August 30th, 2015 at 11:11 AM ^

that bothered me last year about the football program, was the failure of that team to stand up for each other. Now there are actually two plays that come to mind and both involved quarterback hits. One was the late hit on Devin on the pick six that was called back because of that penalty and the other was the hit on Shane Morris that no one on Michigan felt needed addressing in some form or fashion. I mean regardless of whether the hit on Shane was deemed legal, and that's questionable, there was no subsequent reaction from his teammates. 

I mean we talk about stupid motivational things that drew ire and widespread publicity, like the stake plunging incident at East Lansing, then we about real stuff that you know under previous regimes and teams would never have been tolerated. The Morris hit to me signaled a number of issues with the Hoke regime besides those that actually prompted Harbaugh's hire. 

Maybe that is the blow that needed to be landed to turn this ship around. But if a Michigan qb gets hit like that this season, I expect a different reaction from teammates and the sideline. 

Monkey House

August 29th, 2015 at 11:24 PM ^

I agree with the poor coaching under Hoke but I don't necessarily feel the same way with RR. He is a good coach that just didn't work out here for many reasons, but his teams did get better each year even tho they still weren't that good. RR is a proven good coach, Hoke on the other hand didn't really have the track record to have ever even been the coach here.

Stringer Bell

August 29th, 2015 at 11:30 PM ^

Yep, the defensive scheme under RR was bad, and he would've been much better off if he didn't force his 3-3-5 defense and let the D coordinator run the defense the way he wanted.  But it says something that Michigan improved every year under RR, and that Hoke's first year was 11-2 with all of RR's players.