Phil Steele B1G Trends for 2019

Submitted by canzior on July 16th, 2019 at 9:09 AM

3 trends that Phil Steele mentioned in his magazine and 2 predictions. 

1. Teams that lost 34 starts or more to injury the previous year win 57% more games the next year. This applies to Illinois, Michigan State, Minnesota, Wisconsin. 

2. Teams that lost 3 close games in a season win the same or more the following season 79% of the time. Applies to Nebraska & Rutgers. 

3. Teams with 4 or more close WINS in a season, win the same or FEWER 84% of the time. This applies to Ohio State (and Notre Dame). 

4. He predicts an 81% chance Indiana and Nebraska improve because of SOS.

5. He predicts an 85% chance that Ohio State and Wisconsin decline because of SOS. 

 

BPONE suggests this will be the year he is wrong of course. 

 

mGrowOld

July 16th, 2019 at 2:25 PM ^

I think we have a winner in the "best left-handed compliment" category.

True story about my wife.  She has retinal lesions which create a pretty big blind spot in the center of her vision (peripheral is fine).  When we were dating one of my friends asked me "is she blind?" when they met her.   My response was "yeah....she kinda is"

But I keep telling her I'm handsome as hell so it's all good.

Bodogblog

July 16th, 2019 at 10:45 AM ^

He was a big loss last year, no doubt.  I thought Davis was better, and the MSU staff had them as their #1.  Davis graduated though, and White will replace him.  So at that position they'll effectively perform the same as they did injured last year.  White could be marginally better or worse, but they're not going back to a line up that includes both Davis and White.  A WR could develop certainly, but there's no "rebound" there, per what Steele's metrics are observing. 

The point on the OL the poster makes is correct in my mind.  Chewins was out for a few games, so if he's back for 100% they'll be better.  But no one else really matters - the two deep is all interchangeable guys that are terrible at run blocking and good at pass pro. 

DrMantisToboggan

July 16th, 2019 at 10:36 AM ^

I’ve got them at 7-5. 10 would take insane luck. I would say their win probabilities for the following games are:

at OSU - 5%

at Michigan - 7%

at Wisconsin - 35%

at Northwestern - 40%

Penn State - 45%

Arizona State - 60%

Indiana - 65%

Maryland - 75%

That’s 4.7 expected losses. I have them losing the first five games I listed, but even if they beat a Penn State, it wouldn’t surprise me if they drop an Indiana or a Maryland. I really think their ceiling is 8-4 this year. They just have such garbage on offense that they won’t be able to get to 20 points in many, if not most games. Last year, they failed to get 20 points in 7 games, and were under 25 in 3 other games. Their defense is not that elite (and it is very good up front, no doubt) to make up for complete mediocrity at QB, OL, and RB. 

 

DrMantisToboggan

July 16th, 2019 at 12:44 PM ^

Want to bet on that win mark? I don’t like gambling, but I am confident enough here to offer.

There’s a huge difference between supplementing an elite defense with an average offense and an abysmal one. They were 112th in S&P offense last year. Dantonio has won 9 or more games 7 times at MSU. In those seasons, his average S&P Offense rank is 42nd. The worst offense they fielded in those 7 seasons was 2017’s, which finished 72nd. That team was incredibly lucky, and won exactly 9 in the regular season. They would need to improve 40 spots in S&P this year - without any influx of talent or change in coaching/scheme - to match that team’s offense. I just don’t see any way that comes to fruition.

$20 Venmo bet? I pay you if Michigan State wins at least 9 of their regular season (first 12) games. You pay me if they win 8 or fewer of their regular season (first 12) games.

Alumnus93

July 16th, 2019 at 1:50 PM ^

Dontino is as much of a good coach, as he is a prick.  Its a shame how one negates the other... but as much as I want to agree with your predictions, I would give him the win over Wisconsin and Northwestern... only losses I see are to us and to OSU, and one of PSU/ASU.

Perkis-Size Me

July 16th, 2019 at 4:08 PM ^

Mantis, I learned a long time ago to not ever underestimate MSU's ability to pull a rabbit out of its ass in any given year, because that's just what they do. True, their offense is not very good, but they have the uncanny ability to drag higher-ranked and more athletically gifted teams down into the dirt with them, and make that team beat MSU on its own terms: through ugly, defensive sludgefarts of games. MSU has thrived for years off of beating better teams based on incredibly strong defense, meh to "just good enough" offense, and then the real kicker, one or two big plays per game that they are able to force and turn the whole momentum of the game. 

Sure, they could go 7-5, but I could also see them go 10-2. This just feels like it'll be some kind of bounceback year for them. As long as Dantonio is there, I am not counting them out. 

brad

July 16th, 2019 at 1:01 PM ^

This may all be true in an abstract sense, but it's ignoring the fact that MSU will completely ignore half of their schedule in prep for UM.  This will lose them 1-2 games they're favored in.  Then, if UM beats them, they will collapse into a fiery heap as they do.

 

So, predicting 10 wins, or even 9, for MSU is essentially predicting they will beat Michigan.  I can't get on board with that.

Bodogblog

July 16th, 2019 at 1:07 PM ^

This isn't true.  They lost:

  • Andrew Dowell, who was a very good LB for them (97 tackles, 8.5 TFL, 3.5 sacks, 9 pass break-ups) 
  • Khari Willis, their best safety (84 tackles, 2 int, 10 pass break-ups) 
  • Justin Layne, their best corner (72 tackles, 1 int, 15 pass breaks) 
  • Racist John Reschke (33 tackles, 6 TFL, .5 sack) 

That's the #2, #3, #5, and #8 tacklers on the team.  They return a good amount, but replacing the above will be difficult.  No guarantee their defense will be as good this year. 

MH20

July 16th, 2019 at 5:22 PM ^

And then went 22/40 for 172 yards, 0 TD and 1 INT with 16 rushes for 63 yards in a one-point loss (7-6) to Oregon in last season's Redbox Bowl.

Lewerke may not be as bad as he showed in 2018 but I also don't think he's as good as his 2017 stats indicate.

DrMantisToboggan

July 16th, 2019 at 12:50 PM ^

Which is a bad assumption, based on what I’ve watched. Chryst is an awful coach, and they’ve become too one dimensional to be effective against teams with pulses. Their QB situation may actually be worse this year, and there aren’t any playmakers on offense outside of Taylor. The defense might tick up a tad, but even that I am not sure of. I have Wisconsin at 6-6. I could see them winning more, but I could also see them missing a bowl. They’re pretty clearly on a different trajectory than Minnesota, Purdue, and Nebraska in their division, they’re already behind Northwestern, and they get us and OSU as crossovers, and open the season in Tampa against USF. This Wisconsin team could win 7, but could lose 7 too. I don’t see 9 wins on their schedule.