Perspective from the rivalries of peer programs

Submitted by FrankMurphy on

I know all of us could benefit from some perspective in the aftermath of yet another gut-wrenching loss to our biggest rival. The threads about genuine tragedies people have experienced are definitely helpful in terms of  stepping outside the football universe for a moment and regaining perspective on life in general, but to maintain perspective upon returning the football universe, consider the following: 

  • USC lost 11 straght to Notre Dame from 1983 to 1993 and 8 straight to UCLA from 1991 to 1998. Their winless streak against ND had run to 13 by 1995 (tie in '94 followed by another loss in '95). Between 1983 and 2001, USC's record against ND was 3-15-1. No one remembered that when USC started racking up championships and Heisman Trophy winners under Pete Carroll. 

  • Alabama lost 6 straight to Auburn from 2002 to 2007. No one remembers that now that Saban has built a dynasty there.

  • Florida State lost 6 straight to Florida from 2004 to 2009. No one remembered that when Florida State won the NC in 2013. 

  • Texas lost 5 straight to Oklahoma from 2000 to 2004 . No one remembered that when Texas won the NC in 2005. 

  • Miami lost 5 straight to Florida State from 1995 to 1999. No one remembered that when Miami won the NC in 2001. 

  • Tennessee lost 5 straight to Florida from 1993 to 1997. No one remembered that when Tennessee won the NC in 1998. 

Not to mention the fact that we owned impressive winning streaks of our own against both of our major rivals before they recently flipped the script. My point is that rivalries are cyclical, and the data proves that long stretches of futility don't affect a blueblood program's ability to win championships. Better yet, given that we're coached by one of the best in the business, we're well-positioned to not only flip the script but to start competing for championships in the immediate future. It won't take us as long to claw our way back as it did USC. This was a tough loss, but there are plenty of reasons to be optimistic for the future. GO BLUE. 

EDIT: I see that people hate the term "natty". Edited. But I stand by the rest. 

schreibee

November 28th, 2016 at 4:00 PM ^

This cycle has sucked Major Dong, gone on far too long, had so many things happen that were wrong - Howeva...

the quarter century preceeding Tressel going to osu we were 17-7-1 vs osu. That's not too bad, my friends!

Add in that stretch we absolutely broke their hearts on a couple of those, when they came in undefeated or very highly ranked at least.

SO, as an answer I'd just say that over these past 16 games (can it REALLY be 16 years now?!) I believe the only times they knocked us out of anything significant were '06 & '16 - and the complete story on '16 has not yet been written! Lots of football left to be played before the CFP and Bowls are decided...

Just sayin' - trying to find some salve for my aching heart!

BursleyBaitsBus

November 28th, 2016 at 4:32 PM ^

If it makes you feel any better, Tennessee and Washington were both getting wrecked by Florida and Oregon for 11 and 12 years until this year. Look what Petersen has done with Washington in 3 years with mostly his players. I also see why this can be sad bc Washington and Tennessee fucked themselves with poor hires whereas Harbaugh is a great hire... It just so happens Urban Meyer is on the other sideline. Ugh.

BlueKoj

November 28th, 2016 at 4:50 PM ^

Too GD long a cylce indeed. OP seems intent to mollify only those who actually think this will never end. That is a tiny minority of UM fanatics and even smaller for MGoFanatics. Most of us know it will end, that it is cylical, but FFS it should have ended Saturday!! It just feels like it will never end.

I have seen Bo and Woody's 10 year war. I loved the Cooper 90's, but even with all that perspective, I'm still pissed and crushed and need this to tip back again soon. Neither our own cyclical history nor certainly not that of other teams can assuage my bitterness. Victory is the only tonic.

uofmchris

November 28th, 2016 at 3:44 PM ^

Sadly, this was our best chance at beating them in god knows how many years to come. UGH. They were supposed to be young. We were the veteran team. 

 

 

schreibee

November 28th, 2016 at 4:07 PM ^

Chris, they were pretty young, and we were more seasoned, no "supposed to be" in there.

And the fact of the matter is we were Damn well cheated out of our W by some ohio slappy refs.

Not that we couldn't have/shouldn't have done better ourselves, but we did ENOUGH to overcome anything they threw at us except 2 penalties for 6 total yards. We had NO answer for that!

George Pickett

November 28th, 2016 at 4:13 PM ^

This narrative is so overplayed. Here is a list of OSU starters with at least three years in the program: 

 

Brown, Samuel, Jones, Eiflein, Barrett, Baugh, Price, Hubbard, Hill, Lewis, McMillan, Worley, Conley, Hooker, Webb, Lattimore, Johnston, Durbin.

 

That is not an inexperienced team.  

BursleyBaitsBus

November 28th, 2016 at 4:35 PM ^

Okay. They are still the youngest team in the nation. Even if most aren't starting. Can't wait for Harbaughs guys to grow up in the program. If they all play like Kekoa Crawford does then we're in for one hell of a run starting next year... Crosses fingers.

FrankMurphy

November 28th, 2016 at 5:23 PM ^

Not to mention Devin Asiasi. Typically, incoming freshman TEs struggle with blocking, but Asiasi is one of our best blockers outside of the OL. The only reason he didn't get more plays is because Jake Butt is the best TE in the country. Expect Asiasi to have a breakout season next year. 

Heywood_Jablome

November 28th, 2016 at 3:48 PM ^

In case you're unaware, everything you listed was like 5-10 years.  This shit is getting ready to go on 2 decades.

Not to mention next year would be a major upset considering OSU is returning almost everyone.  This was supposed to be the year.

 

FrankMurphy

November 28th, 2016 at 5:24 PM ^

If you want to expand the window a bit, USC went 13 years without beating ND (tie in 1994 followed by another loss in 1995). If you want to expand it further, in the 19 years between 1983 and 2001, USC's record against ND was 3-15-1. 

BassDude138

November 29th, 2016 at 11:09 AM ^

This was supposed to be, and should have been the year, but they don't return as much as everyone thinks next year. They are a young team, but as mentioned above, the majority of their key players have been in the program for at least three years. They will inevitably lose some to the draft. Realistically, they will likely lose almost their whole secondary and linebackers, along with their two best OL and Samuel. They do have Barrett and Weber coming back, but we also have a more experienced Speight, Higdon, and Evans coming back.

3PG

November 28th, 2016 at 3:49 PM ^

Cooper went 2-10-1 against us from 1988-2000. This particularly resonates with me since it's about when I was accepted into Michigan, matriculated there and was a young working punk who ate drank and slept college football. I was one of those 'kids' who couldn't believe this was ever a rivalry (in the other direction) during a time when I was much more impressionable.

The tide has turned but I have no doubt it will turn back in a more favorable direction. Age has given me the benefit of perspective at least.

 

Ty Butterfield

November 28th, 2016 at 8:35 PM ^

Posted this before but overall Cooper was a decent coach but just could not beat Michigan. He had a losing record his first year and he was 6-6 in 1998 I think. Cooper won 111 games in 13 seasons. Not factoring in any ties Cooper won 72% of his games.

UMxWolverines

November 28th, 2016 at 3:54 PM ^

Not true. Tennessee still has a putrid record against Florida since the early 90s. 7-20 since 1990. People still remember that.

Texas still has a putrid record against OU since Bob Stoops got there. 7-11. People still remember that. 

Either we're going to turn this bitch around and start winning some games against them and some Big Ten titles or we're going to be known as 2nd bests like those two are.  

billybrown

November 28th, 2016 at 4:30 PM ^

The sad fact of the matter is we are second bests and no one is talking about it. Both Oklahoma and Texas have won multiple conference titles since michigan has won its last. They've each earned a national title a piece since we have as well. Michigan has been nationally relevant in spots during the season but never at the end for well over a decade.the talk about other programs being also rans and not relevant is always funny when we haven't been relevant in years. This year was the best shot for the foreseeable future and they couldn't get it done. Same as the last dozen years.

FrankMurphy

November 28th, 2016 at 4:54 PM ^

You do realize that we're coached by someone who: 1) took over a 1-11 dumpster fire and inverted its record within four years, and 2) took over an NFL team that hadn't been to the playoffs in nine years and immediately coached them to three NFC Championship games and a Super Bowl, right? When Harbaugh was hired, did you expect that he would have Michigan ranked in the top three in late November during his second season? Do you think things won't improve when Harbaugh brings the level of QB and offensive line play (the two units that remain mediocre and were the absolute worst among a plethora of bad units under Hoke) to the levels he had at Stanford (with access to better talent than he had at Stanford)?

Chitown Kev

November 28th, 2016 at 3:55 PM ^

Funny that when Nebraska did break through and beat Oklahoma in '78 they turned right around and lost to Mizzou in the next game and wound up with a rematch in the Orange Bowl that the Sooners won.

WeimyWoodson

November 28th, 2016 at 3:56 PM ^

once Urban leaves!! This is just another kick in the dick.  

 

It sucks that the last time Michigan won in Columbus I was 14 years old...I'm 30 now.  How's that for perspective?!

Tbone67

November 28th, 2016 at 3:59 PM ^

Well you gave it your best shot but my soul is inconsolable at the moment. Post this again next week and it just might penetrate the darkness.