OT: Woman on GOP Ticket?

Submitted by formerlyanonymous on

John McCain picks Palin, governor of Alaska as his VP?  What? 

Why do I feel this is locking McCain in as the winner already?

cougar blue

August 29th, 2008 at 1:45 PM ^

she has more experience ker right thumb than obama has in his whole life. could SOMEONE somewhere tell me what he has done? I really want to know! Hope and change are great, but I believe that Castro ran on that also...

being a LEADER of a state is more than being a senator for 141 days, and not showing up to his own committee meetings. THAT IS WHY IN YEARS PAST YOU DID NOT HAVE A CONGRESSMAN/SENATOR win the WH. They are not leaders yet they are followers and that is on both sides of the aisle.

kgh10

August 31st, 2008 at 2:39 AM ^

lol hey guys did you see what wingedG did there?! He like, changed Obama's name to Osama! lolz get it?! Like Bin Laden?!

I mean, the least you can do is be creative w/ politician hate names like Jay...I think we deserve that much.

Subrosa

August 29th, 2008 at 12:45 PM ^

McCain spends two months hammering Obama for being an inexperienced celebrity and then runs out and picks a former beauty queen with two years of experience as governor of the most backwoods and sparsely populated state in the Union. Oh, but before that she served on some city counsels and stuff. The VP debate with Biden is going to make Ghoulston-Schilling look like a pleasant give-and-take.

 I mean, she'll appeal to some women, sure. But people don't vote for president based on who the VP is. If so, Walter Mondale would have won.

All of that said, this is a nice pick and will give McCain some positive press, but things are FAAAR from locked up.

 

(Also, what's with all the politics in here lately? I thought that was somewhat verboten?)

kgh10

August 29th, 2008 at 12:54 PM ^

Well, unlike McCain, she's actually conservative, so that will definitely help him. Conservatives should be very happy with this pick. I don't know if it will "lock" his chances at victory b/c he still has many flaws, but it's a step. Since the media & opponents haven't been able to demonize her yet like they already have McCain, Obama, Biden, et al, she seems like a really good fit for voters on the right.

helloheisman - Why is this insulting to women? I understand your claim about him not being able to use Obama's inexperience as much, however, the presidency and the vice presidency are different in terms of how much experience they seemingly should have (at least public perception wise, which is all that matters at this point).

helloheisman.com

August 29th, 2008 at 1:23 PM ^

I think McCain's saying that women supported Hilary strictly because she's a women and they don't have any other political awareness.  Now he's offering up some random woman in hopes of getting those voters on his side.

I, at least, have read that a lot of people are offended by this pick.

kgh10

August 29th, 2008 at 4:11 PM ^

Yeah see I don't know how "random" Palin is though when you look at her overall image. She's a fresh face, can make the religious right happy in a way that McCain never could, isn't tied to the W admin, has a background of anti-corruption and watchdogging as others have noted, which can go a long way in cleaning up the Republican image that is tarnished to a good portion of moderate voters. Basically, I don't know how much of her selection is based off of her vagina having ways, if at all b/c in the long run that excitement over a female VP will die down...you'd have to hope that McCain realized that before he selected her.

TitleIX

August 29th, 2008 at 4:52 PM ^

helloheisman you hit the nail on the head.

damn straight i'm insulted! It is demeaning and wrong to think that the only reason women were interested in Hilary is because of her ovaries so having any ovarian candidate on any ticket will therefore bring those voters over.

McCain has just proven that he is a rash, crazy ol' candidate who just doesn't get it.

 

 

lhglrkwg

August 29th, 2008 at 1:12 PM ^

kinda cool that now we'll either have the first black president or first female vice president...or ron paul pulls the upset (which would also be a first)

Tacopants

August 29th, 2008 at 1:15 PM ^

I think McCain has his reasons, and she does have good qualities that conservatives are looking for, but I think this VP choice was just as flawed as Obama and Biden.

1. Undercutting themes of the campaign: McCain can't attack Obama's inexperience if Palin has even less experience than Obama.  Obama can't harp too much on changing Washington culture if Biden has been a 35 year insider.

2. Picking VPs from small states with tiny electoral votes that weren't going to vote for the opposite party.  There were a ton of VP possibilities from large battleground states, all of which have more than the minimum of 3 electoral votes of both Delaware and Alaska

3. It seems like the Palin pick was pandering towards women/younger voters.  After all, there were plenty of conservatives to choose from, but McCain lags far behind in women.

Yeah, she'll make conservaties happy, but so would Tom Ridge or Mitt Romney, who have lots more experience and could possibly make the difference in a larger, battleground state.  All in all though, Palin addresses some of McCain's weaknesses, just like Biden addresses some of Obama's weaknesses, like a good VP candidate should.

hat

August 29th, 2008 at 2:19 PM ^

Actually if Ridge would have made conservatives happy, he'd have probably been the pick.  Ridge is pro-choice on abortion, which makes him anathema to religious conservatives.  Romney too was not that palatable to the right wing, which was uncertain about his pro-life credentials and a little uneasy with his Mormon faith.   

shikselover

August 29th, 2008 at 1:15 PM ^

woooooooooooo, i'm a hockey mom!  and my husband's a fisherman and plays in the snow!  and i was on a couple commissions in alaska and have been governor for a tiny bit!  and now i get to be the VP nominee!!!   woooooooooooooo! 

about as presidential as my mom. 

DoctorWorm

September 4th, 2008 at 6:27 PM ^

BO: Woooooooo! CHANGE! Yeah! CHANGE! Yeah, thanks, I know! Change to you too, buddy! Anyone have some spare CHANGE? Yes! Haha, I know! Change! We're going to exit wars everywhere, lift all taxes, and live in peace with everyone for eternity! YEAH! CHANGE!

 Rare Conservative Reporter: Um, Mr. Obama. How?

BO: ....CHANGE!

 Legions of Liberal Reporters: YES! He's brilliant!

 

About as presidential as my kooky English professor who thought that the Iraq War was a conservative ploy to control the world and the 9/11 attacks were planned by Bush himself. Speaking of which, the Democrats greatest argument against McCain is the Iraq War. If they're so against it, why doesn't Congress cut funding? Since the majority is Democratic, they could cut funding for the war today, if they wanted. No one seems to think of that when they blame Bush for "hundreds of thousands of dead" and a "ruinous war". Worst part is, the public supports these hypocrites, waving flags and screaming "CHANGE!".

 When your entire campaign is based on a single word with no meaning or substance to it, one would think you'd get trounced.

Md23Rewls

August 29th, 2008 at 1:27 PM ^

Palin's main strength is her ability to attract disenfranchised Hillary supporters. And her anti corruption record. Two, her two major strengths are here ability to attract disenfranchised Hillary supporters and her anti corruption record. And she secures Alaska. Three, her three major strengths are here ability to attract disenfranchised Hillary supporters, her anti corruption record, and that she secures Alaska. Also, she brings youth to the Republican ticket. I'll start over.

Md23Rewls

August 29th, 2008 at 5:15 PM ^

I don't actually know anough about her to come up with three, which was the necessary amount to make the Spanish Inquisition reference. And it would have been a tragedy if someone named Palin got such an honor and no Spanish Inquisition or Parrot Sketch references were made.

hat

August 29th, 2008 at 2:14 PM ^

I could see some women being turned off by this, but realistically, I suspect that the women who would be genuinely offended would mostly be hardcore feminist types, who almost certainly weren't voting for him in any event.  On the whole, it's probably a small net positive for him.  The bigger issue, I think, is not so much her gender as the fact that she's more conservative than he is and thus is an olive branch to the right wing of the GOP.  

littlebrownjug

August 29th, 2008 at 2:51 PM ^

I think that he found someone who is willing to challenge the status quo like himself, and I think that it showed tremendous courage. When I look at the other potential choices, I do not know that there were any who were demonstrably better for him (Lieberman would never have been acceptable to the conservative base, he and Romney attacked each other way too much in the primary season, picking Tom Ridge would have made it hard to separate him from W, Polenty would have brought many of the same concerns with regard to experience that she would, and it would have been a huge political error to go for Jindahl with Gustav on the way). I do not think that it is a good thing for the GOP that there were so few reasonable choices. I don't know much about her, but it sounds like she is a pretty good person, and I think that she helps McCain to secure his conservative base. Her pro choice stance will make a lot of Hillary supporters stay with Obama, and I think her selection was much bolder than the Sen. Obama's selection (she certainly brings less baggage than Sen. Biden). At the end of the day, I think that this election will be about Senators Obama and McCain, and I think that Obama will win.

jamiemac

August 29th, 2008 at 3:10 PM ^

Did my favorite site just become Daily Kos or Red State.

Cripes......if i am unable to avoid the political debate at my mgoblog refuge, then its going to be a long fall.

Although, I will say at least this thread has been conducted with decency unlike most of political forums you can find.

SFBayAreaBlue

August 29th, 2008 at 3:14 PM ^

my chest: fuck anyone with ties to the bush administration.

With that being said, this is a brilliant move by mccain.  The presidential election will not be decided by partisans.  He needed to grab middle ground voters, and after the crap hillary did at the convention you can imagine a lot of P'O'd women joining the mccain camp. (for some god awful reason).  Leave it to the GOP to find the one black person in the room and pretend he represents the party.  I'm sure this 'woman' is a religious nut who doesn't really support woman's rights.  She also highlights the issue of oil drilling.  

The only way this could backfire on him is if she's not 'conservative enough' for the religious nut base, which mccain has had to do a lot of lying and waffling to try to win over in the first place.  but from the few comments here it seems she's more nutty than chunky peanut butter.

I'm sure deibold will hand the election to the republican scum in the presidential election, I'm just hoping the people will vote in a super majority in the house and senate. Then mccain can go take his veto pen and assfuck himself with it for all I care. 

Jay

August 29th, 2008 at 3:30 PM ^

I see you have learned NOTHING from the conversation we had in the first political topic you started here a couple of months ago. Yeah, the republiCONS are the problem. The DemoRATS rule! Go Obama! YEAH!!

Oh and just so everyone knows where I stand. John McCain is a manchurian candidate, a marxist socialist sympathyzer and a scumbag of the highest order. Barack Obama is well known to be a drug addicted bisexual who bottoms for gay prostitutes. Both will be good servants of the Unseen Hand. Don't be stupid. Stay home on Election Day (more properly called SELECTION Day). That's the best way to give the NWO a big FUCK YOU.

big gay heart

August 29th, 2008 at 3:44 PM ^

The fact that the GOP nominated McCain after deriding Kerry for "flip flopping" in 2004 has undermined this campaign from the start. Obama may not have a lot of experience, but you know what you'll get: a move towards socialized infrastructure and a sense of non-atagonistic foreign policy. McCain is a wildcard on most things, especially so in the social realm. That's my .02.

kgh10

August 29th, 2008 at 3:48 PM ^

For the record, if you don't want to talk/read politics, you can easily avoid the post. It's not that hard. I see plenty of the most asinine freakin threads you can imagine on this site and choose to simply not read past the first post and/or to not participate. Unless Brian wants to regulate the board based on subject, don't be that guy/gal and complain about the topic of a thread.

SFBayAreaBlue

August 29th, 2008 at 3:52 PM ^

there's even the helpful "OT" in the title. click at your own risk.

and on an aside, who looks more like the emperor? mccain or the pope? I vote for the pope. dude looks totally evil. I guess the devil had to possess a new body once rumsfeld was booted from office.

http://bp0.blogger.com/_R6JAxpvuDtI/R5L1wz5V_nI/AAAAAAAAAPU/F8oVtDadF4A…

http://synth.at.tut.by/pope-benedict-palpatine.jpg

http://home.planet.nl/~overboxx/uploaded_images/ratzinger-palpatine-727…

BBB

August 29th, 2008 at 4:02 PM ^

Her husband works for BP, the Dems can just rub everybody's face in that from here to the end and alienate enough voters from the McCain/Palin ticket.

BBB

August 29th, 2008 at 4:15 PM ^

My mistake then, hes also a seasonal worker and works as a fisherman in the summer. None the less, when I see "Republican" and "Alaska" in the same sentence, the first thing that comes to mind is "oil". I guess we'll just have to see how that plays out in the general population. Just to be clear, I'm not a Democrat or a Republican, I just hate John McCain and especially what he has become in the last 4 years.

DoctorWorm

September 4th, 2008 at 6:34 PM ^

"Her husband works for BP, the Dems can just rub everybody's face in that from here to the end and alienate enough voters from the McCain/Palin ticket. "

"He's a union member and works on the pipeline."

 

Tripped right out of the starting gate.

Jay

August 29th, 2008 at 4:14 PM ^

We should've been drillin' in Alaska and elsewhere for the last 30 years as well as building refineries. Peak oil is nothing but an f'ing scam. The oil companies love the fact that we have a bunch of morons in Congress that haven't let us drill and keep the supply up with the demand. It makes them richer and richer.

Tacopants

August 30th, 2008 at 12:51 AM ^

Not really a fan of Palin, but this just seems like she had the (figurative) balls to take charge and say "Fuck you" to due process.  The trooper was slapping the wife around, accused of tasering the 11 year old stepson, was suspended for 10 days later reduced to 5.  I only wish Granholm would do something like that to Kwame.

The bigger scandal is the whole "I'm going to replace everybody that doesn't agree with me", which I suppose is what politicians do, but this was a creamery board.  In Alaska.  Let's repeat: A Creamery Board.  In Alaska.  Before this her claim to fame was getting some guy a $12k fine on the ethics committee.

Being governor of Alaska does not equal earth shattering issues.  That and her creationism will probably turn off a ton of people.

Tubes

August 29th, 2008 at 10:57 PM ^

One of the criteria of nominating a VP should be their capability to act as commander in chief.  Someone who was mayor of a town of 9,000 people 2 years ago does not fit this criteria.

Oh, and the VP debates should be interesting.  And by interesting I mean a massacre.

Nickel

August 29th, 2008 at 11:31 PM ^

You mean those debates where the 'winner' is the individual who looks more composed while managing to say absolutely nothing of substance, speaks only in generalities of plans they'll never implement and has a better makeup artist work on them prior to the debate? 

SFBayAreaBlue

August 30th, 2008 at 6:58 AM ^

one of the criteria for electing a PRESIDENT should be their capability to act as commander in chief.  Instead we vote on which one we'd like to have a beer with, or the fact that we're jealous of windsurfers.

Jay

August 30th, 2008 at 11:35 AM ^

Right.

Because Fuckface DoucheBama has TONS of experience with his 4 years in the Senate and a litany of missed votes.

Much like Assface McCain, Joe Biden is nothing but an f'ing career political hack who's old worthless ass should've been tossed out of the Senate by the people of Delaware YEARS ago.

I hate ALL of these screwballs, but, Sarah Palin is the least despicable of the four.

wigeon

August 30th, 2008 at 12:23 AM ^

 She's a committed Christian who's pro-life in practice as well as in theory; she recently gave birth to a son that she knew would have Down Syndrome.

I have, and always will be pro-choice, and suspicious of politicos wearing the "Christian" tag.  And in spite of that, this is perhaps the most exemplary thing I've heard a politician do.

There's a lot of people in this world who would not have taken this route, pro-choice and pro-life (hypocrites). I admire the hell out of her for this single moral choice. It's exactly what this country needs - someone who practices what the hell they preach.