OT: What's going on with gas prices in Houghton Lake?

Submitted by stephenrjking on
So a couple of tweets came across the bow this evening from Patrick DeHaan, courtesy of Michigan Alum meteorologist Ryan Maue. Apparently there's a gas price war in Houghton Lake. The low price, as of two hours ago?

$ 0.48 per gallon.

I'm on a tablet and can't embed, so here's the link. Who's up for a road trip?

https://twitter.com/gasbuddyguy/status/688900279144677376

Glen Masons Hot Wife

January 18th, 2016 at 3:30 AM ^

I think that's a bit of a stretch.... I think your interpretation has made it more about politics than the initial statement.

I know liberals and conservatives that would both agree the government is not always super efficient.

blue in dc

January 18th, 2016 at 8:15 AM ^

While I don't know either UM Proud or Humen, it is not a huge leap to think that UM Proud"s joke just might say something about his political leanings as Humen suggested. On a U of M sports blog an easy and clearly non-contreversial joke might have been, "the owner of that station must have gone to MSU (or OSU)'. If not and you picked another target for your joke (in this case, government, but could just as easily have been some of the wonderful accounting on Wall Street where both the little guy and the greater economy have been screwed while some guy who sits at a desk and doesn"t actually make anything makes billions), it might say something about your political leanings. I recognize that both of those negative descriptions are stereotypes that do not fairly represent tbe majority of the hardworking americans that work either in government or on Wall Street. On the other hand if someone chooses to make a joke about questionable accounting and used either example, I would in fact think that the underlying example might say that something about their politics. This is not to suggest that both examples don"t have truth to them or present opportunities to make changes that could benefit all americans. I will also note in Humen"s defense that he didn"t make the more political statement until asked for the clarification and that while Bernie Sanders might point out inefficincies in our health care budget his solution does not seem to suggest that he believes the federal government as a whole is incompetent while the two leading candidates in the other party have made no secret that they feel much of it is (as is their right as an American and as is the right of anyone that agrees with them) and as I believe Humen quite factually pointed out. I aopoligize if this reply is "close-minded", because I think that there in fact could be some more than subtle political undertones to UM Proud"s original post, but certainly respect (but disagree with those who don't).

wildbackdunesman

January 18th, 2016 at 6:09 AM ^

I think virtually all Americans realize that there are inefficiences within our national budget.  In fact, Democrats point out many of them within our military and I just heard Bernie Sanders point out inefficiences in our health care budget.  I think you are making too big of a stink over a funny joke.

teldar

January 18th, 2016 at 8:12 AM ^

They're all parasites. And deficit spending is out of control. It's not hard to see a problem with deficit spending as countries fail. And the Republicans don't really want to cut spending that much either. They just want a couple percent different allocation. They're not an answer, they're just the other side of the same bent coin.

blue in dc

January 18th, 2016 at 8:27 AM ^

People in the military who risk their lives to defend our country, people at NIH who devote their lives to curing disease, first responders to disasters - yes, certainly all parasites. While our government clearly has room to improve, I"m not sure you"d be thrilled with the way the country would look without it at all.

King Douche Ornery

January 18th, 2016 at 12:54 PM ^

NOWHERE in the constitution or any other document dows it say the US is obligated to balance any budget or that the government is a business that  should make money.

As far as deficit spending, we are following the path the USSR took--a gigantic military budget that bankrupts the country while the rich run off with the money we are giving them so they, uh, can "create jobs" LOLZ

blue in dc

January 18th, 2016 at 9:15 AM ^

Who can make such sweeping generalizations about "government" might want to try some alternatives for a while. Russia, China, much of the middle east. While our government has problems, there are plenty of governments that are more of a disaster

blue in dc

January 18th, 2016 at 10:30 AM ^

But all I see is someone making incredibly broad generalizations about politics on a sports blog - not sure how that is improving things. Further, the person I am responding to has called all government "parasites" that does not really suggest someone in the construcive, "how do we fix things" mode. Suggesting that all things government are a total disaster seems to ignore the fact that the public-private partnership in the US has done some amazing things and that if you want to try to change things a slightly more nuanced view looking at where things work and don"t might be useful. Making government work is really hard. Lots of people are coming from lots of different viewpoints and interests. Trying to find workable solutions that satisfy those often competing interests is hard work that is often failed at, that doesn't mean we should just call it a disaster and give up. By the way - red herrings are widely accepted as "shitty logic" - I"ve re-read my post multiple times and tried to figure out where I said - we should just shut our mouths and not try to improve things.

superstringer

January 17th, 2016 at 11:10 PM ^

CNN said today the lifting of sactions on Iran would bring down gas prices as Iran gets back into the market.

But dang that was fast. Swear I heard them say "in a few months" -- clearly they acfually said "in a few minutes."



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Mr. Yost

January 18th, 2016 at 12:08 AM ^

I don't watch the news...

too depressing for me, I'd rather read the stories I want to read rather than watch the same stuff cycled over and over from predictable viewpoints. But without getting into politics, what's wrong with CNN? It's old?

(honestly didn't get the joke).