CBS Sports writer and former BHGP blogger Adam Jacobi has been fired by CBS for incorrectly reporting Joe Paterno's death. Not terribly surprising, even to him:
Adam_Jacobi Adam Jacobi
CBS Sports writer and former BHGP blogger Adam Jacobi has been fired by CBS for incorrectly reporting Joe Paterno's death. Not terribly surprising, even to him:
Adam_Jacobi Adam Jacobi
if you can't do the time! Oh wait, that's for Sandusky.
"Forty-two Big Ten Championships!"
On the plus side, hopefully he'll bring his own inspired brand of lunacy back to BHGP?
the first time this has happened with a major news organization jumping the gun on someones passing. I remember when the late Frank Reynolds from ABC announced former press secretary James Brady's death the day of President Reagan's assassination attempt. Reynolds bellowed on air "we are paid to get the story right!".
I believe NBC jumped the gun on Joe DiMaggio's death. It has been said that Joltin Joe was lucid enough the have watched that report.
The media also camped outside Jackie Onassis' apartment awaiting her end with some premature reports coming there as well.
I just wish the media- all media- would let an official announcement come out first on the death of a famous individual. The dying person's famuly is at least due that courtesy.
Also, *very recently* many news outlets mistakenly reported the "assassination" of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords last January, and then had to retract when it turned out that she was still alive (and recovering courageously).
but you're kind of a tool.
Adam has been an outsanding blogger for years. He fucked up pretty bad here, but if Mitch Albom is still employed and winning awards after being outed as a fabulist, I see no reason why Jacobi should be forever barred from journalism for actually making a mistake.
There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.
I am saying that fabricating an encounter that never actually took place is a far more serious breach of journalistic ethics than improperly sourcing a major story. I didn't think that was particularly controversial.
There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.
He relied on a report from a Penn State site. That report was wrong and Jacobi should not have run with it until he had additional sources. Firing him was totally understandable and probably appropriate. Crappy sourcing is also a mistake that happens all the time, and I would wager lots of money that it is not an automatic career-ender. Nor should it be, because it's an indication of a correctable error (sloppiness) rather than some kind of ethical failing.
Mitch Albom made up shit that never happened because he's a lazy piece of crap who is too busy trying to squeeze pennies out of old people. He recently won the Red Smith award.
There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.
I have a policy of not buying any breaking story wholesale until it has been confirmed by multiple outlets.
That aside, the issue I thought we were discussing was "should this incident keep Adam Jacobi from ever being employed in journalism again?" Aside from my Mitch Albom example, I can't help but notice that Kirk Herbstreit is still employed despite doing the exact same thing with the Les Miles to Michigan story (as far as I know, he wasn't even suspended).
Jacobi is a good blogger/journalist/writer/whatever, and has done a ton of good work, both at at BHGP and CBS Sports, for several years. To say that he's forever barred because he rushed a story out the door without nailing down the facts (which, again, is something that happens quite frequently), seems like an absurd instance of selective punishment.
There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.
And the dirty secret about celebrity obituaries is that news outlets usually write them well in advance of the person's death, especially when the person is old.
Also, don't big news companies like CBS employ fact-checkers? Is Jacobi the only person losing his job over this?
This isn't really a fact-checking type of situation. When you have a breaking story the company usually takes the reporters word and sources on it. It's typically not a situation that can even be fact checked.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
How small does it go?
Whatcha gonna do, little brother?
That's what she said.
"I love him, he's a great coach, he's a great mentor, he's a great friend. He's every single thing you want a college coach to be, and he does it flawlessly." -David Molk
fabricating an important detail of a story days ahead of time is way worse than being the second in line in misreporting a piece of news that spiraled horribly out of control after a hoax. Wait, that's not what you meant.
Not saying Jacobi didn't screw up --- you've got to get confirmation for these things --- but what Mitch Albom did was an outright lie, not a stupid mistake.
Jacobi is good people. He deserves --- and will get --- another shot.
Site manager/Editor: Maize n Brew
Sporadic Tweeter: @zach_travis
Too bad that it happened, but it's sort of nice to see that CBS has the stones to level a punishment for a failure of journalistic integrity. Can you imagine ESPN doing this? Didn't think so.
How does firing Jacobi changed what happened? Does CBS feel exonerated? And what about his bosses who signed off on the story? Did he get fired?
I have no dog in this fight. I've never read Jacobi and I don't visit cbssports.com. I just think firing someone for this seems wrong.
um, correct me if i'm wrong... but nothing can change what happened. unless i missed the unveiling of the time machine. best you can do is punish those responsible to deter it from happening again in the future.
as for his boss(es), certainly some responsibility rests there, but if the conversation before they ran it went like this "it's your ass on the line if you're wrong" i could understand a reprimand instead of getting canned.
Of course firing him doesn't change what happened. But I think, if I'm hired by a media/news organization, it is a reasonable expectation that my work on the job have consequences. If I do a great job (e.g., broke a legit story on a scandal), I'm sure they would take that work (which after all, is obviously in the past) and perhaps give me a bonus or better job title or something. On the flip, if I commit about as big an error as one can in sports news, it's reasonable to expect being fired - his poor work hurt not just him, but his employer's reputation.
Second, don't think some future cbssports.com writer won't think twice if he finds himself in a similar situation where he has a hot tip. He'll remember that Jacobi lost his job, and perhaps that cbs writer will do some extra due diligence before going with the story (which ultimately will make both him and his employer better off).
I don't have anything against Jacobi and hopefully he can find work elsewhere. It just shouldn't (and won't) be at CBS.
It only ends once. Anything that happens before that, is just progress.
Smart for tweeting this way. Not burning bridges and showing respect will be helpful in his future opportunities. (In contract to a bitter pissed off attitude)
I hope he can land another job soon.
"I'm not a vegetarian b/c I love animals. I'm a vegetarian b/c I hate plants"
Sooooo...can someone here for the life of me explain the interest in being the first to report that a famous person is dead?
I get the idea of breaking a story - but breaking someone's death isn't some grand piece of investigatory journalism like Bernstein and Woodward breaking Watergate - everybody knows when someone famous dies.
It's great to remember what individuals contributed to society over their lifetime and celebrate their triumphs, but I don't understand how being 15 minutes (or 12 hours, or whatever) early is worth it.
Maybe this post should've gone in Brian's front page thread. I just don't get the infatuation with announcing death.
Intensity is a lot of guys that run fast.
to have someone connected with the Penn State story express appropriate remorse.
Black Heart, Gold Frowny Faces : (
or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
Can we fire BRCE from this blog?
"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."
- Jack Handey
Haha this is funny.
I've said something similar (about a different poster) and apparently the guy was upset so I ended up getting served one of those scary "don't attack other users" emails from the MGoJudicial system.
I don't know why but I felt really bad, as if I let someone important down. Like a kid when an adult gets pissed at you.
Anyway, the comment is hilarious. If you get an email, don't let it ruin your Friday night.
Intensity is a lot of guys that run fast.
In about 90 minutes I'm gonna be playing video games and swilling cheap beer with some buddies. No worries here.
"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."
- Jack Handey
in 90 minutes I'll be changing a diaper and getting ready for dinner with the in-laws.
ALWAYS remember the golden rule: He who has the gold, makes the rules
I miss college, too; a night like tonight is how I try and recapture some of the innocence I've lost since leaving its warm, comforting embrace.
"The difference between a man and a boy is, a boy wants to grow up to be a fireman, but a man wants to grow up to be a giant monster fireman."
- Jack Handey
Also working since '08. The key difference between you and benoitballs is a baby.
Warning to all people that like the college lifestyle: Having a baby will make your life ≠ college.
Luckily my friends have learned this lesson for me. Not that there's anything wrong w/babies if you're into that sorta thing haha....
Intensity is a lot of guys that run fast.
I'm happy he was fired. Reporting a person's death prematurely is complete bullshit. It's about time the media began to at least slightly police itself.
I see that i'm in the minority here. I understand it was a mistake but jeesh to fire the guy? thats a bit much in my book especially when the media often takes a rumor and embellishes it with a 15 minute expose which has them standing outside a local HS/City Council/Gov/Sports team talking about nothing other than "we heard something".
Blue is Faster
They had to fire him, and even if they didn't I'm sure he would have resigned. That's the appropriate punishment, and part of the high-stakes game of journalism--you take a chance on a source, make a big mistake, and get the axe.
He does seem like a good guy though who made an honest mistake, and I think he will get picked up by somebody--nothing as high-profile as CBS Sports, but if he is young and talented enough, this will eventually become a footnote to his career.
"The trouble with quotes on the internet, is that it is often difficult to discern whether or not they are genuine" --Abraham Lincoln
I always enjoyed his stuff on BHGP and it is unfrotunate that he lost his position at CBS over this, but I understand why CBS did what they did. Sadly, in such situations, even if it was an honest mistake, it was a mistake that millions read, blogged, tweeted, retweeted....and in today's world, this sadly almost guarantees a canning if you turn out to be wrong or premature. 21st century media is a strange, strange thing sometimes. Hopefully, somebody picks him up somewhere - he's definitely worth a read when he's got something posted.
"Funny isn't it, how naughty dentists always make that one fatal mistake."
Follow the random tweets of a Michigan alum - http://twitter.com/#!/LorneEC3
Didn't JoePa die the same night he reported his death? Maybe he had just inside info from the ultimate insider..
Didn't JoePa die the same night he reported his death? Maybe he had just inside info from the ultimate insider..
To me, firing the guy seemed too reactionary - yes he was wrong about Paterno's death, but he did have a somewhat-legit "source" (and yes, debate away about the quality of said source) and the intent clearly wasn't to defame or injury the Paterno family. If anyone/anything is to the blame, it should be the system in place that rewards news organizations for being "first" over being right, or as I like to call it the Huffington Post/Gawker-ization of news reporting.
Did he deserve to be reprimanded? Yes. Is that a fireable offense given that so many other people responded in kind? Not really, at least in my opinion. I am all for news organizations accepting responsibility for being wrong, but that is the nature of reporting - the drive to report news oftentimes runs counter to the methodical authentication of said news that people trumpet when it serves their purposes. And sometimes you come out on the right side and get a scoop, while other times you come down on the wrong side and incorrectly report news that may be damaging to the subject(s). But to act like we (the news-consuming audience) and the institution of journalism itself don't t force reporters to walk this tight-rope is disingenuous.
but that sucks.
There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter.