OT-ish: Burke #1 in ESPN's Rookie Rankings

Submitted by JonSnow54 on

David Thorpe over at ESPN keeps a list of all NBA rookies and ranks them; he updates it consistently throughout the NBA season.  

He just released the new list today, and #1 is none other than Trey Burke, while Tim hardaway Jr has moved up to #3.  The link is paywalled (need ESPN insider): http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10198337/rookie-watch-trey-burke-takes-top-spot

A small excerpt from the section on Burke: "As we look forward it will be hard not to expect much more from Burke, who has found a way to dominate games despite his lack of size and elite athletic ability, because Utah's schedule will get easier (the Jazz have played the most difficult schedule in the NBA so far). Plus, Burke has proven he has the ability to improve (like he did from his freshman season to his sophomore season at Michigan), which should give Jazz fans more reason to smile."

There is more on Burke, and another section on Hardaway, so if you have ESPN Insider I think it is worth the read.

It is pretty cool to see Burke doing so well, so quickly.  I hope (and expect) him to continue improving.

Lucky Socks

December 27th, 2013 at 5:29 PM ^

Sigh?  What could have been?  We saw what could have been.  Him staying 3 or 4 years means he wasn't the Burke we knew, or ran into injury trouble.  

Burke won a Big Ten Championship as a Freshman and might have been a first round pick.  He came back and was an All-American, All-Big Ten, POY, and led the team to a NCAA runner up finish.

I think in any situation this earns a player the right to challenge himself at the next level.  He conquered the college game and we reaped the benefits.

taistreetsmyhero

December 27th, 2013 at 8:24 PM ^

should top player in college hoops = elite athletic ability? jimmer fredette, evan turner, tyler hansborough, j.j. reddick, andrew bogut, jameer nelson, shane battier all say no.

potential rookie of the year = elite athletic ability? is every effective nba player effective because they are athletic? no.

does trey burke being more athletic than you mean he's an elite athlete? i doubt you are michael phelps.

=====

i love watching trey burke and wish him the best. but just because he is good does not mean that he is a super athlete, or even an above-average nba athlete. it isn't even that subtle of a distinction to make.

MGlobules

December 27th, 2013 at 9:53 PM ^

that you never answered the question as to why it is that Trey lacks such ability, or what such ability constitutes. Anyone who has watched his training videos can attest to a great deal of athletic ability, at least of a kind that most of us can relate to. So tell us exactly what this means at the next level. . . instead of just shaking your head at our ignorance. 

Gameboy

December 27th, 2013 at 10:51 PM ^

Hey, I love Trey as much as anyone around here, but you cannot seriously believe that he has NBA elite level athletic ability. He just doesn't. For example, he posted 36.5 in vertical and 11.09 agility. Those were some of the worst in his group. Compare that to the elite athletic guy in the same draft, Oladipo. He posted 42 in and 10.69. Trey is not in the same league athletically.

taistreetsmyhero

December 28th, 2013 at 11:14 AM ^

does a player need to be able to throw down monstrous jams to be great at basketball? do they need to be able to run a 4.4 40 to dribble a basketball? no and no.

but if you take two people with the exact same abilities at dribbling, shooting, passing, court vision--actual basketball SKILL--and give one of them a 42 inch vertical with lightning quickness and usain bolt speed, and the other a 36 inch vertical with above average (for NBA) speed, they will not be the equal players.

on the flip side, if you take a player who is miles above the next closest player in terms of passing, court vision, and add a once-in-a-generation combination of size and dribbling skills, but put them in a body with only above average speed, quickness and leap, that person can still be the greatest ever player at his position--BECAUSE THEY HAVE MORE BASKETALL SKILL.

bluebyyou

December 28th, 2013 at 11:18 AM ^

In Trey's case, he possesses excellent hand eye coordination or he couldn't be the point guard that he is with excellent dribbling and passing skills, as we saw over his two years at Michigan, and an ability to block a shot at least a foot over the rim in the NC game.  He also can control his body well enough to penetrate to the basket surrounded by giants. 

Would Steve Nash be considered an "elite" athlete?

taistreetsmyhero

December 28th, 2013 at 12:02 PM ^

that eye-hand coordination is an innate athletic ability that is often overlooked, and trey burke probably has great ability (relative to other NBA players) in that regard...but that is still just conjecture because it isn't really something that is measured in predraft workouts.

but we've already established that he isn't a huge leaper relative to other nba players. so, yes he can block a huge shot, but he's not going to be playing above the rim like westbrook or rose, etc.

and no, i doubt steve nash would be considered an elite athlete because his measurables aren't going to be on the level of ELITE (ie a distinction reserved for like 5-10 players in the entire league at that position) athleticism.

now, do examples like trey burke and steve nash demonstrate that being considered an elite athlete is irrelevant? absolutely not, in my opinion. it just proves how great they are at the actual game of basketball, because, unlike better athletes, they rely on actual basketball abilities that they acquired through hours and hours and hard work.

TheJoker

December 27th, 2013 at 11:09 PM ^

He would be in elite company:

 

Going backwards players to have won both the Naismith and the NBA ROY awards:

Kevin Durant, Elton Brand, Tim Duncan, Larry Johnson, David Robinson, Patrick Ewing, Michael Jordan, Ralph Sampson, Larry Bird and Lew Alcindor.

Out of the ones not in the league anymore, only Larry Johnson is not in the HOF. 

KAYSHIN15

December 27th, 2013 at 10:33 PM ^

Effort with actual production. So far this guy has proven himself to be a guy that hustles, but doesn't bring much else to the table. HE IS NOT a shut down defender and HE IS NOT an elite shooter. Maybe he can develop into both later in his career and hopefully by next yr for our sakes, but as of now he is a below avg NBA player

taistreetsmyhero

December 27th, 2013 at 11:57 PM ^

tend to ignore the fact that it would be unlikely we could have pulled off a brandon knight trade had we drafted burke, as we would have lost a lot of leverage.

it's definitely a losing argument to say that, straight up, kcp over burke was the better choice. but, if we are gonna take the captain hindsight approach, i would argue that kcp + jennings is greater than burke + knight.

Michigan4Life

December 28th, 2013 at 12:58 AM ^

No player is a shut down defender, not with the current NBA rules. KCP has been a really good defensive player and that is by itself very useful in the NBA.  Advanced metrics showed that KCP is excellent in that department.  Defense is production.  People think production measure with points, assists, rebounds, blocked shots, etc., but they don't tell the story about defense. Look at KCP's touches per minutes, it's very low because he's the #5 option on the team (which is understandable because of Jennings, Smith, Monroe and Drummond getting the majority of the touches).

KCP is not below average NBA player. He's above average.  Hard to produce when he's the 5th option on the team and Monroe, Drummond, Smith taking up rebounds.  Jennings handling the ball a ton and getting tons of assists.  KCP's role is to play defense and shoot 3s which he is suited perfectly for the team.

Look at the Pistons defensive numbers with KCP on the floor. A below average NBA player would not be playing good defense.

KAYSHIN15

December 28th, 2013 at 5:42 AM ^

For your argument is by using "advanced" defensive measurements then you re kinda proving everyones point. Ive watched all but about 4-5 games this year and I see opposing 2 guards give KCP the bizness on a nightly basis just like Afflalo did last night for Orlando. KCP is asked to do exactly what THJ is doing in NY. Campare the 2 and maybe the bigger argument is whether Timmy should have been taken instead of KCP.

Michigan4Life

December 28th, 2013 at 11:35 AM ^

because NBA is a two way games where players plays both offense and defense.  Sure there are some night where players did not have a good night like a bad shooting night or bad defensive night.  That doesn't take away the overall season production which matters more than a single game production.  KCP is being asked to guard tightly and is very good off the ball (he ranks 13th in the league in that category).

LSAClassOf2000

December 27th, 2013 at 6:03 PM ^

I think this is the sort of news that helps Michigan in the long run, if we are not only sending great talent to the NBA, but talent that is getting early kudos like this.

Trey did an interview with NBA>com about a week ago - HERE - where he talked a little bit about being part of programs that have been on the rebound starting in high school and how he hopes to do similar things with the Jazz like he accomplished here despite the differences in competition level. 

MGlobules

December 27th, 2013 at 10:16 PM ^

thanks for recommending this. Didn't know he was such a fan of Iverson. Good stuff about Stockton's recommendations to him. Very candid about the deficits in his game. Love when he notes that just two years ago he was moving into a dorm and no one in Ann Arbor knew him. 

CRISPed in the DIAG

December 27th, 2013 at 6:21 PM ^

I hope Trey has a long and distinguished career, but I don't think we have seen him hit the rookie "wall" yet.  It exists for nearly all rookies as they acclimate to the grinding schedule and style of play.  

That said, the NBA has been calling a less physical game than college in recent years - maybe we've overestimated Tray's fragility in the League.

bronxblue

December 27th, 2013 at 6:50 PM ^

That's true.  Also, he missed the first 18 games to start the year, so he's relatively fresh.

I think he'll continue to have a pretty good year.  I do think that Utah being as horrible as they are has helped him get comfortable leading the team and getting into the groove.  As the PG he needs the ball in his hand, and without a dominating other player he's done well to take the lead.  I do think he'll win ROY this year, just because the expected top players haven't really done anything.