OT: How athletic are baseball players?

Submitted by Cranky Dave on
Before anyone tells me to quit drinking and go to bed let me say I am in a bar drinking. And I will go to bed when I feel like it. I'm watching baseball for the first time in about 14 years and baseball players are the least athletic professional athletes out of the 4 major sports. That's a fact. So where do baseball players ranks on the athletic spectrum of professional athletes? Discuss.

Profwoot

August 5th, 2017 at 10:04 PM ^

I don't watch baseball either, but I figured it was common knowledge that it's a skill game. Being able to run fast and jump high obviously doesn't hurt, but pure athleticism doesn't directly translate to hitting a baseball or turning a double play. Therefore, the average athleticism in baseball will tend to be lower than sports in which it does translate more directly.

Profwoot

August 5th, 2017 at 10:16 PM ^

Better to envision more of a continuum, where (given similar public interest and player incentives) the activities best facilitated by pure athleticism will tend to have the better athletes. Jumping straight to "therefore baseball players are like chess players" only makes sense if you think those activities have similar athletic requirements.

Wendyk5

August 5th, 2017 at 10:13 PM ^

I think if you look at it as skilled rather than athletic, baseball is higher than football, except maybe for QB and receivers. Baseball players are multi-faceted; they have to be able to throw accurately, catch a small ball whizzing at them at 100 mph, judge a fly ball and then make athletic moves to catch it, react quickly to a situation and know intuitively where the ball needs to go in a split second, hit a 100 mph fast ball and a 70 mph curveball (among others), and if you're a pitcher or catcher, you have a bunch of other skills like throwing different kinds of pitches over a small plate that's judged by an imperfect human and crouch down for the good part of three or four hours, bouncing up and throwing accurately in a split second.  Basketball players, I think especially these days, are the most athletic of all. 

DonAZ

August 6th, 2017 at 7:42 AM ^

Outfielders and 2nd and 3rd basemen and SS are almost always great overall athletes. Other positions? Mixed bag.

It's a known fact first basemen are the most athletic of them all.  /sarc

Right field is a quirky position in that balls to that field off right-handed bats have weird flight patterns.  It's ironic that in my youth the nerd (often me) was placed out in right field. Sure enough, some ball would come looping out that way looking like it would drop short, but in fact went sailing over my head.  Then it was the lonely sprint to get the ball and the futile heave back ot the infield.  

Ah ... memories. :-)

MGoStrength

August 5th, 2017 at 10:21 PM ^

Baseball is predominantly a fine motor skill that utilizes more hand to eye coordination whereas football is predominantly a gross motor skill outside of kicker, punter, and QB.  So, NFL players are more likely to be bigger, stronger, faster, jump higher, be more athletic than MLB players.  There is of course always the exception as guys like Mike Trout, Yasiel Puig, Brynce Harper, and Giancarlo Stanton are pretty good athletes.

 

I can also attest from working in Division 1 & 2 athletics as an S&C coach that the football and hockey players were more athletic than the baseball players typically.  Basketball is such a unique body type however, that they are harder to judge because the taller guys often aren't strong, fast, or jump particularly high.  The guards and small forwards however tend to be quite athletic, but still not typically super strong.

fksljj

August 5th, 2017 at 10:24 PM ^

The big heavy guys, not so much. They're just there to swing the big bats and are usually first basemen who just stand there waiting for someone to throw them the ball. The shortstops, 2nd basemen, some outfielders have a lot of athleticism.

711 Arbor

August 5th, 2017 at 10:38 PM ^

that interviewed a bunch of strength and conditioning coaches and they ordered best athetes in the 4 major sports as 

1.  Basketball

2. Football

3. Baseball

4. Hockey

Erik_in_Dayton

August 5th, 2017 at 10:42 PM ^

The author points out that in the early part of the last century there was a single body type that was seen as best for all sports - the all-purpose athlete (Jim Thorpe is an example). And then he points out that athletes' bodies are becoming increasingly specialized. Almost all NBA players are unusually tall, all NFL linemen are 300+ pounds, high jumpers have have long legs while gymnasts do not, etc. There is still something to be said for general athleticism being a quality that can carry over to multiple sports. But we're getting farther and farther away from that. Is Michael Phelps a better athlete than Usain Bolt or Lebron James? I don't think there's a clear answer to that, because their sports reward different traits.

DonAZ

August 6th, 2017 at 7:46 AM ^

the idea that your 6"10" power forward should be 3-point threat would have been considered laughable

As memory serves, that was Magic Johnson's unique contribution -- he was a 6'8" guard in the days wen such a thing was thought impossible.  It wasn't.

Mr. Yost

August 5th, 2017 at 11:04 PM ^

Wouldn't it depend on the position you're comparing?

For example a CF, 2B or SS compared to a kicker?

And what's your definition of athletic? Do you consider OL athletic?

Goggles Paisano

August 6th, 2017 at 6:44 AM ^

Joe Theisman tells a story about how they used to put the football recruits on the basketball court to see if they could play.  If they could, they considered the recruit to be a pretty good athlete.  

I played football, baseball and basketball from the time I was a little squirt until I couldn't play anymore.  It takes a heckuva lot of athleticism to excel at baseball.  It's a really strange comparison in my opinion as how does one really measure and put a value on "athleticism"?  

There are guys that can run and jump but don't know how to throw a baseball or look funny shooting a basketball.  Are they athletic or not?  I just don't think it's fair to say athletes of one sport are more athletic than athletes of another sport.  

Year of Revenge II

August 6th, 2017 at 8:25 AM ^

Suit and and play in a Big Ten baseball game, and then you will have your answer.  Most of these players will not be good enough to play professionally. 

Before you do though, stop drinking.

Review Michael Jordan story.

Baseball players on the whole are pretty athletic.  You can find outliers, but don't kid yourself.

543Church

August 6th, 2017 at 8:34 AM ^

Doesn't Harbaugh make recruits at camp throw a baseball to see how their general athleticism measures up? I will bet most football players look like crap throwing a baseball.

dRunk07

August 6th, 2017 at 11:54 AM ^

How I compare athleticism is how good someone actually is at baseball as well. Are baseball players the most athletic at a given sport? No. But in general terms the hand eye coordination required to play such a sport fairs well in just about every other sport. In speaking terms put a baseball player on any other sports field and he can get the basics and compete, but put any other athlete on a baseball field and they become helpless 90% of the time. To me this actually makes them the most athletic but who am I to say I've been a baseball player since I was 4.

bronxblue

August 6th, 2017 at 9:18 AM ^

Baseball players are generally atheltic for the elements of baseball that require it; same with every other athlete.  Soccer players are very athletic and talented, but they would probably look out of place on a basketball court.  Outfielders and short-stops are usually pretty athletic and could probably translate those skills to WR or CB pretty well, but would be out of sorts at trying to block guys on the line.

 

EJG

August 6th, 2017 at 10:11 AM ^

The game has changed considerably.  There are still a few specialists hanging around, e.g., designated hitters and pitchers who may lack speed or be a bit overweight; however, the vast majority of professional baseball players have outstanding strength and conditioning.  I talk to the Class A kids in Florida as well as the management and staff for the Tigers, Twins and Red Sox.  The kids are all top athletes in high school who chose baseball over other sports.  The programs in place to build top-notch ballplayers are as impressive if not moreso than what I have seen in football and basketball.  If you ever get a chance to see the MLB Channel's program on the San Francisco Giant's strength and conditioning program, it will blow you away.  I believe it is called, "The Ten Percent" as only 1 of ten minor leaguers ever make it to the show.

BTW, 53 years old and still play competitive baseball with and against many former MLB, MiLB, college baseball and college and NFL football players.  The football players aren't marvel athletes on a baseball field.  They are mostly just strong.

Hitting a baseball is incredibly difficult and requires hand-eye coordination far beyond that required in any other sport.

 

brad

August 6th, 2017 at 10:38 AM ^

It's not really a knock on someone's athleticism to say they're in general the least athletic among NBA, NFL, NHL and Major League Baseball players. Each sport requires elite physical talent and/or skill of some rare type.

I think you're just trying to say you find baseball boring.

FLwolvfan22

August 6th, 2017 at 11:04 AM ^

For employees of my company to try out. This is a big company, I saw dozens of people try, very very few could get a pitch over 50 mph. My best was about 62 (weak stuff I know). and I tried many times to throw harder, faster to no avail. The next month my arm and shoulder were still sore and the guy who sits next to me said the same thing. Anyone who thinks pitchers (at least) aren't athletes is nuts.