Onward on Offense: What are you most excited to see from the offense this spring?

Submitted by MaizeBlueA2 on February 4th, 2022 at 11:17 PM

Onward on Offense: What are you most excited to see from the offense this spring? Biggest concerns? What questions do you have that you hope are answered in spring ball?

Gulogulo37

February 5th, 2022 at 9:17 AM ^

Yes. I love Haskins as much as the next guy but people are underrating Edwards' power. I guess it's easy to overlook because he's fast and great catching the ball, but he's a tough aggressive runner inside as well. He probably won't break quite as many tackles as Hassan but definitely more upside there overall.

username03

February 4th, 2022 at 11:29 PM ^

I'm looking to see the same thing I've been looking for for years now, have we accepted that throwing the ball is a viable, sometimes even necessary, way to win football games. 

UMinSF

February 5th, 2022 at 1:46 PM ^

Not just Ronnie Bell either. Sophomore Anthony is gonna be >> Frosh Anthony.

Plus upper classmen Wilson, Henning, Johnson, Sainristil > younger versions, and upper classmen stud TEs in Schoon and All (plus Honigford and young guys pushing > younger versions.

Add Edwards and Corum who are both dangerous, capable receivers.

We may lose one or two guys to portal, but Michigan has an absolutely LOADED receiving corps.

10+ solid to spectacular experienced receiving talents. Tons of speed, shiftiness, size, deep threats, slot ninjas, end zone targets. Unreal.

Deepest, best squadron of receivers I can ever remember at Michigan. 

Gonna be fun!  Go Blue!

AlbanyBlue

February 5th, 2022 at 7:21 PM ^

Your hyperbole is a bit over-the-top, but I agree with the subtext and the meaning. Hell, I agree with most of what you post once the exaggeration is stripped out of it.

I'm putting it this way -- it appears quite likely that the 2022 passing offense has the potential to be better than the 2022 rushing offense. I'm hoping that the offensive braintrust will step out of their collective comfort zones and fully utilize this to maximize the team's potential this season.

RobM_24

February 4th, 2022 at 11:39 PM ^

It'd be nice to pass the ball in creampuff games rather than proving we can control the line of scrimmage against MAC caliber schools. Perhaps prepare for the games where you can't mash the other teams on the ground. 

YaterSalad

February 5th, 2022 at 7:39 AM ^

Agreed … It’s all context.
 

In the early stages we needed to run the football because we had advantages - o-line run blocking & RB - and got dealt the blow of losing our only experienced WR in Bell. 
 

Plus, you know what, it paid off.  We still used a run heavy game plan to pave OSU. The difference, by that point, is that we were explosive enough in the passing game to keep them on their heals.  Plus we concocted run fits to use against aggression.  
 

RobM_24

February 5th, 2022 at 1:57 PM ^

Running the ball is fine, but unless you have an Alabama-caliber pool of talent, you're going to have a glass ceiling. You'll get to that Georgia/Bama team and have no chance of running the ball bc they have planet-sized NFL players who can't be "out-techniqued" or "out-physicaled". Then you're screwed, and your only answer at halftime of the Georgia game is "we have to be more physical". No, Jim, you don't need to be more physical. They have the horses and you don't. So how do you beat a team when you can't run? You need passing performances like we've seen from Watson, Burrow, Jameis, Cam, and so forth. But unfortunately, you're in that game with a QB who has only had enough live game reps and opportunities for a whopping 15 TDs in 14 games. And for the OL, why aren't pass blocking reps as important as run blocking reps? Or blitz pickup reps for the backs? 

TIMMMAAY

February 5th, 2022 at 11:40 AM ^

But that's not how our coaches approach those games. They use them to practice the things that they know we'll need later on, or to work on plays that need a little tuning, or to establish our base plays more, put things on film for other teams to practice for, etc... 

Why do people want to see us just open it up in those games? They're being used perfectly, IMO, as was clearly demonstrated in 2021. 

M_Born M_Believer

February 5th, 2022 at 1:45 PM ^

You realize that all those live reps early on in the season was invaluable for the OL to be able to be dominate as the seasons went on.  Nothing can replicate live reps.

From a very high level view point, Michigan established the dominate run game early and incorporated new passing concepts as the season progressed.

Now, this is year 2 (particularly with 2 returning QBs and a room full of pass catchers) I would expect the passing game does not need to be so basic to start out with and will have a steeper learning curve

Ronswanson13

February 4th, 2022 at 11:41 PM ^

Biggest question? Everyone knows that.

Biggest concern? No Haskins.

Most excited? Everything else.

Deep down, I’m hoping JJ can grab the bull by the horns and the offense can reach its ceiling. The defense is probably going to give up more points next season, so how about we negate that by scoring more ourselves.

Blue@LSU

February 4th, 2022 at 11:43 PM ^

Roman Wilson running right by any fools trying to cover him. Erik All catching passes in the Butt zone. Blake Corum with 1000+ yds rushing. And most of all Ronnie Bell being...Ronnie Bell.

1WhoStayed

February 5th, 2022 at 11:11 AM ^

Oh good. We have The Cube and bfeeaveef in the same thread. Which one of you gets to hold JJs hand and sing the Victors? If only The (not) Oracle was here!!!

Note: I was going to make reference to an activity done by men in a circle but out if respect to Wendy5k decided ti go with singing the Victors!

jhayes1189

February 4th, 2022 at 11:51 PM ^

Most excited to see: the further development of the WR Corp with Ronnie and passing game with JJ, and how the stud RB’s will compliment them

Biggest concern: tie between losing a great receiver to portal and/or Cade starting over JJ

Question: who will run away as the starting QB? 

uminks

February 5th, 2022 at 12:18 AM ^

We may have an unstoppable offense next season. If JJ wins the QB competition, I think the RPO will be taking a big step up. We will be outscoring teams we play. This will allow our young D to improve through the season until we play OSU.

Mgopioneer

February 5th, 2022 at 12:37 AM ^

I'm excited to see Bell's return. I think his leadership and hard work pushes this offense to the next level. He goes north of 1000 yards Rec. 

My one question, who's gonna get us a yard or two on short yardage downs? 

overall, I think our offense ranks near the top in college football! 

Go blue 

outsidethebox

February 5th, 2022 at 9:43 AM ^

Dunlap was bigger/heavier than Haskins coming in as a freshman last year. He runs hard through initial contact and with a similar style/body lean...is a step faster.

Otherwise, I love Cade but, here, JJ had damn well better be the QB. And if the defense believes they can completely sell-out to stop an interior run on third and short...they will be giving up plenty of TDs in those situations. If the read says pull and he rolls to the edge against a single defender with a WR who is also isolated against a single defender and has the entire field at his disposal-oh my, we are off to the races.  This is what the big-time college, and even pro, offenses have been doing for some time. It would be really nice to see this come to Michigan. 

Durham Blue

February 5th, 2022 at 1:46 AM ^

JJ, Andrel and Donovan's next steps.  And the dominance of the WR and TE groups.  This has the makings of Michigan's best season on offense since I started watching the football team in 1985.  The big question mark is the loss of Hassan Haskins.  Do we have a guy that will pick up 1, 2 or 3 gritty yards to move the chains?

CFraser

February 5th, 2022 at 5:26 AM ^

Obviously the backfield. JJ and Edwards have championship level potential. Also, fully weaponized Gattis should be fun. I liked the spice of having flea-flickers and reverses/creative screens but we definitely did it way too much and telegraphed it.