tdcarl

July 29th, 2009 at 2:22 AM ^

That combo of brick and glass looks straight up beautiful. If it was a woman it would be named Baberaham Lincoln. Makes the stadium look that much more beastly than it already did. Can't wait to see it in person on September 5th.

CarrIsMyHomeboy

July 29th, 2009 at 2:30 AM ^

I'm excited to see the Stadium after the workers are done installing the archway windows of the top three concourses of the East structure (Oh my god, can you believe the East structure will have 4 flipping concourses?). On this webcam (below; viewable only during the day, obviously), you can tell that the workers have "barred up" seven pairs of windows so far (3rd and 4th concourses per pair). http://www.umaec.umich.edu/projects/Stadium/webcam7.html

Brodie

July 29th, 2009 at 2:42 AM ^

My major problem with the renovation all along is that the bricking doesn't go around the entire stadium. The concept designs made it look like a relatively minor problem (http://www.umich.edu/stadium/project-description/regents/N-ElevOutBldgs…) but these images prove my initial fears... the new portions essentially look like two freestanding structures built on top of the stadium, nothing is done to incorporate them into the existing design. See here: http://i447.photobucket.com/albums/qq194/wcfl3/northeast.jpg If they were to brick in the entire thing, it would look a lot less Soldier Field-y, but on the whole I LOVE the new look.

CarrIsMyHomeboy

July 29th, 2009 at 3:49 AM ^

I actually agree with you. The incongruity between old and new, for me too, was and remains the biggest issue with the project. However, the project NEEDED to begin and be done. Moreover, our athletic department likely chose the best (the far best) option from a list of competing blueprints, all of which intending to asymmetrically build around a stadium that was never intended to be asymmetrically built around. Aside from another renovation (of the endzones; the emptily rumored "upper decks"), the Big House will never look elliptical and architecturally coherent again. I've accepted that. In fact, I've embraced it. And--truth be told--it ain't so bad sitting on the sunny side of this discussion. Even if she isn't beautiful (which I think she is; even if the same architects that have long disliked the Horseshoe's structure spewed identical venom regarding the new Michigan Stadium this winter in the Ann Arbor News), she will no doubt be massive, impressive, and intimidating. Those adjectives quintessentially describe Michigan Stadium now--to a *greater* and *newer* degree than ever before. And each of the three is an awesome, awesome word. Now, if only "3-9!" might become more of a battlecry for Michigan fans to **drop** their sense of entitlement (and years of "it's ok if you never yell; obviously, we'll still win" conditioning) than it is a battlecry to ramp up their entitlement in an attempt to pacify the fans of a currently-and-*transiently*-and-maybe-annoyingly-(but seriously go get some flipping composure)-MSU-team. That is to say, if we as Michigan fans get our collective priotities straight, then I think we have an excellent chance to boast a venue that is far louder now than it's ever been before. Of course, we need to have concommitant structural and vocal support to accomplish that. The days of excusing our lameness with a flick of the wrist and the mentioning of "a shallow bowl" are officially behind us now.

Brodie

July 29th, 2009 at 4:42 AM ^

I tend to agree with this on the whole, though I haven't yet gotten used to the idea completely. I think that it looks gorgeous from every angle aside from the end zones, and it will be a massive improvement... but I'd appreciate it if they could just do the end zones considering it's a relatively minor task.

Wolverdore

July 29th, 2009 at 9:19 AM ^

My thoughts exactly. The halo, even as it exists now is the wrong color Blue. Along with the scoreboards for that matter. They need to put brick where the existing wrong color blue border exists and then at the minimum change the color on the scoreboards to a navy, rather than royal blue.

UMxWolverines

July 29th, 2009 at 12:05 PM ^

I was thinking that too, but i think they should update them a little too. http://img182.imageshack.us/i/godzillatron2yd0.jpg/ but i like how michigan has the actual scoreboard that says rushing, passing, total, combined with a videoboard. i would like to see one kind of like this except with a little bigger screen: http://www.huskerboard.com/hw/jumbotron.jpg put the scoreboard on one side then rushing, passing, total on the other and on the bottom have one of those dot matrix boards like we have now. they should outline it in brick, have a big M stick up at the top, and put a sign that says: Michigan Welcomes You To The BIG HOUSE.

Ernis

July 29th, 2009 at 9:46 AM ^

is present in the new medical building on the north side, as well as a small structure on the south side. The photos highlight the main structures on the stadium itself and so the effect of these other structures is not emphasized. When wiewing the stadium in person, on foot, the discontinuity is much less profound... at least, I found it so. Hope you do, too.

TheIcon34

July 29th, 2009 at 3:44 AM ^

I think the roof of the visitor locker room should have a few I-beams above it and allow people to stand/walk around the roof. We can create the most intimidating locker room in college football since we can have x amount of people on the roof stomping and jumping before the game and during halftime. Obviously, safety will be an issue, hence the I-beams. We focused on acoustics to enhance the intimidation factor, so we should build a roof patio above the visiting locker room. :) Can't wait to see a game in 2010!

Ernis

July 29th, 2009 at 9:52 AM ^

is something to be proud of. Perhaps we could do a campaign this year, to make things even more miserable for the press during their last year in the old box. We could all direct our yells to the press box, or try to shake it to the ground...

Bryan

July 29th, 2009 at 8:22 AM ^

For the most part, the interior of the bowl will be complete for this season. All the glass will be installed, but the old press box and none of the new seats will be installed yet. Walking out of the tunnel seeing the new structure is very impressive (I did it last week), and would be very intimidating to other teams. What I am most interested to see...err..hear this year is how much louder the crowd noise is with the glass being installed.

MGoAero

July 29th, 2009 at 10:39 AM ^

I was pleasantly surprised by the extra shade afforded by the new structures last season. Anytime I can avoid getting the "damn, you look like a lobster" comments at work on Monday, I'll take it.

MMB 82

July 29th, 2009 at 10:43 AM ^

of the new construction were already evident last year- people I know who work in the press box regularly said you could really hear a difference, and this was before the glass was put it. I think the new construction integrates very well with the existing stadium, there is no way you could possible compare it to that Roman Coliseum/Alien Spaceship this is now Soldier Field. Oh, and I would love to see a pair of Godzillatrons over the end zones....

STW P. Brabbs

July 29th, 2009 at 11:16 AM ^

Maybe someone who went to a game last year can help me out (yes, sadly last year broke my streak of at least one game per year.) Now that the brick structures block the outdoor concourse from extending around the whole stadium, is the foot traffic before and after games going to be approaching unbearable? Is it relatively easy to traverse through the new towers?