Michigan Monday up at The Ozone

Submitted by StephenRKass on

Michigan Monday is up at The Ozone.

Spartans Prove Stingy Hosts in Rousing Moral Victory!

Just reading it now. Hear are a few quotes:

my prediction for this game was Michigan 31-20. Sometimes when you go on the road, making sense isn't always going to be an option. You have to substitute history and location for a good bit of common sense when looking at games like these. The actual concerning item in all of this for Michigan is that Mark Dantonio's decisions were hurting Michigan State as much as Jim Harbaugh and Don Brown's were. The Spartans left points on the field and gave at least five points away, and couldn't take advantage of the opportunities they had. Of course, had they actually done those things, then I don't think you'd see Michigan go into coast mode and I think they'd keep their cleats mashed onto the accelerator. This was a learning experience for the Wolverines, and a bit of a wakeup call. Both of these are very good things.
The Wolverines rushed for 192 yards on 42 attempts (4.6 ypc). They were led by freshman receiver Eddie McDoom's 53 yards on two jet sweeps. Honestly, pulling a jet sweep or end around against this Michigan State team is like throwing deep when you're up by 49 points. It borders on classless because of how unable to cope the Spartan defense is. The passing game was very calm and collected for quarterback Wilson Speight. His offensive line protected him like Jim Harbaugh protects those around him at baseball games with his glove. Any time a screaming liner came at Speight, left tackle Ben Braden was there to snag it, never once dropping his beer. Or his milk. I forget how the rest of this analogy goes. Speight had so much time to throw the ball that he could have looked over to the Michigan State sideline while dropping back just to check out random Mark Dantonio scowls. "Hey, I haven't seen that one before. That scowl looks like nobody asked him to homecoming. Well, back to the game, oh hey, Amara Darboh is open 40 yards down the field...but let me take one more look over at Mark first..."
The most glaring thing to me is that Michigan State was one of the few teams that has been able to get their running backs into the second level, and when they got there the linebackers seemed to be caught off guard. They are generally the aggressors, but they were caught flat-footed several times in this game. Gedeon and McCray also had some trouble tackling in space.
What Does It All Mean? It means that Michigan now knows what a true road game feels like. Eventually, they'll even find out what it feels like to play a good team on the road. The great news for the Wolverines in this game is that they took Michigan State's best shot in the first quarter and ended the half with a 17-point lead. It was over at that point and I think the UM players knew it. It also means that Michigan cannot let up. Interestingly, I think this is probably the first time this particular complaint has been levied against the Wolverines this year. However, had Dantonio not lost this game first, Michigan could have very well taken their first 'L' of the year against the Spartans with the way they closed this one out. Instead, the Wolverines move to 8-0 on the season and 5-0 in conference play. They have road games against Iowa and Ohio State remaining and no matter how well they play in those two games they cannot let up. They'll never forgive themselves if they do.

kevin holt

November 1st, 2016 at 12:05 AM ^

I agree with all this except the notion that we were ever in any danger of losing or that Dantonio lost the game rather than Michigan winning it. Let's say they go for it on that 4th down---even say they score a TD. We would have driven for one right back and played much differently.

kevin holt

November 1st, 2016 at 12:40 AM ^

Yeah but then contradicts it by saying "However, had Dantonio not lost this game first, Michigan could have very well taken their first 'L' of the year against the Spartans with the way they closed this one out." The only blatantly poor decision Dantonio made til the 2-pointer was the FG right? (minus play calls etc). Dantonio didn't really crap the bed or something; his team just sucks at least compared to Michigan. So I just thought that line was out of place in the article.

Indiana Blue

November 1st, 2016 at 12:15 AM ^

After we took the lead, the remainder of the game was never within 1 score.  No doubt that the 2nd half did not resemble the 1st half (where we scored points on every possession).  In reality only 2 plays concerned me .. 1) the dump off to the RB where M's defense was way too deep in coverage and 2) the jump ball pass for 40+ yards.  Otherwise after the opening drive the defense played well, including a goal line stand.  IIRC, MSU had 34 yards of passing after 3 quarters, and no doubt the freshman QB get MSU a lift when he came in in Q4. 

IMO we controlled roughly 40 minutes of a 60 minute football game, which should prove to be a victory 95% of the time.

Go Blue!

YouRFree

November 1st, 2016 at 12:24 AM ^

This one is not good either. it feel like a little sour grape. first,speight had to escape a couple of penetration and move aside to make the throw. The reason why he got so much time in the porket in many plays is  effetive running and combine with very timed play action call. the major credit goes to the staff to call very good 1st half game. Sparty has no clue whether we are going to run or throw. That buy the QB a few more seconds in many cases.

 

the only think I complain about the play call is all the Shane morris play. They try to use morris as one of the lead blocker after tossing the ball. He's so slow and the ball carrier have to wait for a long time for him to run to a lead blocking position. It ending either no gain or going backward. I am still cratching my head why they still call those low % plays in 2nd half. There is no fun for me to watch that everytime i saw Morris ont he field. I know the staff want to give him a package. He is so loyal to the program and what he went through deserve more than that. But the package doesn't seem to helping the team.

Pepto Bismol

November 1st, 2016 at 9:45 AM ^

Somebody mentioned it yesterday that Michigan damn near popped a huge gain in one of the clock-killing 4th quarter possessions via the Shane Morris look.  They tried a quick dive that McDowell stuffed.  Everybody pulled like the usual crazy-Shane toss play, but Morris turned and handed it to a back.  Had McDowell not avoided Cole and made the play at the line, BIG yardage was there to be had through the middle.

As you mention about a long con, they set that thing up for weeks by running that ineffective toss.  I think that dive might have been the endgame for that package.  Unfortunate, if so.  We whiffed on the big payoff.

lhglrkwg

November 1st, 2016 at 10:32 AM ^

that Morris package has always, always been a pitch or sweep to the outside. On a late 3rd & 3 they had Evans going on a sweeping pitch motion but Shane handed it off to a RB/FB for a dive but McDowell schooled Cole and stuffed it himself. I'm not sure if that was the con we were building for weeks or if it was just one of several available, but the yards were there if Cole did anything other than get obliterated on that play

M-Dog

November 1st, 2016 at 9:57 AM ^

Every opponent Defense assumes that now as well.

If you are going to fake someone out, then the fake itself needs to be effective or it will just be ignored.  Like Play Action . . . it only works when you can run well.

The Morris play is dead because its "fake" base play is ineffective.

Time to move on to something else, oh I don't know, say Peppers throwing on the run?

 

MGoGrendel

November 1st, 2016 at 8:11 AM ^

since it was an area of their D that was a big concern:

 

As impressed as I was with the Michigan offensive line, I was even more unimpressed by MSU's all-everything defensive lineman Malik McDowell. As a defensive end he was repeatedly pushed aside by Michigan's linemen. And they didn't have to push hard. He gave up almost immediately when he played end. At defensive tackle, he was slightly better. He did make some plays and shed blockers there. He looked his best lined up at the nose directly over center Mason Cole. He buckled Cole a couple of times, bending him completely over once. But I wasn't impressed at all. Even Jake Butt pushed McDowell around.

Bo Glue

November 1st, 2016 at 1:20 AM ^

Again, I'm wondering how many of those second-half opportunities were simply due to the Wolverines checking out a bit. It happens to every team, even against a team that views them as a rival.

LSAClassOf2000

November 1st, 2016 at 7:07 AM ^

I actually zeroed in on that quote as well - I admit that I asked myself this question at some point in the fourth quarter but I did not want to presume any sort feeling or action. It always seems like, even in their lean years, MSU has managed to give Michigan the game of MSU's season and as a result we see a lot of atypical statistical performances, so I am willing to attribute some of it to the normal aberrations of rivalry games.

Mr Miggle

November 1st, 2016 at 10:18 AM ^

"even against a team that views them as a rival" of course implying that Michigan doesn't return that sentiment. OSU fans are a jealous lot. They only have one rival and don't like the idea that we might have others. Don't worry Buckeyes, you'll always be our favorite.

y2mh

November 1st, 2016 at 11:55 AM ^

 Yes, loved the jibe at MSU, but view it more on how accurate and semi-objective Gerdeman is. Ok, he is a buckeye fan and writes for a buckeye blog so there is some (AND I believe well-heeled) favoritism there. But I also believe he "gets it". He gets how we think and many times his columns contain lines that I think he has written solely for Maize and Blue fans and they will double me up with laughter. Don't think he looks at in a jealous vein at all but rather an accurate assessment of UofM fans (and Sparty fans for that matter) not just now but throughout the years. Hell, we almost didn't want to acknowledge or accept the "Paul Bunyan Trophy" initially thinking there was no rivalry there. Mike Hart pegged it accurately and succinctly, they are and always have been "Little Brother" in our eyes. Yes, we should be beating them consistently and keep them in their place, but don't hurt them TOO much in fear they'll get discouraged. lol

 Personally, I still believe Sparty is less of a rival for us than ND. I much prefer to clobber the Irish when we play them than MSU. Sure beat MSU every year should be the norm, but put a whoopin' on the Irish and Buckeyes every year,... then you have ideal seasons in my book. lol

bacon

November 1st, 2016 at 5:06 AM ^

I'm guessing Nebraska beats OSU this weekend. OSU hasn't played well the past two weeks and Nebraska is probably the better team. Actually, looking at Nebraska's schedule: they're probably not better at all, but I still think they beat OSU this weekend. 

Njia

November 1st, 2016 at 6:55 AM ^

You're right on all counts. Still, this is the Horseshoe and the Buckeyes we're talking about. I hate those guys, but no matter how bad they look, they have way more talent on both sides of the ball than the Huskers. They deserve a wary eye of respect. The score predictor on Foxsports said that OSU was favored to get around 25 points, while Nebraska would score a few less; and a 58% chance to win. Interestingly, their same predictor gave us a 59% likelihood of victory against Maryland, with a final score of about 29-23. I can't imagine that we'd only score 29 points against the Maryland defense, but their score predictor was fairly accurate last weekend. Just a curiosity, I suppose; but it's the only one that didn't suggest that we'd straight-up murder Sparty on the road.

Kevin13

November 1st, 2016 at 9:43 AM ^

and accurate to how the game played out. I think Michigan learned from this game and will make improvements before they have to travel to Iowa.

M-Dog

November 1st, 2016 at 10:03 AM ^

He's no Michigan homer, so when he says the game was never in doubt, it may have to be the final word on this debate.

If he thought even a little bit that we were legitimately outplayed and lucky to hold on, you know he would have said so.  He's pissed all over some of our "big" wins in the past.

 

 

BeatIt

November 1st, 2016 at 12:30 PM ^

Like herbstreit did when just started on game day and went out of his way not to come off as a homer when commenting on osu games. If tou read some of the comments about michigan monday ccolumns, osu fans gave him a hard time because he was so complimentary about this years um team. Do ypu think sam webb would be any different? I watched parts of the first half and 4th qtr and didn't think the game was ever close. The spartans were totally outmanned, but then again the looked horrible against northwestern as well. Thats why we play the games, you just never know, especially with college kids.