TrueBlue2003

September 6th, 2022 at 3:22 PM ^

And anyone denying that the SEC middle isn't looking superior to the middle of other conferences is kind of kidding themselves.  Florida beat a top 10 team.  Arkansas beat a ranked team that made the playoff last year.

Glad LSU lost or it would have been a totally dominating weekend all around for the SEC.

MGoBlue96

September 6th, 2022 at 3:30 PM ^

Maybe but the counterpoint to that is the Pac 12 has sucked the last whatever many years in ranked matchups and Utah was just overrated. Arkansas also beat a lower ranked team on their home field that lost a ton including the best QB in school history. So I don't think that one is as big of boon for the SEC as you're making it out to be.

TrueBlue2003

September 6th, 2022 at 5:07 PM ^

Past PAC12 performance is totally irrelevant to Utah this year.  Utah was a top 10 team last year and is likely still a top 10ish team this year and Florida beat them. Credit where it's due.

Agree that Arkansas should have beaten Cincinnati so not that big of a deal but at least they took care of business. Still a ranked team that the SEC beat.  Means something that Arkansas performed to expectations as a ranked team.

Three ranked teams lost this week and the SEC administered two of the beatings.

mGrowOld

September 6th, 2022 at 2:39 PM ^

You and most of the grad assistants casting the coaches vote didnt watch.

Clemson looked pretty meh to bad against a really bad Georgia Tech team.  Score was 24-10 going into the 4th quarter and it was a struggle to get there.  At least for now, Clemson is most definitely NOT back, at least not elite talent back and certainly not a team that Alabama, Georgia, OSU and even Michigan would fear very much.

Bo Harbaugh

September 6th, 2022 at 2:44 PM ^

100% agree, except it's about matchups.

Clemson's D-line is elite, even if the rest of the team is meh.  They could neutralize our biggest strength, O-line and running game.  UM-Clemson could be a total rock fight unless we get our passing game going.  I still think we'd be favored and are a better overall team, but not the ideal matchup.

Durham Blue

September 6th, 2022 at 9:34 PM ^

D.J. Oo-ee-unga-la-lay is slightly better than last season and that is mainly because he lost weight and is quicker.  He got crucial yards on the run last night.  But his field recognition and overall passing game still needs a lot of work.  Their defense looks really good but Clemson won't get back to the final 4 with that offense.  O-line was uninspiring and they do not have much of a rushing attack.

RobM_24

September 6th, 2022 at 6:12 PM ^

I find it interesting that Clemson's QB throws for 209 yds, 1 TD, 60% completion, and runs for 20 yards and a TD -- against a power5 team -- and Clemson fans want him benched. Meanwhile, Cade throws for 136 yards, 1 TD, 50%, and -8 rushing yards -- and half the blog wants him to keep his job no matter what bc he was on a good team last year. We need to raise our expectations if we want to play with the big boys. 

Amazinblu

September 6th, 2022 at 3:54 PM ^

Conference Championships don’t mean anything with respect to the playoff.  So, why bother with conference games.

The playoff is a beauty contest.  Let’s get ready for the bathing suit competition - is that even part of the pageant anymore?   For sure, there can be a talent section.

Prepare to vote for Mr / Mrs / Miss Congeniality…

Amazinblu

September 6th, 2022 at 5:01 PM ^

2003 - I think the Bucks are a question mark on both sides of the ball.  ND didn’t have a passing game - for several reasons - their receiving corps is depleted, first time starter at QB, etc.  it was a run the ball game plan for ND - and, the Bucks were prepared for it.

The Bucks O vs ND’s D.  The Bucks did enough to win, obviously - and ND carried over a lot of defensive talent, schemes, etc - from last year.  But, the Bucks O didn’t resemble the Death Star.

I look forward to the Badgers visit to Columbus, and the Bucks visit to EL.

TrueBlue2003

September 6th, 2022 at 5:11 PM ^

Look, if you think the Bucks are a question mark on offense then you must think there has never been an offense without question marks, which like, fine if that's your bar.  They aren't a (full) NFL offense so there's that. 

They were insane last year and return almost all of the key pieces.  Their offense is about as sure thing as it gets in CFB.  A credit to NDs defense which is probably going to be very good this year.  But OSU did gain 395 yards so still pretty good in a low possession game (they only had four real drives in the whole second half).  And they missed a 39-yard FG that was very uncharacteristic of Ruggles.

The Bucks do have question marks on defense, like I said.  Unclear how improved they are or how bad ND's offense is.  They certainly have a lot of talent so it's not hard to see how they would be very good this year with much better coaching.

Amazinblu

September 6th, 2022 at 5:49 PM ^

2003 - perhaps I misstated it a bit, when referring to the Bucks O.  Are they talented?  Yes, absolutely, they are.  Are they deep at skill positions?  Again, I would say - yes. Has their OL stepped up a notch?  Honestly, I’m not so sure if they have.

I was expecting to see “more” from the Bucks offense. 

The question - and, it may remain unanswered until later this season is - quality of execution.  I saw several inaccurately thrown passes - and, it’s difficult to say whether it was the ND coverage, the route, or the delivery.

It will be interesting to see what the Bucks do in the conference season - and, September 24th - hosting Wisconsin - will be the next test.

wolve1972

September 6th, 2022 at 5:54 PM ^

Seriously, you think OSU is a question mark on offense. Why? They return just about everybody and in addition two starting WRs were basically out this game - Julian Fleming and that Jaxon Smith Whatever kid (hurt in 1st quarter). I have a feeling people are going to find out that the ND defense is elite and that all points to Marcus Freeman. ND was dropping their safeties deep refusing to let OSU get behind them so eventually OSU just started pounding them on the ground - in the late 3rd and 4th quarters - and there was nothing ND could do to stop it

Now I do agree with you about the defense. I realize they looked solid under those new coaches on Saturday but I want to see a bigger sample before I declare them the 2nd coming of the Steel Curtain. Plus, I really don't think ND had the skilled players to challenge them

 

Jibbroni

September 6th, 2022 at 2:39 PM ^

Say OSU and Michigan both go undefeated until they play.  Would the one loss loser of that most likely top 2 or 3 team matchup be left out of the playoff?   

NittanyFan

September 6th, 2022 at 2:46 PM ^

If there are at least 3 undefeated 13-0 teams among the SEC, Clemson, Oklahoma and USC --- 100% absolutely they're left out.

If everyone in the rest of the Power 5 conferences has at least 2 losses --- 100% absolutely they're in.

The only answer to your question is --- "it's way too early to tell."

TrueBlue2003

September 6th, 2022 at 3:31 PM ^

Michigan's abysmal non-conference schedule would almost certainly keep them out unless there aren't any other 1 loss conference champs and I could see a 2-loss conference champ making it over them.   Their non-conference schedule means they have no margin for error against OSU.  The best team they'll have beaten will be..Iowa? PSU? MSU? 

OSU would have a much better chance of making it considering they have the win over ND and hence would have a much stronger SoS and all-important strength of record metric than a hypothetical 1-loss Michigan team.

OSU might be able to make the argument to be in over even 1-loss conference champs, especially if ND beats Clemson and USC (who are the most likely candidates to be 1-loss conference champs vying for the fourth spot from their respective conferences).