Latest updates from Balas

Submitted by FlaWolverine22 on November 7th, 2023 at 1:22 PM

I'm skeptical of him as a reporter but I paid for a subscription to share with those who find him credible.

The rule the Big Ten is accusing Michigan of is advance scouting of a future opponent

Michigan is expecting a "season" suspension of Harbaugh"(not clear, if that means the remainder of season, or next year games as well)

A potential Harbaugh suspension would include College Football Playoff games as well.

If the injunction is denied Michigan can appeal immediately. 

Connor Stallions was working on behalf of Central Michigan when he was on their sidelines. However, "he's still a Michigan employee advance scouting a future opponent."

He believes the sign stealing collusion against Michigan story will gain traction after coaches names are revealed. He doesn't know if the information was illegally obtained but sharing signs is against big ten rules.

He believes Ryan Day is not in the clear regarding the PI firm, the NCAA doesn't care about it and haven't investigated it. Michigan is adamant on gathering evidence and proving that he was involved.

ESPN requested 50 tickets to the Michigan -Ohio State game and he thinks Michigan will decline their request.

 

Clarence Beeks

November 7th, 2023 at 2:47 PM ^

I don't agree, respectfully. In the case of the Baylor coach, he was simply at the game. In the case of Stalions, he was apparently there working for CMU (more likely: independently working for someone who works for CMU). As far as I'm aware, there isn't a rule that someone cannot work for two universities at the same time.

Kingpin74

November 7th, 2023 at 2:53 PM ^

Yeah good point, I just meant it was likely for a purpose other than scouting for Michigan. It's probably more severe than the Baylor example but still not much in the grand scheme of things. And like I said, he's gone. Plus, for the Harbaugh "should have known" test, there are literally 2 or 3 nights per year when a coach or staffer can even attempt to do this given their responsibilities to attend Michigan games. This rule is unique in that a large part of the monitoring by a head coach takes care of itself.

And this news about the other sign stealing puts other schools in the "grey area" that so many of us have talked about here. This CMU incident seems to be the only differentiator now, and a pretty minor one given that it didn't appear to extend beyond Stalions.

oriental andrew

November 7th, 2023 at 6:53 PM ^

Real talk - if CMU actually did invite him, they may have also (un)knowingly broken an NCAA rule by having him there. 

We joke about the NCAA being so mad at Kansas that they bring the hammer down on [insert small school here]. 

In this case, if this evidence does bear out, they could theoretically penalize CMU which would just take this whole thing to another level of insanity.

jmblue

November 7th, 2023 at 1:50 PM ^

That's possible.  At any rate, whether it was McElwain or a different staff member, it seems likely to me that someone at CMU invited him and outfitted him with the appropriate gear.  This would explain why Stalions went himself, when his M.O. was to buy a ticket for someone in the "vast network" to go and sit in the stands. 

Chaco

November 7th, 2023 at 2:19 PM ^

yep - especially the first game of the season.  He couldn't magically steal/guess the right coaches uniform.  He was probably killing 2 birds with 1 stone: moonlight to make $$ (he logically would have known McElwain from his year in Ann Arbor) + learn MSU signs/code from the game so he could apply to his job in Ann Arbor.  It makes sense.

mackbru

November 7th, 2023 at 2:26 PM ^

If he was there to steal signs, he would have sat in the stands, where it's much easier to see the opposing sideline (and to watch play generally). Watching from the field offers a terrible view of everything, which happens in an obstructed blur. Also, was he filmed videotaping the game or meticulously scribbling notes after each play? Otherwise all he did was attend a game. Which is a violation, evidently, but not one that offers any sort of competitive advantage.

daile1bm

November 7th, 2023 at 4:21 PM ^

FWIW I assistant-coach at a HS with a much smaller staff, and wouldn't bat an eye to some person I don't know being on the sideline.

 

I guess that could cut either way though, as 1. I don't care as much and we as a team have much less at stake, but 2. there are a lot of "gameday" coaches and hangers-on that only show up on Friday's, who make it onto the sideline.

DennisFranklinDaMan

November 7th, 2023 at 4:50 PM ^

Fully agree. Especially in the absence of any evidence (so far) that Harbaugh knew of the plan and expressly authorized from it. I understand the head-coach-liability concept, but this is taking that too far. 

An entire season would be obviously excessive (and apparently purposefully punitive), and I imagine would result in an immediate injunction. 

 

BoFan

November 7th, 2023 at 1:44 PM ^

Seems likely given the situation.  

But why can’t they hire him to steal in game signs?  When you make under $50k everyone needs a side hustle.  How is it that everyone is allowed, and in many cases today forced, to side hustle except for CS under arcane NCAA rules?  How is it that head coaches making millions can send signs they steal to other coaches ahead of their game (they don’t have to pay each other) but CS cant pick up a few more bucks? 

If CMU paid him while he’s also a UM employee then he is a CMU contractor.  If you are working for Ford and take a side gig with a restaurant your actions at the restaurant are not the responsibility of Ford.  

St Joe Blues

November 7th, 2023 at 2:13 PM ^

How would that be any different than the sign stealer for Rutgers getting paid for Rutgers stealing Michigan's signs then giving them to the sign stealer from Maryland who is getting paid by Maryland? Other than it's 2 different people, there are 2 different entities that are doing the hiring.

MGoClimb

November 7th, 2023 at 1:57 PM ^

The example you used in your last paragraph isn’t an apples to apples comparison. Stalions wouldn’t be a Ford employee taking a side gig at a restaurant. He’d be a Ford employee taking a side gig with another vehicle manufacturer. On both sides there are conflict of interest disclosures that would need to be made. It’s doesn’t entirely rule out the possibility, but there is a lot more red tape to go through. 

Blusqualo

November 7th, 2023 at 2:32 PM ^

One thing people keep forgetting about Stalions is that he was a Retired Marine Captain, he Retired with less than 20 years, which means he was Medically Retired…

So he is making about $4,000 a month in Retirement pay and $1,000-$3,800 in Tax Free VA disabilty. So he is bringing in $60,000 from his military service on top of the $55,000 salary from Michigan. $115,000 is not too bad for a guy with no wife or kids.

Clarence Beeks

November 7th, 2023 at 1:59 PM ^

I had been wondering that. The honest to goodness easiest answer when it comes to Stalions, including the CMU stuff, is that there is off the record payment from individual to individual (e.g. Stalions to his "scouts", some coach on CMU to Stalions, etc.) from their own personal finances. In this case, someone on CMU knew Stalions and thought he could benefit CMU, so that person - unbeknownst to other coaches - engaged with him and brought him there. If I were Michigan, I would fight the "Stalions was working for Michigan when he was at CMU hard" if there isn't a provision - either contractually with the university or by either Big Ten or NCAA rule - that a coach can't be working for two teams OR that a coach can't be employed by one team and have a side gig (neither of which I have ever heard exists). Ultimately, this is all a question of employment law and agency, and always has been.  By basic agency principles everything that Stalions was doing, on his own outside of his employment relationship with the University of Michigan, wouldn't be implicated back to either Michigan OR CMU. If in fact it is true that he was there working for CMU the case it makes Michigan's case better because it is EASY to make that Stalions was running his own independent consulting gig as a side hustle (which it truly appears was the case).