Interesting article comparing Harbaugh to Ton Osborne/John Cooper

Submitted by bluinohio on December 2nd, 2019 at 4:52 PM

https://es.pn/2R8bund

Details struggles each former coach had against their rival and how Osborne overcame them but Cooper did not.

UofM Die Hard …

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:00 PM ^

Yeah I saw that, interesting correlation..and I dont disagree with it too much.  Bottom line, we are a really solid team, we are in the B1G East, we are stuck here, and OSU is a fuckin juggernaut.  New normal....what you gonna do you know?

No new HC will change that

UofM Die Hard …

December 2nd, 2019 at 7:10 PM ^

Yeah i agree, but not on the regular like OSU.  Case in point, PSU, off and on with them, same with Wsicy... Its OSU and everyone else in the B1G and we have our way with the rest, as some of them do the same to us form time to time.

Not one person, or one thing will change that story line

So....keep getting at it, keep fighting for recruits, keep getting faster...catch a good year and beat them, that's where we are at my dude. 

Gucci Mane

December 2nd, 2019 at 7:11 PM ^

Correct because we are not the very best team in college football, and therefore lose some games. Every school loses games. Even Ohio state (usually) blows a game or two they shouldn’t. 
Strive to get better every day. Onward and upward. 

Couzen Rick's

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:13 PM ^

The John Cooper comparison annoys me to no end. Cooper had top ranked Buckeye teams with top ranked recruiting classes that would go 10-1 and lose to 9-3/8-4 Michigan teams. 

Harbaugh has 9-3/10-2 type Michigan teams that lose to 11-1/12-0 type OSU teams.

It's not the same scenario

Bo Harbaugh

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:18 PM ^

Yep...Cooper had more talented teams than Tressel.  OSU could have won 3 or 4 national championships with Cooper, but underdog Michigan teams ruined their seasons.

Meyer, then imported the SEC model and they now have even more talent than ever.  Meyer may have left a couple national titles on the table given how much talent he brought in, but it was obviously never due to UM screwing over their season.

befuggled

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:43 PM ^

Not entirely true. Ohio State was down when Cooper came on; Michigan was almost certainly the better team for his first five years (0-4-1 against Michigan). Looking back I'm kind of surprised he kept his job long enough to get good.

From 1993 to 1998, though, he had three undefeated teams get beaten by Michigan and the 11-1 1998 team that did beat Michigan but were upset by Michigan State.

In 1999 and 2000 they were down, Michigan beat him both years and they fired him.

Leaders And Best

December 2nd, 2019 at 6:05 PM ^

Thanks for writing this as this has been my take whenever I hear someone bring this up. The only thing they have in common is a losing streak in the rivalry to start their career which has happened to a lot of coaches.

I am hoping for the Dabo Swinney comparison years from now. Dabo started 1-5 vs South Carolina and 2-5 vs FSU before turning both rivalries around.

reshp1

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:19 PM ^

Not beating Ohio State isn't a Harbaugh problem. It's a Ohio State is really fucking good problem. Michigan football becomes a lot more enjoyable once you except that The Game is a probable annual loss.

oriental andrew

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:46 PM ^

That's pretty much it. osu has lost more than 2 games once in the last 10 years - the anomolous 6-7 2011 season. 

They've lost to Purdue (x1), Oklahoma (x1), Iowa (x1), Penn State (x1), Clemson (x2), msu (x2), VT (x1), and Wisconsin (x1).

They've only lost more than once to msu (at the height of Mork's reign) and Clemson. Otherwise, it's been one-hit wonders outside of 2011. 

That's just a dang good team. 

In the past 10 seasons:

  • Alabama has 15 losses
  • osu has 17 losses, including the 7-loss 2011 campaign
  • Clemson has 22 losses, but since they started their run in 2012 (8 seasons ago), they have 11 losses
  • Michigan has 17 losses in the past FIVE seasons

Would we rather be Auburn, averaging 7-5 with a truly elite season every decade or so? 

MGoBlue96

December 3rd, 2019 at 10:54 AM ^

I agree as well, I mean Auburn's game against Bama on Saturday wasn't that much different than Michigan/OSU in terms of Alabama moving the ball with ease all day, Auburn just got two pick sixes to help stay in the game. Also they got the benefit of Alabama's star QB being out.

I Like Burgers

December 2nd, 2019 at 8:06 PM ^

Kinda where I'm at.  Like...I do accept that Michigan is going to lose to Ohio State annually at this point, but it doesn't make the season enjoyable.  In fact, it does the opposite because Michigan sees itself as an elite program, but they can never achieve the goals that an elite program should have.  They can't make a conference title game, they can't make the CFP, and more often than not, they are going to be left out of the NY6 bowls.

So given all of that...what's the point of the season?  Fight hard and get to the Citrus/Outback Bowl?  Maybe have a really good season and make one of the NY6 Bowls?

reshp1

December 3rd, 2019 at 9:12 AM ^

I don't think losing to OSU will ever not hurt. What I mean is the specter of OSU looming at the end of the season ruins enjoyment of the preceeding games because even in wins, "that's not good enough to beat OSU" is in the back of your head. Once you accept that probably nothing Michigan can show earlier in the season means they'll beat OSU, then it's easier to enjoy the victories. 

ndscott50

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:53 PM ^

A expanded playoff could help overcome the OSU problem to a point. Five star players want to get in the NFL and be in the playoff. Your best bet for that to happen is to go to Ohio State, Alabama or Clemson. You can argue against this all you want to recruits but the stats don’t lie.

An expanded playoff of 8 to 12 teams would help break down this advantage for the top 3 to 4 teams 

1VaBlue1

December 3rd, 2019 at 8:23 AM ^

I will never accept as fact that Michigan will lose to OSU annually, nor do I think the team will accept that.  That screams loser mentality - there would never be any improvement, or desire to improve, if one accepts that premise.  That's what losers do.

Stiffen up, Reshp!  Take a loss like a man, identify the exploited weak spots and fix them.  Repeat as necessary until the wins come.  They will come because everything is cyclical.  There will come a time again when OSU is the OSU we know and love - the one that loses this game most often.  Hopefully that happens really soon!  

(*Series record: 58-51-6, Michigan)

Don

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:25 PM ^

The dominant power in the Big Ten from 1933 through 1941 was Minnesota, which won or tied for seven conference championships and won five national championships, all under Bernie Bierman.

From 1933 through the 1942 season, under Harry Kipke and and the sainted Fritz Crisler, Michigan went 0-9-1 against Bierman's Gophers. Crisler's share of that was a gaudy 0-5 mark. It wasn't until after Bierman left Minnesota for WWII military service that Michigan finally notched a victory against Minnesota's interim replacement for Bierman in 1943.

Bierman returned to Minnesota in '45, but by then the balance of power had shifted and the Gophers never finished higher than 3rd in the conference before he retired in 1950.

TennesseeMaize

December 2nd, 2019 at 5:25 PM ^

Read this today as well. It’s quite clear when you take OSU out of the equation, Jim’s the best coach we’ve had. He’s off to a better start than Bo, Lloyd, or Gary. 
 

While OSU is extremely important of a rivalry, it has to be noted that Jim has completely turned this program from consistently mediocre to winning as a top 15 program every year. The talent gap with OSU will continue until something is done about the compensation of players’ families at some schools and Michigan getting off its high horse to do what it takes to land top talent. 
 

I, for one, am EXTREMELY happy with Jim. Better than the feelings I had Between 2007-2014