MrWoodson

February 5th, 2024 at 7:12 PM ^

There's a simple solution. I have hired people for decades. Decide who you want and pay them enough to stay. Period. This is a fragile time for Michigan football. It's a transition to a new head coach, a guy who has never been a HC before. We all want him to be successful, but it's pretty much a crap shoot. If you were Mike Elston or Steve Clinkscale (or Minter, Herbert, et al), would you feel more secure tying your future to Jim Harbaugh or Sherrone Moore? Michigan might have to "overpay" a bit. Call it combat pay if you want. You just saved about 7 million per year on the head coach. Overpay to keep who you want. This is a Warde Manuel problem not a Sherrone Moore problem. Pay Herbert 2 million per year. Pay Minter $3.0+ million if need be. Pay them all. Or lose them.

The Wolf

February 5th, 2024 at 9:55 PM ^

I don't think you could have said this any better. Truly. The new/young guy (Moore) may be great in the future but the experienced/old guy has been a rainmaker for decades. When you put it in that context it doesn't seem like a very tough decision unless you are getting paid or potentially have additional upward mobility to show your stuff.

tim4landg

February 6th, 2024 at 12:09 AM ^

I'm with you as far as overpaying a bit, but laying this on Warde is mob-mentality grabbing for an easy answer. Herbert's departure raises some eyebrows given the low profile of NFL strength jobs and the rumors about what he wanted to stay, but the other guys could have all kinds of other reasons to consider leaving -- from recruiting to family reasons, climate or loving Harbaugh. I agree Manuel should be helping to keep coaches. I hope he is, but it wouldn't surprise me if he's not. But I don't think you know any more than I do.

Which is okay to acknowledge. It's not like you or I can do anything about it anyway.

moetown91

February 6th, 2024 at 1:38 PM ^

I think what bothers me most here is that Warde doesnt seem to be getting pressure from above.  I'm not a fan of mob mentality either....but there's a long list of raise your eyebrow moments on his watch.  I'll give him credit to not succumbing to the witch-hunt after the 2020 season, but he's got to do better to go all in to keep this thing going.  and his bosses need to make him feel that pressure......coom-by-ya we just won a natty isn't gonna get it done.  The game has changed, and we need to change as an athletic department to keep up!

Blue boy johnson

February 5th, 2024 at 6:49 PM ^

Not screwing over Clink, Elston, Herbert, (or whatever his name is; already forgot) and others. I think part of Coach Harbaugh rationale is getting all those guys raises. 

 

Good for Jay Harbaugh too. Get some different exposure. 

 

On the other hand, I’m much less sympathetic to Cade McNamara. Self concerned leadership isn’t truly leadership. I would guess Cade didn’t enjoy M winning a Natty. 

tbeindit

February 5th, 2024 at 8:05 PM ^

Are people still pretending like the Director's Cup means anything material? Stanford (the king of the Director's Cup) just had to beg to get into the ACC. Whether Warde and others want to admit it, his job depends on the football program. If they're going to get in the business of penny pinching, it's probably not going to end well for him and company.

Lakeyale13

February 5th, 2024 at 8:17 PM ^

You are correct. You are talking about facts when Harbaugh was still and employee of UM. Remind me of this on this date next year and every year for the next 3 years.  If it is the same result, or close to the same result I will donate $500’to the charity of your choice.  
 

Harbaugh was a generational coach and a rising tide lifts all ships.

RobSk

February 6th, 2024 at 9:34 AM ^

I disagree. You don't succeed like Jim Harbaugh by making decisions based mainly or even largely on screwing other people. If he's pursuing these guys it's because he believes they are both the best and the most reliably good candidates for these jobs on his staff. I think it's just that simple. 
 
Does he dislike WM? Who knows? Yeah, probably. I just don't think that's what this is about.

         Rob

The Oracle 2

February 5th, 2024 at 7:08 PM ^

Those coaches are entitled to take whatever job they want. Why shouldn’t they be? They can be fired by the university whenever it wants, and if they were, no one would be calling the university traitorous. Likewise, if Harbaugh wants to offer them a job that they might consider better than the one they hold at Michigan, he’s not a “traitor” for doing so. He’s just trying to build the best staff he can and reward coaches who did a good job for him. Those coaches aren’t Michigan’s property. 

snarling wolverine

February 5th, 2024 at 9:36 PM ^

So who did you think he was going to hire?

He's been away from the NFL for a decade.  He doesn't know who the young up-and-comers are in the pros, and his brother's not going to help him with referrals anymore now that they're competitors.  Of course he was going to look to bring his Michigan assistants if he could.  He's not going to L.A. to just cash checks, he wants to win.  

Anyone who was saying "Let him leave, he's hurting our recruiting" - well, you got your wish.

NotAMichiganSpy

February 5th, 2024 at 5:19 PM ^

This would sound better if the man doing it wasn't connected to the university that he's supposed to want the best for.

Harbs has already taken the gut punch coaches. He can leave us the replacement guys. Continuing to take from the staff comes off as him not giving a single F about how things go at Michigan now that he's gone. 

Blau

February 5th, 2024 at 6:35 PM ^

What concerns me is what I perceive as a lack of communication surrounding the intent of Harbaugh’s staffing decisions between himself and the current coaching staff.

It’s one thing to advocate for a first time HC to take the reigns at the university you just left but it’s a whole other ordeal to poach assistant level coaches no more than two weeks after taking the job, essentially leaving Moore likely to scramble to get the pieces in place.

Now if Elston and Clink are initiating the moves, that’s fine. That’s their right to move on to other opportunities. What’s not fine is to dangle the carrot in front of the bunnies who already have a home you helped build.

Gentleman’s agreements are usually put in place so nobody gets hurt feelings and to set some ground rules. I typically I hate them but this is a case where they would help everyone involved.

The Oracle 2

February 5th, 2024 at 7:12 PM ^

So Harbaugh shouldn’t offer a better opportunity to guys he thinks did a great job and deserve it, because while it might be good for them, it wouldn’t be good for Michigan? The nature of the coaching business is that coaches move, whether they’re fired or take better jobs elsewhere. Those coaches contributed to a national championship. They’re entitled to do what they want. 

Blau

February 5th, 2024 at 8:07 PM ^

I’m all for providing opportunities and there is no written rule that says who you can/cannot contact or offer a job to. 

All I’m saying is Harbaugh is putting his successor at a disadvantage very late in the game in his first weeks on the job. There’s also much more at stake for retaining college players vs NFL players. I don’t think it’s too much to ask for the outgoing coach to give the new guy a quick heads up before kicking the tires on his own staff with major vacancies, especially when the new coach emphatically proclaimed on live tv that he “fucking loves you, man”.

Just my opinion but that guy deserves at least a quick text saying “this kewl wit u?”

PrincetonBlue

February 5th, 2024 at 9:42 PM ^

If harbaugh wants to offer clink and elston then he should do it regardless of what Moore thinks. It would be incredibly unfair to clink and elston to have opportunities and raises denied to them because harbaugh wants to do Moore a solid. Think about how toxic the workplace could be if that ever came to light.

It’s much better to just let everyone go where they want to go.

The Oracle 2

February 5th, 2024 at 11:05 PM ^

Moore is now the Head Coach at Michigan, a job that should only be given to a grown up. He shouldn’t need any charity to get the job done, or for anyone to take it easy on him. I hope he’s not the kind of guy who expects either. It’s up to him to put his staff together in a competitive environment, just like every coach does.

Blau

February 6th, 2024 at 10:33 AM ^

I don't disagree that Moore will be challenged to keep his staff together but I think you're mistaking charity for decency. This isn't a sink or swim situation in my mind. It's making sure someone else's foundation is sturdy before asking to borrow a hammer and shovel, especially if you've been anticipating building a house somewhere else for the past 3+ years.

For a guy who eats and sleeps football, Harbaugh's had more than enough time to put together a short list of assistant coaching candidates since his flirtation with taking an NFL job became a forgone conclusion. All I'm hoping for is that he at least sent Moore a proxy email with his intent.

RobSk

February 6th, 2024 at 9:41 AM ^

Anyone taking the Michigan job right now, complete with expectations and talent turnover that is a part of college football, is "set up for failure".

Failure is always an option in these situations.

My statement has nothing to do with Sherrone Moore or his very considerable abilities. 

Both Moore and Harbaugh are under no illusions at all that winning just happens because you are at Michigan. Or because you're Jim Harbaugh. They both know you need the best team of coaches around you. The best organization. 

This is just super hard to do.  Jim Harbaugh isn't setting Moore up for failure. He's doing exactly what he needs to do to have a chance to take a moribund NFL franchise and have any chance at success in the next 2-3 years. He knows that if he doesn't turn it around NOW, he'll be the next guy ushered out in 1 year. 2 years.. 3 years maybe. 

Moore has 3 years to show he's got this, minimum. However, Hoke level failure will lead to him being fired. Whose fault is that? Nobodies. Not Harbaugh. That's just the way it is when you are paid millions to do a job and there are lots of capable dudes out there who could take that job. 

      Rob

snarling wolverine

February 5th, 2024 at 5:55 PM ^

The man wants to win a Super Bowl.  To do that, he's going to want to hire the best staff he can.  Unfortunately for us, that's probably going to include a lot of guys he hired here.  You can't expect this ultra-competitive man to go to the pros and then just hire a bunch of retread assistants.

What I never understood was why so many MGoPosters were blasé about him leaving before it happened.  Did people really think the staff was going to be totally intact, just without Jim?

gruden

February 5th, 2024 at 6:19 PM ^

I don't think we were blase, we certainly all saw Minter going with him, and probably Jay as well.  I personally didn't expect him to take all the best coaches (esp. Herbert) and damage the program further.  At some point there has to be some consideration for what he's leaving behind. 

I mean, aren't there some former Bama or Georgia assistants or such he can raid?

snarling wolverine

February 5th, 2024 at 6:40 PM ^

There might be, but he doesn't know them.  This is a man who wants to work with "known friends and trusted agents."  His first choice for any opening will be someone who climbed the mountaintop with him at Michigan.

None of this should surprise anyone.  I wish we would have offered a deal with everything he wanted instead of being dickish about the immunity clause (and then conceding at the very last minute).

RobSk

February 6th, 2024 at 9:46 AM ^

There is no question, some people had a rosy picture in their heads that did not take reality into account. Everyone was imagining Moeller for Bo, Carr for Moeller, and forgetting RichRod for Carr. 

I don't blame anyone here for thinking that way. It's not our jobs to be realistic.

OTOH, I also think Manuel was thinking that way to some degree. I DO blame him. It IS his job.

He was, IMO, unprepared to face the force of nature that is Jim Harbaugh and fight for what he needed to keep his football program together. Could he force people to stay that didn't want to? Obviously not. However, it's my opinion he is NOT taking the best shot he can take to retain some of these guys. That's a failure on his part.

        Rob

jmarsh22

February 6th, 2024 at 10:32 PM ^

When you create straw man arguments you admit your position is weak. No one expected the staff to remain completely intact. But I also didn’t expect him to completely gut our staff and potentially cause our promising players on defense to transfer. Real shitty thing to do to the guy you supposedly pushed for to replace you.