ESPN ranks the top 20 jobs in college football

Submitted by Maizen on

Heavy southern bias. Also in what world is the MSU job better than the PSU job? Finally, the fact that they ranked the UofM job and MSU job only 5 spots apart is spectacular hilarity.

Here's a look at how ESPN ranked the top 20 college football jobs, with athletic department revenue rank and attendance rank:

1. Alabama (No. 4 revenue, No. 4 attendance)
2. Ohio State (No. 5 revenue, No. 2 attendance)
3. Texas (No. 2 revenue, No. 10 attendance)
4. USC (Revenue N/A, No. 18 attendance)
5. Florida State (No. 17 revenue, No. 20 attendance)

6. Florida (No. 9 revenue, No. 9 attendance)
7. LSU (No. 6 revenue, No. 7 attendance)
8. Oklahoma (No. 7 revenue, No. 13 attendance)
9. Georgia (No. 19 revenue, No. 8 attendance)
10. Clemson (No. 39 revenue, No. 14 attendance)

11. Notre Dame (Revenue N/A, No. 15 attendance)
12. Michigan (No. 3 revenue, No. 1 attendance)
13. Oregon (No. 1 revenue, No. 32 attendance)
14. Texas A&M (No. 10 revenue, No. 3 attendance)

15. Auburn (No. 13 revenue, No. 12 attendance)

16. Tennessee (No. 14 revenue, No. 5 attendance)
17. Michigan State (No. 18 revenue, No. 19 attendance)
18. UCLA (No. 29 revenue, No. 22 attendance)
19. Penn State (No. 12 revenue, No. 6 attendance)
20. Stanford (Revenue N/A, No. 42 attendance)

M-Dog

March 5th, 2016 at 4:07 PM ^

Georgia is a phenomenal job.  it has it all . . . tradition, glamour conference, local recruting area, great college town, passionate fanbase, weather, location.  

It has no real weaknesses as a destination job.

The level of underachivement at that program has been criminal.

 

adamum5

March 5th, 2016 at 4:12 PM ^

Bullshit list. No way is Clemson, FSU, Florida or Oklahoma a better job than Michigan. And how is Oregon #1 in revenue? I can see Texas but Oregon? My list: 1. Alabama 2. Texas 3. Michigan 4. Ohio State 5. USC 6. Georgia 7. LSU 8. Florida 9. Oklahoma 10.Notre Dame

ohanyan1

March 5th, 2016 at 4:07 PM ^

sometime soon. I guess I am alone in thinking we should do something since the B1G Championship game has been a thing, before we declare which programs are meaningful and which jobs are the greatest. We keep talking, how about we win something. Fuck sparty and fuck o$u but this is stupid.

jethro34

March 5th, 2016 at 4:43 PM ^

it wasn't that long ago, it seems, that Miami (YTM) belonged on that list. Oh, how they have fallen. Also amazing that Oregon doesn't recruit better given their resources, record on the field, and placement on this list. Hoke to the rescue.

M-Dog

March 5th, 2016 at 4:56 PM ^

I'm always surprised when I see the recruiting rankings over X years and see how low Oregon always is.

They look so athletic when you watch them that you think they must be in the top 5 every year.  But they are not.  More like 15 -25.

They are getting it done with their system.

You would think they would recruit much better with their recent success, outrageous facilities / perks, "cool" uni buzz, and the Nike association.  

But it just goes to show you . . . at the end of the day most recruits want to stay within a few hours of home.  Oregon is a long way away from any fertile recruiting grounds. 

It also shows what a great job Harbaugh is doing, being able to recruit nationally at an elite level at Michigan.  Not many programs can do that.

Brandywine

March 6th, 2016 at 12:25 PM ^

My opinion is that Oregon has created a culture where players take immense, unrivaled pride in being as athletic as possible. Freshman see the level of athleticism, the training style, the work ethic that the players in front of them display and compete like hell to be the next DeAnthony Thomas, LaMichael James. Josh Huff, Arik Armstead. The standard of play is right there in front of them and continues to be pushed. From that perspective it doesn't take 5 star recruits to get there, it's the culture that develops players into that mold. 

NRK

March 5th, 2016 at 10:37 PM ^

I truly believe that had Kelly not departed that program would have continued to move upward. I realize he's had a mixed bag in the NFL, but he had a ton going for him at Oregon and he was cracking into the top athletes right before he left. Two other things that always impacted Oregon's rankings was the recruited for their system (agile OL. Space players, didn't always match up to rankings) and their defense was never great.

Wolfman

March 5th, 2016 at 5:54 PM ^

Players, no matter the climate, tend to stay near home. I have a few questions as to the rankings of the SEC teams, for instance A&M over TN. TN, with a good coach, has to be one of the easiest gigs in the country. Virtually everything is allowed.

Personally, that area of the country experiences humidity levels as early as mid-April that make my return to the north not even a real decision.

But the SEC, along with Clemson, simply makes it so damn easy on the coaches that almost every school except Vanderbilt should receive some type of consdieration.

Obviously prestige associated with position was not a consdieration.

NRK

March 5th, 2016 at 10:43 PM ^

Surprised this wasn't a BR slideshow. I don't care because oh man offseason. Just look at Clemson's rank and try to keep a straight face.