Home
we had subs it was crazy

Primary links

  • About
    • $upport (lol)
    • Ethics
    • FAQ
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • MGoStore
  • MGoBoard
    • MGoBoard FAQ
    • Ticket spreadsheet
    • Michigan bar locator
    • Moderator Action Sticky
  • Useful Stuff
    • Depth Chart By Class
    • Unofficial Two Deep
    • 2013 Offer Board
    • Crude Bug Tracking System
    • Third Down Stats
    • Diaries, Windows Live Writer, And You
    • Michigan Future Schedules
    • User-Curated HOF
    • 2013 Recruiting Board
    • Where To Eat In Ann Arbor
Home Forums MGoBoard

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Recent posts

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

MGoElsewhere

  • @MGoBlog (Brian)
  • @aceanbender
  • @TomVH (Tom)
  • RSS Feed
  • iPhone App
  • Facebook profile
  • MGoKindle Store
  • mgo.licio.us
  • Brian @ TSB [Archive]
  • Brian @ AOL [Archive]
  • Sour Salty Bitter Sweet

Michigan Blogs

  • Big House Blog
  • Burgeoning Wolverine Star
  • Genuinely Sarcastic
  • Go Blue Michigan Wolverine
  • Holdin' The Rope
  • MGoFootball
  • MVictors
  • Maize 'n' Blue Nation
  • Maize 'n' Brew
  • Maize And Go Blue
  • Michigan Hockey Net
  • The Blog That Yost Built
  • The Hoover Street Rag
  • The M Block
  • The M Zone
  • The Wolverine Blog
  • Touch The Banner
  • UMGoBlog
  • UMHoops
  • UMTailgate
  • Wolverine Liberation Army

M On The Net

  • mgovideo
  • MGoBlue.com
  • Mike DeSimone
  • Recruiting Planet
  • The Wolverine
  • Go Blue Wolverine
  • Winged Helmet
  • UMGoBlue.com
  • MaizeRage.org
  • Puckhead
  • The M Den
  • True Blue Fan Forum

Big Ten Blogs

  • Illinois
    • A Lion Eye
    • Hail To The Orange
    • Illinois Baseball Report
    • Illinois Loyalty
  • Indiana
    • Inside The Hall
    • The Crimson Quarry
  • Iowa
    • Black Heart, Gold Pants
    • Fight For Iowa
  • Michigan State
    • The Only Colors
  • Minnesota
    • GopherHole.com
    • The Daily Gopher
    • I'm In Love With A Fringe Bowl Team
    • TNABACG
  • Nebraska
    • Big Red Network
    • Corn Nation
    • Husker Mike's Blasphemy
    • Husker Gameday
  • Northwestern
    • Sippin' On Purple
    • Lake The Posts
  • Notre Dame
    • The House Rock Built
    • One Foot Down
  • Ohio State
    • Eleven Warriors
    • Buckeye Commentary
    • Men of the Scarlet and Gray
    • Our Honor Defend
    • The Buckeye Nine
  • Penn State
    • Slow States
    • Black Shoe Diaries
    • Happy Valley Hardball
    • Penn State Clips
    • Linebacker U
    • Nittany White Out
  • Purdue
    • Boiled Sports
    • Hammer and Rails
  • Wisconsin
    • Bruce Ciskie

Links of Note

  • Baseball
    • Big Ten Hardball
    • College Baseball Today
    • The Baseball Zealot
    • The College Baseball Blog
  • Basketball
    • Ken Pomeroy
    • Basketball Prospectus
    • Midmajority
  • College Hockey
    • Chris Heisenberg
    • College Hockey Stats
    • Inside College Hockey
    • Michigan College Hockey
    • Hockey's Future
    • Sioux Sports
    • USCHO
    • Western College Hockey
    • CCHA
      • LSSU Hockey
      • Bronco Hockey Blog
  • Football
    • Smart Football
    • Every Day Should Be Saturday
    • Doctor Saturday
    • CFB Stats
    • Harold Stassen
    • NCAA D-I Stats Page
    • The Wizard Of Odds
  • General
    • Sports Central
  • Local Interest
    • The Ann Arbor Chronicle
    • Arborwiki
    • Arbor Update
    • Teeter Talk
    • Vacuum
  • Teams Of The D
    • Lions
      • Pride of Detroit
      • Fire Millen
    • Pistons
      • Detroit Bad Boys
      • Need4Sheed
    • Tigers
      • Roar Of The Tigers
      • The Detroit Tigers Weblog
      • The Daily Fungo
    • Red Wings
      • On The Wings
      • Behind The Jersey
      • Winging It In Motown
    • Michigan Sports Forum

Archive

  • May 2013 (42)
  • April 2013 (94)
  • March 2013 (104)
  • February 2013 (81)
  • January 2013 (93)
  • December 2012 (74)
  • November 2012 (142)
  • October 2012 (143)
  • September 2012 (107)
  • August 2012 (103)
  •  
  • 1 of 11
  • ››

Get Yer Tickets

Football Display Case

NFL Watches

Follow your favorite team with localtv-satellite.com: Click Here.

Site Search

Diaries

  • New
  • Popular
  • Hot
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 1 day ago
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 3 days ago
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 4 days ago
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 1 week ago
  • MGoAcceptance: Another MGoAnecdote
    LSAClassOf2000 - 1 week ago
  •  
  • 1 of 4
  • ››
more
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 1,395 views
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 593 views
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 393 views
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 230 views
  • Big Ten Recruiting Rankings 5-15-13
    Ace - 51 comments
  • Future Non-Conference Opponent Recruiting Watch
    EGD - 15 comments
  • The Blockhams in "HOCKEY HANGOVER"
    Six Zero - 13 comments
  • Way Too Late B1G Men's Basketball Scheduling Idea
    BeileinBuddy - 2 comments
  • More Milford Men Than Michigan Men: Comparing the 11-12 and 12-13 Hockey Teams
    MGoBlueline - 2 comments

MGoBoard

  • New
  • Recent
  • Hot
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    15 replies
  • OT: Saturday Night Drinking/Open/Tigers Thread
    46 replies
  • B1G Network Helmet Bracket
    32 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    45 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    3 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    44 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    43 replies
  • Michigan Women's Tennis Swept by UCLA
    4 replies
  • OT: Preakness Stakes
    26 replies
  • M Softball hosting Cal in Regional - 5/18
    21 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    113 replies
  • Marvin Robinson to FSU
    50 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    38 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    25 replies
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    10 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Caption Contest - Preakness Fan
    15 replies
  • OT: Ron English & Mike Hart to jump out of a plane for new EMU bathrooms
    38 replies
  • OT: Saturday Night Drinking/Open/Tigers Thread
    46 replies
  • OT: ESPN Mag/Insider special $5/Year
    25 replies
  • OT- happy World Whisk(e)y day everyone!
    44 replies
  • B1G Network Helmet Bracket
    32 replies
  • OT: IIHF Semifinal US vs Switzerland Open Thread
    3 replies
  • Steve Everitt rips Notre Dame!
    45 replies
  • Siva Admits Trey Burke's Title Game Block Was Clean
    62 replies
  • Softball Open Thread 7pm vs Valpo ESPN3
    36 replies
  • Michigan Baseball vs Nebraska on BTN Open Thread
    43 replies
  • Michigan Women's Tennis Swept by UCLA
    4 replies
  • BBall year in review Deleted...
    10 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    113 replies
  • OT: Preakness Stakes
    26 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››
  • OT: Red Wings @ Ducks Game 7 Open Thread
    229 replies
  • OT: Red Wings vs. Blackhawks Open Thread
    201 replies
  • Shane Morris to wear the famed #7 jersey, J.J. McGrath #46
    175 replies
  • Jabrill Peppers Announcement Date Set
    169 replies
  • Brady Hoke Calls Notre Dame A Chicken
    163 replies
  • UM 2014 Conf schedule football
    123 replies
  • Brandon on Uniformzzz
    119 replies
  • OT: Red Wings @ Hawks Game 2 Open Thread
    113 replies
  • Notre Dame's Nix fires back at Coach Hoke
    110 replies
  • GoBlueWolverine's Dre Barthwell: Marvin Robinson to leave Michigan
    96 replies
  • Alex Bars to Notre Dame
    96 replies
  • Sparty losing recruits to the rap game
    95 replies
  • PSU about to get blasted again by SI investigative report
    88 replies
  • Michigan has #1 recruiting class on ESPN now.
    73 replies
  • OT: Advice on moving to Ann Arbor
    72 replies
  •  
  • 1 of 7
  • ››

mgo.licio.us

  • Big Ten football procrastinates on parity-based scheduling, and nothing ever changes

    the just released schedules were a flat-out statement that the B10 doesn't believe SOS will matter in playoff selection

    1 comments
  • Michigan's Glenn Robinson III, Mitch McGary ranked inside top 20 on ESPN's 2014 draft board

    but I thought that draft was supposed to be incredibly loaded?

    1 comments
  • Tim Hardaway Jr. turning heads, viewed as a first-rounder by some teams, analyst says

    If you're gonna go please be in the first round.

    0 comments
  • Michigan-Ohio State once, Indiana-Purdue once? The Big Ten has to protect its hoops rivalries

    another delightful side effect of a 14 team conference

    0 comments
  • Beilein on transfers: All should have to sit a year, regardless of situation

    I disagree.

    0 comments
  • Julie Hermann takes over as Rutgers AD, won't try to spend like Michigan

    GOOD PLAN

    1 comments
  • Jay Harris says no to Michigan State, decides to become a rapper

    hahahahaha

    0 comments
  • The Difference Between A Good Fan And A Bad Fan

    thoughtful piece from Jacobi on middle finger lady

    3 comments
  • Michigan's rising recruiting profile exciting John Beilein, who remains true to his scouting form

    Their high school coaches and AAU coaches have probably a better appreciation of Michigan than maybe they had before," Beilein said. "It's a tough balance right now. Tim Hardaway and Trey Burke weren't really high-profile players, nor was Darius Morris, and all were high-profile players. "We're still looking at 'who is the best fit.' "

    0 comments
  • Charles Barkley discusses Michael Jordan, Dream Team and more - NBA - Jack McCallum - SI.com

    "When I call somebody a midget, clearly I'm not trying to insult f---ing midgets. I'm just using basketball terminology."

    0 comments
  • Why does the NFL make for such bad media?

    robots

    0 comments
  • Pictured: Detroit's Robocop Statue nears completion date

    elsewhere in awesome things kickstarter made happen

    0 comments
  • Spectacular images of the madness that was the first FA Cup final

    And you think you're crowded at Michigan Stadium

    0 comments
  • Bear Vs. Monkey Bicycle Race Ends With Bear Eating Monkey

    IMPORTANT: Ondre Pipkins not involved.

    11 comments
  • Damon Bullock Has the Greatest Vine Account of All Time

    this is amazing

    7 comments

Denard: I could take Usain Bolt (at a 40 yd dash)

115 posts / 0 new
Login or register to post comments
Last post
August 12th, 2012 at 7:11 PM
#1
orobs
Joined: 10/03/2010
MGoPoints: 1729
Denard: I could take Usain Bolt (at a 40 yd dash)
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Denard-I-could-take-Bolt.html "I've watched him run, and I'm pretty sure I can beat him in a 40-yard dash," Robinson said at Michigan's media day Sunday. "I'd get a better start, and I could take him. "At 60 yards, I'd be in trouble, and at 100 meters, he'd be gone, but I could get him in a 40."
Top
  • Login or register to post comments
Tags:
  • MGoBoard

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
August 12th, 2012 at 7:16 PM | Gardner started this (Score:5 Normal)
Marley Nowell
Marley Nowell's picture
Joined: 07/31/2008
MGoPoints: 2896

Seems kind of out of character for Denard to say something like this, not that I necessarily disagree with him

"Relax you panic monger" -Megatron

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:20 PM | I'm pretty sure this (Score:5 Normal)
MgoSuh
MgoSuh's picture
Joined: 12/31/2010
MGoPoints: 394

I'm pretty sure this statement was 99.9% tongue in cheek from Denard...

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:26 PM | Nyet (Score:4 Normal)
superstringer
superstringer's picture
Joined: 02/04/2009
MGoPoints: 970

why does it have to be tongue in cheek. He was saying he'd be faster over the first 40. Why wouldn't that be true. He was honestly saying its the last 60 where bold would pull away.



Bolt: NOT powered but flash dilithium. (powered by...?)

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:33 PM | From what I could gather... (Score:5 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

with a quick search, Bolt had a split of 4.64s at 40m when he ran the 9.58. Denard would be right there with him at forty yards, but much further than that and Bolt pulls away.

Nothing tongue and cheek about it IMO.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:57 PM | 40m (Score:5 Normal)
jaggs
jaggs's picture
Joined: 02/03/2009
MGoPoints: 2433

40m =/= 40y

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:11 PM | Which is why... (Score:1 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

I didn't say Denard was faster, I said he'd be right there. Denard runs forty yards faster than 4.6.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 9:39 PM | no way (Score:2 Normal)
umchicago
Joined: 02/05/2009
MGoPoints: 3531

unless you mean he would be within several yards of him.  i doubt denard gets a better "jump" than bolt who practices track every day.  bolt's 40 splits were even better than carl lewis and ben johnson.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 10:17 PM | I was there (Score:1 Overrated)
MSHOT92
MSHOT92's picture
Joined: 02/07/2011
MGoPoints: 278

to see Denard run track for UM in the 'duals' vs ohio his freshman year...he could hang with Bolt the first 40 easy because the fastest sprinter in Olympic 100m isn't the guy who gets out the fastest, it's the guy who slows down the least after 60 meters.  His first race ever in the indoor 60 he ran away from the field...he's no joke and I would guess he was joking as much as he was serious. Denard is a special kid and Bolt is a superhuman sprinter. Denard's statement is probably more accurate than you'd believe.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 10:18 PM | You are high (Score:1)
Roachgoblue
Joined: 08/29/2011
MGoPoints: 1477

It wouldn't even be close.

[Caved troll is caved. Sorry, Mobile app users.]

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 10:34 PM | That's a valid opinion. (Score:2 Normal)
justingoblue
justingoblue's picture
Joined: 11/16/2010
MGoPoints: 10858

I was defending my original post against saying that 40m =/= 40y. Denard definitely runs faster than a 4.6 40y, so that's all the post you replied to said.

As to whether he could hang with Bolt for 120ft, I'd reply that Bolt doesn't have to have elite acceleration to be the fastest 100m/200m runner. If there were an Olympic 50m/30m, I think Denard would be in serious contention for a medal.

Go Blue!

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 8:49 AM | If you have followed Bolt at all... (Score:2 Normal)
Blue in Yarmouth
Blue in Yarmouth's picture
Joined: 02/18/2009
MGoPoints: 2327

you would know that he is crap out of the blocks. He had been doing considerable work on his start out of the blocks building up to the olympics because he knew his starts were far below most of his other competitors.He had a flase start during Olympic qualifying that further exacerbated his issues with his starts.

Look at most of his races and see were he is during the first 40 meters...he's playing catch-up. It is the last 60 where he catches up and passes his competition. 

Now I'm not saying Denard could beat Bolt in a race of any length, but the idea that it is because Bolt would have a far superior start isn't where I would hang my hat in this debate.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:07 PM | To hash out the math on that (Score:2 Normal)
SoFlaWolverine
SoFlaWolverine's picture
Joined: 07/08/2011
MGoPoints: 366

To hash out the math on that (40 meters = 43.7445 yards):

Assuming Denard runs about a 4.32 (the only figure I ever remember seeing) for the first 40 and continues at that pace (a completely inexact estimation) for another 3.7445 yards, he would get to 40 meters in 4.7244 seconds, not too far behind Bolt's pace to that point. For comparison's sake, Bolt's pace would calculate to a 4.243 40 yard time (another completely inexact estimation).

EDIT: This inexact meaure of pace from Bolt would put him in a virtual deadheat with Chris Johnson's 4.24 40 at the combine a few years ago.

Denard is my homeboy.

University of Michigan Class of 2014

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:28 PM | The math is a little different (Score:5 Normal)
panthera leo fututio
panthera leo fututio's picture
Joined: 09/15/2008
MGoPoints: 887

You get 4.24 if you take a straight proportion of [time] X [36.576yd] / [40m].

HOWEVA, 100 meter champions apparently accelerate through the first 50 or so meters, so a better estimate can be made by taking times at 30m and then estimating the time run in the last 6.576 meters by prorating the runners' 30-40m split. For Bolt's '08 Olympic run, this yields a 4.35. (Though since he was still accelerating through 40m, his true time at 40yd might have been closer to 4.36; I refuse to use calculus on a message board, dammit.)

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:36 PM | I cant contribute anything to (Score:3 Normal)
MgoJohnStamos
MgoJohnStamos's picture
Joined: 08/04/2010
MGoPoints: 681

I cant contribute anything to this discussion, but I dont think you will ever see this discussion taking place on any forum except for one representing the greatest university in the world, University of Michigan.

Go Blue!

I don't know who's hair is better, John Stamos circa Full House or Denard

GO BLUE

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 10:22 PM | this seems a bit arrogant (Score:5 Normal)
WFBlue
WFBlue's picture
Joined: 10/03/2010
MGoPoints: 1769

its not like RCMB hasn't  posted some pretty impressive discussions:

http://michiganstate.247sports.com/Board/93/HOW-STUPID-IS-THIS-WOMAN-11382672/1

 
 

Time is working funny again. Greg Mattison has a phonebooth time machine he sent the secondary back to Charles Woodson's childhood in; they have emerged with ZZ Top beards, children, and skills.-BC

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 10:23 AM | I swear RCMB has threads like (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12582

I swear RCMB has threads like that sticky-ed.  Just golden stuff.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:09 PM | Metric conversions (Score:4 Normal)
panthera leo fututio
panthera leo fututio's picture
Joined: 09/15/2008
MGoPoints: 887

Looking at the splits here, Bolt covered the first 40 yards in Beijing in '08 in 4.35 seconds, and all the fastest times in the world leading up to that run (by Maurice Greene, Asafa Powell, etc.) covered the first 40 in approximately the same time.

On the one hand, 4.35 definitely seems doable for Denard. On the other, I have a hard time thinking that he'd beat all the fastest people who've ever lived, in the primes of their career, and having comitted themselves to training programs aimed purely at increasing sprinting speed.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 9:29 PM | Denard has been timed at 4.32 (Score:0 Flamebait)
OmarDontScare
OmarDontScare's picture
Joined: 08/13/2010
MGoPoints: 1485

Denard has been timed at 4.32 I believe

I got the shotgun. You got the briefcase. It's all in the game though, right?

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 12:43 PM | That doesn't take his (Score:2)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4684

That doesn't take his reaction into account.  The way football people measure the 40, they start the clock on the runner's movement, as opposed to when the gun sounds.  If they measured it the way track and field does it, his time would probably be more like 4.45-4.50.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 7:27 AM | Sounds good to me (Score:1)
Tater
Tater's picture
Joined: 08/13/2008
MGoPoints: 10358

It sounds like a well-reasoned answer, and Denard did put his typical touch of humility at the end.  It's not like he said he could outrun Bolt in Bolt's specialty.  I don't think this was the least bit "out of character," and I think Denard could back up his statement.

 

 

 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:34 PM | It wouldn't be true because (Score:-1 Overrated)
MgoSuh
MgoSuh's picture
Joined: 12/31/2010
MGoPoints: 394

It wouldn't be true because Usain Bolt is the fastest person in the history of the world.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:32 PM | While it is out of character (Score:4 Normal)
Business Time
Business Time's picture
Joined: 02/17/2011
MGoPoints: 140

While it is out of character for Denard, I was under the impression that the weakest part of Bolt's game, so to speak, is his start out of the blocks. Same reason why Chris Johnson has said that he thinks he could beat Bolt in a 40.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:35 PM | Chris Johnson also does his (Score:3 Normal)
turtleboy
turtleboy's picture
Joined: 04/22/2011
MGoPoints: 3207

Chris Johnson also does his best work at the end of a contest. Put up a lot of numbers in garbage time last year, that guy.

How many times have you been on the freeway and had someone fly by you at 100 mph then end up 2 cars ahead of you at the off ramp? What's the point? -Mark Harmon

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:07 PM | But it's not like Bolt is bad (Score:2 Normal)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4684

But it's not like Bolt is bad at getting off the blocks; he's just slightly worse at it than some of the other 5-10 fastest men in the world.  He's probably better than Denard (or any other non-Olympian) at it.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 9:09 PM | Bolt looked extra cautious (Score:3 Normal)
rbgoblue
rbgoblue's picture
Joined: 07/20/2009
MGoPoints: 1614

Bolt looked extra cautious out of the blocks in London.  Must have been some carry over from his DQ at the Worlds.

And in all honesty, its not like you have to be that quick out of the blocks when you have an extra gear that no one else in the field has.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 9:11 PM | btw (Score:2)
cclittle
cclittle's picture
Joined: 10/04/2009
MGoPoints: 323

That is a 10/10 avatar-name combo right there.

For the record, I'm not a eugenicist.
  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 10:11 AM | Botl has always had one of (Score:1)
bronxblue
Joined: 11/22/2008
MGoPoints: 12582

Botl has always had one of the "slower" starts for an elite sprinter, due to his longer-than-average torso and legs.  So yeah, short little muscular guys like Johnson could certainly get a jump on him, but after a couple of seconds Bolt's longer stride takes over and they'd all be lost.  So yeah, I could definitely see Denard keeping up with Bolt, but it would be close.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:23 PM | Hmm (Score:2)
ShruteBeetFarms
Joined: 09/25/2010
MGoPoints: 1527

Does anyone know how fast runs the 40 in? I'd be curious to know.

"I'm not a vegetarian b/c I love animals. I'm a vegetarian b/c I hate plants"

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:25 PM | 4.9 (Score:4 Normal)
M Wolve
Joined: 09/04/2011
MGoPoints: 732

maybe 4.8

Bring back Keith Jackson

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:23 PM | I'd love to see that race. (Score:1)
South TX MFan
Joined: 10/13/2011
MGoPoints: 317

I'd love to see that race.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:28 PM | I think Denard wins. A 40 is (Score:5 Funny)
Jeffy Fresh
Jeffy Fresh's picture
Joined: 03/21/2009
MGoPoints: 775

I think Denard wins. A 40 is not the same as a 100 meter. Plus Bolt would be mesmerized by Denards smile and start crying at the mere sight of such a thing.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:30 PM | It's funny to see yards and meters mixed that way. (Score:2)
LB
LB's picture
Joined: 09/26/2009
MGoPoints: 5050

I wonder if it is hard to switch them up going from football to track?

May you have a strong foundation
When the winds of changes shift

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:30 PM | Mickey Rourke recently said (Score:3 Normal)
NoMoPincherBug
NoMoPincherBug's picture
Joined: 04/08/2011
MGoPoints: 1421

Mickey Rourke recently said that he took Bolt in a footrace at 3 AM outside a club recently.  He said that Bolt gave him a 5 step start and he still won...lol.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/actor-mickey-rourke-says-he-beat-usain-bolt...

IMO Denard has a good point.  He has an incredible first couple of steps...very explosive.  It is what sets Denard apart from just other fast guys.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:36 PM | r/CFB (Score:5 Normal)
gomaize11
gomaize11's picture
Joined: 09/02/2009
MGoPoints: 290

This was discussed on Reddit also. User "Spicy_TWatkins" provides some interesting insight:

 

 

40 yard times are measured off of the runners start not the runner reacting to a gun. Bolt had a reaction time in that race of 0.146s, so subtracting that off you get to a 40 yard dash time of about 4.05s.

 

...

 

Just looked at Denard's profile on Michigan's track team's website and his 60m PB is 6.81s, Bolt ran the first 60m in Bejing and Berlin in 6.155 and 6.161, respectively. In less then 24m Bolt wouldn't be able to make up 0.6s on Denard, he would have to already be well ahead at 36.576m (40yds).

 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 3:53 AM | Or maybe Denard slows down (Score:1)
1 percent
1 percent's picture
Joined: 09/09/2010
MGoPoints: 284

Or maybe Denard slows down more after 40 than Bolt does. Good thing for Denard
the hypothetical race is a 40yd Not 60m.

BEAT OHIO

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:43 PM | In any event (Score:5 Normal)
ppToilet
ppToilet's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 777

I'll take Denard with 30 seconds left in the game, down 3 points, on our own 20 yard line.

Denard is clearly not intimidated by gold; be it on medals or helmets.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 7:45 PM | Bolt would crush him even at (Score:5 Normal)
VSS
Joined: 06/23/2011
MGoPoints: 148

Bolt would crush him even at 40 yds. 4.05 sounds reasonable for him, but people have to understand that Bolt is already beating or close to beating sub-10s 100m guys by 40 yds. There are only a few people on the planet who can keep up with Bolt at that distance. Denard doesn't have that kind of speed, even though he does have great acceleration. And, if Bolt were to get a decent start like he did when he clocked a 9.58, than I think Bolt could showboat the last 5+ yds maybe. I expect people like Chris Johnson and Denard to be confident in themselves, so I'm not even surprised he said this. 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:02 PM | 4.05?!?!?  Nobody on Earth (Score:4 Normal)
543Church
543Church's picture
Joined: 03/09/2012
MGoPoints: 216

4.05?!?!?  Nobody on Earth can get that in the first 40m.  The last 40m Bolt might be 4.05. 

The dude is 6'5", that is why his starts are "slow", but whence he commences upon full stride he becomes THE FASTEST MAN IN THE WORLD.

 

Jon Runyan plugged my toilet.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:15 PM | That's a "football" 4.05 - (Score:2)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4684

That's a "football" 4.05 - in football, they measure it by the runner's movement, not from the gun.

BTW, I'm pretty sure Bolt runs the last 40m of a race in well under four seconds.  Otherwise it'd be impossible for him to cover 100m in under 10 seconds.  

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:16 PM | Metric System, How Does It Work? (Score:1 Normal)
543Church
543Church's picture
Joined: 03/09/2012
MGoPoints: 216

I think we also need to remember 40m > 40 yards

Jon Runyan plugged my toilet.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:23 PM | The 4.05 time suggested above (Score:3 Normal)
snarling wolverine
Joined: 12/14/2011
MGoPoints: 4684

The 4.05 time suggested above was for 40 yards, not 40m.  What is your confusion?

 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 1:46 AM | in 2009 (Score:3 Normal)
Scarlatina
Joined: 12/22/2011
MGoPoints: 99

Bolt ran the last 40m of the 100m in 3.27s.

Why would a 4.05m electronically-timed 40 yards be surprising? 

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 2:12 AM | Because the last 40M is when (Score:1)
WestMichiganWol...
Joined: 03/18/2012
MGoPoints: 30

Because the last 40M is when he is at full speed, that is a way different thing than being timed from when he starts, most of the 40 yard dash is still acceleration, so yes a 4.05 40 yard dash would be absoilutely incredible and IMO impossible at this point in time

  • Login or register to post comments
August 15th, 2012 at 8:31 PM | Sure, but (Score:1)
Scarlatina
Joined: 12/22/2011
MGoPoints: 99

Bolt trains to accelerate at the 40-50m mark when he runs the 100m. If you were to shorten the distance, Bolt would re-adjust his strategy accordingly.

The guy may not have the most prefect techinque getting off the blocks, but it doesn't matter because he has world-class acceleration and higher top speed than anyone in the world. If Bolt trained for the 40 yards and ran a sub-4.1s time, I would not be shocked.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:10 PM | Bolt's first 50 (Score:0 Overrated)
zatsyuk
Joined: 11/25/2011
MGoPoints: 18

is significantly slower than his second 50, Bolt takes a little while longer to get going because of his height.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 8:24 PM | Every sprinter has a slower (Score:3 Normal)
jvick9006
Joined: 05/01/2009
MGoPoints: 395

Every sprinter has a slower second 50m then they do first 50m.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 9:04 PM | You meant (Score:5 Normal)
ppToilet
ppToilet's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 777

"faster" second 50m.  Good point, though.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 9:15 PM | Yeah, my bad. (Score:4 Normal)
jvick9006
Joined: 05/01/2009
MGoPoints: 395

Yeah, my bad.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 12th, 2012 at 10:12 PM | nope... (Score:2 Normal)
MSHOT92
MSHOT92's picture
Joined: 02/07/2011
MGoPoints: 278

YOU WEREN'T completely wrong. a runner slows after 60m. It's what makes the sprint what it is. The base principle as I already said is the guy who slows down the least. Studies have been done to measure human performance/explosive endurance. 60 Meters appears to be the range where the human body no longer sustains maximal speed.

  • Login or register to post comments
August 13th, 2012 at 6:55 AM | Not completely true either (Score:3 Normal)
ppToilet
ppToilet's picture
Joined: 04/18/2011
MGoPoints: 777
At 60m you reach maximal acceleration, sustaining speed afterwards is the trick. Your velocity will remain stable with an acceleration of zero. http://www.faqs.org/sports-science/Pl-Sa/Running-Sprinting.html

The strength of the runner has a secondary consideration once the runner has left the starting blocks. The start is virtually instant acceleration, which continues for approximately 30 m to 40 m. After 60 m, the runner cannot accelerate any further and success in the race is then determined by how long the runner can maintain top speed, attempting to defeat the forces of deceleration acting on the body.

  • Login or register to post comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
Powered by Pressflow, an open source content management system
Theme provided by Roopletheme; sidebars adapted from Chris Murphy.