Reader71

March 22nd, 2017 at 7:17 PM ^

A larger party is more difficult because they all order at once. If you have 5 4-tops, you can stagger the drink orders to give you a bit of time to handle the 20 drinks. A 23-top means you have to punch in 23 drink orders at once and deliver them at roughly the same time. And then food -- everyone has to get their food at the same time. Ever been the one person in a party waiting to get your food while everyone is eating? It's not math. It's logistics. A large party is more difficult.

Blueblood2991

March 22nd, 2017 at 7:19 PM ^

Table turnover. Small groups generally eat and get out. You get more chances for tips on a per person basis. Large parties tend to linger for hours. Stats say usually about 60-70% longer. 

A waitress has an assigned section, and if all of her tables are pushed together for one party it is imperative that they are compensated. With small groups, you can overcome one bad tip with the next diners, but when all of your tables are tied up you get held hostage.

RoseInBlue

March 22nd, 2017 at 6:58 PM ^

He's right.  Tips aren't required.  People tip because in civilized society it's expected.  But it's not as though you suffer repercussions if you choose not to tip (you might not want to eat there again, though).  It just makes you kind of an asshole.  But some people are cool with that so...oh well.

Great Cornholio

March 22nd, 2017 at 7:59 PM ^

down to 10% from me for that flagrant misuse of "your" on a blog full of pedantic grammar obsessives. A tip is a gratuity, an expression of thanks, not a mechanism for redressing a crappy wage scale. Want to tip 20%? Great! 10%? Fine! Having 15% as a social norm and as a way of setting the index for acceptable service makes sense to me. Servers who criticize customers' gratitude, no matter what the measure, should consider a new line of work.

Don

March 22nd, 2017 at 6:52 PM ^

LOL says no waitress ever.

"Technically you can tip 0% and face no reprocussions in any way"

I encourage you to do that in a restaurant you eat at frequently. You'll get some interesting additions to your food that you didn't even ask for.

 

EGD

March 22nd, 2017 at 4:15 PM ^

The actual tip was 16.66%.  

The article calculated the tip as 15.3% of the entire bill ($425.15).  However, the subtotal on the bill came to $390.05, and it was only the sales tax which brought the bill up to $425.15.  You don't need to tip on the sales tax.  So, the $65 tip was 16.66453019% of the $390.05 subtotal.

crg

March 22nd, 2017 at 6:04 PM ^

I always err on the side of generous tipping (18-20%) unless the service was poor. I do this for one reason only: never piss off the people who handle your food.

Red is Blue

March 23rd, 2017 at 10:08 AM ^

While I generally agree with the "never piss off the people who handle your food" rule, I tend to apply that ex ante.  Unless you're going back to the same establishment, or your tip amount somehow impacts a future service, a tip is ex post.  This doesn't mean you should be cheap.

dougbrown8

March 22nd, 2017 at 4:59 PM ^

People criticizing the Deadspin writer here are wrong. It's a lighthearted story and he puts everything in context. It's not an attack on Michigan. 

Reporters (I am one) often do public records request to find things out. If nothing newsworthy comes of it, it's not the end of the world to do a jokey post on what's in there. You don't need to have a malicious intent to file a public records request. 

Edit: Here's a jokey Deadspin/public records post I did a few years back on Wisconsin's football coaching search: "I Do Not Fit The Mold You Would Expect": Meet The Pharmacist, The FedEx Courier, And Other Dreamers Who Applied To Coach Wisconsin Football. It wasn't an attack on Wisconsin when I requested the applications (from those who didn't request the university keep them confidential). 

turtleboy

March 22nd, 2017 at 5:54 PM ^

Well they expected to get a story, and ended up not getting one, but they'd already spent money on the numerous Foia requests, so they had to write something.

nappa18

March 22nd, 2017 at 8:27 PM ^

IMH0, 15% is a minimum. 16.6 % for a large table with at least one diner making $5 million plus a year seems low. Possibly even "tightwad" low. I do not make $5 million plus a year but usually tip 20% on the theory that the waitstaff could use the extra few bucks more then I.

StephenRKass

March 23rd, 2017 at 8:45 AM ^

It is possible he gave an additional tip out of his pocket. Claim 15% on expense acct. Add another $50 from your own pocket. I have been in groups of a dozen guys where someone picks up the tab and everyone there chips in for the tip. I wouldn't put it past Harbaugh to strongly encourage guys there to tip generously.

GoBlueMAGNUS

March 22nd, 2017 at 10:14 PM ^

Everybody bitching about the tipping keep in mind companies watch that extremely closely. Anything over 15% draws a flag. I know of a few people who tipped too high and got canned over it

Njia

March 23rd, 2017 at 8:48 AM ^

He insinuates that taxpayers are on the hook for the expenses of the Dept of Athletics, and by extension, the football program and its head coach.

That is wrong, and he would have known that had he done just a little bit of digging (it wouldn't take much - there's that useful new tool called "Google" now; maybe he's heard of it). 

McSomething

March 23rd, 2017 at 10:54 AM ^

Of all the scbools and programs you could hit with a FOIA request to try and write a story, Michigan Football is what you choose? That's either ignorance or incompetence. And I'm not entirely sure it isn't maliciously so.