Academic Requirements - ND, UM and others
December 2nd, 2009 at 9:19 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 9:40 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:30 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 1:06 PM ^
August 14th, 2010 at 9:25 AM ^
One of the differences I have read, is that ND requires all students to take Calculus in the first year,...
this is untrue and, as mentioned, the calc offered at ND is not the same as 115 at M.
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:00 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:10 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:19 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:29 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:32 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:39 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:11 PM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:34 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:46 AM ^
FOOTBALL SAT SCORES: THE TOP 10 (School, Average) Georgia Tech, 1028 Oregon State, 997 Michigan, 997 Virginia, 993 Purdue, 974 Indiana, 973 Hawaii, 968 California, 967 Colorado, 966 Iowa, 964 THE BOTTOM 10 (School, Average) Oklahoma State, 878 Louisville, 878 Memphis, 890 Florida, 890 Texas Tech, 901 Arkansas, 910 Texas A&M, 911 Mississippi State, 911 Washington State, 916 Michigan State, 917It only did public universities, so Notre Dame wasn't counted. Also note that MSU is 10th to last, not last (that goes to Louisville and Oklahoma State). Still, that's really bad. Considering the schools they're lumped in with, that's gotta be embarrassing for Sparty. My magazine works with Georgia Tech on a trade show, and I've met a handful of their football players (including Calvin Johnson). They're not kidding about academics there -- these fellas knew more about environmental science than most of the professionals in the room.
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:53 AM ^
“They’re saying we’ll take just about anybody as long as we can get them through,” said Allen Sack, director of the University of New Haven’s Institute for Sport Management and a former University of Notre Dame football player. “They’re betting what they can do is they can get anyone through school if they get the right kind of counseling.”I highly recommend the whole read.
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:10 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:22 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:51 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 1:04 PM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:36 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:40 PM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:48 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 12:43 PM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 7:44 PM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:54 AM ^
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:57 AM ^